跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.30) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/28 19:15
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳渝璇
研究生(外文):Yu-Hsuan Chen
論文名稱:外人援助,貪污,與經濟成長:門檻迴歸模型的應用
論文名稱(外文):Foreign Aids, Corruption, and Economic Growth:The Applications of Threshold Model
指導教授:楊志海楊志海引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-Hai Yang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:經濟學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:48
中文關鍵詞:外人援助外人投資貪汙經濟成長門檻迴歸模型
外文關鍵詞:Foreign AidsForeign direct investmentCorruptionEconomic GrowthThreshold Regression Model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:419
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:107
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
學術上探討外人援助(Foreign Aids, FA)與外人投資(Foreign direct investment, FDI)對經濟成長的直接影響,大多獲致正向關聯的結論。然而,開發中國家的政經體制通常並非十分健全,政府貪污的事件時有所聞。我們發現,貪污與制度因素,對於經濟成長的影響通常是間接的。因此,本研究的目的在於:探討貪污與制度因素間接影響下,外人援助與外人投資對於開發中國家經濟成長的效果。
考量不同貪污程度與制度因素,外人投資及外人援助對經濟成長的影響會有所不同,本研究採用Hansen(2000)門檻模型,跨國分析1996至2011年、非OECD國家共148國樣本。實證結果顯示:在合併的橫斷面資料迴歸中,外人投資對於經濟成長呈現明顯的正向效果;外人援助的顯著性則不明顯。考慮門檻效果之後,我們發現外人投資在貪污程度較低及經濟自由度相對較高的國家,對於經濟成長的影響仍然呈現顯著的正面影響;反之在貪污程度較高及經濟自由度相對較低的國家,外人投資對於經濟成長則沒有顯著效果。外人援助在經濟自由度較高的國家對經濟成長也有很大的助益,但在貪污程度間接影響下,對於經濟成長的表現則尚未有定論。

In most of academic literature, the positive impact of Foreign Aids (FA) and Foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth are obtained. In developing countries, however, they often do not have sound political and economic systems. We can always hear about corruption news in these countries. Therefore, we find out indirect impact of corruption and institutional factors that influence economic growth. This paper aims to empirically investigate the effect of FA and FDI on economic growth in developing countries, under the indirect impact of corruption and institutional factors.
Considering the possible difference in the relationship between FDI and FA on economic growth for different corruption and institutional factors' level, this study employs the technique of the threshold model to proceed with empirical estimates. Based on a dataset of 148 non-OECD countries over the 1996-2011 period. The empirical results show that stronger FDI stimulate more economic growth in the case of the conventional pooled cross section regression, while FA are not statistical significance. After considering the threshold effects, FDI still have a significantly positive impact on economic growth for countries with lower level of corruption and higher degree of economic freedom, but for countries with higher level of corruption and lower degree of economic freedom, the impact of FDI on economic growth is statistical insignificance. FA are still helpful for economic growth when the countries have higher degree of economic freedom, while the impact is ambiguous under the indirect effect of corruption.

目錄
中文摘要.............................................................................................................i
英文摘要.............................................................................................................ii
致謝....................................................................................................................iii
目錄....................................................................................................................iv
圖目錄..............................................................................................................v
表目錄....................................................................................................................vi
第一章、 緒論.............................................................................................1
1.1 研究動機與背景.........................................................................................1
1.2 研究目的....................................................................................................4
1.3 資料來源....................................................................................................4
1.4 研究架構.....................................................................................................5
第二章、 文獻回顧......................................................................................6
2.1 國外援助對經濟成長的影響....................................................................6
2.2 FDI對經濟成長的影響.............................................................................8
2.3 貪污對經濟成長的影響..............................................................................10
第三章、 實證模型,研究方法與資料..........................................................13
3.1 實證模型建構...............................................................................................13
3.2 門檻迴歸模型...............................................................................................16
3.3 樣本期間與選樣標準.......................................................................................17
第四章、 實證結果與分析...............................................................................19
4.1 合併的橫斷面資料迴歸...............................................................................19
4.1.1 貪腐控制指數做為貪污變數...............................................................19
4.1.2 經濟自由度指數做為制度變數..........................................................22
4.2 不對稱縱橫資料門檻迴歸.............................................................................25
4.2.1 貪腐控制指數做為門檻變數...............................................................25
4.2.2 經濟自由度指數做為門檻變數.............................................................29
第五章、 結論與建議....................................................................................35
5.1 研究結論與貢獻..........................................................................................35
5.2 研究限制與後續建議.......................................................................................36
5.2.1 研究限制..............................................................................................36
5.2.2 後續建議..............................................................................................36
參考文獻.......................................................................................................37

