臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在全球化競爭環境中，企業必須提高本身競爭力以求生存，技術取得即是其中之一，然而無效的技術取得決策，可能造成企業競爭力無法提升，產品未能即時上市，市場霸業將拱手讓人。因此，如何適逢其時地選擇技術取得方式來滿足企業需求，成為各企業首要考慮之議題。
本研究將建構技術取得方式之評選機制，提供決策者一個務實的決策評選工具。然而在分析處理決策問題時，除了使問題更貼近實際的決策環境外，還要能有效地降低決策問題的複雜度。模糊網絡分析法(Fuzzy Analytic Network Process; Fuzzy ANP)不僅能處理動態相依性問題，還能考慮人為決策時常有之不精確性，作為評估選擇的工具。
藉由超矩陣(supermatrix)之概念，可有效地處理評選機制之影響因素層與評估準則層之動態相依性關係，然而影響因素層屬於外生因素，只是提供評估者一個機會，證明評估準則時與內心所冀望的影響條件是否相符合；若符合即可繼續進行成對比較(pairwise comparison)，反之將重新評估準則之相對權重。
本研究藉由模糊網絡分析法建立技術取得方式評選之一般性架構，巨細靡遺訂定出考慮技術取得方式時，所應重視之準則與次準則要素，透過此評選機制，期望能有效提供企業作為決策評選工具。除此之外，以中部某一手工具製造業為例，驗證本模式之有效性。

Enhancing the competitiveness of a company is essential for an entrprise to survive in the fiercely competitive global environment. The acquisition of advanced technology is one of the usable strategies for a company. However, an ineffective acquisition approach not only jeopardizes the competitiveness of a company but also causes delay for products to enter the market. As a result, the primary issue for an entrprise to consider is how to make the right technology acquisition at the right time to satisfy the need of an entrprise.
We propose a mechanism for selecting technology acquisition mode. It is a mechanism for decision-maker to implement a practical decision making. In addition, the success of a strategic decision-making depends on both its proximity to the environment and level of its complexity of the decision-making process. Fuzzy analytical networks process not only handles the dynamic interdependence situation of a decision-making problem but also addresses the vagueness when the decision is made.
The supermatrix is applied to handle the dependent situation between the influence level and criteria level. However, the influence level belongs to external factor. The external factor gives the decision-maker a chance to review if the intensity of the motive obtained for the mechanism is consistent with that in his mind. If it is so, it can used to pairwise comparison; on the other hand, it should reconsider the weighting process, too.
In this research, the fuzzy ANP is applied to construct a general mechanism for discussion of the technology acquisition problem. Besides, a case study of a tool manufacturing company is employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism.

誌謝 vi
目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究範圍 3
1.4研究架構與流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1技術取得 5
2.2網絡分析法 8
2.3 模糊多屬性決策理論 9
2.3.1 模糊理論 10
2.3.2 模糊網絡分析法 11
第三章 技術取得方式評選之機制 15
3.1獲取技術之動機與影響因素 15
3.2獲取技術之方式 22
3.3技術取得方式之評選準則 25
3.4建構技術取得方式之評選機制 33
3.4.1 評選機制之建構 33
3.4.2 各準則之次準則內容 35
第四章 應用Fuzzy ANP於技術取得方式之評選 40
第五章 案例探討 56
5.1資料蒐集 56
5.2訪談結果 57
第六章 結論與建議 67
6.1 結論 67
6.2 未來研究建議 68
參考文獻 70
附錄 訪談問卷 75

