跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.66) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/16 10:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳岱夆
研究生(外文):CHEN,TAI-FENG
論文名稱:全球競爭力與國家產業集中度對經濟成長的影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Global Competitiveness and Industrial Concentration on Economic Growth
指導教授:王銘杰
指導教授(外文):WANG,MING-CHIEH
口試委員:周德光欉清全莊文彬李超雄王銘杰
口試委員(外文):CHOU, TE-KUANGTSONG, CHING-CHUANCHUANG, WEN-BINLEE, CHAO-HSIUNGWANG,MING-CHIEH
口試日期:2018-06-13
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:74
中文關鍵詞:全球競爭力產業集中度經濟成長
外文關鍵詞:global competitivenessindustrial concentrationeconomic growth
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:232
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:9
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
經濟長期成長一直是各國持續追求的目標,衡量經濟成長的指標有許多種,但未有文獻探討全球競爭力與產業集中度,兩者對於經濟成長所產生的影響。本文使用自2004年開始編製的全球競爭力指標,檢驗全球競爭力與產業集中度的交互作用,探討兩者對長期經濟成長的影響。
本研究的樣本群組可分別為30個已開發國家及12個開發中國家,資料期間為2006年到2014年,並使用固定效果的追蹤資料模型(Panel data model with the fixed effect),來探討這二群組的差異。本研究有二個主要的實證結果:(1)產業集中度對已開發國家的經濟成長率的影響效果為負向,但對開發中國家的經濟成長具有非線性的正向影響;(2)全球競爭力方面,提高全球競爭力可進一步提高國家的經濟成長率,但影響程度與該國的產業集中程度有關。最後,本研究亦採用不同的全球競爭力副指標,研究結果同樣支持全球競爭力與產業集中度會因不同的國家群組或指標而有所差異。因此本研究的實證結果,對於政府的經濟發展目標和政策方向,均有相當高的參考價值。

Sustained economic growth has always been the primary goal pursued by nearly every country in the world. There are many indicators of economic growth, but so far there is no article discussing how the relationship between global competitiveness and industrial concentration has an impact on economic growth. The global competitiveness indicator started in 2004, andit is hoped that through the interaction between the indicators of global competitiveness and industrial concentration that it will be possible to understand what impacts these two factors will have on future economic growth.
This study took30 developed countries and 12 developing countries as the samplewith the study period covering 2006 to 2014The empirical method analyzes the effect of global competitiveness and national industrial concentration on economic growth by using the panel data model with the fixed effect. The empirical results show that: (1) in the developed countries, the effect of industrial concentration on the economic growth rate is not obvious; (2) overall, the promotion of national global competitiveness can enhance the national economic growth rate,a government should thus be committed to relevant policies, and (3) most of the evidence shows that due to anincrease in industrial concentration,developed countrieswill reduce their global competitiveness fromthe economic growth benefits brought about by such an increase,which subsenquently has the greatest impact on national performance indicators. Governments should thus propose to strengthen the efficiencies of education and the labor, economic, and financial markets.
目次 致謝辭...............................................................i
摘要………………………………………………………………...........…ii
Abstract…………………………………………………………….............iii
目次……………………………………………………….…………..……v
表目次………………….......…...…………………..………….…………vii
圖目次…..……………………........…………………………....………..ⅷ
第一章緒論 ................................................................................................ 1
第一節研究動機與目的................................................................ 1
第二節研究方向與重要名詞說明................................................ 3
第三節研究方法與步驟................................................................ 6
第四節研究範圍與限制................................................................ 7
第二章文獻探討.......................................................................................... 8
第一節經濟成長意涵與理論之演進分析.................................... 8
第二節全球競爭力介紹與文獻探討.......................................... 17
第三節產業集中度介紹及文獻探討.......................................... 19
第三章研究設計與實施............................................................................ 23
第一節模型建構背景.................................................................. 23
第二節模型基本理論.................................................................. 25
第三節實證模型設定.................................................................. 28
第四節研究方法.......................................................................... 32
第四章實證資料及變數............................................................................ 34
第一節實證樣本資料.................................................................. 34
第二節實證研究變數.................................................................. 34
第五章實證結果與分析............................................................................ 37
第一節基本統計分析.................................................................. 37
第二節已開發國家的實證研究.................................................. 43
第三節開發中國家的實證研究.................................................. 50
第四節模型檢定...........................................................................59
第六章結論與建議.................................................................................... 67
參考文獻.................................................................................................... 69
一、中文部分................................................................................ 69
二、英文部分................................................................................ 71
一、中文部分
行政院(2012a)。黃金十年國家願景。取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/ RelFile/26/689506/dcb966ab-a072-42ce-a907-26c16671053c.pdf
行政院(2012b)。經濟動能推升方案。取自http://theme.ndc.gov.tw/POWERUP/cp.aspx?n=445B991A1B69EF87&s=4C8F2E9B5908645D
行政院主計總處(2013a)。國民所得統計年報。臺北市:作者。
行政院主計總處(2013b)。國民所得統計摘要。中華民國統計資訊網。取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33338&ctNode=3565&mp=4
行政院主計總處(2015a)。統計資料背景說明。中華民國統計資訊網。取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14616&CtNode= 356 4&mp=4
行政院主計總處(2015b)。國民所得統計簡介。中華民國統計資訊網。取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=11978&CtNode= 493 &mp=4
行政院主計總處(2015c)。國內資本形成與投資有何差異?中華民國統計資訊網。取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem= 10881 &ctNode=2404
行政院主計總處(2016a)。多因素生產力基期價格調整與行業改編方法說明。中華民國統計資訊網。取自:http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/642913318IGBKG0IN.pdf
行政院主計總處(2016b)。何謂勞參率?如何計算?中華民國統計資訊網。 取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=702&ctNode=520
張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏(1995)。經濟學-理論與實務上冊(3 版)。臺北市:作者。
張雲龍(2016)。「臺灣高等教育數量發展與經濟成長關係之研究」,臺匇市立大學教育學系研究所博士論文。
陳心蘋、曹書豪 (2013)人口聚集型態與經濟成長. 人口學刊第47期:127-156.
