跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.41) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/14 02:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳冠如
研究生(外文):Chen, Kuan-Ju
論文名稱:在子宮內膜不典型增生的分類上利用DNA甲基化分析SOX1,HS3ST2,AJAP1和PTGDR基因
論文名稱(外文):Triage of Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia by DNA Methylation of SOX1, HS3ST2, AJAP1 and PTGDR
指導教授:趙載光趙載光引用關係賴鴻政賴鴻政引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chao, Tai-KuangLai, Hung-Cheng
口試委員:呂福江
口試委員(外文):Leu, Fur-jiang
口試日期:2012-05-29
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國防醫學院
系所名稱:病理及寄生蟲學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:74
中文關鍵詞:子宮內膜不典型增生甲基化指數類子宮內膜腺癌附基因體修飾
外文關鍵詞:Atypical HyperplasiaMethylation indexEndometrioid AdenocarcinomaEpigenetic Modification
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:397
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
子宮內膜癌在全世界婦科癌症裡是排名第二位,在台灣地區比起其他的婦女癌症,子宮內膜癌的發生率是位居第三位。近年來子宮內膜癌的發病率在近年來有逐漸攀升之趨勢。附基因體修飾(epigenetic modification)的失調,特別是在早期腫瘤的發展,是跟基因突變一樣會推動癌症的發展和增長。
子宮內膜癌的症狀為停經前後陰道之異常出血,向醫生求診之後會先進行子宮擴張刮除術(Dilation And Curettage)做初步的檢查,結果是非典型子宮內膜增生(Atypical hyperplasia)的話,只施行全子宮切除手術(Total Hysterectomy)的治療即可,當全子宮切除手術開下來後,卻發現是子宮內膜癌就必須再動一次腹腔鏡下之淋巴摘除手術(Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy),不僅對病人造成困擾還得支付額外的醫療花費。因此,非典型子宮內膜增生(Atypical hyperplasia)和分化良好的子宮內膜癌兩者的區分,在婦科病理學上是較為困難且重要的鑑別診斷。目前為止並沒有一種標準或常規的檢查是用在子宮內膜癌上。故研究的目的是想利用附基因體修飾(epigenetic modification)的技術去偵測特定基因的DNA甲基化,藉以幫助病理科醫師正確診斷出子宮內膜癌。
所收集的檢體是已經過固定、脫水和包埋的子宮內膜組織蠟塊,實驗分成三組:正常組(Normal)是正常子宮內膜組織20例、癌症組(Cancer)是子宮內膜癌20例以及癌前病變組(Precancer)是子宮內膜不典型增生60例,總共是101個病理蠟塊。從蠟塊中萃取的DNA得先經過亞硫酸氫鈉(Sodium Bisulfite)的處理,再以定量甲基化聚合酶連鎖反應檢測每個基因的甲基化程度。
針對AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, SOX1基因以Mann-Whitney U test統計出P值各分別為<0.0001,0.0002,0.0004,0.0035,代表在統計學上具非常顯著的意義(P值<0.01),所代表的意義是指AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, SOX1這四個基因的DNA甲基化程度用來鑑別正常子宮內膜和子宮內膜癌兩者是可行的。比較子宮內膜癌前期(precancer)和子宮內膜癌(cancer)兩者的結果顯示,AJAP1基因的P值為0.0005,具有非常顯著的意義(P值<0.01),HS3ST2, SOX1基因的P值分別為0.014,0.023,有顯著性的意義(P值<0.05),唯獨PTGDR基因的P值是0.22,在統計學上是沒有顯著性意義(P值>0.05),代表利用AJAP1, HS3ST2, SOX1三個基因的DNA甲基化程度在鑑別子宮內膜癌前期(precancer)病變和子宮內膜癌(cancer)兩者是可行的。首次發表出AJAP1, HS3ST2, SOX1 三個基因的DNA高度甲基化分析可做為一種具有潛力的生物標記,並偵測出惡性的子宮內膜癌。
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the one of the most common cancers in female genital tract worldwide. It can be classified into two major subtypes with respect to histopathology, cell biology and clinical course. Epigenetic aberration is known to be important in human carcinogenesis. Promoter methylation status of SOX1, HS3ST2, AJAP1 and PTGDR, was evaluated in 20 endometrial carcinomas (EC) and normal endometrial tissue by methylation specific PCR. These 4 genes had higher methylation value in patients with EC than in normal controls of AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, and SOX1 (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0002, p = 0.0004, p = 0.0035, respectively). Atypical hyperplasia (AH) is a premalignant lesion of endometrial pathology. Women with this