臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

過去知識分享研究顯示，從組織角度來看，組織期望從組織公平及組織文化等機制來鼓勵員工進行知識分享。從員工個人角度，員工則認為知識分享對自己而言是一種威脅，至少要有相當的利益交換才願意進行知識分享。因此，組織及員工雙方對知識分享的想法截然不同。
過去理論已探討心理所有權的議題，從組織的角度希望員工可以知識分享，至今知識分享尚未普遍實行於企業中，但仍存在潛在因素，由於無法直接得知員工心理層面的認知想法，欲利用本研究探究員工心理，對於知識分享的認知為何？是否影響員工產生知識分享行為？本研究目的欲探討員工知識心理所有權對知識分享行為之影響，並且分析知識分享認知的調節效果。研究對象是台灣的製造業與服務業，以郵寄問卷方式來蒐集資料，即每一位主管針對三名員工進行填答問卷。總共蒐集了有效問卷156筆配對資料，進行層級迴歸分析。
研究結果顯示：(1) 專業知識的知識心理所有權顯著影響知識分享行為；(2)知識分享認知（成長與威脅）對知識心理所有權與知識分享行為之關係皆具有調節效果。
根據上述研究結果，討論本研究造成知識分享認知成長與威脅具調節效果之結果如預期，此外提供如何增強知識員工心理所有權，以及其對知識分享認知如何強化成長力以及降低威脅力，讓組織促使員工進行知識分享行為的管理提供實務參考價值。

Prior knowledge sharing research shows that in organization points of view, organization expects employees to share knowledge from organization justice and organization culture. In employees points of view, employees think knowledge sharing is a threat. Obviously, it is different from organization and employees.
Prior theory discussed about psychology ownership found that reinforced ownership impelled employees to carry some activities. To date, knowledge sharing generally carries out yet. It still conceals some reason. We don’t directly understand employees’ mind. So we intend to explore employees’ mind and how to perceive knowledge sharing.
The purpose of study examined the relationship between knowledge based ownership and knowledge sharing by knowledge sharing perception. A questionnaire survey comprising 156 samples was used. The results of the study demonstrates that (1) knowledge based ownership had a positive effect on knowledge sharing.(2) knowledge sharing perception- growth and threat in the relationship between knowledge based ownership and knowledge sharing had a moderating effect.
According to research results, discussed why knowledge based ownership had a positive effect on knowledge sharing. We provide how to reinforce knowledge based ownership, how to elevate knowledge sharing perception-growth , and how to reduce knowledge sharing perception-threat. Finally, we provide some management practices and suggestion to business.

第一章 緒論
第一節　研究背景……………………………………………………1
第二節　研究目的……………………………………………………2
第三節　研究重要性…………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻評論
第一節　心理所有權…………………………………………………3
第二節　知識分享……………………………………………………7
第三節　知識分享的認知……………………………………………11
第四節　研究架構……………………………………………………14
第三章 研究方法
第一節 問卷設計與研究對象………………………………………15
第二節 變數衡量與操作定義………………………………………16
第三節 資料分析方法………………………………………………19
第四節 修正後研究架構……………………………………………21

第四章 結果與討論
第一節 描述性統計…………………………………………………22
第二節 因素與信度分析……………………………………………24
第三節 相關分析……………………………………………………27
第四節 迴歸分析……………………………………………………29
第五節 研究限制……………………………………………………35
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………36
第二節 理論與實務涵義……………………………………………40
第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………………43
參考文獻
中文部分………………………………………………………………44
英文部分………………………………………………………………45
附錄
附錄A 問卷調查內容……………………………………………… 51

