跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.139) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/22 02:08
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:楊宗霖
研究生(外文):Zong-Lin Yang
論文名稱:利用生物分解法處理廢水中含鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀之研究
論文名稱(外文):Application of Biodegradation for the Treatment of Potassium Hydrogen Phthalate in Wastewater
指導教授:陳文章陳文章引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wen-Jang Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:化學工程系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:化學工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:中文
論文頁數:112
中文關鍵詞:動力學模式不動桿菌屬菌種鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀生物分解
外文關鍵詞:Kinetics of modelAcinetobacterPotassium Hydrogen PhthalateBiodegradation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:702
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
由於塑膠工業上使用的有機化學製程中的副產物,多半具有生物難分解性及毒性,造成近年來許多人工合成污染物的廢水處理問題,例如:芳香族化合物所造成的污染,其結構中的苯環物性穩定,很難被微生物所分解。
本研究嘗試以鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀(Potassium Hydrogen Phthalate, KHP)作為廢水處理模型,分別以Acinetobacter sp.及活性污泥分解不同濃度的鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀,利用特殊馴化培養基探討馴化菌種對於KHP之生物氧化性及生物分解性的影響。並以相關動力學模式探討經過馴化的菌種Acinetobacter sp.對於鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀之單一碳源基質動力學,其中KHP之生物分解指標是分別利用總有機碳(TOC)與生物需氧量(BOD)作對照分析。實驗結果發現,當以KHP加入馴化培養基為主要碳源時,純菌種對分解KHP的效果較污泥雜菌為佳,且經過馴化的菌種Acinetobacter sp.存在於鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀的臨界濃度為2100 mg C/L KHP(產生抑制現象)。
利用相關動力學模式所求得的動力學參數如下:Monod氏動力學模式求得之最大比生長率(μmax)為0.011 hr -1、飽和常數(KS)為0.201 g C/L;Michaelis-Menten動力學模式求得之最大比分解率(Vmax)為0.0592 hr -1、飽和常數(K”S)為0.133g C/L。利用修飾後Michaelis-Menten動力學模式求得之動力學參數在低濃度環境下之最大比分解率(Vmax)為0.0473 hr -1、飽和常數(K”S)為0.0742 g C/L;在高濃度環境下之最大比分解率(Vmax)為0.0931 hr -1、抑制常數(Ki)為0.67g C/L。

Various organic synthetic plastics and their derivative have been reported to seriously contaminate natural wastewater and water environments, due to their poor biodegradability and cytotoxicity in living cells. For example, aromatic compounds are frequently persistent pollutants in the wastewater that their benzene ring structures can not be easily degraded by microorganisms. In this work, we chose potassium hydrogen phthalate(KHP)as a model system and studied the culture conditions influencing the biodegradation of various concentrations of KHP in aqueous solutions by the acclimated Acinetobacter sp. and activated sludge, respectively. The experimental results showed that the degradation rate by the acclimated pure culture of Acinetobacter sp. were higher than those of the acclimated activated sludge when cells grew on KHP as sole carbon source, and the inhibition took place when KHP concentration exceeding 2100 mg C/L. Throughout the experiments, we measured the degradation rates of KHP by using the total organic carbons(TOC)and biochemical oxygen demands(BOD)as the analytical method in the liquid cultures. Finally, we have studied the microbial growth kinetics and KHP biodegradation kinetics by using Monod equation and modified Michaelis-Menten equation, respectively. According to the Monod equation in a model wastewater system, apparent KS and μmax values for the degradation of KHP by Acinetobacter sp. were 0.201 g C/L and 0.011 hr -1, respectively. According to the Michaelis-Menten equation in a model wastewater system, K”S and Vmax values for the degradation of KHP by Acinetobacter sp. were 0.133 g C/L and 0.0592 hr -1 respectively. According to the modified Michaelis-Menten equation in a model wastewater system, the apparent K”S and Vmax values for the degradation of KHP by Acinetobacter sp. at low concentration less than 1200 mg C/L were 0.0742 g C/L and 0.0473 hr -1, respectively. The apparent Ki and Vmax values for the degradation of KHP by Acinetobacter sp. at high concentration greater than 1200 mg C/L were 0.67g C/L and 0.0931 hr -1, respectively.

