跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.54) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/12 13:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:施茗棋
論文名稱:互動式超媒體之分段動畫結合Novak概念圖之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Interactive Hypermedia Combining Novak Concept Maps with Segmented Animation
指導教授:黃華山黃華山引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:113
中文關鍵詞:Novak概念圖互動式超媒體分段式動畫混成式學習
外文關鍵詞:Novak concept mapsinteractive hypermediasegmented animationblended learning
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:314
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要是探討互動式超媒體之分段式動畫結合Novak概念圖的混成式學習,其對學習者之學習成效、認知負荷、學習動機以及學習滿意度之影響。
本研究採用準實驗法進行探究,以高中一年級三個班共105名受測者作為研究樣本,並分別建置傳統式數位學習、圖文Novak概念圖以及互動式分段動畫Novak概念圖等三組的數位學習教材進行學習實驗。
研究結果顯示,互動式超媒體之分段動畫結合Novak概念圖的混成式學習,相對其他兩種學習方式,不僅可減輕了學習者的認知負荷問題,而在學習成效、學習動機以及學習滿意度方面,亦顯著優於其他兩種學習方式。

The main concept for this study is to link up interactive hypermedia with Novak concept maps, and use segmented animations to characterize the knowledge. The purpose of this research is to compare the effects, extraneous cognitive load, motive and the degree of satisfaction from different ways of learning.
The Quasi-experiment method was used for this research, taking samples from 105 senior high students in their first grade. We did the learning experiment by building traditional e-learning platforms, graphic Novak concept map and Novak concept map with interactive segmented animations.
The results show that interactive hypermedia animation Novak concept map not only improved the cognitive load, but also to effectively enhance the learners' learning, motivation and learning satisfaction.

目 錄
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
致 謝 III
目 錄 IV
圖索引 VI
表索引 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍與限制 5
第四節 研究架構與研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 NOVAK概念圖 8
第二節 互動式超媒體 15
第三節 分段動畫 21
第四節 學習成效 25
第五節 認知負荷理論 27
第六節 學習動機 32
第七節 學習滿意度 35
第三章 研究方法 38
第一節 研究設計 38
第二節 研究架構與研究變項定義 39
第三節 研究假說 43
第四節 研究樣本 45
第五節 學習教材設計 45
第六節 實驗設計與流程 55
第七節 實驗工具 58
第八節 研究工具 60
第四章 實驗結果與分析 63
第一節 不同學習方式對學習成效的前測之影響 63
第二節 各構面定義與信效度分析 66
第三節 不同學習方式針對整體各個構面 68
第四節 不同學習方式與各個構面之事後分析 73
第五節 研究結果彙整 82
第六節 研究發現 88
第五章 結論與未來展望 89
第一節 研究結論 89
第二節 研究限制與未來展望 92
參考文獻 93
附錄A 【學習成效前測驗試題】 106
附錄B 【學習成效後測驗試題】 108
附錄C 【學習動機問卷測驗試題】 110
附錄D 【認知負荷問卷測驗試題】 111
附錄E 【學習滿意度問卷測驗試題】 112


圖索引
圖1-1 研究流程圖 7
圖2-1 概念圖範例 9
圖2-2 超媒體資料庫 18
圖2-3 傳統與非線性連接文件方式 19
圖2-4 認知負荷成因與評估要素圖 29
圖3-1 研究架構圖 40
圖3-2 圖文NOVAK概念圖之解說頁面 48
圖3-3 實驗流程圖 57


表3-1 學習實驗人數分配 45
表3-2 傳統式數位教學教材之學習主畫面 46
表3-3 圖文NOVAK概念圖之學習主畫面 49
表3-4 互動式分段動畫NOVAK概念圖之解說頁面 51
表3-5 互動式動畫NOVAK概念圖之學習主畫面 52
表3-6 實驗設計模式 55
表3-7 本研究之學習實驗活動與內容 56
表4-1 前測測驗變異數分析之描述性統計 64
表4-2 前測成績變異數同質性測試 64
表4-3 前測成績ANOVA檢定 65
表4-4 構面與個子構面之定義 66
表4-5 各構面之子構面信度分析 67
表4-6 各構面信度分析 68
表4-7整體各個構面描述性統計資料 69
表4-8 BOX'S 共變異數矩陣等式檢定 70
表4-9 LEVENE單變項變異數檢定 70
表4-10多變量顯著性考驗 71
表4-11 MANOVA多變量的F檢定 72
表4-12後測成績SCHEFFE多重比較 73
表4-13認知負荷SCHEFFE多重比較 76
表4-15學習滿意度SCHEFFE多重比較 80
表4-16 假說檢定結果彙整 82

參考文獻
一、 中文部分
多媒體和超媒體(無日期)。多媒體緒論。取自http://mail.tku.edu.tw/ccchen34/2012_01_%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E7%AB%A0_new.pdf
江玥蘋(2009)。探討影響大學生學習成效的重要因素(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。
江南輝(2003)。探究超媒體課程與學習者學習迷失之關係。師說,174,39-42。
何榮桂、計惠卿、朱延平(1995)。CAI課程軟體編製技術參考手冊。台北市:教育部。
