跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.75) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/22 10:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林曉祺
研究生(外文):Hsiao-chi Lin
論文名稱:譜風險衡量指標之最佳投資組合─AR(1)及關連結構模型
論文名稱(外文):Optimal Portfolio Selection with Spectral Risk Measure under AR(1)-Copula Model
指導教授:黃士峰
指導教授(外文):Shih-feng Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄大學
系所名稱:統計學研究所
學門:數學及統計學門
學類:統計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:37
中文關鍵詞:關聯結構投資組合選擇譜風險衡量指標
外文關鍵詞:copulaportfolio selectionspectral risk measure
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:508
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:29
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文探討在譜風險衡量指標下最佳投資組合的選取問題,其中以一階自我相關模型為各個標的資產報酬建立時間序列模型,而標的資產報酬間的相依性藉由關聯結構函數來描述,並利用線性規劃來找出最佳的資產配置。實證研究本文藉由分析台灣50指數的成分股,觀察風險厭惡程度、股價報酬的自我相關以及股價報酬尾部相依性對選擇投資組合問題造成的影響。數值結果說明風險規避程度低的投資人於景氣好時可獲得較高的報酬,而經濟不景氣時保守的投資人相較於其他投資人可獲取較高的報酬。然而這個現象在股價報酬尾部相依性高時則不明顯。景氣復甦時,報酬的自我相關為負則風險規避程度低的投資人可獲得較高的報酬。
In this article, a portfolio selection problem with spectral risk measure is considered. The dynamics of the returns of each underlying asset is modeled by an autoregressive model of order 1. The tail dependence structure of the underlying asset-return vector is depicted by a copula function. The technique of linear programming is employed to solve the optimal asset allocation. Empirical studies are conducted for investigating the impact of the degree of risk aversion, the level of autocorrelation and the tail dependence for underlying assets on the portfolio selection problem based on the component stocks of the Taiwan 50 Index. Numerical results indicate that less risk aversion investors have higher income during a period of economic prosperity while conservative investments have less losses during a recession. However, these phenomena are unapparent if the tail dependence for underlying assets is large. In addition, a less risk aversion investment strategy receives higher earnings in an economic recovery if underlying returns are negatively autocorrelated.
Abstract(Chinese)...ii
Abstract(English)...iii
1 Introduction...1
2 Literature Review...3
2.1 Coherent measures of risk...3
2.2 Spectral measures of risk...5
2.3 Portfolio selection with SRM...6
2.4 Copula methods in finance...7
3 Models and Data...8
3.1 Methodology...8
3.2 Data source...10
4 Empirical Results...11
4.1 The impact of the magnitudes of risk aversion...11
4.2 The impact of autocorrelation...13
4.3 The impacts of heavy-tail and tail-dependence...14
5 Discuss and Future Works...16
[1] Acerbi, C. (2002). Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1505-1518.
[2] Acerbi, C. (2004). Coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. In Szego, G. (ed.), Risk Measures for the 21st Centry. Wiley.
[3] Acerbi, C., Simonetti, P. (2002). Portfolio optimization with spectral measures of risk. Working paper, Abaxbank, Italy.
[4] Acerbi, C., Tasche, D. (2002). On the coherence of expected shortfall. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1487-1503.
[5] Adam, A., Houkari, M., Laurent, J.-P. {2008}. Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1870-1882.
[6] Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9 (3), 203-208.
[7] Chabaane, A., Laurent, J.-P., Malevergne, Y. and Turpin, F. (2006). Alternative risk measures of alternative investments. Journal of Risk, 8, 1-32.
[8] Cherubini, U., Luciano, E. and Vecchiato, W. (2004). Copula Methods in Finance, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[9] Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Vanduffel, S. and Vyncke, D. (2004). Capital requirements, risk measures and comonotonicity. Belgian Actuarial Bulletin, 4, 53-61.
[10] Giamouridis, D. and Vrontos, I.D. (2007). Hedge fund portfolio construction: A comparison of static and dynamic approaches. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 199-217.
[11] Harris, R.D.F. and Mazibas, M. (2010). Dynamic hedge fund portfolio construction. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19, 351-357.
[12] Harris, R.D.F. and Mazibas, M. (2013). Dynamic hedge fund portfolio construction: A semi-parametric approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 139-149.
[13] Haslett, W. V. (2010). Risk Management : Foundations For a Changing Financial World, John Wiley & Sons.
[14] Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J. and Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4.
[15] Kroll, Y., Levy, H. and Markowitz, H.M. (1984). Mean-variance versus direct utility maximization, Journal of Finance, 39, 47-61.
[16] Kusuoka, S. (2001). On law invariance coherent risk measures. In: Kusuoka, S. and Maruyama, T. (eds.), Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol. 3. Springer, Japan, 83-95.
[17] Markowitz, H.M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77-91.
[18] Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[19] Markowitz, H.M. (1991). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
[20] Merton, R.C. (1972). An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. J. Finan. Quant. Anal., 7, 1851-1872.
[21] Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2 (3), 21-41.
[22] Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1443-1471.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top