跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/05 05:10
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:王玉昌
研究生(外文):Yu-Chang Wang
論文名稱:公司治理機制和自願性資訊揭露間之關連性實證分析-以法人說明會為例
論文名稱(外文):The Empirical Analysis of Association between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Voluntary Information Disclosure-Example for Conference Calls
指導教授:歐陽豪歐陽豪引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hou Ou-Yang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:崑山科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:54
中文關鍵詞:公司治理法人說明會偏離權
外文關鍵詞:Corporate governanceConference callsDivergence of Control-Cash Flow right
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:1069
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:165
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
造成2007年迄今的次貸危機,是引發全球經濟嚴重衰退和融資成本較高的原因之一,在於資訊揭露較不透明,且股權集中於控制股東,使得資訊不對稱之問題存在於控制股東與小股東之間,所產生之核心代理問題所致。本研究即在探討公司之董事會組成與股權結構對於事後是否召開法人說明會的意願與次數之影響。實證結果發現:當公司的控制股東控制權與現金流量權的偏離程度愈大時,管理當局反而較願意召開法人說明會,對召開法人說明會影響達顯著水準,此點是與過去的研究最大差異所在,並與金成隆等(2008)的實證結果不同。而控制股東之董事會席次比率與現金流量權間或控制股東之董事會席次比率與控制股東控制權間的偏離程度愈大時,管理當局較不願意召開法人說明會,由此可知,決定法人說明會招開與否的主要因素是控制股東成員擔任董事席次之比率;此外,當控制股東成員擔任董事席次比率愈高,管理當局為控制家族成員,同時董事長兼任總經理時,管理當局召開法人說明會的機率也愈低。顯示出控制股東的股權結構愈不偏離與掌控董事會程度愈高時,控制股東為掩飾其剝削小股東與債權人之行為,因此較不可能召開法人說明會,也使得公司的資訊揭露較不透明。而公司存在次大股東時,對公司召開法人說明會的機率亦不顯著,亦即,當公司存在次大股東時,對於公司揭露之政策未必有正面之影響。

One of the reasons incurred subprime loan crisis, triggered global economic recession, and high cost of financing from 2007 to date is due to low levels of corporate information transparency and are not motivated to disclose private information to the investing public. In addition, ownership concentrated on controlling shareholder, and they makes the agency conflicts arise between the controlling shareholder and minority shareholders. This problem of asymmetric information also called core agency problem. In this study, the main motives and purposes are discussed the effects of board of directors components and structure of ownership on whether managers will hold conference call and the frequency.We first explore the association between ownership structure and the likelihood of holding conference calls, an important medium for voluntary disclosure, in Taiwan. We examine whether firms are more likely to hold conference calls as the divergence rights owner decreases.The results showed that firms with greater divergence of control voting right minus cash flow rights, Instead, it appeal with more willing to hold conference call. While there is no significant effect of firms with greater divergence of control seats ratio minus cash flow right on the willing of holding conference call. Only control the divergence of control seats ratio minus cash flow rights is more likely to host voluntary conference calls. This finding is the biggest difference of the prioi study, and it is also differed with the empirical results of Chen-Lung Chin et. al.(2008). Next, we investigate the effect of the board composition on the decision to host conference calls. We extend prior literature on board effectiveness by exploring the effect of the proportion of board seats occupied by controlling family on the likelihood and the frequency of holding conference calls. Our empirical results show that the ratio of board seats controlling by control shareholder, managers are members of controlling family, and chairman of board of directors is also CEO, are all negatively related to the likelihood to host conference calls. It shows that the more deviation and controlling rights of controlling shareholder, the less the probability of holding conference calls, in order to disguise their exploitation on the interests of f minority shareholders.