曹書豪(2010)聚集經濟對經濟成長之影響:全球實證分析. 碩士論文, 台北:國立政治大學經濟學研究所
沈中華與林昌平(2009)「金融發展對經濟成長的影響--動態追蹤資料門檻模型」。
薛正芳(2009)「金融發展與經濟成長因果關係-以Panel Data 探討台灣、日本、韓國之實證研究」,臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 黃啟倫, (2005)政府高等教育支出與經濟成長. 碩士論文, 台北:國立政治大學財政學研究所
王銘正 (2001)「技術進步,環境品質與經濟成長」,《經濟論文叢刊》,29(2),105-116

二、英文部分
Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 2, 323-351.
Amar, M.B., Hamdi, M.T., 2012. Global competitiveness and economic growth: Empirical verification for African countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance 4, 125-131.
Barro, R.J., 1990. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 5, 103-125.
Barro, R.J., 1991. Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 407-443.
Barro, R.J., 2003. Determinants of economic growth in a panel of countries. Annals of Economics and Finance 4,231-274.
Berg, A., Borensztein, E., Sahay, R., Zettelmeyer, J., 1999. The evolution of output in transition economies: Explaining the differences. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=189437
Davis, C., Hashimoto, K.I., 2015. Industry concentration, knowledge diffusion, and economic growth without scale effects. Economica, 1-30.Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.12129/full
Desmet, K., Parente, S.L., 2010. Bigger is better: Market size, demand elasticity, and innovation. International Economic Review 51, 319-333.
Dew-Becker, I., Gordon, R.J., 2008. The role of labour market changes in the slowdown of European productivity growth. CERP Discussion Paper 6722.
Fischer, S., Sahay, R., Vegh, C.A., 1998. How far is eastern Europe from Brussels? Retrieved from https://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=2WabMxdj2K0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA4&dq=How+far+is+eastern+Europe+from+Brussels&ots=c2LIF-AfTF&sig=e7TDeatS5KAmin1KNarzc0V_V_0
Foster-McGregor, N., Kaba, I., Szirmai, A., 2015. Structural change and the ability to sustain growth. Retrieved from http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2015/wp2015-048.pdf
Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
Hausman, J., 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46, 1251-1271. Hausman, J., Taylor, W., 1981. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49, 1377-1398.
Havrylyshyn, O., Izvorski, I., van Rooden, R., 1998. Recovery and growth in transition economies 1990-97: A stylized regression analysis. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=882706
Havrylyshyn, O., van Rooden, R., 2003. Institutions matter in transition but so do policies. Comparative Economic Studies,2003,45, 2-24.Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100005
Imbs, J., Wacziarg, R., 2003. Stages of diversification. American Economic Review 93, 63-86.
Islam, N., 1995. Growth empirics: A panel data approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 1127-1170.
Jelilov, G., Enwerem, H.I., Isik, A., 2016. The impact of industrialization on economic growth: The Nigeria experience (2000-2013). British Journal of Advance Academic Research 5, 11-20.
Kanstantakapoulou, I., Tsionas, E., Tryphon, K., 2009. Stylized facts of prices and interest rates over the business cycle. Economics Bulletin 29, 2613-2627.
Kaulich, F., 2012. Diversification vs. specialization as alternative strategies for economic development: Can we settle a debate by looking at the empirical evidence? Retrieved from https://epub.wu.ac.at/5232/
Ledyaeva, S., Linden, M., 2008. Determinants of economic growth: Empirical evidence from Russian regions. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 5, 87-105.
Lucas, R.E., 1988. On the mechanisms of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 1, 3-42.
Mankiw N., D., Romer, D., Weil, 1992. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quraterly Journal of Economics 107, 407-437.
Pagano, M., 1993. Financial markets and growth: An overview. European Economic Review 37, 613-622.
Pichelmann, K., Roeger, W., 2008. Employment and labour productivity in the EU: Reconsidering a potential trade-off in the Lisbon strategy. In Eichengreen, Landesmann, and Stiefel (eds) The European Economy in an American Mirror, 128-142.
Robinson, J.A., Acemoglu, D., Simon, J., 2005. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth 1A: 386-472.
Romer, P.M., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 5, 1002-1037.
Romer, P.M., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 5, 71-102.
Schimmelpfenning, D.E.,Pray,C.E.,Brennan,M.F.,2004. The impact of seed industry concentration on innovation: A study of US biotech market leaders. Agricultural Economics 30, 157-167.
Soto, M., 2000. Capital flows and growth in developing countries: Recent empirical evidence. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.tw/scholar?hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Soto%2C+M.%2C+2000.+Capital+flows+and+growth+in+developing+countries%3A+Recent+empirical+evidence&btnG=
United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2015. Industrial development report 2016. The role of Technology and innovation in inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Vienna.
Webb, R.H., 2003. The cyclical behavior of prices and employee compensation. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Economic Quarterly 89, 69-83.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top