跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.182) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/27 08:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:傅怡萍
研究生(外文):FU,YI-PING
論文名稱:薪酬績效敏感性、公司治理與盈餘管理型態關係之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Association Among Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity,Corporate Governance and The Type of Earnings Management
指導教授:沈文華沈文華引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shen,Wen-Hua
口試委員:方俊儒林宗輝
口試委員(外文):Fang,Chun-JuLin,Tzong-Huei
口試日期:2016-06-17
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:會計系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:73
中文關鍵詞:薪酬績效敏感性公司治理實質盈餘管理裁決性應計盈餘管理
外文關鍵詞:pay-performance sensitivitiesCorporate governanceReal activities earnings managementAccrual-base earnings management
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:512
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:82
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究以2006年至2014年台灣上市與上櫃公司為研究樣本,目的在於探討薪酬績效敏感性與企業盈餘管理型態之間的關係,並檢驗公司治理機制對不同盈餘管理型態是否具有調節效果。實證結果發現:(1)相較於裁決性應計項目盈餘管理,薪酬績效敏感性較高之公司,經理人較傾向以實質營運活動進行盈餘管理;(2)相較於較低的經理人持股比率,當經理人持股比率較高時,高薪酬績效敏感性公司的盈餘管理程度較小。最後(3)相較於較低的外部法人持股比率,當外部法人持股較高時,高薪酬績效敏感性公司的盈餘管理程度較小。
The purpose of the study is to investigate the association between pay-performance sensitivity and the types of earnings management using companies, publicly listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange or Taipei Exchange during the period from year 2006 to 2014, as a sample. The empirical results show: (1) The manager within a company with high pay-performance sensitivity will prefer using real activities earnings management rather than accrual-base earnings management; (2) Comparing with low managerial ownership, high managerial ownership is more likely to mitigate the positive relationship between pay-for-performance sensitivities and earnings management; and finally (3) Comparing with low institutional investor’s stockholding, high institutional investor’s stockholding is more likely to mitigate the positive relationship between pay-for-performance sensitivities and earnings management.
目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
壹、緒論 1
一、研究背景與動機 1
二、研究目的 5
三、研究貢獻 5
四、研究架構 6
貳、文獻探討與假說發展 8
一、盈餘管理 8
(一)裁決性應計項目盈餘管理 8
(二)實質營運活動盈餘管理 9
(三)裁決性應計項目與實質營運活動盈餘管理之間比較 10
二、薪酬績效敏感性與盈餘管理 10
三、公司治理與薪酬績效敏性 13
參、研究方法 18
一、樣本選取 18
二、研究模型 20
(一)因變數 22
(二)模型(1)及模型(2)之自變數─薪酬績效敏感性(PPS) 24
(三)模型(3)之自變數 25
(四) 控制變數 27
肆、實證結果與分析 30
一、樣本概述與敘述性統計 30
二、Pearson相關性分析 34
三、最小平方法迴歸分析結果 36
(一)H1之檢驗結果 36
(二)H2之檢驗結果 37
四、穩健性測試 41
(一)以總薪酬基礎 (TPPSD與MTPPSD)之檢驗結果 41
(二)向上之盈餘管理樣本分析 45
(三)向下之盈餘管理樣本分析 52
伍、結論與建議 60
一、研究結論 60
二、研究限制 61
三、未來研究建議 62
參考文獻 63
一、中文部分 63
二、英文部分 64


一、中文部分
李佳玲,2006,不確定性、高階經理人報償差距與公司績效之關聯性:競賽理論之驗證,會計評論,第42期:23-53。
李啟華及郭翠菱,2014,獎酬契約與盈餘管理,輔仁管理評論,第21卷第3期:23-48。
李淑華,簡雪芳,蔡彥卿及張玲玲,2015,以利害關係人觀點分析公司零盈餘門檻操控,交大管理學報,第35卷第2期:31–79。
林欣美,郭麗華及蘇迺惠,2008,國際化程度、董事會結構、精練法人監督對盈餘管理之影響:以台灣資訊電子業爲率,臺大管理論叢,第19卷第1期:157–186。
林靜香及王萬成,2010,員工獎酬資訊揭露對公司治理結構的影響,交大管理學報,第30卷1期:81-119。
洪玉舜及王泰昌,2008,績效衡量指標在總經理股票誘因薪酬之相對重要性分析,會計評論,第46期:1–29。
范宏書,林彥廷及陳慶隆,2015,實質盈餘管理對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響,臺大管理論叢,第25卷第3期:163-196。
張森河,黃劭彥,王登仕及康照宗,2016,產業競爭與盈餘管理,管理與系統,第23卷第1期:107 – 135。
張瑞當,方俊儒及曾玉琦,2007,核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討,管理學報,第24卷第1期:17-39。
張瑞當、林國欽、沈文華及侯佩秀,2007,高階經理人薪酬績效敏感度對自願性資訊發布之影響,會計與公司治理,第4卷第1期:57-84。
許永聲, 陳信吉及陳琬菁,2013,董事會特性與盈餘管理之選擇行為,會計評論,第57期:39 – 72。
陳玉麟,2012,企業策略、非財務績效衡量與總經理薪酬:電子業證據,會計評論,第54期:117–150。