目錄
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究動機 6
1.4 研究結果 7
1.5 研究貢獻 8
第二章 文獻回顧與研究假說 11
2.1 文獻探討 11
2.2 研究假說 12
第三章 研究設計與方法 16
3.1 樣本選取、資料來源與特性 16
3.2 研究設計與方法 19
3.3 研究變數 20
3.3.1 控制股東公司治理結構變數 20
3.3.2 其他控制變數 23
第四章 實證結果 30
4.1 單變量分析 30
4.2 相關分析 32
4.3 多變量迴歸分析 36
4.4 共線性之探討 43
第五章 結論 44
參考文獻 49
中文部分: 49
英文部分: 51
自述 54
表1 樣本公司是否召開法人說明會之產業分配表(2008年) 17
表2 為法人說明會召開次數年度分配表 18
表3 變數之敘述統計量 31
表4 法人說明會召開與否(CC)及法人說明會召開次數(N_CC)與各自變數之間的Pearson積差相關係數彙總表 34
表 5 公司治理結構與法人說明會是否召開之分析結果 39




企業亞洲網絡(Corporate Asia Network)和國際愛迪西公司(TechInsight Inc),(民93)。台灣地區上市上櫃投資人關係與資訊科技應用調查報告,http://www.techinsight.com.tw。
吳庭州,(民86)。「股權結構、盈餘管理與盈餘資訊性之研究」,輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳晉誠,(民94),「法人說明會與公司治理變數對分析師盈餘預測影響之研究」,淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
李建然與蔡幸儒,(民91),「法人說明會之資訊內涵及影響管理當局召開的動機」,Working paper。
沈中華與林昆立,(民97),「公司治理對基本財務資訊與股票報酬關係的影響:內生性轉換模型之應用」,管理評論 第27 卷,第2 期,1-27
周建新與林宗得,(民94),「資訊透明度對企業價值增額解釋能力之研究」,會計與公司治理,第二卷 第二期,25-46。
林玉霞,(民91),「臺灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究」,中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
金城隆,林美鳳與梁家紋,(民97),「公司治理結構和法人說明會之關聯性研究」,管理學報,第25卷,2期,221-243。
翁淑育,(民89),「台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究」,私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
許崇源,李怡宗,林宛瑩與鄭桂蕙,(民92),「控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上) 」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,7月,頁15-31。
許崇源,李怡宗,林宛瑩與鄭桂蕙,(民92),「控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(下) 」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,9月,頁11-26。
陳令軒,(民91),「台積聯電促以法說會取代財測-法人:高風險產業提財測反將誤導投資人甚至淪為炒作股票工具」,經濟日報,2002/07/24,22 版。
游靚怡,(民93),「初次上市(櫃)公司召開法人說明會動機之研究」,台北大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
葉銀華,(民91),「台灣公司治理的問題與改革之道」,證券暨期貨管理,20:11,頁1-16。
葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩,(民91),「公司治理與評等系統」,台北,商智文化。
葉銀華、蘇裕惠、柯承恩與李德冠,(民92),「公司治理機制對於關係人交易的影響」,證券市場發展季刊,第15 卷第4 期,頁69-106。
蔡幸儒,(民91),「法人說明會資訊內涵及影響管理當局召開行為動機之研究」,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
賴柏錚,(民92)。「不同型態法人說明會資訊內涵之差異及法人說明會之資訊公平性研究」,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
英文部分:
Agrawal, A. (1990). Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Cost, and OwnershipControl: The Case of All-Equity Firms. Journal Offinance 45:1325-1331.
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson.(1986).Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 17: 223-249.
Baginski, S. P., J. M. Hassell and M. D. Kimbrough.(2004). Why Do Managers Explain Their Earnings Forecasts? .Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 1-29.
Botosan, C. A.(1997). Disclosure Level and the Cost OfEquity Capital. Accounting Review, 72, 323-349.
Botosan, C. A. and M. Plumlee.(2002).A Re-examinationof Disclosure Level and the Expected Cost of EquityCapital. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 21-40.
Bowen, R. M., A. K. Matsumoto and D. A. Matsumoto.(2002).Do Conference Call Affect Analyst’s Forecast.The Accounting Review, 77(2), 285-316.
Bushee, B. J., D. A, Matsumoto, and G. S., Miller.(2003).Open vs. Closed Conference Call: The Determinantsand Effects of Broadening Access to Disclosure.Journal of Economics, February, 149-180.
Byard, D., and K.W. Shaw.(2002).Corporate disclosure quality and properties of analyst’s information environment. working paper, SSRN.
Chang, S. J.(2003) .Ownership Structure, Expropriation,and Performance of Group-affiliated Companies in Korea.Academy o Management Journal, 46(2),238.
Chin, C., K, Gary, P. P. Lee. and M.F. Lin.( 2006).Corporate Ownership Structure and Accuracy andBias of Mandatory Earnings Forecast: Evidence fromTaiwan.Journal of International Accounting Research, 5(2), 41-62.
Chin, C. L., G. Kleinman, P. Lee and M. Lin.( 2006).Corporate Ownership Structure and Accuracy and Bias of Mandatory Earnings Forecast: Evidence from Taiwan.Journal of International Accounting Research, 5(2), 41-62.
