臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　網際網路的蓬勃發展，加快了知識創造及傳遞的速度。為了跟上時代的腳步，
人們必須不斷學習新的知識。礙於傳統學習方式受到時間空間的限制，網路教學
已經越來越受到重視與肯定，所以利用教學平台來進行自我學習已經是現代人的
功課之一。然而，選擇學習內容是進行自我學習前的首要工作，若缺乏適當的輔
助及引導機制，容易使學習結果與預期目標產生落差，造成偏離方向或發生迷失。
　　有鑑於此，本研究將以建立適性化教材內容為目的，嘗試以「層級分析法」
(Analytical Hierarchical Processing, AHP) 為基礎，並依照不同面向去擷取教師教學
經驗，以及使用者所期待之學習目標，建立決策資料庫，以儲存教師經驗以及學
習者意願，來建構一個具適性化特性的教學內容推薦平台，產生學符合學習者需
求的課程內容，滿足其學習目標。
　　由於網路環境已堂堂邁入Web 2.0之時代，促使網路應用程式出現了許多新設
的計概念，故本研究也將應用了RIA (Rich Internet Applications) 的概念建構了新一
代數位學習系統，並設計其開發架構，將使用者畫面元件化、功能模組化，並提
供自動化管理模組擴充與樣板元件，以提高系統之延展性及一致性，希望藉此達
成早日邁向E-Learning 2.0 的時代。

　　The rapid growth of Internet has accelerated the speed of knowledge creation and
delivery. To catch up with the evolution of progressive technologies, people have to
keep on learning new knowledge continuously. Due to the time and space limitation of
traditional learning models, e-learning has already been recognized as an effective
media for contemporary learners. Therefore, to offer knowledge workers an effective
learning environment, it is indispensible to establish an adapative learning platform.
However, casual learners may deviate from the original course direction with frustration,
if the learning platform lacks of auxiliary guidance mechanism.
　　In this thesis, we will propose an approach based on the Analytical Hierarchical
Processing (AHP) method to create a decision database, which collects all of the
involved teachers＇ opinion and experience, and build an adaptive learning platform for
providing a flexible course portfolio for various learners. Besides, to make the learning
platform more attractive, we employ the concept of Rich Internet Application (RIA) to
implement a prototype for the next generation e-learning platform conforming to the
concept of Web 2.0. Based on such platform, the system can be extended by
dynamically pluging new functionalities into the system. We believe our platform can
provide a valuable testbed for the next generation e-learning environment.

中文摘要......................................................................................................................... i
Abstract........................................................................................................................... ii
致謝............................................................................................................................... iii
目錄............................................................................................................................... iv
圖目錄........................................................................................................................... vi
表目錄.......................................................................................................................... vii
1. 緒論..............................................................................................................................1
　　1.1 研究背景與動機................................................................................................1
　　1.2 研究目的............................................................................................................4
　　1.3 研究範圍與限制................................................................................................4
2. 文獻探討......................................................................................................................7
　　2.1 數位學習研究現況............................................................................................7
　　2.2 數位學習標準演進............................................................................................8
　　2.3 SCORM標準.......................................................................................................9
　　　　2.3.1 內容聚合模組 (Content Aggregation Model, CAM) ............................10
　　　　2.3.2 內容模型 (Content Model) ...................................................................10
　　　　2.3.3 詮釋資料 (Meta-data) ...........................................................................12
　　　　2.3.4 內容封裝 (Content Packaging) .............................................................13
　　2.4 AHP相關研究...................................................................................................13
　　　　2.4.1 優勢與劣勢...........................................................................................14
　　　　2.4.2 應用範疇...............................................................................................16
　　　　2.4.3 基礎理論...............................................................................................19
　　　　2.4.4 減少資料蒐集.......................................................................................24
　　2.5 Web 2.0 與其關鍵技術....................................................................................26
　　　　2.5.1 豐富的網際網路應用 (Rich Internet Applications,RIA) ......................28
　　　　2.5.2 Ajax框架 (Frameworks).........................................................................32
3. 系統架構與決策方法................................................................................................35
　　3.1 系統架構..........................................................................................................35
　　3.2 課程組織與決策方法......................................................................................37
　　　　3.2.1 課程組合機制.......................................................................................37
　　　　3.2.2 決策模型與方法...................................................................................38
　　　　3.2.3 決策範例與說明...................................................................................41
4. 系統分析設計與實作................................................................................................52
　　4.1 資料庫架構規劃..............................................................................................52
　　　　4.1.1 系統框架資料庫規劃...........................................................................52
　　　　4.1.2 課程組合資料庫規劃...........................................................................56
　　4.2 系統框架分析設計..........................................................................................59
　　4.3 AHP模組系統分析與設計...............................................................................66
　　　　4.3.1 教師開課子系統...................................................................................70
　　　　4.3.2 學生選課子系統...................................................................................77
5. 總論與未來研究........................................................................................................84
　　5.1 總論..................................................................................................................84
　　5.2 未來研究..........................................................................................................85
附錄A.............................................................................................................................95
附錄B ...........................................................................................................................101

[1] ADL SCORM 2004 2nd Edition Overview, http://www.adlnet.org.