目 錄
中文摘要 ....................................................i
英文摘要 ...................................................ii
誌謝.........................................................iv
目錄..... ....................................................v
表目錄... ...................................................vii
圖目錄... ..................................................viii
第一章 緒論..................................................1
1.1 研究動機.............................................1
1.2 研究目的.............................................3
第二章 文獻回顧..............................................5
2.1菌種馴化..............................................5
2.2生物分解之基本觀念與介紹..............................7
2.2.1 生物分解途徑...........................................8
2.2.2 一般生物分解名詞之定義................................18
2.2.3 生物分解性測試方法....................................19
2.3利用Acinetobacter屬菌種分解芳香族成分文獻回顧.............21
2.4鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀生物代謝路徑推導............................29
2.5生物分解法實驗-TOC、BDO...................................41
第三章 實驗設備、方法與步驟.................................44
3.1實驗菌種與器材............................................44
3.2實驗藥品..................................................47
3.3實驗方法與步驟............................................49
3.3.1 菌種活化..............................................50
3.3.2 菌種馴化..............................................51
3.3.3 菌種前培養............................................55
3.3.4 TOC實驗...............................................56
3.3.5 BOD實驗...............................................57
3.3.6單一基質之相關動力學模式探討............................58
3.4實驗儀器操作..............................................62
第四章 結果與討論...........................................64
4.1菌種活化生理特性..........................................64
4.2菌種馴化之必要性..........................................68
4.3馴化後菌種與活性污泥雜菌之生物分解能力比較................69
4.3.1 馴化後Acinetobacter sp.前培養實驗.....................69
4.3.2 馴化後的Acinetobacter sp.與活性污泥雜菌的生物分解
性比較................................................70
4.3.3 馴化後的Acinetobacter sp.與活性污泥雜菌的生物氧化
性比較................................................76
4.3.4 UV生物分解測定........................................79
4.4單一基質之相關動力學模式探討..............................85
第五章 結論與建議 ...........................................91
5.1結論......................................................91
5.2建議......................................................93
參考文獻.....................................................94
附錄
A 各種極限生物分解測試法之比較.........................101
B TOC1010型例行操作步驟................................102
C 乾菌重v.s OD分析檢量線...............................103
D 以Monod模式配合Lineweaver-Burk法求比生長速率動力學
參數.................................................104
E Michaelis-Menten模式配合Lineweaver-Burk法求比分解速率
動力學參數..........................................107
F 修飾後Michaelis-Menten模式配合Lineweaver-Burk法求比分
解速率動力學參數....................................110
表目錄
表2.1 水中有機物含量分析法的優缺點..........................20
表3.1 實驗設備..............................................45
表3.2 實驗器材..............................................46
表3.3 實驗藥品..............................................47
表3.4 菌種中心之活化培養養..................................50
表3.5 活性污泥之活化培養養..................................50
表3.6 第一階段馴化培養基....................................52
表3.7 第二階段馴化培養基....................................52
表3.8 第三階段馴化培養基....................................52
表3.9 BOD基鹽...............................................53
表4.1 Acinetobacter sp.利用鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀之動力學參數.......90
圖目錄
圖1.1 鄰苯二甲酸酯反應圖....................................2
圖1.2 鄰苯二甲酸酯衍生物....................................2
圖2.1 在初步階段菌種將各種芳香族與芳香族碳水化合物進行礦化作用,代謝轉變protocatechuate..................................12
圖2.2 在初步階段菌種將各種芳香族與芳香族碳水化合物進行礦化作用,代謝轉變成catechol.......................................13
圖2.3 β-ketoadipate路徑階段性控制反應步驟.................14
圖2.4 推測真菌類微生物將β-carboxy cis , cis-muconate轉變成
β-ketoadipate的分解路徑......................................15
圖2.5 單一主要反應代謝分歧機制:利用微生物代謝L-tryptophan的二次礦化路徑.................................................16
圖2.6 利用meta-與ortho-環裂解路徑形成protocatechuate與catechnol的礦化作用,藉由dioxygenase裂解二酚基團的每一階段測量...........................................................17
圖2.7 芳香族化合物的代謝利用機制...........................24
圖2.8 利用各種不同的Acinetobacter屬菌種對於七種芳香族化合物分
解的相關文獻圖...............................................25
圖2.9 利用各種不同的Acinetobacter屬菌種將芳香族化合物轉變成
Catechol.....................................................26
圖2.10 利用各種不同的Acinetobacter屬菌種將芳香族化合物轉變
