臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以兩個實驗探討圖象色彩組合對於主觀偏好與腦波反應的影響。實驗一為”圖象色彩組合主觀偏好評分實驗”，探討圖象符號在不同目標色與背景色組合下，的主觀偏好評分。實驗結果發現：在目標色與背景色中，白色之評比皆優於其他色彩，而圖象色彩組合上偏好評比高的為黑色與白色、白色與藍色、紅色與白色之組合，偏好評比低的為紅色與紫色、白色與黃色之組合。色彩組合偏好與Lippert色差值之皮爾森相關係數（r=0.57）顯著。
實驗二為”圖象色彩組合在短暫時間呈現下之辨識績效與腦波 (EEG)評估”。研究結果發現1.主觀偏好高的色彩組合在辨識率上確實優於主觀偏好低的色彩組合。2.大腦視覺區的腦波P100潛時時間上主觀偏好高的色彩組合顯著快於主觀偏好低的色彩組合。3. P300平均振幅在呈現時間短時顯著較高。亦即，呈現時間短時，對受試者作業負荷較重。綜合研究結果圖象色彩組合與呈現時間對於辨識正確率皆有顯著的影響，並且得到腦波時間面分析上的證實。

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of color combination on subjective preference, glance legibility and EEG response of symbols.
The first experiment evaluated subjective preference of target/background color combinations of the symbols. The result showed that white was rated greaten than other colors. The more preferable color combinations were black/white, white/blue and red/white. while red/purple and white/yellow was less preferable. A significantly positive correlations (r = 0.57). was found between subjective preference and color difference of color combinations.
The second experiment investigated the effects of color combinations on glance legibility and EEG response. The results showed: 1.The color combinations of greaten subjective preference had better glance legibility .
2.The latency of P100 for color combinations of greaten subjective preference was faster than those of less subjective preference. 3.The mean amplitude of P300 was larger when the duration of stimulant presentation was shorter.
The result of this study showed that color combinations had significant effects on glance legibility, subjective preference and EEG.

摘 要 I
Abstract II
目 錄 III
表索引 VI
圖索引 VII
第一章 緒論
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究限制 2
1.4研究架構 3
第二章 文獻探討
2.1圖象理論 5
2.1.1圖象辨識評估指標之探討 6
2.1.2評估指標間的相關性 8
2.2顏色（color）理論 9
2.2.1物理學上光和顏色的關係 9
2.2.2生理與顏色知覺 11
2.2.3心理與顏色 13
2.2.4顏色屬性 13
2.2.5顏色的表示法 15
2.2.6ＣＩＥ的色度座標及色度圖 16
2.2.7色差 17
2.2.8顏色與視覺機能的研究 19
2.2.9螢幕顏色組合與亮度的研究 19
2.2.10色差的研究 21
2.3腦波的理論與研究 23
2.3.1腦波的概念 23
2.3.2大腦皮質構造 23
2.3.3腦波分析方法 26
2.3.4腦波之量測與記錄 26
2.3.5事件相關電位（ERPs） 28
2.3.6色彩易讀性的ERP研究 30
第三章 實驗一：圖像色彩組合主觀偏好的評估
3.1實驗設計 32
3.1.1自變項 32
3.1.2因變項 33
3.1.3受試者 33
3.1.4實驗材料與設備 33
3.1.5 VDT工作站環境 36
3.1.6實驗程序 36
3.1.7資料收集與分析 37
3.2實驗結果 38
3.3實驗討論 44
第四章 實驗二：圖像色彩組合在短暫時間呈現下之辨識績效與腦波（EEG）評估
4.1實驗設計 46
4.1.1自變項 46
4.1.2因變項 47
4.1.3受試者 48
4.1.4實驗材料與設備 48
4.1.5 VDT工作站環境 49
4.1.6實驗程序 50
4.1.7資料收集與分析 52
4.2實驗結果 54
4.2.1辨識正確率 54
4.2.2生理指標(EEG)評估 56
4.3實驗討論 63
4.3.1辨識績效方面 63
4.3.2在腦波（EEG）的評估方面 64
4.3.3比較腦波的與辨識正確率的關係 65
第五章 結論與建議
5.1結論 66
5.2建議 67
參考文獻 69
附 錄A：受試者同意書 75
附 錄B：受測者基本資料 76
附 錄C：圖象色彩組合主觀評比評分表 77
附 錄D：圖象色彩組合辨識績效實驗 指導語 78
附 錄E：實驗辨識紀錄表 79
附 錄F：各電極位置的P100的潛時（latency）的ANOVA表 80
附 錄G：各電極位置的P300振幅（amplitude）ANOVA表 90
附 錄Ｈ：主觀偏好高的色彩組合在兩呈現時間的ANOVA表 100
附 錄I：現行的色彩組合在兩呈現時間的ANOVA表 100
附 錄J：主觀偏好低的色彩組合在兩呈現時間的ANOVA表 100