[2] Alliance of Remote Instructional Authoring and Distribution Networks for Europe
　　(ARIADNE). (http://www.ariadne-eu.org/)
[3] Ananda, J., Herath, G., “The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate
　　stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning, ＂ Forest Policy and
　　Economics, Vol.5(1), January 2003, pp.13-26.
[4] Andijani, A.A., “A multi-criterion approach for Kanban allocations,＂ Omega,
　　Vol.26(4), 24 August 1998, pp. 483-493.
[5] Aviation Industry CBT Committee. (http://www.aicc.org/)
[6] Bao, Y., Wu, Y., He, Y., Ge, X., “An Improved AHP Method in Performance
　　Assessment, ＂ Proc. the 5''h World Congress on Intelligent Control and
　　Automation, Hangzhou, P.R. June 2004, pp.177-180
[7] Belmiro, P.M., Duarte, Reis, A., “Developing a projects evaluation system based
　　on multiple attribute value theory, ＂ Computers & Operations Research,
　　Vol.33(5), May 2006, pp.1488-1504.
[8] Ben Galbraith(2006),"Ajaxian.com 2006 Survey Results.",Retrieved May 24, 2007,
　　from http://ajaxian.com/archives/134-ajax-frameworks-and-counting
[9] Srdjevic, B., “ Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic
　　hierarchy process synthesis,＂ Computers & Operations Research, 32(7): 2005,
　　pp.1897-1919.
[10] Buckley, J.J., Thomas Feuring, Yoichi Hayashi, “Fuzzy Hierarchical analysis,＂
　　Fuzzy sets and system, Vol.17(3), 1985, pp.233-247.
[11] Buyukozkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D., “Determining the
　　importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the
　　fuzzy analytic network approach.,＂ International Journal of Intelligent Systems,
　　19, 2004, pp. 443-461.
[12] Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Gülçin Büyüközkan, “A fuzzy optimization model
　　for QFD planning process using analytic network approach,＂ European Journal
　　of Operational Research, Vol.171(2), 1 June 2006, pp.390-411.
[13] Chang H.-T., Chen, J.-L., “ The conflict-problem-solving CAD software
　　integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation,Advances in Engineering Software, ＂
　　Vol.35(8-9), August-September 2004, pp.553-566.
[14] Cheng, A.C., Chen C.J., & Chen, C.Y., “A fuzzy multiple criteria comparison of
　　technology forecasting methods for predicting the new materials development,＂
　　Technological Forecasting and Social Change, In Press, Corrected Proof,
　　Available online 22 September 2006.
[15] Cheong, C.W., Way, C.C., “Fuzzy Linguistic Decision Analysis for Web Server
　　System Future Planning,＂ International Journal of the Computer, the Internet
　　and Management 8/3 ,2000 pp.267-372
[16] Crane, D., Pascarello, E., James, D., “Ajax in Action,＂ Manning Publications
　　Co, 2006.
[17] David, Jennifer,“The Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative,＂ Retrieved
　　June 1 2006, from http://www.adlnet.gov/downloads/files/240.cfm
[18] Forman, E.H., Gass, S.I., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Exposition,＂
　　Operations Research, 49(4), 2001, pp.469-486.
[19] Frei, F.X., Harker, P.T., “Measuring aggregate process performance using AHP,
　　＂ European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.116(2), 16 July 1999,
　　pp.436-442.
[20] Ghazinoorya, S., Aliahmadib, A., Namdarzangenehc S., Ghodsypourd, S.H. , “
　　Using AHP and L.P. for choosing the best alternatives based the gap analysis,＂
　　Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol.184(2), 2007, pp. 316-321.
