臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

The objective of this research is to investigate the sound transmission loss (TL) of 7 different lightweight load-bearing calcium silicate board (CSB) partitions. By using the ASTM E90 and ISO 10140 measurement standards, the effects of testing equipment and procedure and the physical and environmental conditions of the testing chambers can be minimized and controlled.
To study the CSB layers, with the similar trends of transmission loss values, the range of sound transmission class (STC) results in 1 to 2 dB. For Rockwool displacement of ASTM 2+3 partition, there was a 1-dB STC increase when placing the insulation on the stud cavity in the receiving room side. To study the effect of test specimen size, there were 3 to 16 dB TL differences between 10.5 m2 and 1.875 m2 test specimens, and the larger test specimen has higher TL than the smaller test specimen. To study the effect of the reverberation time, to increase or decrease 1 second from the smaller specimen, the STC rating can vary from 3 to 6 dB. However, if the reverberation time decreases 4.9 seconds at 125 Hz in larger specimen, there was no effect of STC rating. Finally, to study the effect of using ASTM E90 and ISO 10140 measurement standards, there was only 1 to 3 dB TL difference. Both ASTM E413 and ISO 717-1 includes methods to calculate and report a single value of the measured sound transmission loss The rule that the total sum of the deficiencies should equal or not exceed 32 dB for their specified frequency bands are in both standards. The most important discovery of this research is that the rule of the 8-dB maximum deficiency from ASTM E413. As lightweight partition tends to have less desired TL at the lower frequency bands, the 8-dB maximum deficiency often occurred in this range. Thus, the partition with the STC rating of ASTM E413 has a more stringent sound reduction property than the RW rating of ISO 717. Thus, it is preferable for architects and acoustic consultants to use the STC rating to specify the lightweight partition for sound isolation purposes.

ABSTRACT-p.4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS-p.5
TABLE OF CONTENTS-p.6
LIST OF FIGURES-p.8
LIST OF TABLES-p.12
LIST OF EQUATIONS-p.13
INTRODUCTION-p.14
LITERATURE REVIEW-p.17
2.1 Lightweight partition systems-p.17
2.2 Calcium silicate board and metal stud-p.21
2.3 Transmission loss-p.22
2.4 Mass Law-p.23
2.5 Test method with ASTM E90-p.24
2.6 Test method with ISO 10140-p.30
2.7 Comparisons of ASTM E90 and ISO 10140-p.32
METHODS-p.33
3.1 Acoustical laboratory in NTUST-p.33
3.2 Measurement equipment and setup-p.35
3.3 Measurement procedures-p.39
3.4 Specification of test specimen-p.41
DATA ANALYSES AND RESULTS-p.47
4.1 Effectiveness of CSB layers-p.48
4.2 Effectiveness of ASTM and ISO measurement and classification methods-p.53
4.3 Effectiveness of Rockwool displacement-p.55
4.4 Effectiveness of specimen size-p.55
4.5 Effect of reverberation time-p.61
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE STUDY-p.65
5.1 Conclusion-p.65
5.2 Future study-p.66
REFERENCES-p.76
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH-p.78

1.Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of The Interior. (2013). Retrieved January 03, 2018, from http://www.telasia.net/cht/info/download/EEWH.pdf
2.ASTM Standard E90. (2016). Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements
3.ASTM E413. (2010). Classification for Rating Sound Insulation. ASTM International.
4.Chang, C.J., &Hsu, H.H. (2013). Analysis and Deliberation for Materials of Interior Boards of Frame and Dry Walls, International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Environmental Engineering (2013), 6
5.Institute for Research in Construction. (1997). Control of Sound Transmission through Gypsum Board Walls. Retrieved December 15, 2017 from https://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ctu-sc/files/doc/ctu-sc/ctu-n1_eng.pdf
6.ISO 10140. (2014). Acoustics- Laboratory measurement of sound insulation od building element.
7.ISO 717-1. (2013). Acoustics- Rating of sound insulation in buildings and building elements, Airborne sound insulation, 3.
8.Lamancusa, J.S. (2000). Transmission of sound through structures. Retrieved December 21, 2017 from http://www.mne.psu.edu/lamancusa/me458/9_trans.pdf
9.Sabine, W.C. (1922). Collected Papers on Acoustics. Retrieved November 21, 2017, from http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-RT60.htm
10.Model 831 Boucher. Retrieved December 15, 2017 from http://www.larsondavis.com/products/soundlevelmeters/Model831.aspx
11.Prance building material company. (2016, December 20). What is the difference between Calcium Silicate Board and Gypsum Board? Retrieved November 23, 2017, from http://www.prancebuilding.com/blog/2016/12/20/what-is-the-difference-between-calcium-silicate-board-and-gypsum-board/
12.USG Corporation. Ossature, 73. Retrieved December 21, 2017 from https://www.usg.com/content/dam/USG_Marketing_Communications/canada/product_promotional_materials/finished_assets/cgc-construction-handbook-ch02-framing-can-fr.pdf
13.Vitor, R, João P.S., & Vasco, G. (2016). ISO 16283 versus ISO 140, Retrieved December 24, 2017, from http://www.sea-acustica.es/fileadmin/Oporto16/116.pdf
14.Wu, J.X. (2009). Discussion for the material of partition system. Modern Construction Journal (359), 19-32. Retrieved November 21, 2017 from http://www.arch.net.tw/modern/month/359/359-1.htm
15.Wikipedia. (2017). Calcium Silicate. Retrieved December 21, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_Silicate
16.Warnock, A.C.C., & Quirt, J.D. (1997). Part 31 Airborne Sound Insulation. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control. 3rd edition, 5-6.
17.Yang, M.L.(2005). An Introduction of the Architectural Acoustics Laboratories in Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of Interior
18.Yao, R.L. (1992). The implementation of drywall method,15-17