跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.54) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/08 08:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:郭惠雯
研究生(外文):Hui-Wen Kuo
論文名稱:代言人外表吸引力/類型與賽事之配適效果-運動行銷之應用
論文名稱(外文):The Effect Match-up between Endorser''s Physical Attractiveness/Types and Sports Event - Application to marketing of sport
指導教授:蔡佳靜蔡佳靜引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chia-Ching Tsai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:128
中文關鍵詞:配適效果代言人可信度運動行銷廣告效果
外文關鍵詞:advertising effectivenessmatch-up hypothesiscelebrity credibilitysport marketing
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:693
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
過去許多關於代言人外表吸引力相關的研究,指出高度外表吸引力較適度外表吸引力通常會產生較高的廣告效果,且許多文獻探討配適假設對廣告效果的影響,並指出代言人與產品類別之間的高配適程度通常會產生較高的廣告效果。故本研究實驗一即針對運動行銷探討外表吸引力與吸引力相關運動類型之搭配對廣告效果的影響,並加入代言人可信度為應變數,研究結果發現,外表吸引力對吸引力有顯著影響;而外表吸引力相關運動類型則對專業性有顯著影響;然而之間的交互效果對可靠性及專業性都有顯著的影響。另外,高度外表吸引力運動員較適度外表吸引力運動員有較好的廣告效果及購買意願;外表吸引力無關運動類型較外表吸引力相關運動類型有較好的品牌態度;高度外表吸引力搭配外表吸引力相關運動類型較搭配外表吸引力無關運動類型產生較好的廣告態度;適度外表吸引力搭配外表吸引力無關運動類型較搭配外表吸引力相關運動類型產生較好的廣告態度,故本實驗一研究結論證實運動領域中外表吸引力與吸引力相關運動類型的配適假說。
然而,在運動行銷的領域較少探討配適假設這方面的探討。故本研究實驗二即針對運動行銷探討運動員類型與運動項目之搭配對廣告效果的影響,並加入代言人可信度為應變數,研究結果發現,運動員類型對吸引力及可靠性有顯著影響;而運動項目不會對代言人可信度產生影響;然而運動員類型與運動項目之間交互作用對可靠性及專業性皆有顯著影響。且當運動員類型與運動項目配適程度高時,產生的廣告效果優於配適程度低時,因此,研究結論證實了配適假說。而本研究最後也建議在運動行銷的領域中,選擇運動員代言人時,也需考量其與運動項目的配適,才能產生運動代言人的廣告最大效益。
There are some previous research about endorser’s physical attractiveness, and found that highly attractiveness models usually cause better advertising effectiveness than normally ones. In addition, some literature reviews discuss the impact of match-up hypothesis on advertising effectiveness, and found that match endorser with products would have positive impact on advertising effectiveness. Study1 focus on match endorser''s physical attractiveness with sport type attractiveness of sport marketing on advertising effectiveness. And take celebrity credibility as dependent variable. The result found that physical attractiveness has significant impact on the attractiveness. And sport type attractiveness has significant impact on the expert. Furthermore, the interaction effect between trust and expert both have significant impact. Besides, highly attractive athlete has better advertising effectiveness and purchase intention than normally ones. Highly attractive athlete with sport type attractiveness has better advertising effectiveness than with no sport type attractiveness ones. Normally attractive athlete with no sport type attractiveness has better advertising attitude than attractiveness ones. Therefore study1 demonstrates that match endorser''s physical attractiveness with sport type attractiveness in sport area. The result confirmed the match-up hypothesis.
In addition, there are some approach about match-up hypothesis in sport marketing. Thus, study2 discuss the impact of matching athlete type with sport type on advertising effectiveness, and take celebrity credibility as dependent variable.The result found that athlete type has significant impact on attract and trust. However, sport type has no impact on celebrity credibility. And the interaction between athlete type and sport type both has significant on trust and expert. When athlete type have highly match with sport type, the advertising effectiveness is better than normally match ones. Therefore, the study confirms the match up hypothesis. This study also suggest that when select the athlete endorser, it should consider about athlete endorser fit the sport type to gain the greatest advertising benefit from athlete endorser, when select the athlete endorser
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………i.