[21] Greiner, M.A., Fowler, J.W., Member, IEEE, Shunk, D.L., Carlyle, W. M., &
　　McNutt, R.T., “ E-learning: Research and applications, ＂ Industrial and
　　Commercial Training, Vol.34, 2002, pp. 44-53.
[22] Greiner, M.A., Fowler, J.W., Shunk, D.L., Carlyle, W.M., McNutt, R.T., “A
　　hybrid approach using the analytic hierarchy process and integer programming to
　　screen weapon systems projects,＂ Vol.50(3), 2003, pp.192-203.
[23] Harker, P.T., “Alternative modes of Questioning In the Analytic Hierarchy
　　Process,＂ Mathl. Modelling, Vol. 9, No. 3-5, 1987, pp.353-360.
[24] Aras, H., Erdomu, S., and Koc, E., “Multi-criteria selection for a wind
　　observation station location using analytic hierarchy process, ＂ Renewable
　　Energy, Vol29(8), July 2004, pp.1383-1392
[25] Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., Luque, M., “Some Issues on
　　Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations,＂ European Journal of Operational
　　Research, Vol.154(1), April 2004, pp. 98-109.
[26] Ho, W., “Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature
　　review,＂ European Journal of Operational Research, In Press, Corrected Proof,
　　Available online 1 February 2007.
[27] Hsu, P.-F., Wu C.-R., Li, Z.-R., “Optimizing resource-based allocation for senior
　　citizen housing to ensure a competitive advantage using the analytic hierarchy
　　process,＂ Building and Environment, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online
　　25 January 2007.
[28] Hsueh, S.-L., Perng, Y.-H., Yan M.R., Lee, J.R., “On-line multi-criterion risk
　　assessment model for construction joint ventures in China Automation in
　　Construction,＂ Volume 16(5), August 2007, pp.607-619.
[29] ICC/CMI CMI001 Guidelines for Interoperability Version 3.5. October 23, 2000.
　　Includes: AICC Course Structure Format, AICC CMI Data Model Available at:
　　http://www.aicc.org/
[30] IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, http://ieeeltsc.org/
[31] IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (http://www.imsglobal.org/)
[32] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Learning Technology
　　Standards Committee (LTSC). (http://ltsc.ieee.org/)
[33] Instructional Management System Specifications, http://www.imsglobal.org/specifications.html
[34] Jung, H.W., Choi, B., “Optimization models for quality and cost of modular
　　software systems,＂ European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.112(3),
　　1999, pp.613-619.
[35] Kang, H.-Y., Lee, A.H.I., “Priority mix planning for semiconductor fabrication
　　by fuzzy AHP ranking,＂ Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 32(2), February
　　2007, pp.560-570.
[36] Kao, R.J., CHI, S.C., KAO, S.S., “A decision support system for locating
　　convenience store through fuzzy AHP, ＂Computers & Industrial Engineering,
　　Vol.37(1-2), 1999, pp.323-326.
[37] Kekkonen-Moneta, S., Moneta, G. B., “E-learning in Hong Kong: Comparing
　　learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory
　　computing course,＂ British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33, 2002,
　　pp. 423-433.
[38] Kengpol, A., O＇Brien, C., “The development of a decision support tool for the
　　selection of a advanced technology to achieve rapid product development,＂
　　National Journal of Production Economics, Vol.69(2), 2001, pp.177-191.
[39] Kwiesielewicz, M., Uden, E., “Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in
　　pairwise comparison method in the AHP,＂ Computers & Operations Research,
　　Vol.31,2004, pp.713–719
[40] Lai, V.S., Wong B.K., Cheung. W., “Group decision making in a multiple
　　criteria environment: A case using the AHP in the software selection,＂ European
　　Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), 2002, pp.134–144.
[41] Lam P.K., Chin, K.S., “Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for
　　conflict management in collaborative new product development,＂ Industrial
　　Marketing Management, Vol.34(8), November 2005, pp.761-772.
[42] Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W.-C., and Chang, C.-J., “A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach
　　for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in
　　Taiwan,＂ Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.34(1), January 2007, pp.96-107.
[43] Lia, H.-L., Ma., L.-C., “ Detecting and adjusting ordinal and cardinal
　　inconsistencies through a graphical and optimal approach in AHP models,＂
　　Computers & Operations Research, Vol.34, 2007, pp.780–798
[44] Lin, H.-Y., Hsu. P.-Y., Shiau, W.-L., “A Review of Software Selection Using the
　　Analytic Hierarchy Process,＂ journal of e-business, Vol.7 , 2005, 293-312.