diagnosis based on endometrial sampling are frequently found to have EC at hysterectomy. The failure of accurately diagnose EC preoperatively in these women can lead to inadequate staging and potentially suboptimal treatment for some women. So, there is a need for other markers to identify women with AH in endometrial sampling harboring an underlying EC. Sixty-one endometrial sampling with pathological diagnosis of AH were analyzed. Fourteen of the sixty-one (23%) AH patients were confirmed to have EC at hysterectomy. Three of 4 genes had higher methylation value in patients with EC hidden in AH compared with AH of AJAP1, HS3ST2 and SOX1 (p = 0.0005, p = 0.014, p = 0.023, respectively). Best cutoff values of the methylation data for different genes were determined to test the sensitivity, specificity, positive predict value (PPV), negative predict value (NPV) and to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for the best performance for separating EC from AH has a sensitivity of 0.86, 0.71 and 0.71, respectively, and a specificity of 0.72, 0.70 and 0.60, respectively and accuracy of 0.81, 0.72 and 0.70, respectively, and a PPV of 0.48, 0.42 and 0.35, respectively, and a NPV of 0.94, 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. In conclusion, promoter hypermethylation of AJAP1, HS3ST2, PTGDR and SOX1 is found in EC. In addition, we also show for the first time that AJAP1, HS3ST2 and SOX1 hypermethylation analysis may have potential as a EC biomarker for endometrial malignancy.
正文目錄
頁次
中文摘要 09
英文摘要 11
第一章 緒言 13
第一節 子宮內膜介紹 14
第二節 子宮內膜不典型增生與子宮內膜癌診斷的治療 15
第三節 癌症與附基因體調控 19
第四節 SOX1基因 21
第五節 HS3ST2基因 23
第六節 AJAP1基因 25
第七節 PTGDR基因 26
第二章 實驗目的與實驗設計 27
第三章 實驗材料與方法 28
第一節 檢體收集 28
第二節 石蠟切片與常規蘇木素-伊紅染色 29
第三節 去氧核醣核酸(DNA)的萃取與定量 30
第四節 亞硫酸氫鈉處理(Sodium Bisulfite) 34
第五節 定量甲基化聚合酶連鎖反應(Quantitative-MS PCR) 37
第六節 統計分析 40
第四章 實驗結果 41
第一節 比較四個基因SOX1, HS3ST2, AJAP1和PTGDR在正常子宮內膜和子宮內膜癌的甲基化狀態 41
第二節 在子宮內膜癌前期與癌前期開刀後是子宮內膜癌兩者比較SOX1, HS3ST2, AJAP1和PTGDR的甲基化狀態 42
第三節 利用SOX1, HS3ST2, AJAP1和PTGDR檢測子宮內膜癌前期與子宮內膜癌間的敏感度、特異性與預測值比較 46
第四節 合併SOX1, HS3ST2和AJAP1三個基因檢測子宮內膜癌前期與子宮內膜癌間的敏感度、特異性與預測值比較 51
第五章 討論 53
第六章 結論與展望 57
第七章 參考文獻 58

圖目錄

圖一、AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, SOX1基因在正常子宮內膜和子宮內膜癌的甲基化指數分佈圖 66
圖二、AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, SOX1基因在子宮內膜不典型增生追蹤後續診斷為正常子宮內
膜、子宮內膜增生、子宮內膜不典型增生及子宮內膜癌的甲基化指數分佈圖 67
圖三、AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, SOX1基因在子宮內膜不典型增生追蹤後續診斷為癌前期病變
與子宮內膜癌的甲基化指數分佈圖 68
圖四、AJAP1, PTGDR, HS3ST2, SOX1基因鑑別子宮內膜不典型增生和子宮內膜癌的ROC曲線圖 69

表目錄

表一、AJAP1, HS3ST2, SOX1基因的DNA甲基化檢測子宮內膜不典型增生和子宮內膜癌的性能表 70
表二、在子宮內膜不典型增生和子宮內膜癌中利用AJAP1, HS3ST2, SOX1基因單獨及兩個基因合
併DNA甲基化的檢測性能表 71
表三、AJAP1, HS3ST2, SOX1三個基因合併的DNA甲基化檢測子宮內膜不典型增生和子宮內膜癌的性能表 72

附錄目錄

附錄一、在正常子宮內膜、子宮內膜不典型增生和子宮內膜癌上偵測RAR-β,CHFR,E-cadherin,
APC,hMLH1這五個基因的甲基化程度百分比 73
附錄二、在119個子宮內膜癌(第一型和第二型)病例偵測不同的抑癌基因的甲基化程度百分比 74

[1]Sakuragi N, Hirai A, Tada M, Yamada H, Yamamoto R, Fujimoto S, Moriuchi T. Dominant-negative mutation of p53 tumor suppressor gene in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic oncology 2001;83:485.