陳家偉,王凱立,吳安琪及吳振宇,2015,董事責任險於股權結構廣度及企業價值之研究管理評論;第34卷第1期:23–45。
陳軒晟,2014,實質與應計基礎盈餘管理 : 權益性薪酬與市場評價的影響,國立成功大學。
陳慶隆及林品妤,2015,實質盈餘管理與後續會計績效之探討–公司治理調解角色之檢測,會計評論,第61期:1-36。
黃俊閎,林鳳儀,吳勝富及黃仁伯,2014,公司治理是否有效減少亞洲新興市場公司之盈餘管理?交大管理學報,第34卷第2期:87-111。
黃家齊,2000,績效資訊特性與控制、薪資設計-組織控制觀點與代理理論觀點之整合,臺大管理論叢,第10卷第2期:227-255。
楊朝旭,蔡柳卿,陳家慧及廖思婷,2012,董事會特性與實質盈餘管理,臺大管理論叢,第23卷第1期:363-400。
楊朝旭及吳幸蓁,2003,總經理薪酬績效敏感性、績效門檻與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,會計評論,第36期:55-87。
跨國人力資源公司,2015全球薪酬趨勢調查報告。
蔡柳卿,2007,依會計盈餘時效性設計高階主管薪酬契約:董事會所扮演的角色,會計評論,第44期: P61–94。
蔡柳卿及楊怡芳,2006,公司治理與符合績效門檻盈餘管理行為之關聯性研究,東吳經濟商業學報,第53期:33-72。
韜睿惠悅及英國牛津研究機構,全球人才2021(Global Talent 2021)報告
韜睿惠悅企管顧問公司,2014整體獎酬市場調查報告。
二、英文部分
Babenko, I. 2009. Share repurchases and pay-performance sensitivity of employee compensation contracts. Journal of Finance 64(1): 117–151.
Balsam, S. 1998. Discretionary accourting choices and CEO compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(3): 229-252.
Banker, R.D., S.Y. Lee, G. Potter, and D. Srinivasan. 2000. An empirical analysis of continuing improvements following the implementation of a performance -based compensation plan. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30(3): 315–350.
Bergstresser, D., and T. Philippon. 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 80(3): 511-529.
Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease, C.W. Smith Jr. 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics 20(1-2): 267-291.
Byrd, J. W., and K. A. Hickman.1992. Do outside director monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics 32(2): 195-221.
Campbell, T. L., and P. Y. Keys. 2002. Corporate governance in South Korea: The chaebol experience. Journal of Corporate Finance 8(4): 373–391.
Chung, H., W. Q. Judge, and Y.H. Li. 2015. Voluntary disclosure, excess executive compensation, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance 32: 64–90.
Cohen, D. A., A. Dey, and T. Z. Lys. 2008. Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review 83(3): 757-787.
Cohen, D.A., and P. Zarowin. 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50(1): 2–19.
Conyon, M. J., and L. He. 2011. Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 17(4): 1158–1175.
Cornett, M. M., A. J. Marcus, and H. Tehranian. 2008. Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 87(2): 357–373.
Dechow, P.M., R.G. Sloan, A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1): 1-36.
Dechow, P. M., and R.G. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14(1): 51-89.
DeFond, M., and M. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17(1-2): 145-176.
Erkens, D.H., M. Hung, and P. Matos. 2012.Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance 18(2): 389–411.
Ewert, R., and A. Wagenhofer. 2005. Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management. The Accounting Review 80(4): 1101-1124.
Francis, B., I. Hasan, and L.Li. 2015. Evidence for the existence of downward real-activity earnings management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 31(2): 212-248.
Frankel, R., M. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditor’s fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77: 71-105.
Gao, H., and K. Li. 2015. A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms. Journal of Corporate Finance 35: 370–388.
Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40(1): 3-73.
Gunny, 2006, What are consequences of real earnings management? University of Colorado, U.S.A.