宋冠郁(2005)。以「概念圖」為主之教材呈現方式對自然科學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,桃園縣。
宋涵鈺(2012)。基於學習風格之適性化遊戲學習模式對學習成就與動機之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,台北市。
李文卿(2012)。行政效能知覺與學習滿意度之相關研究—以某補習班為例(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學,台中市。
施嘉桓(2007)。概念圖與認知型態對數位學習成效影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
洪佩雲(2006)。概念圖教學在國中生數學合作學習成效之研究─以「二元一次方程式的圖形」為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
徐欣瑩(2003)。兒童生命教育網路學習素材之研發與評鑑研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
張家豪(2008)。不同測驗類型融入超媒體學習環境對國小學童自我調整學習和閱讀成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
張霄亭(2002)。教學媒體與學習科技。台北市:雙葉書廊。
陳欣宜(2010)。代數與幾何概念圖教學對國中生數學學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
陳韋銘(2005)。生涯規劃課程學習檔案的教學實踐(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
陳涵青(2006)。淺談學習動機。翰林文教月訊,37,10-14。
陳嘉成(1998)。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。國立政治大學教育與心理研究會,21,107-128。
陳碩琳(2003)。目標導向、學習滿意度與學習績效關係之研究-以國立空中大學高雄學習指導中心為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
喬慰萱、林泰州(譯)(2000)。動畫技巧百科(原作者:Richard Taylor)。台北市:遠流出版社。
曾育慧(2011)。超媒體模態對閱讀行為及理解的影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
黃國禎(2012)。數位學習的研究議題、策略與工具。取自:http://idols.easylearn.org:41402/twelf2012/Gwo-Jen_Hwang.pdf
黃達三(2006)。概念圖在科學教學上的應用。研習資訊,3(4),75-86。
黃靜儀(2010)。不同人格特質、學習壓力及學習滿意度之相關研究-以嘉義市國中表演藝術課為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣體學院,台北市。
楊慧珍(2012)。運用概念圖策略於國小高年級學童閱讀教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學教育系,臺東市。
廖佩芬(2011)。國小四年級學童在不同分組對談中建構科學概念圖之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
劉俊庚(2002)。迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析-以概念構圖和後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
蔡謹韓(2013)。漸進式提示策略對行動學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺灣科技大學,台北市。
駐芝加哥辦事處教育組(2013)。認識MOOCs。教育部電子報。取自http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=12344 (電子報)
薛雅明、徐玉瓊(2005)。自我調整學習策略與學習者控制在超媒體互動環境之應用研究。嘉南學報,31(1),345-336.
簡貞玉(譯)(2008)。員工訓練與能力發展(原作者:Noe, R. A.)。台北市:五南圖書。
羅希哲、溫漢儒、曾國鴻(2007)。概念構圖融入電腦輔助教學法應用於綜合高中學生化學科之學習成效及態度之研究。科學教育學刊,15(2),169-194。
蘇家賢(2001)。網路超媒體暨互動式演算法動畫對演算法學習成效影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,桃園縣。
龔雅雯(1995)。超大型分散式超本文/超媒體系統之探究。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊,1(3),29-44。 

二、 原文部份
Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A. (2007). Effects of various user-controlled animation strategy courseware on the students Cognitive and Retention Skills. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Ausubel , D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Education psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart &; Winston.
Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C., &; Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25(2), 348-353.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., Portrat, S., Vergauwe, E., &; Camos, V. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 570-585.
Bétrancourt, M., Dillenbourg, P., &; Clavien, L. (2008). Display of key pictures from animation: Effects on learning. In J. F. Rouet, R. Lowe &; W. Schnotz (Eds.), Understanding multimedia documents (pp. 61-78). New York: Springer.
Borsook, T. K., &; Higginbotham-wheat, N. (1991). Intevactivity: What is it and what can it do for computev-based instruction?. Educational Technology, 3(10), 11-17.