成Protocatechuate............................................27
圖2.11 Acinetobacter屬菌種的Mandelate 路徑..................28
圖2.12 利用微生物分解鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀之代謝機制示意圖.........32
圖2.13 苯甲酸化合物之代謝機制...............................33
圖2.14 Pseudo putida F1之甲苯代謝路徑.......................34
圖2.15 Pseudo putida之ortho-與meta-代謝路徑.................35
圖2.16 β-ketoadipate 代謝機制...............................36
圖2.17 苯甲酸代謝與TCA循環..................................37
圖2.18 經由二羥苯的芳香化合物代謝途徑.......................38
圖2.19 Pseudo wcnas Ovals S-5氧化gentisic Acid..............39
圖2.20 鄰苯二甲酸氫鉀之可能生物代謝路徑.....................40
圖2.21 二氧化碳之生物分解性測試系統圖.......................43
圖3.1 生物分解實驗總流程圖.................................49
圖3.2 生物分解系統示意圖(巨觀上)..........................53
圖3.3 生物分解系統示意圖(微觀上).........................54
圖3.4 菌種前培養流程圖.....................................55
圖3.5 生物分解性(TOC)實驗流程圖..........................56
圖3.6 生物氧化性(BOD)實驗流程圖..........................57
圖4.1 未經馴化的A. calcoaceticus RAG-1在菌種中心培養基環境下
生長曲線變化情形.............................................64
圖4.2 未經馴化的A. calcoaceticus RAG-1在菌種中心培養基環境下
p H變化情形..................................................65
圖4.3 未經馴化的A. calcoaceticus RAG-1在單一碳源KHP環境下的生
物分解能力之探討.............................................65
圖4.4 未經馴化的A. calcoaceticus RAG-1在不同濃度KHP環境下生長
曲線變化情形.................................................66
圖4.5 未經馴化的A. calcoaceticus RAG-1在不同濃度KHP環境下pH
值變化情形...................................................66
圖4.6 馴化與未馴化之Acinetobacter屬菌種在50 ppmC KHP環境下的
生物分解能力之探討...........................................68
圖4.7 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源的50ppmC KHP環境下
進行前培養實驗之生長曲線變化情形與生物分解能力之探討.........69
圖4.8 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源的50ppmC KHP環境下
進行前培養實驗之pH值變化情形.................................70
圖4.9 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源100ppmC KHP環境下
生長曲線變化情形.............................................71
圖4.10 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源200~600ppmC KHP環境
下生長曲線變化情形...........................................71
圖4.11 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源100ppmC KHP~600
ppmC KHP環境下pH值變化情形...................................72
圖4.12 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源100ppmC KHP~600
ppmC KHP環境下生物分解性之探討...............................73
圖4.13 活性污泥雜菌在單一碳源50~500ppmC KHP環境下生長曲線變
化情形.......................................................74
圖4.14 活性污泥雜菌在單一碳源50~500ppmC KHP環境下pH值變化
情形.........................................................74
圖4.15 活性污泥雜菌在單一碳源50ppmC KHP環境下生物分解性之探討...........................................................75
圖4.16 活性污泥雜菌在單一碳源100ppmC KHP~500ppmC KHP環境下
生物分解性之探討.............................................75
圖4.17 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源50~500ppmC KHP環境
下溶氧量曲線情形.............................................76
圖4.18 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源50~500ppmC KHP環境
下BOD曲線變化情形............................................77
圖4.19 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種與活性污泥雜菌在單一碳源50
ppmC KHP環境下DO與BOD曲線變化情形............................78
圖4.20 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種與活性污泥雜菌在單一碳源500
ppmC KHP環境下DO與BOD曲線變化情形............................78
圖4.21 單一基質10 ppmC KHP之UV圖譜..........................79
圖4.22 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源的400ppmC KHP環境
下之生長曲線變化與KHP濃度變化情形............................80
圖4.23 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源400ppmC KHP環境下
之菌種生長前後之UV圖譜變化情形...............................81
圖4.24 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源的1400ppmC KHP環境
下之生長曲線變化與KHP濃度變化情形............................82
圖4.25 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源1400ppmC KHP環境下
之菌種生長前後之UV圖譜變化情形...............................82
圖4.26 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源的2400ppmC KHP環境
下之生長曲線變化與KHP濃度變化情形............................83
圖4.27 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源2400ppmC KHP環境下
之菌種生長前後之UV圖譜變化情形...............................83
圖4.28 不動桿菌在不同濃度KHP環境下的單一基質生長動力學
.............................................................85
圖4.29 不動桿菌在不同濃度KHP環境下的單一基質分解動力學
.............................................................86
圖4.30 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源1200ppmCKHP~1700
ppmC KHP環境下生長曲線變化情形..............................87
圖4.31 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源1800ppmC KHP~2300
ppmC KHP環境下生長曲線變化情形...............................87