[2]Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. The Lancet 2005;366:491.
[3]Purdie DM. Epidemiology of endometrial cancer. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice 2003;3:217.
[4]Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer MS. Obesity, Endogenous Hormones, and Endometrial Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2002;11:1531.
[5]Chen CJ, You SL, Lin LH, Hsu WL, Yang YW. Cancer epidemiology and control in Taiwan: a brief review. Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2002;32:S66.
[6]Shinmura Y, Yokoi T, Tsutsui Y. A case of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the mullerian duct in persistent mullerian duct syndrome: the first reported case. The American journal of surgical pathology 2002;26:1231.
[7]Ferenczy A, Bergeron C. Histology of the human endometrium: from birth to senescence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1991;622:6.
[8]Lin PC, Bhatnagar KP, Nettleton GS, Nakajima ST. Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction. Fertility and sterility 2002;78:899.
[9]Andersson S, Moghrabi N. Physiology and molecular genetics of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. Steroids 1997;62:143.
[10]Inai K, Arihiro K, Tokuoka S, Katsube Y, Fujiwara A. Mesonephric duct hyperplasia of the uterus. Pathology International 1989;39:457.
[11]Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma. Blaustein pathology of the female genital tract. 5th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag 2002:467.
[12]Kurman RJ, Norris HJ. Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well differentiated carcinoma. Cancer 1982;49:2547.
[13]Smith DC, Prentice R, Thompson DJ, Herrmann WL. Association of exogenous estrogen and endometrial carcinoma. New England journal of medicine 1975;293:1164.
[14]Chang W, Wang Y, Chiang Y, Tsai H, Chen C. Unilateral Obstructive Uropathy caused by Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES-TAIPEI 2008;28:99.
[15]Lessey B, Damjanovich L, Coutifaris C, Castelbaum A, Albelda S, Buck C. Integrin adhesion molecules in the human endometrium. Correlation with the normal and abnormal menstrual cycle. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1992;90:188.
[16]Longacre TA, Bartow SA. A correlative morphologic study of human breast and endometrium in the menstrual cycle. The American journal of surgical pathology 1986;10:382.
[17]Schwab KE, Chan RWS, Gargett CE. Putative stem cell activity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells during the menstrual cycle. Fertility and sterility 2005;84:1124.
[18]Chan RWS, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biology of reproduction 2004;70:1738.
[19]Schiff I, Sela HK, Cramer D, Tulchinsky D, Ryan K. Endometrial hyperplasia in women on cyclic or continuous estrogen regimens. Fertility and sterility 1982;37:79.
[20]Tavassoli F, Kraus F. Endometrial lesions in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. American journal of clinical pathology 1978;70:770.
[21]Janicek MF, Rosenshein NB. Invasive endometrial cancer in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Gynecologic oncology 1994;52:373.
[22]Bergman L, Beelen MLR, Gallee MPW, Hollema H, Benraadt J, van Leeuwen FE. Risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer after tamoxifen for breast cancer. The Lancet 2000;356:881.
