臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究利用兩種學習理論：人類連結記憶模式與適應性網絡模式，來解釋消費者是透過何種方式來學習品牌與屬性這兩種產品線索，以及如何利用產品線索建立預測系統。本研究採用實驗設計的方式進行研究，藉著操弄產品線索出現的次數與順序，來觀察消費者在不同情況下的學習過程是否也有所差異，也希望能藉此了解品牌與屬性在消費者的學習過程中是否擁有不同的權重。此外，本研究另一個目的為藉由實驗的操弄觀察消費者在延伸產品上的品質評價，並進一步得知品牌權益的變動與延伸，
本研究發現，在品牌與屬性資訊同時出現的情況下，消費者會傾向使用屬性來預測產品品質。這證實了消費者在學習過程中是以邏輯為基礎的觀點來學習如何預測產品品質。但若是讓消費者先學習到品牌與品質間的連結關係之後，消費者便會增加品牌的預測能力，進而建立品牌權益。因此本研究建議廠商在安排產品資訊時，可以利用這種阻礙效應，先將品牌名稱與產品價值的連結曝露給消費者，讓消費者先建立品牌與品質間的連結，才不會使品牌權益被產品屬性稀釋掉，也有利於廠商更進一步的建立品牌忠誠度或推出延伸產品。

We try to explain how consumers learn the two predict cues, brand and attribute, and how they develop the predict system on the basis of two learning theories: Human Associative Memory (HAM) and Adaptive Network Model. We use experimental design to observe if learning process will be different in different situations by manipulating the frequency and order of predictive cues. And we also want to know whether brand and attribute have different weight in the learning process. Besides, another purpose of this thesis is to examine the variation of brand equity and brand extension in quality evaluation of extension category.
We find that consumers tend to predict product quality by attributes if brand and attribute information come together. It proves that consumers assess predictiveness and causality through normative causal-reasoning processes. But consumers will add brand predictiveness and then brand equity is built after preexposure of the relationship of brand and quality. Because of blocking effect, we suggest firms can expose the linkage of brand name and product evaluation to consumers first, then brand equity will not be diluted by attribute equity. Furthermore, firms will be advantageous to develop brand loyalty and brand extension.

中文摘要 …………………………………........................................…… i
英文摘要 …………………………............................................………… ii
銘謝 ………………………………...…………………………….……… iii
目錄 ………………………………...…………………………….……… iv
表目錄 …………………………………………………………………… v
圖目錄 …………………………………………………………………… v

第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究問題與研究目的 …………………………………… 2
第二章 文獻回顧 ……………………………………………………… 4
第一節 記憶的連接模型 …………………………………………. 4
第二節 擴散促動理論 ……………………………………………. 5
第三節 人類連結記憶模式 ……………………………………… 6
第四節 適應性網絡模式 ………………………………………… 7
第五節 兩種模型的比較與先前的研究 ………………………… 9
第六節 品牌權益與品牌延伸 ……………………………………. 11
2. 6-1 品牌權益的定義 …………………………………….. 11
2. 6-2 品牌延伸的定義 ……………………………………… 12
2. 6-3 消費者的學習過程對品牌延伸的影響 ……………… 13
第三章 研究方法 ……………………………………………………… 15
第一節 研究框架與研究假設 …………………………………… 15
3. 1-1 品牌與屬性間的關係 ………………………………… 15
3. 1-2 阻礙效應的存在 ……………………………………… 16
3. 1-3 加入屬性對品牌權益以及延伸產品的影響 ……….. 17
第二節 實驗設計 ……………………………………….………… 17
3. 2-1 目標產品與實驗樣本 ………………………………… 17
3. 2-2 實驗架構與實驗設計 ………………………………… 18
3. 2-3 變數的定義與衡量 …………………………………… 23
第四章 研究結果 ……………………………………………………… 25
第一節 統計分析方法 ……………………………………………. 25
第二節 樣本結構 …………………………………………………. 25
第三節 全部樣本檢定 ……………………………………………. 26
第四節 品牌與屬性間的關係 ……………………………………. 28
第五節 阻礙效應的存在 …………………………………………. 29
第六節 加入屬性對品牌權益以及延伸產品的影響 …………… 30
第五章 結論與建議 ………………………………………………….. 32
第一節 結論與討論 ………………………………………………. 32
第二節 貢獻與建議 ………………………………………………. 34
第三節 研究限制 …………………………………………………. 35
第四節 後續研究建議 …………………………………………. 36
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………… 38
附錄：正式實驗的學習過程與問卷設計 ……………………………… 40