一、中文部分
李田樹 (2006)。留住知識。世界經理文摘，240期，36–54頁。
吳盛、林東清、林杏子(2006)。以社會交換理論觀點探討影響虛擬 團隊成員知識分享行為因素。資訊管理學報，13卷，1期，193–219頁。
林于荻(2003)。組織文化如何影響知識分享知探索性個案研究。台 大管理論叢，13卷，2期，59-99頁。
林鉦棽、蕭淑月、何慧清 (2005)。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究：以信任與關係為分析切入點。人力資源管理學報春季號，5卷，1期，77–110頁。
林鉦棽、王政智(2005)。從社會交換理論與交易成本理論分析組織內之知識分享行為。人力資源管理學報夏季號，5卷，2期，95–119頁。
洪賢奇 (2004)。心理所有權、知覺組織支持與組織承諾對員工行為之影響－以企業推動全員生產管理(TPM)為例。私立東海大學管理碩士學程在職進修專班。
夏侯欣鵬 (2000)。權利對組織內知識分享意願影響之研究－以銀行部門主管為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究博士論文。
郭羅基 (2000)。什麼是所有權？民主論壇2000.5.10。http://asiademo.org/b5/2000/05/20000510a.htm
張火燦、劉淑寧(2002)。從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享。人力資源管理學報秋季號，2卷，3期，101–113頁。
湯令儀(2001)。知識網路分享之研究。國立政治大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
董玉娟(2004)。知識分享意願影響前因之研究：威脅知情境效果。人力資源管理學報秋季號，4卷，3期，117–137頁。
鄭仁偉、黎士群(2001)。組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究。人力資源管理學報秋季號，1卷，2期，69–93頁。
蕭淑月(2003)。關係型態與影響知識分享相關因素之研究。屏東科技大學企業管理系碩士班。　
Working knowledge: How organization manage what they know(1999)。知識管理－企業組織如何有效利用知識（胡瑋珊譯）。中國生產力中心。(英文版 1998）
二、英文部分
Anderson, P., Finkelstein, S., & Quinn, J.B. (1996).Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review,71–80.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173–1182
Beggan, J.K., & Brown, E.M. (1994).Association as a psychological justification for ownership. Journal of Psychology,128,365–380.
Bock, G.W., Zumd, R.W., Kim, Y.G., & Lee, J.N. (2005).Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing : Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social–psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly,29(1),87–115.
Bostrom, R.P. (1989).Successful application of communication techniques to improve the systems development process. Information and Management,16(5),279–295.
Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, S.(1994).What mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research,5(4),400–421.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981).The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the sell.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darr, E.D., & Kurtzberg, T.R.(2000).An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organization Behavior and Human Dicision Precesses,82(1),28–44.
Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Dittmar, H. (1992).The social Psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: S t. Martin’s Press.
Drucker, P.(1993).Post-Capitalist society. New York: Butterworth Heinemann.
Duncan, N.G. (1981).Home ownership and social theory. In J.S. Duncan(Ed.).Housing and identity: Cross-cultural perspectives,98–134.
Durham, C.C., Knight, D., & Locke, E.A. (1997).Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organization Behavior and Human Dicision Precesses,72,203–231.
Dyer, J.H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000).Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: The TOYOTA case. Strategic Management Journal.21,354–367.
Dyne, L.V., & Pierce, J.L. (2004).Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organization Behavior,25(4),439–459.
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P.(1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology,82,812–820.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D.(1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology,71,500–507.
Fraser, V., Marcella, R.,& Middleton, L.(2000).Employee perceptions of knowledge sharing: Employment threat of synergy for the greater good. Competitive Intelligence Review,11(2),39–52.
Grant, R.M.(1996). Toward a knowledge –based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,17,109–122.
Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000).Knowledge management’s social dimension : Lessons from nucor steel. MIT Sloan Management Review,42(1),Fall,71–80.
Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal,21,Special Issue,405–425.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science,383–397.
MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Rich, G.A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Academy of Marketing Science 29, 115–134.
Matson, E., Patiath, P., & Shavers, T. (2003).Stimulating knowledge sharing：Strengthening your organization’s internal knowledge market. Organizational Dynamics32(3),275–285.
Hendriks, P.(1999).Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management,6(2),91–100
Hidding, G., & Shireen, M.C.(1998).Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at Anderson consulting.Knowledge and Process Management,5(1),3–13.
Locke, J.(1690).Two treatises of government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marx, K.(1976).The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed.).(Edited by R.C. Tucker.).New York: Norton.
Newell, A.(1982).The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence,18,87–127
Nonaka, I. (1991).The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review,96–104.
Nonaka, I. (1995).A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Institute of Business Research,14–37.
Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K.T. (2001).Toward A theory of psychological ownership in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 298–308.
Parise, S., Cross, R. & Davenport, T.H.(2006).Strategies for preventing a knowledge-loss Crisis, MIT Sloan Management Review,47(4),31–38.
Rudmin, F.W., & Berry, J.W.(1987).Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. The Psychological Record,37,257–268.
Ruggle,R.(1998).The state of notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review,40,80–89.
Senge, P. (1997).Sharing Knowledge. Executive Excellence.14(11),17.
Simon, H.A. (1991).Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science,2,125–134.
Tacq, J.(1997).Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research. London: SAGE.
Tan, M.(1994).Establishing mutual understanding in systems design: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems,10(4),159–182.
Thibaut, J.W. & Kelley, H.H.(1959).The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, New York.
Trandis, H. C.(1995).Individualism and collectivism. Boulder,CO: Westview Press.
von Hippel, E.(1998).The sources of innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wijnhoven, F.(1998). Knowledge logistic in business contexts: Analyzing and diagnosing knowledge sharing by logistics concepts. Knowledge and Process Management,5,143–157