Gupta, M., C. Seethamraju, and M. Pevzner. 2010. The implications of absorption cost accounting and production decisions for future firm performance and valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 889-922.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(1-3): 85–107.
Hermalin, B. E. 2005. Trends in corporate governance. Journal of Finance 60(5): 2351–2384.
Himmelberg, C. P., R.G. Hubbard, and D. Palia. 1999. Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership. Journal of Financial Economics 53(3): 353-384.
Himmelberg, C. P., and R. G. Hubbard. 2000. Incentive pay and the market for CEOs: An analysis of pay-for-performance sensitivity, Tuck-JFE Contemporary Corporate Governance Conference.
Holthausen, R.W., D. F. Larcker, and R. G. Sloan. 1995. Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19(1): 29–74.
Jensen, M. 2005. Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financial Management 34(1) : 5–19.
Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top – management incentives. The Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225-264.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.
Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29: 193-228.
Kato, T., and K. Kubo. 2006. CEO compensation and firm performance in Japan: evidence from new panel data on individual CEO pay. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 20(1): 1–19.
Kothari, S.P., A. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1): 163-197.
Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(1): 109-126.
Lang, M. and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31(2): 246-271.
Lennox, C., X. Wu, and T. Zhang. 2016. The effect of audit adjustments on earnings quality: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61(2-3): 545-526.
Lippert, R. L., and G. Porter. 1997. Understanding CEO pay: A test of two pay-to-performance sensitivity measures with alternative measures of alignment and influence. Journal of Business Research 40(2): 127–138.
Lippert, R. L., and W. T. Moore. 1994. Compensation contracts of chief executive officers: determinants of pay-performance sensitivity. Journal of Financial Research 17(3): 321–332.
Lo, A.W.Y., R.M.K. Wong, and M. Firth. 2010. Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 16(2): 225-235.
Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38(2): 163–184.
Moeckel, C. 1990. The effect of experience on auditors' memory errors. Journal of Accounting Research 28(2): 368-387.
Murphy, K.J. 1993. Executive Compensation 1000. United Shareholder Association.
Nelson, J. 2005. Corporate governance practices, CEO characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 11(1–2): 197–228.
O'Sullivan, N. 1997, Insuring the agents: The role of directors' and officers' insurance in corporate governance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 64(3): 545-556.
Ramalingegowda, S., and Y. Yu. 2012. Institutional ownership and conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53(1–2): 98-114.
Rhodes, A. 2016. The relation between earnings-based measures in firm debt contracts and CEO pay sensitivity to earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61(1): 1-22.
Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(3): 335–370.
Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on earnings management. accounting horizons 3(4): 91-102.
Subramanyam, K.R. 1996. The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22(1-3): 249–281.
Sweeney, A. P. 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17(3): 281-308.
Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild, and K. L. Wild. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20(1): 61–91.
Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Watts, R. L., and J.L. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53(1): 112-134.
Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9(3): 295–316.
Zang, A.Y. 2012. Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review 87(2): 675-703.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 李佳玲,2006,不確定性、高階經理人報償差距與公司績效之關聯性:競賽理論之驗證,會計評論,第42期:23-53。
2. 林欣美,郭麗華及蘇迺惠,2008,國際化程度、董事會結構、精練法人監督對盈餘管理之影響:以台灣資訊電子業爲率,臺大管理論叢,第19卷第1期:157–186。
3. 范宏書,林彥廷及陳慶隆,2015,實質盈餘管理對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響,臺大管理論叢,第25卷第3期:163-196。
4. 張森河,黃劭彥,王登仕及康照宗,2016,產業競爭與盈餘管理,管理與系統,第23卷第1期:107 – 135。
5. 張瑞當,方俊儒及曾玉琦,2007,核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討,管理學報,第24卷第1期:17-39。
6. 張瑞當、林國欽、沈文華及侯佩秀,2007,高階經理人薪酬績效敏感度對自願性資訊發布之影響,會計與公司治理,第4卷第1期:57-84。
7. 許永聲, 陳信吉及陳琬菁,2013,董事會特性與盈餘管理之選擇行為,會計評論,第57期:39 – 72。
8. 陳玉麟,2012,企業策略、非財務績效衡量與總經理薪酬:電子業證據,會計評論,第54期:117–150。
9. 黃家齊,2000,績效資訊特性與控制、薪資設計-組織控制觀點與代理理論觀點之整合,臺大管理論叢,第10卷第2期:227-255。
10. 蔡柳卿,2007,依會計盈餘時效性設計高階主管薪酬契約:董事會所扮演的角色,會計評論,第44期: P61–94。