1. Aaker, David A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: Free Press.
2. Anderson, John R. and Gordon H. Bower (1973), Human Associative Memory, New York: Halstead.
3. Anderson, John R. (1983), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (June), 261-295.
4. Anderson, John R. (1993), Rules of the Mind, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Anderson, John R. and Christian Lebiere (1998), The Atomic Components of Thought, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bergen, Mark, Shantanu Dutta, and Steven M. Shugan (1996), “Brand Variants: A Retail Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (February), 9-19.
7. Brown, Christina L. and Gregory S. Carpenter (2000), “Why Is the Trivial Important? A Reasons-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice.” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 372-385.
8. Cheng, Patricia W. and Laura R. Novick (1992), “Covariation in Natural Causal Induction,” Psychological Review, 99 (April), 365-392.
9. Collins, A. M. and Loftus, E. F. (1975) “A Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,” Psychological Review, 82, 407-425.
10. Gluck, Mark A. and Gordon H. Bower (1988), “From Conditioning to Category Learning: An Adaptive Network Model,” Journal of experimental Psychology: General, 117 (September), 227-247.
11. Hebb D O. (1949), The organization of behavior, New York:Wiley.
12. Hoch, Stephen J. and John Deighton (1989), “Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 1-20.
13. Hutchinson, J. Wesley and Joseph W. Alba (1991), “Ignoring Irrelevant Information: Situational Determinants of Consumer Learning,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (December), 325-345.
14. Janiszewski, Chris and Stijn M. J. van Osselaer (2000), “A Connectionist Model of Brand-Quality Association,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (August), 331-350.
15. Kamin, Leon J. (1969), “Predictability, Surprise, Attention, and Conditioning,” in Punishment and Aversive Behavior, ed. Byron A. Campbell and Russell M. Church, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 279-296.
16. Keller, Kevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 1-22.
17. Keller, Kevin Lane (1998), “Brand Knowledge Structures,” in Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 86-129.
18. Kotler, P. (1994), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th, ed. New Jersey: Pretice Hall International, Inc.
19. Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management, New Jersey: Pretice Hall International, Inc.
20. Lasser, W., Mittal, B. and Sharma, A. (1995), "Measuring customer-base brand Equity", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12 (No.4), 11-20.
21. Park, C. W., Milberg, S. and Lawson, R. (1991), “Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (September), 11-20
22. Pearce, John M. and Mark E. Bouton (2001), “Theories of Associative Learning in Animals,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 111-139.
23. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). “A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement,” Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 64–99.
24. Shanks, David R. (1994), “Human Associative Learning,” in Animal Learning and Cognition, ed. N. J. Mackintosh, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 335-374.
25. Shanks, David R., Douglas L. Medin, and Keith J. Holyoak, eds. (1996), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 34, Causal Learning, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. Tauber, E. M. (1981), “Brand Franchise Extension: New Product Benefits from Existing Brand Names,” Business Horizons, 24(2), 36-41.
27. Teas, R Kenneth and Grapentine, Terry H. (1996), “Demystifying brand equity,” Marketing Research, Iss. 2(Summer), 24-29.
28. van Osselaer, Stijn M. J. and Joseph W. Alba (2000), “Consumer Learning and Brand Equity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (June), 1-16.
29. van Osselaer, Stijn M. J. and Chris Janiszewski (2001), “Two Ways of Learning Brand Associations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (September), 202-223.
30. van Osselaer, Stijn M. J. and Joseph W. Alba (2003), “Locus of Equity and Brand Extension,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (March), 539-550.
31. Waldmann, Michael R. and Keith J. Holyoak (1992), “Predictive and Diagnostic Learning within Causal Models: Asymmetries in Cue Competition,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 121 (June), 222-236.
32. Young, Michael E. (1995), “On the Origin of Personal Causal Theories,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2 (March), 83-104.