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………ii.
致謝………………………………………………………………………………………iii.
一、 緒論………………………………………………………………………………1
1.1研究背景與動機……………………………………………………………………1
1.2研究目的……………………………………………………………………………3
1.3研究流程……………………………………………………………………………4
二、文獻探討 …………………………………………………………………………5
2.1外表吸引力…………………………………………………………………………5
2.2代言人廣告的理論基礎 …………………………………………………………6
2.3配適性假設 ………………………………………………………………………12
2.4運動行銷 …………………………………………………………………………14
2.5廣告效果 …………………………………………………………………………16
2.6究架構及假設 ……………………………………………………………………18
三、研究方法 …………………………………………………………………………26
3.1研究設計……………………………………………………………………………26
3.2前測…………………………………………………………………………………27
3.3正式實驗……………………………………………………………………………31
3.4信度分析……………………………………………………………………………36
四、實驗一之研究結果 ………………………………………………………………38
4.1操弄測試……………………………………………………………………………38
4.2外表吸引力與外表吸引力相關運動類型對廣告效果之影響……………………38
4.3外表吸引力與外表吸引力相關運動類型對代言人可信度之影響………………51
4.4代言人可信度對廣告效果之影響…………………………………………………60
五、實驗二之研究結果 ………………………………………………………………64
5.1運動員與運動項目對廣告效果之影響……………………………………………64
5.2運動員類型與運動項目對代言人可信度之影響…………………………………73
5.3代言人可信度對廣告效果之影響…………………………………………………81
5.4小結…………………………………………………………………………………84
六、結論與建議 ………………………………………………………………………92
6.1研究結論……………………………………………………………………………92
6.2學術貢獻與行銷實務意涵…………………………………………………………94
6.3研究限制與建議……………………………………………………………………95
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………………………98
中文部分 ………………………………………………………………………………98
英文部分 ………………………………………………………………………………98
附錄 ……………………………………………………………………………………103
中文部分
1.David Ogilvy,賴東明譯,1981,一個廣告人的自白,台灣中華書局,台北。
2.余雅玲,2005,台灣職棒球團主場經營之運動行銷策略之研究,玄奘大學企業管理所,碩士論文。
3.李秉憲,2006,運動員代言商品對棒球運動消費者購買意願之研究-以美國職棒紐約洋基隊球員王建民為例,國立台灣師範大學體育研究所,碩士論文。
4.連新,2008,運動代言人對品牌權益與顧客購買意願之影響:以產品類別為調解變數,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
5.賀傳智,2002,廣告模特兒吸引力與產品類別搭配之廣告效果研究,國立臺灣大學商學研究所,碩士論文。
6.楊茗月,2003,模特兒吸引力、瀏覽者社會比較程度對負面效應探討,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系,博士論文。
7.蔡淑珠,2003,運動品牌代言人可信度來源因素對消費者購買意願影響之研究,台灣科技大學管理學研究所,碩士論文。

英文部分
1.Atkin, C. and Block, M.,1983, “Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorses.”Journal of Advertising Research, vol.23, pp.57-61
2.Baker, M. J., and Churchill, Jr, A. G., 1977, “The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.14, pp.538-555.
3.Bower, A. B., and Landreth, S.,2001, “Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising ”, Journal of advertising.vol. 30,pp. 1-12.
4.Bower, Amanda B., 2001, “Highly Attractive Models in Advertising and the Women Who Loathe Them: The Implications of Negative Affect for Spokesperson Effectiveness”, Journal of Advertising, vol.30,pp. 51-63.
5.Brooks, C.M. and Harris, K. K.,1988, ”Celebrity athlete endorsement: An overview of the key theoretical issues”, Sport Marketing Quarterly, vol.7, pp.33-34.
6.Burns, L H.,1987, “Infertility and the sexual health of the family ."Journal of Sez Education and Therapy , vol.13 , pp.30-34.