參考文獻
網頁資料
1. Transparency International,” Global Corruption Barometer.”, Posted 9 July 2013, Website: http://www.transparency.org/gcb2013
2. World Bank,” Net ODA received per capita (current US$) | Map”,
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.ODA.ODAT.PC.ZS/countries/1W?display=map
3. Transparency International,” Corruption Perceptions Index 2013”,
http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/
4. World Bank,” Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank”, http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corruptn/cor02.htm

Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Sena, V. (2008). Governance Regimes, Corruption and Growth: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 195-220.
Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33-63.
Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Financial Markets. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 89-112.
Aoki, Y., & Todo, Y. (2012). FDI and Economic Growth in Less Developed Countries: A Theoretical and Empirical Survey. OECD Journal: General Papers, 2008(1), 1-31.
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic Growth in A Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
Beck, P. J., & Maher, M. W. (1986). A Comparison of Bribery and Bidding in Thin Markets. Economics Letters, 20(1), 1-5.
Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Freedom and Growth: New Evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 529-545.
Berthélemy, J. C., & Demurger, S. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Theory and Application to China. Review of Development Economics, 4(2), 140-155.
Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (1997). Aid Spurs Growth-in A Sound Policy Environment. Finance and Development, 34, 4-7.
Campos, N. F., & Kinoshita, Y. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment as Technology Transferred: Some Panel Evidence from the Transition Economies. The Manchester School, 70(3), 398-419.
Chervin, M., & van Wijnbergen, S. (2010). Economic Growth and the Volatility of Foreign Aid (No. 10-002/2). Tinbergen Institute.
Dalgaard, C. J., Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2004). On the Empirics of Foreign Aid and Growth. The Economic Journal, 114(496), F191-F216.
de Mello Jr, L. R. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries and Growth: A Selective Survey. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(1), 1-34.
Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2001). Public Expenditure, Corruption, and Economic Growth: the Case of Italy. European Journal of Political Economy,17(1), 1-16.
Dowling, J. M., & Hiemenz, U. (1983). Aid, Savings, and Growth in the Asian Region. The Developing Economies, 21(1), 3-13.
Ehrlich, I., & Lui, F. T. (1999). Bureaucratic Corruption and Endogenous Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), S270-S293.
Fischer, S. (2001). Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 3-24.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth. European Economic Review, 35(2), 517-526.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1993). The Politics of Free Trade Agreements(No. w4597). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., & Mašika, M. (2012). Firm Efficiency: Domestic Owners, Coalitions, and FDI. Economic Systems.
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345-368.
Hansen, B. E. (2000). Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation. Econometrica,68(3), 575-603.
Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2000). Policy Arena Aid Effectiveness Disputed. Journal of International Development, 12(3), 375-398.
Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development, 12-19.
Holsti, O. R. (1992). Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates. International Studies Quarterly, 439-466.
Knorr, K. E. (1975). The Power of Nations: The Political Economy of International Relations (pp. 152-5). New York: Basic Books.
Kohpaiboon, A. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillover: A Cross-industry Analysis of Thai Manufacturing. World Development, 34(3), 541-556.
Krueger, A. (1998). Why Trade Liberalization Is Good for Growth. The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1513-1522.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14.
Levy, V. (1988). Aid and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Recent Experience. European Economic Review, 32(9), 1777-1795.
Lipsey, R. E., & Sjöholm, F. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in East Asia: Lessons for Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies,47(1), 35-63.
Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2000). Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 407-425.
Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
Lui, F. T. (1985). An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery. The Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760-781.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(3), 681-712.
Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263-279.
Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and Economic Growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66-79.
Nath, H. K. (2009). Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies. Comparative Economic Studies, 51(1), 20-50.
Papanek, G. F. (1973). Aid, Foreign Private Investment, Savings, and Growth in Less Developed Countries. The Journal of Political Economy, 120-130.
Ram, R., & Zhang, K. H. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross‐Country Data for the 1990s*. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(1), 205-215.
Rock, M. T., & Bonnett, H. (2004). The Comparative Politics of Corruption: Accounting for the East Asian Paradox in Empirical Studies of Corruption, Growth and Investment. World Development, 32(6), 999-1017.
Romer, P. M. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3-22.
Samuel, P. (1968). Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599-617.
Singh, R. D. (1985). State Intervention, Foreign Economic Aid, Savings and Growth in LDCs: Some Recent Evidence. Kyklos, 38(2), 216-232.
Wang, J. Y., & Blomström, M. (1992). Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A Simple Model. European Economic Review, 36(1), 137-155.
Zhang, K. H. (2001). Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Contemporary Economic Policy,19(2), 175-185.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