臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

剪力牆為鋼筋混凝土結構中一個相當重要的耐震元件，近來也被廣泛使用。對於剪力牆的研究目前大多還停留在靜態試驗的部分，對於多層樓剪力牆的動力分析，雖有理論可供分析，卻少有試驗可以比較。
剪力牆一般可分成高型剪力牆及低型剪力牆，前者屬於彎矩破壞，後者則是剪力破壞。由於在不知實驗結果的情形下，吾人先假設試體為低型剪力牆，屬於剪力破壞，結果試體為彎矩破壞，所以第一次的預測與試驗結果相差甚多，最後再使用高型剪力牆彎矩破壞的模式，而得到了與試驗相近的結果。本篇論文提供了兩種破壞模式的預測方法，同時說明了唯有對結構的破壞模式有充分的瞭解，才能得到準確的動力分析。

第一章 緒論…………………………………………………1
第二章 試驗計畫……………………………………………3
2-1 幾何尺寸…………………………………………………3
2-2 材料特性………………………………………………3
2-2-1混凝土………………………………………………3
2-2-2 鋼筋………………………………………………4
2-3 配筋……………………………………………………4
2-4 質量分佈…………………………………………………4
2-5 試體的製作與組合………………………………………5
2-6 試驗之地震譜……………………………………………5
2-7 震動台……………………………………………………6
2-8 震動台控制程式與資料擷取設備…………………………7
2-9 位移計及應變計…………………………………………7
第三章 分析模式………………………………………………10
3-1 概述……………………………………………………10
3-2 剪力破壞模式……………………………………………11
3-2-1基準曲線……………………………………………11
3-2-2 遲滯圈模式……………………………………...…17
3-2-3 動力分析模式………………………………………18
3-3 彎矩破壞模式……………………………………………22
3-3-1基準曲線……………………………………………23
3-3-2 遲滯圈模式………………………………………25
3-3-3 動力分析模式………………………………………26
第四章 實驗結果………………………………………………29
4-1 試驗結果及破壞情形……………………………………29
4-2 轉角及位移………………………………………………30
4-3 彎矩與遲滯圈……………………………………………31
4-4 自然頻率與阻尼的改變…………………………………32
第五章 試驗與分析之比較………………………………………34
5-1 假設為剪力破壞…………………………………………34
5-1-1 基準曲線…………………………………………34
5-1-2 遲滯圈……………………………………………36
5-1-3 最大位移、彎矩、剪力………………………………36
5-2 假設為彎矩破壞……………………………………………37
5-2-1 基準曲線………………………………………37
5-2-2 遲滯圈……………………………………………38
5-2-3 最大位移、彎矩、剪力………………………………39
5-3 討論……………………………………………………40
第六章 結論與展望……………………………………………43
6-1 結論……………………………………………………43
6-2 展望……………………………………………………46
參考文獻………………………………………………………………48

1.莫詒隆，「剪力牆－最佳之樓房抗震結構」，結構工程，第七卷，第四期，民國八十一年十二月，pp.59-63。
2.Fintel, M., “Shearwall－An Answer for Seismic Resistance”, Concrete International, July, pp.48-53, 1991.
3.“Camus3 Specimen and loading characteristics Specifications for the participants report”
4.Mo, Y.L. “Dynamic Behavior of Concrete Structure”, ELSEVIER SCIENCE 1994.
5.Hsu, T.C. and Mo, Y.L. “Softening of Concrete in Low-Rise Shearwalls”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 88, No. 6, 1985, pp. 883-889.
6. Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H-S. and Wen, Y.K., “Seismic Damage Analysis and Damage-Limiting Design of R/C Building”, Civil Engineering Studies, SRS No. 516, University of Illinois, Urbana, October 1984.
7. Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A. and Nielsen, N.N., “Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes”, Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. ST-12, 1970.
8. Muto, K., Hisada, T., Tsugawa, T. and Bessho, S., “Earthquake Resistant Design of a 20-Story Reinforced Concrete Building”, Proc, of 5th WCEE, Rome, 1973.
9. Nakata, S., Sproul, T. and Penzien, J., “Mathematical Modeling of Hysteresis Loops for Reinforced Concrete Columns”, UCB/EERC Report 78-11, University of California, Berkeley, June 1978.
10. Hsu, T.C. “Nonlinear Analysis of concrete Membrane Elements”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 88, No. 5, 1991, pp. 552-561.
11. Pang, X, B. and Hsu, T.C., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Membrane elements in Shear”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 92, No. 6, 1995, pp. 665-679.
12. Belarbi, A. and Hsu, T.C. (1994). “Constitutive laws of concrete in tension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete”, Structural Journal of American Concrete Institute, Vol. 91, No. 4, July.-August, pp.465-474.
13. Belarbi, A. and Hsu, Hsu T.C. (1995). “Constitutive laws of softened concrete in biaxial tension-compression”, Structural Journal of American Concrete Institute, Vol. 92, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp.562-573.
14. Mo, Y.L., “Analysis and Design of Low-Rise Structural Walls under Dynamically Applied Shear Forces”, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 85, No. 2, 1988, pp.180-189.
15. Jost, S.D., and Mo, Y.L., “An Algorithm for seismic Analysis of Low-Rise Structural Walls”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol.131, 1991, pp. 263-270.
16. Paz, M., Structural Dynamics, 3rd Editon, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991, pp.626.
17. Chopra, Anil K., Dynamics of Structures, International Edition, Prentice Hall, chapter 5 and 15.
18. Wilson, E. L., Rarhoomand, I., and Bathe, K.J., “Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Complex Structures”, Int. J. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.1, 1973, pp.241-252.
19. Kent, D. C., and Park, R., “Flexural members with confined concrete”, J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 97(7) 1971, pp. 1969-1990.