跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/03 11:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:傅泓誠
研究生(外文):Fu,Hung-Cheng
論文名稱:監督型委員會與公司舞弊之關聯性—以中國上海證券交易所為例
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Monitoring-Intensive Board and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from China Shanghai Stock Exchange
指導教授:吳明政吳明政引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wu,Ming-Cheng
口試委員:陳俊元吳明政林逸程
口試委員(外文):Chen,Chun-YuanWu,Ming-ChengLin,Yi-Cheng
口試日期:2016-06-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:財務金融技術學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:49
中文關鍵詞:公司舞弊獨立董事委員會監督密集
外文關鍵詞:corporate fraudindependent directorcommitteemonitoring-intensive
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:152
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
經濟發展的好壞已成為國家競爭性的代表,有鑑於公司舞弊的發生造成經濟衰退、社會動盪不安、打擊投資人對市場的信心、使得股市重挫,並且嚴重打亂金融市場的秩序。近年來中國市場備受全球的關注,本研究將探討中國獨立董事是否有發揮其自身的功能,且對於公司舞弊的關聯性。以2008年至2014年為研究期間,實證結果顯示中國上市公司在監督密集的情況之下,能降低公司舞弊的發生。雖然審計委員會也有相同效果,卻沒有預期的顯著。由此可知,中國雖逐漸成為全球的焦點,但在委員會的監督功能、獨立性和可靠性方面仍須加強,本文建議非任何決策都必須由董事會的通過才可,應讓委員會發揮實質的權力。
Global economic growth and environmental changes can promote national developments but also come with corporate frauds. Therefore, independent directors play an important role in corporate governance. Based on Code of Corporate Governance for Listed Companies in China, this paper examines whether company committees and independent directors have an effect on corporate frauds in China Shanghai Stock Exchange over the period 2008-2014.
This paper studies the efficiency of audit, compensation committee and independent directors’ monitoring in listed companies. The empirical results that monitoring-intensive can decrease the likelihood of corporate frauds, when a majority of independent directors serve on at least two of monitoring committees. However, in this paper also find that a negative effect but not significant relationship between audit committee and incidence of corporate fraud.

目錄
摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 III
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 8
第三節 研究架構與流程 9
第貳章 文獻探討 11
第一節 舞弊 11
第二節 委員會與其重要性 12
第三節 委員會、監督密集與舞弊 14
第參章 研究方法 19
第一節 資料來源與樣本選取 19
第二節 變數衡量 21
第三節 實證模型 24
第肆章 實證結果與分析 26
第一節 敘述性統計 26
第二節 相關性分析 31
第三節 實證結果 33
第伍章 結論 40
參考文獻 41
附錄 47


一、 中文部分
牛建波、劉绪光 (2008),董事會委員會有效性與治理溢價,證券市場導報,第一卷,頁64-72。
林淑芸、金旻姍 (2015),專題一:美國COSO內部控制相關報告之介紹,證券暨期貨月刊,第三十三卷,第六期。
邱茗囷 (2011),實務新知二:2010年美國公開發行公司會計監督委員會(PCAOB)國際審計監理年會—Dodd-Frank Act對會計師館以規範之最新動態,證券暨期貨月刊,第二十九卷,第四期。
馬嘉應 (2006),審計學,五南圖書出版有限公司。
楊慧輝、張曉嵐、張若遠 (2011),經理人自訂薪酬與薪酬考核委員會的本原性質分析,東華經濟管理,第二十五卷,第七期,頁88-92。
張雅珺、邱茗囷 (2015),出席美國公開會計監督委員會(PCAOB)第9屆2015年國際審計監理官年會報告,金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局。
葉康濤、祝繼高、陸正飛和張然 (2011),獨立董事的獨立性:基於董事會投票的證據,《經濟研究》,第一期,頁 126-139。
謝振蓮、和麗芬 (2012),民營企業內部控制構建研究,西南財經大學出版社。
謝增毅 (2005),董事會委員會與公司治理,《法學研究》,第五期,頁 60-69。

二、 英文部分
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A Theory of Friendly Boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250.
Beasley, M. S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441-454.
Bonner, S. E., Palmrose, Z. V., & Young, S. M. (1998). Fraud Type and Auditor Litigation: An Analysis of SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. Accounting Review, 503-532.
Carcello, J.V., D.R. Hermanson, T.L. Neal, and R.A. Riley, Jr., (2002). Board Characteristics and Audit Fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 19, 365-384
Chan, K. C., & Li, J. (2008). Audit Committee and Firm Value: Evidence on Outside Top Executives as Expert-Independent Directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(1), 16-31.
Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424-448.
Chen, J., Cumming, D., Hou, W., & Lee, E. (2014). Does the External Monitoring Effect of Financial Analysts Deter Corporate Fraud in China?. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16.
Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371-406.
Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2014). Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-23.
Conyon, M. J., & Peck, S. I. (1998). Board Control, Remuneration Committees, and Top Management Compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 146-157.
Eugene F. Fama (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
Eugene F. Fama and Michael C. Jensen (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2011). The Costs of Intense Board Monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160-181.
Hass, L. H., Tarsalewska, M., & Zhan, F. (2015). Equity Incentives and Corporate Fraud in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-20.
Heidrick & Struggles, (2007). 10th Annual Corporate Board Effectiveness Study. Heidrick & Struggles and USC/Center for Effective Organizations, Los Angeles, Californua.
Hölmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91.
Hou, W., & Moore, G. (2012). Player and Referee Roles Held Jointly: The Effect of State Ownership on China’s Regulatory Enforcement Against Fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 317-335.
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
John E. Core, Robert W. Holthausen, David F. Larcker, (1999). Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51, 371-406.
Karim K., Robin A., & Suh S. (2015). Board Structure and Audit Committee Monitoring: Effects of Audit Committee Monitoring Incentives and Board Entrenchment on Audit Fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 31 (2), 249-276.
Shaker A. Zahra and John A. Pearce II (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.
Uzun, H., Szewczyk, S. H., & Varma, R. (2004). Board composition and corporate fraud. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(3), 33-43.
Vafeas, N., (2005). Audit Committee, Boards and the Quality of Reported Earing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 1093-1122.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top