[23]Bernstein L, Deapen D, Cerhan JR, Schwartz SM, Liff J, McGann-Maloney E, Perlman JA, Ford L. Tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer and endometrial cancer risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1999;91:1654.
[24]van Leeuwen FE, van den Belt-Dusebout A, Benraadt J, Diepenhorst F, van Tinteren H, Coebergh J, Kiemeney L, Gimbrre C, Otter R, Schouten L. Risk of endometrial cancer after tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer. The Lancet 1994;343:448.
[25]Antunes CMF, Stolley PD, Rosenshein NB, Davies JL, Tonascia JA, Brown C, Burnett L, Rutledge A, Pokempner M, Garcia R. Endometrial cancer and estrogen use. New England journal of medicine 1979;300:9.
[26]Ziel HK, Finkle WD. Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens. New England journal of medicine 1975;293:1167.
[27]Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic oncology 1983;15:10.
[28]Rose PG. Endometrial carcinoma. New England journal of medicine 1996;335:640.
[29]Lax SF. Molecular genetic pathways in various types of endometrial carcinoma: from a phenotypical to a molecular-based classification. Virchows Archiv 2004;444:213.
[30]Silverberg SG, Bolin MG, Degiorgi LS. Adenoacanthoma and mixed adenosquamous carcinoma of the endometrium. A clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1972;30:1307.
[31]Jeffrey JF, Krepart GV, Lotocki RJ. Papillary serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Obstetrics and gynecology 1986;67:670.
[32]Silverberg SG, De Giorgi LS. Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Clinical, pathologic, and ultrastructural findings. Cancer 1973;31:1127.
[33]Suh-Burgmann E, Hung YY, Armstrong MA. Complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia: the risk of unrecognized adenocarcinoma and value of preoperative dilation and curettage. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009;114:523.
[34]Lin YH, Chang FW, Chen CH. Perimenopausal Amenorrhea with Cervical Atresia and Hematotrachelos. J Med Sci 2010;30:173.
[35]Clark TJ, Voit D, Gupta JK, Hyde C, Song F, Khan KS. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2002;288:1610.
[36]Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival. Gynecologic oncology 2004;92:789.
[37]Obermair A, Manolitsas T, Leung Y, Hammond I, McCartney A. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 2005;15:319.
[38]Gemignani M, Curtin J, Zelmanovich J, Patel D, Venkatraman E, Barakat R. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges. Gynecologic oncology 1999;73:5.
[39]Silverberg SG. Problems in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Modern Pathology 2000;13:309.
[40]Wheeler DT, Bristow RE, Kurman RJ. Histologic alterations in endometrial hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma treated with progestins. The American journal of surgical pathology 2007;31:988.
[41]Kendall BS, Ronnett BM, Isacson C, Cho KR, Hedrick L, Diener-West M, Kurman RJ. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma. The American journal of surgical pathology 1998;22:1012.
[42]Suh-Burgmann E, Hung YY, Anne Armstrong M. The Value of Additional Pathology Comments Indicating Suspicion of Adenocarcinoma Among Women Diagnosed Preoperatively With Complex Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia. International Journal of Gynecologic Pathology 2012;31:222.
[43]Leitao Jr MM, Han G, Lee LX, Abu-Rustum NR, Brown CL, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Levine DA, Jewell EE. Complex atypical hyperplasia of the uterus: characteristics and prediction of underlying carcinoma risk. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2010;203:349.
[44]Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2006;56:11.
[45]Robertson G. Screening for endometrial cancer. Medical journal of Australia 2003;178:657.
[46]Teschendorff AE, Zhuang J, Widschwendter M. Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1496.
[47]Edwards JR, O'Donnell AH, Rollins RA, Peckham HE, Lee C, Milekic MH, Chanrion B, Fu Y, Su T, Hibshoosh H. Chromatin and sequence features that define the fine and gross structure of genomic methylation patterns. Genome research 2010;20:972.
[48]Ellis L, Atadja PW, Johnstone RW. Epigenetics in cancer: targeting chromatin modifications. Molecular cancer therapeutics 2009;8:1409.