一、中文部分
1.朱介英, (1998). 色彩設計計劃, 美工圖書社, pp.41-100
2.李陽世（1984），色彩技術原理與應用，台北：永大，46-60。
3.林清山（1992），心理與教育統計學，台北：東華，384-390。
4.吳進安（1998），神經診斷學，台北：揚智，59-99。
5.洪蘭譯（民90b）：M. H. Johnson 原著。發展的認知神經科學。台北市：信誼基金出版社。
6.洪聰敏（民87）。腦波：探討運動及身體活動心理學的另一扇視窗。中華體育，44，63-74。
7.許勝雄、彭游、吳水丕(譯)（1996），人因工程，台北：滄海，88-90。
8.張春興（2001），現代心理學，台北：東華，258-303。
9.黃世賢（1983），圖解臨床腦波檢查法，台北：和記，122-128。
10.彭昭英（2001），SAS與統計分析，台北：儒林。
11.謝光進（1995），顏色對比與作業特性對視覺績效與視覺疲勞影響之研究，NSC 85-2213-E011-014。
12.謝光進、陳明德（1997），螢幕文字/背景色彩組合與相關作業特性對視覺績效與視覺疲勞影響之研究，台灣科技大學博士論文。
13. 魏景漢（2002）認知事件相關電位教程，中國：經濟日報
二、英文部分
1.ANSI/HFS 100-1988. (1988). American National Standard for Human Factors Engineering of visual display terminal workstations. Human Factors Society, Inc., Santa Monica, California.
2.Berger, H. 1969, Hans Berger on the electroencephalogram of man(P. Gloor,Trans),Elecctroencephalograph and Clinical Neuropsychology (Suppl. 28).(Origina work published 1929).
3.Bullimore, M. A., Fulton, E. J., Howarth, P. A., 1991. Chapter 26: Assessment of visual performance, In: Wilson & Corlett (Eds.), Evaluation of Human Work, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 648-681.
4.Bruce, M. and Foster, J. J. (1982). The visibility of colored characters on colored background on viewdata displays. Visible Land, 32, 382-390.
5.Cacioppo, J. T., & Tassinary, L. G. (1990). Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.Cairney,P.T.and Siess,D.,1982.Communication effectiveness of symbolic safety signs with different user group.Applied Ergonomics,13（2）,91-97.
7.Dewar, R. E., and Ells, J. G., 1984. Methods of evaluation of traffic signs. In: Easterby, R. and Zwaga, H. (Eds.), Information Design, John Wiley and Son Ltd., N.Y., 77-90.
8.Dewar, R. E., 1976. The slash obscures the symbol on prohibitive traffic signs. Human Factors 18(3): 253-258.
9.Elm, W. and Woods, D. 1985, Getting lost: a case study in interface design, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA), 927-931.
10.Fukuzumi, S., Yamazaki, T., Kamijo, K. and Hayashi, Y. 1998, Physiological and psychological evaluation for visual display colour readability: A visual evoked potential study and a subjective evaluation study, Ergonomics, 41, 89-108.
11.Gevins, A. (1993). High-resolution EEG. Brain Topography, 5(4),321-325.
12.Jacobs, R. J., Johnston, A. W., Cole B. C., 1975. The visibility of alphabetic and symbolic traffic signs. Australian Road Research, 5(7), 68-86.
13.Kacmar, C. J., Carey, J. M., 1991. Assessing the usability of icons in user interface. Behavior and Information Technology, 10, 443-457.
14.Lodding.K.,1983.Iconic interfacing,IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,4（12）,13-23
15.Lippert, T. M. (1986). Color-difference prediction of legibility performance for CRT raster imagery. SID Digest of Technical Papers, XVI, 86-89.
16.Mahnke, F. H. and Mahnke, R. H. (1987). Color and light in man-made environments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
17.Matthews, M. L. (1987). The influence of colour on CRT reading performance and subjective comfort under operational conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 18(4), 323-328.
18.Matthews, M. L., Lovasik, J. V. and Mertins, K. (1989). Visual performance and subjective discomfort in prolonged viewing of chromatic displays. Human Factors, 31(3), 259-271.
19.Mackett-Stout, J., and Dewar, R., 1981. Evaluation of symbolic public information signs. Human Factors 23(2): 139-151.
20.Mathews, M.L.& Mertines, K., （1988）, Working with color CRTs: Pink eyes, yellow fever, and feeling blue. In E.D. Megaw(ED), proceedings of the Ergonomic society‘s 1988, Annal conference-Landon: Taylor & Francis, 228-233.
21.Matthews, M. L. and Mertins, K., (1988). Working with color CRTs: Pink eyes, yellow fever, and feeling blue. In: E. D. Megaw (Ed.) Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society’s 1988, Annal conference-London: Taylor & Francis, 228-233.
22.Murray L. A., Magurno, A. B., Glover, B. L., Wogalter, M. S., 1998. Prohibitive pictorials: Evaluations of different circle-slash negation symbols. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 22, 473-482
23.National Research Council，(1983). Video display, work and vision. National Academy Pres, Washington, DC.
24.Pastoor, S., （1990）. Legibility and subjective preference for color combinations in text. Human Factors, 32(2), 157-171.
25.Pfurtscheller, G., and Klimesch W. 1992. Functional topography during a visuoverbal judgment task studied with event-related desynchronization mapping. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9,120-131.
26.Ray, W. J. (1990). The electrocortical system. In J. Cacioppo & L. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.Sanders, M. S. and McCormick E. J., (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
28.Shieh, K. K. and Chen, M. T. (1997). Effects of screen color combination, work-break schedule, and workplace on VDT viewing distance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 11-18.
29.Shieh, K. K., Chen, M. T., and Chuang, J. H. (1997). Effects of color combination and typograghy on identification of characters briefly presented on VDTs. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 169-181.
30.Smith, M. J., Cohen B. G. F. and Stammerjohn, L. W., （1981）. An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operators. Human Factors, 23（4）, 387-400.
31.Snyder, H. L., (1988). Image quality. In: Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction, Elsevier science publishers, Amsterdam.
32.Wickens,C.D.,1992.Engineering Psychology and Human Performance，Harper Cillins :New York.
33. Wiedenbeck, S., 1999. The use of icons and labels in an end user application program: an empirical study of learning and retention. Behavior & Information Technology 18(2): 68-82.
34.Wilson, J. R., Corlett, E. N., 1992. Part 1 General approaches and methods, In: Wilson & Corlett (Eds.), Evaluation of Human Work, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 31-34.