7.Caballero, Marjorie J. et al., 1984, “Effects of Model Attractiveness on Sales Response”, Journal of Advertising, vol. 13, pp.17-23.
8.Freiden, J. B., 1984, “Advertising Spokesperson Effects : An Examination of Endorse Type and Gender on Two Audiences ”, Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 24, pp.3-41.
9.Friedman H. H. and Friedman L., 1979, “Endorser Effectiveness by Product Type”. Journal of Advertising Research, vol.195, pp. 63-71
10.Friedman, H. H., et al. 1977, “The Effectiveness of Advertising Utilizing Four Types f Endorsers” , Journal of Advertising, vol.6, pp.22-24
11.Goldsmith, Ronald E. et al., 2000, “The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands“, Journal of Advertising. Vol.29,pp.43-54.
12.Hatfied, E., and Sprecher, S., 1986, Mirror; Mirror: The Importance of Loodks in Everyday Life, Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York
13.Heider, F., 1958, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: John & Wiley.
14.Kahle, Lynn R. and Pamela Homer, 1985, “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorsers: A Social Adaptation Perspective”, Journal of consumer research, vol.11, pp.954-961.
15.Kaikati, Jack G.,1987 , “Celebrity Advertising: A Review and Synthesis”, International Journal of Advertising, vol. 6, pp.93-105.
16.Kamins, Michael A., 1990, “An Investigation into the match-up hypothesis in celebrity advertising: when beauty may be only skin deep”, Journal of Advertising, vol.19(1),pp.4-13.
17.Kanungo, R. N. and Pang, S., 1973, “Effects of Human Models On Perceived Product Quality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.57, pp.172-178.
18.Kesler, L., 1979, “Man created ads in sport’s own image.” Advertising Age, vol. 8, pp.5-8.
19.Martin, M. C. and Kennedy, P. F.,1993, “Advertising and social comparison: consequence for female Pre-adolescents and adolescents ”, Psychology and Marketing, vol.10,pp. 512-530.
20.McCrachen, Grant., 1989, “Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process”, Journal of consumer research, vol.16, pp.310-321.
21.Misra, S. and Beatty, S. E., 1990, “ Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence : An assessment of recall and affect”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 21,pp. 159–173.
22.Mowen, J. C. & Stephen, W. B., 1980, “On Explaining and Predicting the Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers”, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 8, pp.437-441.
23.Mowen, J.C. and S.W. Brown., 1980, “ On Explaining and Predicting the Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorser”, Advertising in Consumer Research, vol. 8,pp.437-441.
24.Ohanian, Roobina, 1990, “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness”, Journal of Advertising Research, vol.19 , pp.39-52.
25.Ohanian, Roobina.,1991, “ The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons”Perceived Image on Consumers’Intention to Purchase”, Journal of Advertising Research, vol.31(1), pp.46-54.
26.Patzer, G. L., 1983, “Source Credibility as a Function of Communicator physical Attractiveness”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 11,pp. 229-241.
27.Perroshins, S. M., and Crocker, K. E.,1989, “ An empirical analysis of spokesperson characteristics on advertisement and product evaluations”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 17(3),pp. 217-225.
28.Peterson, R. A. & Kerin, R. A., 1977, “The female role in advertisement: Some experimental evidence”, Journal of Marketing, vol.41, pp. 59-63.
29.Petroshins, S. M., and Crocker, K. E., 1989, “An empirical analysis of spokesperson characteristics on advertisement and product evaluations”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 17, pp.217–225.
30.Shamdasani, P. N. et al., 2001, “Location, location, location: Insights for advertisement placement on the web”, Journal of advertising Research, vol. 41(4),pp. 7-21.
31.Striegel-Moore, R. H. et al., 1986, “ Towards an understanding of risk factors for bulimia”, American Psychology, vol. 41, pp.246-263.
32.Thorndike, R. M., 1978, Correlational procedures for research. NewYork: Gardner.
33.Weiner, B., 1974, Achievement motivation and attribution theory, Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top