圖4.32 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源1200ppmC KHP~1700
ppmC KHP環境下生物分解性之探討...............................88
圖4.33 馴化後Acinetobacter屬菌種在單一碳源1800ppmC KHP~2300
ppmC KHP環境下生物分解性之探討...............................89

參考文獻
1.吳婉娥、葛紅光、張克峰,廢水生物處理技術,化學工業出版社(2002)
2.黃政賢,污水工程,高立圖書(1995)
3.金相燦,環境毒性有機污染化學,淑馨出版社(1989)
4.陳文章、羅勝崇、邱鴻勝、林軒民,”利用二氧化鈦光催化分解鄰苯
二甲酸鉀水溶液pH值效應”,2002輸送現象及其應用研討會論文集,pp.619-622(2002)
5.陳國誠,廢水生物處理學,茂昌圖書(1991)
6.江漢全,「水質分析」,三民書局(1995)
7.孫常榮等人,水質分析及實驗,文京圖書(2000)
8.Atlas, R. M., “Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons:an environmental perspective”, Microbiol. Rev. 45:180-209(1981)
9.Colwell, R. R., and J. D. Walker., “Ecological aspects of microbial degradation in the marine environment”, Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 5:423-445(1977)
10.Leahy, J. G., Colwell, R., “Microbial Degradation of Hydrocarbons in the Environment”, Microbiological Reviews , 54
(3):305-315(1990)
11.Spain, J. C., P. H. Pritchard, and A. W. Bourquin., “Effects of adaption on biodegradation rates in sediment/water cores from estuarine and freshwater environments”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , 40:726-734(1980)
12.Spain, J. C. and P. A. van Veld , “Adaptation of natural microbial communities to degradation of xenobiotic compounds:effects of concentration, exposure time, inoculcm and chemical structure”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , 45:428-435(1983)
13.Hollaway, S. L., G. M. Faw , and R. K. Sizemore , “The bacterial community composition of an active oil field in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico”, Mar. pollut. bull. , 11:153-156(1980)
14.Hood, M. A., W. S. Bishop, Jr., F. W. Bishop, S. P. Meyers, and T. Whelan Ⅲ, “Microbiol indicators of oil-rich salt marsh sediments”, Appl. Microbiol. , 30:982-987(1975)
15.Walker, J. D., and R. R. Colwell. , “Some effects of petroleum on estuarine and marine microorganisms” Can. J. Microbiol. , 21:305-313(1975)
16.Walker, J. D. et al., “Biodegradation of petroleum by Cheasapeake Bay sediment bacteria”, Can. J. Microbiol. 22:423-428(1976)
17.Walker, J. D., and R. R. Colwell. , “Measuring the potential activity of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria” , Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , 31:189-197(1976)
18.Caparello, D. M., and P. A. LaRock. , “A
radioisotope assay for the quantification of hydrocarbon biodegradation potential in environmental sample”, Microb. Ecol. 2:28-42(1975)
19.Herbes, S. E., and L. R. Schwall. , “Microbial transformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pristine and petroleum-contaminated sediments”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:306-316(1978)
20.Sherrial, T. W., and G. S. Sayler. , “Phenanthrene biodegradation in freshwater environments” , Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:172-178(1980)
21.Sayler, G.. S. et al., “Microcosm and experimental pond evaluation of microbial community response to synthetic oil contamination in fresh-water sediments”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:211-219(1983)
22.Cooney, J. J. et al., “Factors influencing hydrocarbon degradation in three freshwater lakes”, Microb. Ecol. 11:127-137(1985)
23.Bauer, J. E., and D. G. Capone., “Effect of co-occurring aromatic hydrocarbons on degradation of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediment slurries”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1649-1655(1988)
24.Kerr, R. P. and D. G. Capone., “The effect of salinity on the microbial mineralization of two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in estuarine sediments”, Mar. Environ. Res. 26:181-198(1988)
25.B. S. Roa and A. F. Gaudy, jr., “Effect of sludge concentration on various aspects of biological activity in activated sludge”, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 38:794-812(1966)
26.T. B. S. Prakasam et al., “Aerobic heterotrophic bacterial populations of sewage and activater sludge”, Appl. Microbial., 19:663-670(1970)
27.張嘉修,“微生物技術在廢水處理之應用”,化工技術期刊,第九卷,第二期pp.202-227,2001。
28.Buckley, E. N. et al., “Characterization of microbial isolate from an estuarine ecosystem:relationship of hydrocarbon utilization to ambient hydrocarbon concentration”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32:232-237(1976)
29.Mulkins-Phillips, G. J. et al., Distribution of hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria in northwestern Atlantic waters and coastal sediments”, Can. J. Microbiol. 20:955-962(1974)
