跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.213) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/08 14:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:Kuan Chun Huang
研究生(外文):Kuan Chun Huang
論文名稱:National Intellectual Capital of Malawi
論文名稱(外文):National Intellectual Capital of Malawi
指導教授:蔡馥陞蔡馥陞引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fu-Sheng Tsai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:管理碩博士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:41
外文關鍵詞:intellectual capitalnational wealthnational capitalintangible assetseconomic growth
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:160
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Intellectual capital is defined as ‘intellectual material – such as knowledge, information, intellectual property, experience – than can be put to use to create wealth’. The measurement of intellectual capital can be located in the micro (organization) level as well as in the macro (national or regional) level. This is a descriptive study on the intellectual capital of Malawi (Central Africa) where data was collected on the five types of national capital; these include human capital, market capital, process capital, renewal capital and financial capital. The aim of this study is to paint a clearer picture of the conditions regarding Malawi’s intangible assets in the hopes that the research can increase Malawi’s economic growth. Due to the large number of developing countries within Africa, a study that analyzes its national wealth (macro level) and the factors that may affect national competition will be quite important in assisting the decision-making from internal (government) and external (foreign) aid. This research can as well benefit the county’s policy reforms. Policy reforms in any country will impact the economic growth of a country, therefore if we analyze the factors affecting the country’s growth we can find solutions by changing the policy to ensure a competitive advantage. This study uses the research framework and methodology taken from another published work on Intellectual capital with slight modifications due to difficulties encountered during the data collection process. Based on the results of this study, suggestions and limitations of the research are presented to ensure an improved research for the any future research.

Acknowledgements I
Abstract II
List of Tables IV
List of Figures V
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1. Research Background 6
1.2. Problem Statement and Research Objectives 8
1.3. Research Significance 9
Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10
2.1 Development Of National Intellectual Capital: Background and Obstacles 10
2.2 The Current National Intellectual Capital Measurement Models 12
2.3 The Main Models Used For Measuring IC of Nations 13
2.4 The Measurements Proposed by Regional or World Development Organizations
 15
2.4.1 The World Bank’s Knowledge Assessment Methodologies and Scorecards 15
2.4.2 The OECD Measurement Models for National Intellectual Capital 16
2.4.3 The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Model 16
Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY 17
3.1 Research Design 17
3.2 Measurement of Indicators 21
3.3 Process for Data Collection 24
Chapter 4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 25
4.1 Statistical Analysis for Missing Value Input & GDP Logarithm 25
4.2 Interpretations of Descriptive Data 27
Chapter 5 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 36
5.1 Research Summary 36
5.2 Theoretical and Practical Implications 37
5.3 Research Limitations 37
5.4 Suggestions for Future Research 37
References 38

Bontis, N. (2004). ‘National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.13–39.
Carr, N.G. (2003). ‘IT doesn’t matter’, Harvard Business Review, pp.41–49.
Collins, J. (2001). ‘Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolve’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp.67–76.
Edvinsson, L., and M.S. Malone. (1997)a. Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by defining its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Business.
Garcia-Ayuso, M. (2003)a. Intangibles: Lessons from the past and a look into the future. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(4): 597-604.
Jarehov, M., and C. Stenfelt. (1998). IC on National level, Stockholm University, Market Academy, Master thesis.
Klein, P.A. (2000)a. National statistics, portrait of the value floor. Journal of Economy Issues 34: 445–452.
Malhotra, Y. (2000). ‘Knowledge assets in the global economy: assessment of national intellectual capital’, Journal of Global Information Management, July–September, pp.5–15.
Malhotra, Y. (2003). Managing and measuring knowledge assets in the public sector. Working paper, Syracuse University.
Nolan. A. (2011). ‘New Sources of Growth: Intangible assets’, Updated September, 2011, from http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/46349020.pdf
OECD. (2001)a. The wellbeing of nations: The role of human and social capital. Center for educational research and innovation research paper. Paris: OECD.
Pasher, E. (1999). The Intellectual Capital of the State of Israel, Herzlia Pituach: Kal Press.
Pasher, E., and S. Shachar. (2007). The intellectual capital of the state of Israel: 60 years of achievement. http://www.moital.gov.il/ic.
Pomeda, J.R., Moreno, C.M., Rivera, C.M. and Martil, L.V. (2002). ‘Towards an intellectual capital report of Madrid: new insights and developments, presented at “The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles”’, Madrid, Spain, 25–26 November.
Saruaorg. (2016). Saruaorg. Retrieved 27 May, 2016, from http://www.sarua.org/files/publications/ST_country_Malawi.pdf.
Spring Project (2002). http://cordis.europa.eu/data/PROJ_FP5/ACTIONeqDndSESSIONeq21722200595ndDOCeq104ndTBLeqEN_PROJ.htm.
Steward, T.A. (1997)a. Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Nicholas Brealey.
Unescoorg. (2016). Unescoorg. Retrieved 27 May, 2016, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/sti-policy/country-studies/mongolia/
United National Development Programme (UNDP). (2000). Survey of economic and social development in the ESCWA region 1999–2000. United National Development Programme Research Paper. New York, NY.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2003). Status of and Trends in the Development of E-Government, New York, NY.
Weziak, D. (2007). Measurement of national intellectual capital application to EU countries. http:// www.ceps.lu/pdf/11/art1294.pdf.
World Bank (1998). World Development Report: Knowledge for Development, Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2001)a. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank (2002). ‘The knowledge assessment’, Methodology and Scoreboards, http://www1.worldbank.org.
World Bank. (2013). Malawi - Public expenditure review. Public Expenditure Review (PER). Washington DC : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/11/19230252/malawi-public-expenditure-review
Worldbankorg. (2016). Worldbankorg. Retrieved 26 May, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/country/malawi
Worldbankorg. (2016). Worldbankorg. Retrieved 27 May, 2016, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/Resources/226300-1279680449418/HigherEd_MongoliaSkillsReport.pdf.
Yan. S. (2015). ‘China is spending billions in Africa’, CNN Money, First published December 3, 2015, from http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/03/news/economy/china-investing-africa/

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