[45] Macromedia(2002).,Macromedia Flash MX-A next-generation rich client, ＂
　　Retrieved June 13 2007,from
　　http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/whitepapers/richclient.pdf
[46] Malakooti, B., “Ranking and screening multiple criteria alternatives with partial
　　information and use of ordinal and cardinal strength of preferences,＂ IEEE
　　Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part A, Vol.30(3), May 2000,
　　pp.787–801.
[47] Mangun, D., Thurston, D.L., “Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture,
　　and recycle into product portfolio design,＂ IEEE Transactions on Engineering
　　Management, 2002, Vol.49(4), pp. 479-490.
[48] Michael Mahemoff (2007), “210 Ajax Frameworks and Counting.＂, Retrieved
　　May 24, 2007, from
　　http://ajaxian.com/archives/134-ajax-frameworks-and-counting
[49] Mohan, P., Brooks, C.,“ Learning Objects on the Semantic Web,＂ IEEE
　　Computer Society, 9-11 July 2003, pp.195- 199
[50] Moran, D., McVittie, A., Allcroft, D.J., & Elston, D.A., “Quantifying public
　　preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: A comparison of methods,
　　＂ Ecological Economics, Vol.63(1), 15 June 2007, pp.42-53.
[51] Nicol, D. J., Minty, I., and Sinclari, C., “The social dimensions of online learning,
　　＂ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 2003, Vol. 40, pp.
　　270-280.
[52] Parra-López, C., Calatrava-Requena, J., & de-Haro-Giménez, T., “A systemic
　　comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive
　　systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework,＂ Ecological Economics,
　　In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 11 June 2007.
[53] Pöyhönen, M., Hämäläinen, R.P., “On the convergence of multi-attribute
　　weighting methods,＂ European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.129(3), 16
　　March 2001, pp.569-585
[54] Rehak, D.R., and Mason, R.D., “Keeping the learning in learning objects,＂
　　Reusing Educational Resources for Networked Learning,2003, Kogan Page,
　　London.
[55] Saaty, T. L., “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory,＂ RWS
　　publication, 1994.
[56] Saaty, T.L, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process 2nd,＂ McGraw-Hill,1980,, New
　　York.
[57] Saaty, T.L., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies,＂
　　Springer-verlag, New York, 1989, pp.59-67.
[58] Saaty, T.L., and Vargas, L.G., “Uncertainty and Rank Order in the Analytic
　　Hierarchy Process,＂ European Journal of Operationals Research, Vol. 32, No.2,
　　1987, pp.107-117.
[59] Saaty, T.L., Chob, Y., “The decision by the US congress on China＇s trade
　　status: A multi-criteria analysis,＂ Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.35(4),
　　2001 pp. 243–252.
[60] Saaty, T.L., et al., “The allocation of intangible resources:The analytic hierarchy
　　process and linear programming,＂ Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.37 (3)
　　, 2003, 169–184.
[61] Saaty, T.L., Shang, J.S., “Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of
　　preference,＂ Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, Vol.41(1), March
　　2007 pp. 22-37.
[62] Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., Dellmann, k., “The allocation of intangible resources:
　　The analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, ＂ Socio-Economic
　　Planning Sciences, Vol.37 (3) ,2003, pp.169–184.
[63] Sam Stephenson.,“Prototype1.5 The Complete API Reference,＂ Published
　　March 2007 2nd edition
[64] SCORM Specificaitons, http://www.adlnet.org/scorm/index.cfm, 2004
[65] SCORM, Content Aggregation Model (CAM) Version 1.3.1, 2004 Advanced
　　Distributed Learning.
[66] SCORM, Content Aggregation Model (CAM) Version 1.3.1, 2004 Advanced
　　Distributed Learning.
[67] Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., Daigo, M., “Property of a Positive Reciprocal Matrix and
　　Their Application to AHP,＂ Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan,
　　Vol. 41(3), 1998, pp.404-414.
[68] Sloane, E.B., Liberatore, M.J., Nydick, R.L., Luo, W., & Chung, Q.B., “Using
　　the analytic hierarchy process as a clinical engineering tool to facilitate an iterative,
　　multidisciplinary, microeconomic health technology assessment,＂ Computers &
　　Operations Research, Vol.30(10), September 2003, pp.1447-1465.