30.Ward, D. M., and T. D. Brock., “Environmental factors influencing the rate of hydrocarbon oxidation in temperate lakes”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31:764-772 (1976)
31.Horowitz, A., and R. M. Atlas., “Continuous open flow-through system as a model for oil degradation in the Arctic Ocean”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33:647-653(1977)
32.Jensen, V., “Bacterial flora of soil after application of oily waste”, Oikos 26:152-158(1975)
33.Jobson, A et al., “Microbial utilization of crude oil”, Appl. Microbiol. 23:1082-1089(1972)
34.Jobson, A et al., “Effect of amendments on the microbial utilization of oil applied to soil”, Appl. Microbiol. 27:166-171(1974)
35.Kilbane, J. J. et al., “Detoxification of 2, 4 , 5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid from contaminated soil by Pseudomonas cepacia” , Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:1697-1700(1983)
36.Kirk, P. W., and A. S. Gordon., “Hydrocarbon degradation by filamentous marine higher fungi” , Mycologia 80:776-782(1988)
37.Leahy, J. G. et al., “Hydrocarbon mineralization in sediments and plasmid incidence in sediment bacteria from the Campeche Bank”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1565-1570(1990)
38.Lehtomaki, M., and S. Niemela., “Improving microbial
degradation of oil in soil”, Ambio 4:126-129(1975)
39.Llanos, C., and A. Kjoller., “Changes in the flora of soil fungi following oil waste application”, Oikos 27:377-382(1976)
40.Mihelcic, J. R. and R. G. Luthy., “Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under various redox conditions in soil-water systems”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1182-1187(1988)
41.Fusey, P., and J. Oudot., “Relative influence of physical removal and biodegradation in the depuration of petroleum-contaminated seashore sediments”, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 15:136-141(1984)
42.Walker, J. D. et al., “Biodegradation rates of components of petroleum”, Can. J. Microbiol. 22:1209-1213(1976)
43.Fedorak, P. M., and D. W. S. Westlake., “Microbial degradation of aromatics and saturates in Prudhoe Bay crude oil as determined by glass capillary gas chromatography”, Can. J. Microbiol. 27:432-443(1981)
44.Bertrand, J. C. et al., “Microbial degradation of crude oil in sea water in continuous culture”, Biotechnol. Lett. 5:567-572(1983)
45.蕭來春,生物性界面活性劑增效萃取重金屬污染土壤之研究,碩士論文,台北科技大學化學工程研究所,台北(2003)
46.Stanier, R. Y., and Ornston, L. N., “The β-ketoadipate pathway” Adv. Microb. Physiol., 9:89-98(1973)
47.Feist, C. F. and Hegeman, G. D., “Phenol and Benzoate Metabolism byPseudomonas putida﹕Regulation of Tangential Pathways” , J. Bact. 100:869-877(1969)
48.Davies, J. I. and Evans, W. C., “Oxidative metabolism of naphthalene by soil pseudomonads”, Biochem. J. , 91:251-261(1964)
49.Cain, R. B. and Farr, D. R., “Metabolism of Arylsulphonates by Micro-organisms” , Biochem. J. 106:859-877(1968)
50.Brid, J. A. and Cain, R. B., “Catechol Oxygenase induction in pseudomonas aeruginosa” , Biochem. J. 106:879-885(1968)
51.黃麗娟、陳爾寧、唐靜雯、陳哲陽,”界面活性劑生物分解度評估方法之介紹”界面科學會誌,20(4):185-199(1997)。
52.姚俊宇,“淺談水中有機物與其量測方法”,石油通訊技術第五卷第二期(1993)
53.C. A. Fewson. et al., The Biology of Acinetobacter , NewYork.(1991)
54.Fewson, C. A., “The identity of the Gram-negative bacterium NCIB8250(Vibrio 01’)” , J. Gen. Microbiol., 48:107-110(1967)
55.Baumann, P. et al., “A study of the Moraxella group. Ⅱ. Oxidase-negative species(genus Acinetobacter)”, J. Bacteriol., 95:1520-1541(1968)
56.Fewson, C. A., “The growth and metabolic versatility of the gram-negative bacterium NCIB8250(‘Vibrio 01’)”, J. Gen. Microbiol., 46:255-266(1967)
57.Evans, W. C. and Happold, F. C., “The utilization of phenol by bacteria” , J. Chem. Soc., 58:55(1939)
58.Evans, W. C., “Oxidation of phenol and benzoic acid by some soil bacteria”, Biochem. J., 41:373-382(1947)
59.Kilby, B. A., “The bacteria oxidation of phenol to β-ketoadipic acid ”, Biochem. J., 43:v(1948)
60.Kilby, B. A., “The formation of β-ketoadipic acid by bacterial fission of aromatic rings ”, Biochem. J., 49:671-674(1951)
61.Cook, A. M., and Fewson, C. A., “Evidence for specific transport mechanisms for aromatic compounds in bacterium NCIB8250”, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 290:384-388(1972)
62.Fewson, C. A., “Microbial metabolism of mandelate:a microcosm of diversity”, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 54:85(1988)
63.Dagley, S., “Pathways for the utilization of organic growth substrates, in〝The Bacteria, vol. Ⅵ, Bacterial Diversity〞, p.305, L. N. Ornston and J. R. Sokatch, eds., Academic Press, New York.