Carolyn Yang, Y. T., Chang, Y. C., Li, L. Y. &; Tseng, S. S.(2013). A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers &; Education, 63(2), 285-305.
Chaudhuri, A., &; Behan, P. O. (2004). Fatigue in neurological disorders. The Lancet, 363, 978-988.
Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, Wei, C. W., &; Chen, H. J. (2008). Mining e-Learning Domain Concept Map from Academic Articles. Computers &; Education, 50(3), 1009-1021.
Chen, S., &; Chen, A. (2012). Youth physical activity behavior and energy-balance knowledge: an expectancy-value perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(4), 329-343.
Cheng, C. H., &; Su, C. H. (2012). A game-based learning system for improving student’s learning effectiveness in system analysis course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 669-675. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.122
Chiou, C. C. (2008).The effect of concept mapping on students' learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375-387
Chiou, C.C., Lee, L. T., &; Liu, T.Q, (2012). Effect of Novak Colorful Concept Map with Digital Teaching Materials on Student Academic Achievement. Computers &; Education, 64(9), 192-201.
Chou, C. (2003). Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 265-279.
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., &; Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load?. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 315-324.
Clark, R. C., &; Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Fransico: Pfeiffer.
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., &; Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Pfeiffer, Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Hoboken, NJ.
Cliburn, J. W. (1986). Using concept maps to sequence instructional materials. Journal of College Science Teaching, 15(4), 377-379.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 2(9), 17-41.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87-114.
Dickey, M. D. (2006). Game design narrative for learning: appropriating adventure game design narrative devices and techniques for the design of interactive learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 245-263.
Duchastel. P. (1990). Examining cognitive processing in hypermedia usage. In Hypermedia, 2(3). 221-233.
Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci, &; W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199-210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., &; Midgley, C. (1983 ). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp.75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Feiz, P., Hooman, H. A., &; Kooshki, S. (2013). Assessing the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in Iranian Students: Construct Validity and Reliabilitys. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(9), 1820-1825.
Fong, S. F. (2000). The effect of animation on learning of procedural knowledge of meiosis among students with different psychological profiles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Fong, S. F. (2013). Effects of Segmented Animated graphics among students of different spatial ability levels: A Cognitive load perspective. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 89-96.
Fong, S. F., Lily, L. P. L., &; Por, F. P. (2012). Reducing Cognitive Overload Among Students of Different Anxiety Levels Using Segmented Animation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1448-1456
Hofer, B. (2006). Motivation in the college classroom. In W. J. McKeachie &; M. Svinicki (Eds.), McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M., &; Albert, D. (2008). Dynamic Media in Computer Science Education; Content complexity and learning performance: Is less more?. Educational Technology &; Society, 11(1), 279-290.
Hsu, L. L., &; Hsieh, S. I. (2005). Concept maps as an assessment tool in a nursing course. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(3), 141-149.
Huang, H. S., Chiou, C. C., Chiang, H. K., Lai, S. H., Huang, C. Y., &; Chou, Y. Y. (2012). Effects of multidimensional concept maps on fourth graders' learning in web-based computer course. Computers &; Education, 58(3), 863-873.
Huang, W.H., Huang, W.Y., &; Tschopp, J. (2010).Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: the relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Computers &; Education, 55(3), 289-297.
Hudspeth, D. (1997). Testing learner outcomes in web-based instruction. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp.353-356). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Chen, N. S., &; Ho, H. J. (2014). Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students' learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers &; Education, 71, 77-86.
Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., chen, N. S., &; Ho, H. J.(2014). Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students' learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers &; Education, 71, 77-86.
Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., &; Wang, S. Y.(2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers &; Education, 69, 121-130.
Hwanga, G. J., Wub, P. H., &; Kec, H. R. (2011). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers &; Education, 57(4), 2272-2280.
Jarc, D. J. (1999). Assessing the benefits of interactivity and the influence of learning styles on the effectiveness of Algorithm animation using Web-based Data Structures courseware (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from the George Washington University database.
Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., &; Okebukola, P. A. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students’ anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951-960.
Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., &; Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), 356-369.
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., &; Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers &; Education, 62, 149-158.
Kamble, S. K., &; Tembe, B. L. (2013). The Effect of Use of Concept Maps on Problem Solving Performance and Attitude in Mechanical Engineering Course. Computers &; Education, 83(4), 748-754.
Kramarski, B., &; Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24-33
Kwon, S. Y., &; Cifuentes, L. C. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers &; Education, 52(2), 365-375.