1.大前研一，「即戰力：如何成為世界通用的人才」，台北：天下雜誌股份有限公司，2007。
2.大前研一，「研磨商業力」，台北：天下雜誌股份有限公司，2008。
3.大前研一，「專業：你的唯一生存之道」，台北：天下遠見出版，2006。
4.中華民國經濟部，「物價上漲對台灣經濟之影響及因應對策」，經濟部研發會委託，12月，2007。
5.天下雜誌，第402期。
6.方世杰，「國內廠商參與科技專案研發動機之研究」，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，第四卷第三期，1998。
7.王文俊，「認識Fuzzy-第三版」，台北：全華科技圖書，2006。
8.王鴻裕，「產業資訊技術取得模式之研究-以高科技產業為例」，碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系，2003。
9.行政院國家科學委員會，「中華民國科學技術白皮書」，2007。
10.行政院經濟部技術處，「業界開發產業技術計畫」，http://doit.moea.gov.tw/。
11.吳怡芬，「應用網路層級分析法於研發聯盟夥伴評選之研究」，碩士論文，國立勤益科技大學，2007。
12.吳耀文，「台灣大型製藥廠技術取得模式之決定因素分析」，碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系，1999。
13.李靜芬，「以購併方式取得技術之策略決策與尋找檢視」，碩士論文，元智大學管理研究所，2000。
14.刀根薰，「競賽式決策制定法-AHP入門」，台北：建宏出版社，1993。
15.尚正倫，「競爭環境科技產業研發活動之系統動態模型(以TFT-LCD為例) 」，碩士論文，國立東華大學，2006。
16.林傑毓、余孟行，「物流技術特性與技術取得方式之關係－以國內物流產業為例」，運籌研究集刊，No. 9，25-38，2006。
17.林凌仲，「應用 FANP 於品牌生命週期形象管理：以百貨公司為例」，博士論文，國立高雄第一科技大學，2006。
18.胡政源，「科技創新管理」，台北：新文京開發，2005。
19.翁振益、周瑛琪等，「決策分析：方法與應用」，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司，2007。
20.商業周刊，第1104期。
21.康嘉豪，「組織慣性、資源存量與專案特性評估對技術取得方式影響之研究」，碩士論文，國立中央大學企業管理研究所，2001。
22.許國崢，「台灣資訊產業技術取得影響因素之研究」，碩士論文，長榮大學經營管理研究所，2004。
23.黃國平、廖章鈞，「都市捷運供給與需求之系統關係及績效評估指標」，全國土地管理與開發學術研討會，2005。
24.黃啟誠，「科技研發專案的模糊網絡決策分析」，博士論文，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所，2005。
25.黃漢斌，「台灣沖鍛機械產業技術取得模式之研究」，碩士論文，大葉大學工業工程與科技管理學系，2006。
26.經濟部工業局，「台灣技術交易市場機制發展計畫」，經濟部工業局委託，3月，2004。
27.葉忠、張智勇，「科技管理」，台北：高立圖書，2005。
28.劉豐瑞、賴嘉宏，「結合模糊分析網路程序法與模糊邏輯於營建工程環境影響評估(I)：理論研究」，Journal of Science and Engineering Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 55-67 (2007).
29.賴士葆、謝龍發、陳松柏，「科技管理」，台北：華泰文化，2005。
30.簡禎富，「決策分析與管理：全面決策品質提升之架構與方法」，台北：雙葉書廊有限公司，2007。
31.Bhardwaj, A., Sushil and S.K. Sharma, “Synthesis of research issues in technology acquisition – a literature review and Indian field study,” International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, Vol. 4, No. 2, 206-230 (2005).
32.Chen, H.H., A.H.I. Lee and Y. Tong, “Analysis of new product mix selection at TFT-LCD technological conglomerate network under uncertainty,” Technovation, 26, 1210-1221 (2006).
33.Cheng, E.W.L., H. Li and L. Yu, “The analytic network process (ANP) approach to location selection: a shopping mall illustration,” Construction Innovation, 5, 83-97 (2005).
34.Cui, X., Feng Wang, Xuhong Li, Yong Zhang and Shijun Yu., “A Fuzzy-ANP Approach to Cooperation Risk Evaluation of Virtual Logistics Enterprise,” IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, 18(21), 1452-1457 (2007).
35.Cuiping, W. and X. Zeshui, “A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 443-449 (1999).
36.Desyllas, P., “Sourcing technological knowledge through corporate acquisition: Evidence from an international sample of high technology firms,” Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 18, 157-172 (2008).