[49]Portela A, Esteller M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nature biotechnology 2010;28:1057.
[50]Wu G, Guo Z, Chang X, Kim MS, Nagpal JK, Liu J, Maki JM, Kivirikko KI, Ethier SP, Trink B. LOXL1 and LOXL4 are epigenetically silenced and can inhibit ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in human bladder cancer. Cancer research 2007;67:4123.
[51]Agrawal S, Unterberg M, Koschmieder S, zur Stadt U, Brunnberg U, Verbeek W, Bchner T, Berdel WE, Serve H, Meller-Tidow C. DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes in clinical remission predicts the relapse risk in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer research 2007;67:1370.
[52]Teodoridis JM, Strathdee G, Brown R. Epigenetic silencing mediated by CpG island methylation: potential as a therapeutic target and as a biomarker. Drug resistance updates 2004;7:267.
[53]Klose RJ, Bird AP. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends in biochemical sciences 2006;31:89.
[54]Esteller M, Guo M, Moreno V, Peinado MA, Capella G, Galm O, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Hypermethylation-associated inactivation of the cellular retinol-binding-protein 1 gene in human cancer. Cancer research 2002;62:5902.
[55]Esteller M, Gaidano G, Goodman SN, Zagonel V, Capello D, Botto B, Rossi D, Gloghini A, Vitolo U, Carbone A. Hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002;94:26.
[56]Kan L, Israsena N, Zhang Z, Hu M, Zhao LR, Jalali A, Sahni V, Kessler JA. Sox1 acts through multiple independent pathways to promote neurogenesis. Developmental biology 2004;269:580.
[57]Malas S, Duthie S, Mohri F, Lovell-Badge R, Episkopou V. Cloning and mapping of the human SOX1: a highly conserved gene expressed in the developing brain. Mammalian genome 1997;8:866.
[58]Pevny LH, Sockanathan S, Placzek M, Lovell-Badge R. A role for SOX1 in neural determination. Development 1998;125:1967.
[59]Hitoshi S, Seaberg RM, Koscik C, Alexson T, Kusunoki S, Kanazawa I, Tsuji S, Van Der Kooy D. Primitive neural stem cells from the mammalian epiblast differentiate to definitive neural stem cells under the control of Notch signaling. Genes & development 2004;18:1806.
[60]Titulaer MJ, Klooster R, Potman M, Sabater L, Graus F, Hegeman IM, Thijssen PE, Wirtz PW, Twijnstra A, Smitt PAES. SOX antibodies in small-cell lung cancer and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: frequency and relation with survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:4260.
[61]Lai HC, Lin YW, Huang THM, Yan P, Huang RL, Wang HC, Liu J, Chan MWY, Chu TY, Sun CA. Identification of novel DNA methylation markers in cervical cancer. International journal of cancer 2008;123:161.
[62]Su HY, Lai HC, Lin YW, Chou YC, Liu CY, Yu MH. An epigenetic marker panel for screening and prognostic prediction of ovarian cancer. International journal of cancer 2009;124:387.
[63]Lai HC, Lin YW, Huang RL, Chung MT, Wang HC, Liao YP, Su PH, Liu YL, Yu MH. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis detects cervical intraepithelial neoplasms type 3 and worse. Cancer 2010;116:4266.
[64]Shworak NW, Liu J, Petros LM, Zhang L, Kobayashi M, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Rosenberg RD. Multiple isoforms of heparan sulfate D-glucosaminyl 3-O-sulfotransferase. Isolation, characterization, and expression of human cdnas and identification of distinct genomic loci. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1999;274:5170.
[65]Liu J, Shworak NW, Sinay P, Schwartz JJ, Zhang L, Fritze LMS, Rosenberg RD. Expression of heparan sulfate D-glucosaminyl 3-O-sulfotransferase isoforms reveals novel substrate specificities. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1999;274:5185.
[66]Shivapurkar N, Sherman ME, Stastny V, Echebiri C, Rader JS, Nayar R, Bonfiglio TA, Gazdar AF, Wang SS. Evaluation of candidate methylation markers to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecologic oncology 2007;107:549.