Lee, W., Chiang, C. C., Liao, I. C., Lee, M. L., Chen, S. L., &; Liang, T. (2013). The longitudinal effect of concept map teaching on critical thinking of nursing students. Computers &; Education, 33(10), 1219-1223.
Liaw, S. S., &; Huangb, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers &; Education, 60(1), 14-24.
Lin, C. F., Hung, Y. H., Chang, R. I., &; Hung, S. H. (2014). Developing a problem-solving learning system to assess the effects of different materials on learning performance and attitudes. Computers &; Education, 71, 50-66.
Liu, C. C., Chen, H. S. L., Shih, J. L., Huang, G. T., &; Liu, B. J. (2011). An enhanced concept map approach to improving children’s storytelling ability. Computer &; Education, 56, 873-884.
Liu, Chen, &; Chang, (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers &; Education, 54(2), 436-445.
Liu, P. L. (2011). A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing. Computers &; Education, 57(4), 2548-2558.
Malone, J., &; Dekkers, J. (1984). The concept map as an aid to instruction in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 84(3), 220-231.
Mangano, J. A., &; Corrado, T. J. (1979). Adult students' satisfaction at six two- year colleges. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED1180563)
Mayer R. E., &; Moreno R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., &; Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390-397.
Mayer, R. E., &; Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mayer, R. E., Dow, G., &; Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds?. Journal of Educaitonal Psychology, 95, 806-813
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Mohamad Ali. A. Z., &; Madar. A. Z. (2010). Effects of segmentation of instructional animation in facilitating learning. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 2(2), 15-29.
Mohamad Ali., A. Z. (2013). Effects of Segmented-Animation in Projected Presentation Condition. Educational Technology &; Society, 16(3), 234-245.
Molenaar, I., Roda C., van Boxtel, C., &; Sleegers, P. (2011). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers &; Education, 59(2), 515-523. doi:org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.006
Moreno, R. (2007). Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 765-781.
Novak, J. D. (1981). Apply learning psychology and philosophy of science to biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 43,12-20.
Novak, J. D., &; Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paas, F. G. W., &; Van Merriënboer J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., &; Lves, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401-426
Pintrich, P. R. &; Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research &; applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Motivation Enhancing Environment, 6, 117-160.
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., &; McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
Prasart, N., &; Thammasena, B. (2009). Cognitive development, analytical thinking and learning satisfaction of second grade students learned through inquiry-based learning. Asian Social Science, 5 (10), 82-87.
Saleh, I., &; Kim, S. (2009). A fuzzy system for evaluation students’ learning achievement. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6234-6236. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.106
Sánchez-Franco, M. J., Peral-Peral, B., &; Villarejo-Ramos, A. F. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers &; Education, 74, 81-97.
Schar, S. G., &; Zimmermann, P. G. (2007). Investigating means to reduce cognitive load from animations: Applying differentiated measures of knowledge representation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 64-78.
Schunk, D. H., &; Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learning. In S. L. Christensons, A. L. Reschly, &; Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219-235). New York, NY: Springer.
Spanjers, I. A. E., Van Gog, T., Wouters, P., &; Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012). Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: The role of pausing and temporal cueing. Computers &; Education, 59, 274-280.
Su, M. H., &; Duo, P. C. (2012). EFL learners’ language learning strategy use and perceived self-efficacy. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(3), 335-345.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., &; Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &; Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Thurmond, V. A., &; Wombach, K. (2004). Understanding interactions in distance education: a review of the literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(1), 9-26
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., &; Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21-30.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &; Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &; Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professions education: design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85-93.
Vighnarajah, S. L., Wong, A. B., &; Kamariah. (2009). Qualitative findings of students' perception on practice of self-regulated strategies in online community discussion. Computers &; Education, 53, 94-103
Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29.
Weinertha, K., Koeniga, V., Brunnerb, M., &; Martina, R. (2014). Concept Maps: A Useful and Usable Tool for Computer-Based Knowledge Assessment? A Literature Review With a Focus on Usability. Computers &; Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.002
Weller, D. M. (1988). Biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens in the hizosphere with bacteria. Annual review of Phytopathology, 26, 379-407.
Wigfield, A., &; Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Zeyer, A. (2010). Motivation to learn science and cognitive style. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &; Technology Education, 6, 123-130.
Zhang, D., &; Zhou, L., (2003). Enhancing e-learning with interactive multimedia. Information Resources Manegement Journal, 16(4), 1-14, doi: 10.4018/irmj.2003100101.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top