37.Durrani, T.S., S.M. Forbes and C. Broadfoot, “An integrated approach to technology acquisition management,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp.597-617 (1999).
38.Ertay, T., C. Kahraman and G. Buyukozkan, “A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network process approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, 171, 390-411 (2006).
39.Hemmert, M., “The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: survey results from Germany and Japan,” Research Policy, Vol. 33, 1019-1039 (2004).
40.Hipkin, I. and P. Naude, “Developing effective alliance partnerships,” Long Range Planning, 39, 51-69 (2006).
41.Hsu, Y.G., G.H. Tzeng and J.Z. Shyu, “Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of government-sponsored frontier technology R&D projects,” R&D Management, 33(5), 539-550 (2003).
42.Hung, S.W. and R.H. Tang, “Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan,” Technovation, Vol. 28, 551-563 (2008).
43.Hussinger, K. and C. Grimpe, “Pre-empting technology competition through firm acquisitions,” Economics Letters, 100, 189-191 (2008).
44.Kaur, P. and N.C. Mahanti, “A Fuzzy ANP-Based Approach for Selecting ERP Vendors,” International Journal of Soft Computing, 3(1), 24-32 (2008).
45.Khalil, T.M., Management of Technology: The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation, The McGraw-Hill companies, Inc (2000).
46.Lee, A.H.I., H.Y. Kang and W.P. Wang, “Analysis of priority mix planning for the fabrication of semiconductors under uncertainty,” International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 28, 351–361 (2006).
47.Lee, H.T., S.H. Chen and Y.F. Wu, “Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance,” Management Decision, 46(3), 449-465 (2008).
48.Lee, Y.T. and W.W. Wu, “Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process,” Expert System with Applications, 32, 841-847 (2007).
49.Liang, G.S. and M.J.J. Wang, “Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 78, 22-33 (1994).
50.Lin, Y.H., C.C. Chiu and C.H. Tsai, “The study of applying ANP model to assess dispatching rules for wafer fabrication,” Expert System with Applications, 34, 2148-2163 (2008).
51.Liou, T.S. and M.J.J Wang, “Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50, 247-255 (1992).
52.Mikhailov, L. and M.S. Singh, “Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Review, Vol. 33, 33-41 (2003).
53.Mon, D.L., C.H. Cheng and J.C. Lin, “Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 62, 127-134 (1994).
54.Poon, J.P.H. and A. MacPherson, “Technology acquisition among Korean and Taiwanese firms in the United States,” International Business Review, Vol. 14, 559-575 (2005).
55.Puranam, P., H. Singh and M. Zollo, “A bird in the hand or two in the bush? Integration trade-offs in technology-grafting acquisitions,” European Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, 179-184 (2003).
56.Quey, T.M. and N.K. Malhotra, “Technology transformation and purposed play: model development and implications for high tech product development” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, 62-87 (2004).
57.Saaty, T.L. and L.G. Vargas, Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001).
58.Saaty, T.L., “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 234-281 (1977).
59.Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA (1996).
60.Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mcgraw-Hill, New York (1980).
61.Stock, G.N. and M.V. Tatikonda, “The joint influence of technology uncertainty and interorganizational interaction on external technology integration success,” Journal of Operations Management, 26, 65-80 (2008).
62.Tiwari, M.K., R.P. Mohanty, R. Agarwal and A.K. Choudhury, “A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43, No. 24, 15, 5199-5216 (2005).
63.White, M.A. and G.D. Bruton, The Management of Technology and Innovation: A Strategic Approach, Thomson Learning Company, (2007).
64.Wu, C.R., C.T. Lin and H.C. Chen, “Integrated environmental assessment of the location selection with fuzzy analytical network process,” Quality and Quantity, Vol. 41, No. 1, online first (2007).
65.Wu, C.R., C.W. Chang and H.L. Lin, “A Fuzzy ANP-based Approach to Evaluate Medical Organizational Performance,” Information and Management Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 1, 53-74 (2008).
66.Yoshikawa, T., “Technology development and acquisition strategy,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 25, Nos. 6/7, 666-674 (2003).
67.Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, 8, 338-353 (1965).