Claessens, S. and J. P. H. Fan.( 2003). Corporate Governance in Asia: A survey. Working Paper.
Cleassens, S., S., Djankov and L. H. P., Lang.(2000). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations.Journal of Finance Economics, 58,81-112.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang.(1999), “ Expropriation on Minority Shareholders:Evidence from East Asia. Policy Research”, Working Paper 2088, The World Bank.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang.( 2002). Disentangling the Incentive and EntrenchmentEffects of Large Shareholdings. Journal of Finance,57, 2741-2771.
Copeland, T. E. and D. Galai.( 1983).Information Effects on the Bid-Ask Spread.The Journal of Finance 38:1457-1469.
Cronqvist, H. and M. Nilsson.(2003).Agency Costs of Controlling Minority Shareholders.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 695-719.
Diamond, D. and R. Verrecchia.(1991). Disclosure, Liquidity and the Cost of Equity Capital.Journal of Finance, 1325-1360.
Fan, P. H. and T. J. Wong.(2002).Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23, 401-425.
Feng, M.(2005).Why Do Managers Meet Earnings Forecasts in Equilibrium? Working Paper,University of Pittsburgh. Frankel, R., M., Johnson and D. J., Skinner, 1999. An Empirical Examination of Conference Calls as a Voluntary Disclosure Medium.Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 133-150.
Greene, W. H.(2000).Econometric analysis.4th ed, New York, CA: Sage Publications.
Haw, I. M., B. B. Hu, L. S. Hwang and W. Wu.(2004).Ultimate Ownership, Income Management, and Legal and Extra-legal Institutions. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 423-426.
Helay, P.M., A.P. Hutton, and K.G. Paleau.(1999).Stock performance and intermediation changes surroundings sustained increase in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research 16(3) : 485-520.
Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu.(1993). The effects of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices.Accounting Horizons March : 1-11.
Healy, P. M. and K. G. Palepu.(2001).Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics,31, 405-440.
Heflin, F., K.W. Shaw, and J. Wild.( 2001). Disclosure quality and market liquidity. working paper, SSRN.
Jensen, M. and W. Meckling.( 1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Joh, S.W., (2003). Corporate Governance and Firm Profitability: Evidence from Korea before theEconomic Crisis. Journal of Financial Economics,68(2), 287-322.
Jung, K., and S. Y., Kwon .(2002). Ownership Structure and Earnings Informativeness: Evidence from Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 301-325.
Lang, M., and R. Lundholm.(1993).Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research (31)”, 246-71.
Lang, M. H. and R. Lundholm. .(1996). Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior.The Accounting Review, 467-492.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer.(1999). Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny.( 2002). Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147-1170.
Lemmon, M. L. and K. V. Lins.( 2003). Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 58, 1445-1468.
Lev, B. and P. Zarowin. (1999 ).The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them.Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353-385.
Leftwich, R.W., R. L.Watts and J. L. Zimmerman. (1981). Voluntary Corporate Disclosure: The Case of Interim Reporting Studies on standardization on accounting practice. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 50-77.
Leuz, C., D. Nanda and P. D. Wysocki. (2003). Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison.Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 505–527.
Lins, K. V. (2003). Equity Ownership and Firm Value in Emerging Markets, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 159-184.
Miller, G., Piotroski, J. (2000 ).Fordward-looking earnings statements: determinants and market response. Working paper.
Sànchez-Ballesta, J. and E. Garcìa-Meca. (2007).Ownership Structure, Discretionary Accruals and the Informativeness of Earnings.Corporate Governance : An International Review, 15, pp.677-691.
Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny. (1997). A survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53,737-783.
Skinner, D. J.(1994). Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 38-60.
Sunder, S.V.(2002). Investor Access to Conference Call Disclosures: Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Information Asymmetry. Working Paper.
Tasker, S.(1998). Bridging the Information Gap: Quarterly Conference Calls as a Medium for Voluntary Disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies, 137-167.
Verrecchia, R. E.( 1999). Disclosure and the Cost of Capital: A Discussion. Journal of Accounting andEconomics, 26, 271-283.
Yeh, Y. H. and T. S. Lee.( 2002). Corporate Governanceand Corporate Equity investments: Evidence from Taiwan. The 9th Global Finance Conference, Beijing,China.
Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee and T. Woidtke.(2001). FamilyControl and Corporate Governance: Evidence form Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2, 21-48.
Yeo, G. H. H., P. M. Tan, K. W. Ho and S. S. Chen.(2002).Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings.Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29, 1023-1046.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top