[67]Lim EH, Ng SL, Li JL, Chang AR, Ng J, Ilancheran A, Low J, Quek SC, Tay EH. Cervical dysplasia: Assessing methylation status (Methylight) of CCNA1, DAPK1, HS3ST2, PAX1 and TFPI2 to improve diagnostic accuracy. Gynecologic oncology 2010;119:225.
[68]Bediaga NG, Acha-Sagredo A, Guerra I, Viguri A, Albaina C, Ruiz Diaz I, Rezola R, Alberdi MJ, Dopazo J. DNA methylation epigenotypes in breast cancer molecular subtypes. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12:R77.
[69]Bharti S, Handrow-Metzmacher H, Zickenheiner S, Zeitvogel A, Baumann R, Starzinski-Powitz A. Novel membrane protein shrew-1 targets to cadherin-mediated junctions in polarized epithelial cells. Molecular biology of the cell 2004;15:397.
[70]Schreiner A, Ruonala M, Jakob V, Suthaus J, Boles E, Wouters F, Starzinski-Powitz A. Junction protein shrew-1 influences cell invasion and interacts with invasion-promoting protein CD147. Molecular biology of the cell 2007;18:1272.
[71]McDonald JM, Dunlap S, Cogdell D, Dunmire V, Wei Q, Starzinski-Powitz A, Sawaya R, Bruner J, Fuller GN, Aldape K. Research Paper The SHREW1 Gene, Frequently Deleted in Oligodendrogliomas, Functions to Inhibit Cell Adhesion and Migration. Cancer biology & therapy 2006;5:300.
[72]Sanz C, Isidoroarca M, Dvila I, Moreno E, Laffond E, Avila C, Lorente F. Promoter genetic variants of prostanoid DP receptor (PTGDR) gene in patients with asthma. Allergy 2006;61:543.
[73]Oguma T, Palmer LJ, Birben E, Sonna LA, Asano K, Lilly CM. Role of prostanoid DP receptor variants in susceptibility to asthma. New England journal of medicine 2004;351:1752.
[74]Boie Y, Sawyer N, Slipetz DM, Metters KM, Abramovitz M. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human prostanoid DP receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995;270:18910.
[75]Storms WW. Asthma associated with exercise. Immunology and allergy clinics of North America 2005;25:31.
[76]Selman AE, Niemann TH, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ. Quality assurance of second opinion pathology in gynecologic oncology. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1999;94:302.
[77]Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2000;53:459.
[78]Butler SF, Fernandez K, Benoit C, Budman SH, Jamison RN. Validation of the revised Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP-R). The Journal of Pain 2008;9:360.
[79]Mock V, Atkinson A, Barsevick A, Cella D, Cimprich B, Cleeland C, Donnelly J, Eisenberger M, Escalante C, Hinds P. NCCN Practice Guidelines for Cancer-Related Fatigue. Oncology (Williston Park, NY) 2000;14:151.
[80]Benedet J, Hacker N, Ngan N. Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynaecologic cancers. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2000;70:207.
[81]Kottmeier HL. Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer, 1990.
[82]Gimpelson R, Rappold H. A comparative study between panoramic hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dilatation and curettage. A review of 276 cases. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1988;158:489.
[83]Gross JC, Schreiner A, Engels K. E-cadherin surface levels in epithelial growth factor-stimulated cells depend on adherens junction protein Shrew-1. Molecular biology of the cell 2009;20:3598.
[84]Lin N, Di C, Bortoff K, Fu J, Truszkowski P, Killela P, Duncan C, McLendon R, Bigner D. Deletion or Epigenetic Silencing of AJAP1 on 1p36 in Glioblastoma. Molecular Cancer Research 2012;10:208.
[85]Miyamoto K, Asada K, Fukutomi T, Okochi E, Yagi Y, Hasegawa T, Asahara T, Sugimura T, Ushijima T. Methylation-associated silencing of heparan sulfate D-glucosaminyl 3-O-sulfotransferase-2 (3-OST-2) in human breast, colon, lung and pancreatic cancers. Oncogene 2003;22:274.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top