64.Fewson, C. A., “Biodegradation of aromatics with industrial relevance, in 〝Microbial Degradation of Xenobiotics and Recalcitrant Compounds〞, p.143, T. Leisinger, R. Hutter, A.M. Cook and J. Nuesch, eds., Academic Press, London.
65.Sze,I. S. —Y. et al., “Degradation of substituted manelic acids by meta fission reactions”, J. Bacteriol.,169:3833-3835(1987)
66.Cain, R. B., “The metabolism of protocatechuic acid by a Vibrio”, Biochem. J.,79:298-312(1961)
67.Ornston, L. N., and Stanier, R. Y., “Mechanism of β-ketoadipate formation by bacteria, Nature”, 204:1279(1964)
68.劉如招,”石油的微生物分解與利用”,石油季刊 1967
69.陳霈芝,Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum NTU-7C之苯甲酸降解研究,碩士論文,台灣大學農業化學研究所,台北(1999)
70.盧蘊澤、阮幕玲、陳啟祥,”以生長曲線分析單一及混合的苯環化合物之生毒性”,第二十一屆廢水處理技術研討會論文集,pp. 505-508,1996。
71.王根樹,活性氧對有機物生物分解性之影響研究,碩士論文,台灣大學環境工程學研究所,台北(1988)
72.顧夏聲,廢水生物處理數學模式,曉園出版社,1991
73.葉淑姿,芳香族化合物生物分解之動力學參數,碩士論文,台灣大學農業化學研究所,台北(1992)
74.G. H. M. Counotte and R. A. Prins, “Calculation of Km and Vmax form substrate concentration versus time plot” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. ,38:758-760(1979).
75.P. D. D’Adaom, A. F. Rozich, and A. F. Gaudy Jr. , “Analysis of growth data with inhibitory carbon source”, Biotechnol. Bioeng. ,26:397-402(1984)
76.S. Simkins and M. Alexander, “Model for mineralization kinetics with the variables of substrate concentration and population density”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 47:1299-1306(1984)
77.S. Simkins and M. Alexander, “Nonlinear estimation of the parameter of Monod kinetics that best describe mineralization of several substrate concentrations by dissimilar bacterial densities”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 50:816-824(1985)
78.D. H. Hutchinson and C. W. Robinson , “Kinetics of the simultaneous batch degradation of p-cresol and phenol by Pseudomonas putida , Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. , 29:599-604(1988)
79.K. T. O’Reilly and R. L. Crawford ,”Kinetics of p-cresol degradation by an immobilized Pseudomonas sp.” , Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55:866-870(1989)
80.B. R. Folsom, P. J. Pritchard, ”Phenol and trichloroethylene degradation by Pseudomonas cepacia G4:kinetics and interactions between substrates ”, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56:1279-1285(1990)
81.F. Volker, A. M. Breure, A. Sterkenburg, and J. G. Andel, ”Mocrobiol degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons:effect of substrate availability on bacterial growth kinetics” , Appl. Mocrobiol. Biotechnol. 36:548-552(1992)
82.L. E. Greer , J. A. Robinson , and D. R. Shelton , Kinetic comparison of seven strains of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-degradation bacteria , Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , 58:1027-1030(1992)
83.S. B. Rahalkar et al., “Biodegradation of aromatic compounds by Rhodopseudomonas gelatinosa”, Current Microbiology , 22:155-158(1991)

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top