[69] Stannard B., Zahir, S., “ Application of analytic hierarchy process in
　　multi-objective mixed integer programming for aircraft capacity planning,＂
　　Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, Vol.23(1), 2006, pp.61-76.
[70] Steuer, R.E., Na, P., “Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance:
　　A categorized bibliographic study, ＂ European Journal of Operational
　　Research, Vol.150(3), November 2003, pp. 496-515
[71] Steuer, RE., Na P., “Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A
　　categorized bibliographic study,＂European Journal of Operational Research,
　　2003, 150 496-515.
[72] The Advanced Distributed Learning Network (ADLNet.org) Web site.
　　(http://www.adlnet.org/)
[73] Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S. H., “A Computational Evaluation of the AHP and
　　the REvised AHP When the Eigenvalue Method Is Used under A Continuity
　　Assumption, ＂ Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol.26, 1994, pp.
　　609-618.
[74] Tseng, C.-C., “Portfolio management using hybrid recommendation system,＂
　　Proc. IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service,
　　March 2004, pp.202-206.
[75] Vaidya O.S., Kumar, S., “ Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of
　　applications,＂ European Journal of Operational Research, 2006,169 1-29.
[76] Varga, L.G., “ An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its
　　Application,＂ European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, pp.48 2-8.
[77] Wang Y.-M., Yang J.-B., Xu D.-L., “A two-stage logarithmic goal programming
　　method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices,＂ Fuzzy Sets
　　System, Vol.152, 2005, pp.475−498.
[78] Wedley, W.C., Choo, E.U., Schoner, B., “Magnitude adjustment for AHP
　　benefit/cost ratios,＂ European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.133 (2)
　　,2001, pp. 342–351.
[79] Wikipedia."Applet".Retrieved June 13 2007,from
　　http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applet
[80] Wikipedia."Flex". Retrieved June 13 2007,from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flex
[81] Yang, T., Chen, M., Hung, C., “Multiple attribute decision-making methods for
　　the dynamic operator allocation problem,＂ Mathematics and Computers in
　　Simulation, Vo.73(5), 10 January 2007, pp.285-299
[82] Zahedi, F., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: survey of the method and its
　　applications,＂ Interfaces, 16(4), 1986, pp.96-108.
[83] Zeng, G., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu, M., andLi, J., “Optimization of wastewater
　　treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis,＂ Journal of
　　Environmental Management, Vol.82(2), January 2007, pp.250-259.
[84] Zhu J.Z., Xiong, X.F., “Optimal reactive power control using modified interior
　　point method,＂ Electric Power Systems Research, Vol.66(2), August 2003,
　　pp.187-192.
[85] Zhu X., Dale, A.P., “JavaAHP: a Web-based Decision Analysis Tool For Natural
　　Resource And Environmental Management, ＂ Environmental Modelling &
　　Software, Vo.16(3), April 2001, pp.251-262.
[86] 王建武，王明德，張家祝，改良式分析階層程序法權重求解模式之研究，台
　　大工程學刊 第九十二期 民國93 年10 月 pp.11–27
[87] 吳信輝，"網頁技術的新趨勢—RIA(Rich Internet Application)，"民96 年6 月
　　13 日,取http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/rain-hsu/article?mid=1776&next=1625&l=f&fid=51
[88] 沈炳宏(December,2004),"Smart Client 的架構與設計原則"民96 年6 月13 日,
　　取自 http://www.microsoft.com/taiwan/msdn/columns/mvp/200411_smartclient.htm
[89] 許建志(July 06,2004)，"Smart client 有多Smart"，民96 年6 月13 日，取自
　　http://taiwan.cnet.com/enterprise/column/0,2000062893,20090633,00.htm
[90] 黃悅民，王坤德，個人劃學習教材管理機制的探討與應用, 網路教學系統平台
　　與內容標準化, 網路教學系統平台與內容標準化研討會2003, 台灣.
[91] 簡禎富(2005)，決策分析與管理：全面提升決策品質之架構與方法，雙葉書廊
　　，台北。
[92] 顏榮泉，全球資訊網在教學與學習上之應用探討，教學科技與媒體，25 卷，
　　民86，頁33-41。
[93] 羅英姻(2003)，探討不完整資訊成對比較矩陣之AHP 問題，國立交通大學交
　　通運輸研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。