跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.77.59) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/03/29 00:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:胡舒婷
研究生(外文):Shu-Ting Hu
論文名稱:以資料為依據飛航安全風險評估模型之建構與應用
論文名稱(外文):Construction of a Data-Driven Risk Assessment Model for Aviation Safety and Its Applications
指導教授:吳文方
指導教授(外文):Wen-Fang Wu
口試委員:莊禮彰洪一薰
口試委員(外文):Li-Chang ChuangYi-Xun Hong
口試日期:2019-07-23
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:工業工程學研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:36
中文關鍵詞:飛航安全風險識別風險矩陣風險管理貝葉斯網路
DOI:10.6342/NTU201902325
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:270
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
與飛航安全有關的風險管理一直是大眾關注的焦點,近年來國際上針對該項風險管理的研究重心逐漸從層級較低的風險因素識別轉往層級較高的資源有效配置,而在配置過程中,如何量化不同事故及不同狀態的風險成為準確決策的一項關鍵議題。就此,本研究針對各類飛航事故發生率及其損失建構分析模型,該模型除可分析既有資料數據,藉以識別高風險事故外,也可依貝葉斯網路(Bayesian network),透過新收集到的數據,更新模型參數。該模型主要係以狄利克雷分布(Dirichlet distribution)描述各類事故發生機率,並用以評估事故損失;兩者可供風險矩陣的繪製,並可藉以建構反帕雷托前沿,做為高風險事故之識別準則。經應用該模型分析所收集到我國、美國及歐盟的飛航事故資料,本研究發現,整體而言,我國近年來的飛航安全略優於美國、但不如歐盟;就事故識別而言,影響我國飛航安全之高風險事故類型包含偏出跑道(Runway Excursion, RE)、可控飛行撞地(Controlled Flight Into Terrain, CFIT)、非動力相關的零件組失效(System/Component Failure or Malfunction (non-powerplant), SCF-NP)、在飛行中失控(Loss of Control – Inflight, LOC-I)等,這些高風險事故值得管理當局配置有效資源予以防範。
Risk management related to aviation safety, which is sometimes called “aviation risk management” in brief, is important to the public. Its research has shifted gradually from risk identification to the more ambitious resource allocation in recent years. The purpose is to allocate resources appropriately for preventing various kinds of risk-event based on the result of quantitative risk assessment of those events. To that end, a quantitative risk assessment model is proposed in this thesis. The model employs Dirichlet distribution to describe probabilities of various risk events and evaluate their potential losses. The result is then used for constructing a risk matrix and an Anti-Pareto frontier. The former can be used for risk management including resource allocation and the latter can be used for setting criteria of high-risk events. Bayesian network is also employed in the model for updating model parameters based on available data. Aviation accident data of Taiwan, the United States and European Union are collected and analyzed based on the proposed model. It is found that, in terms of overall aviation safety, the situation of Taiwan is slightly better than that of the United States but slightly worse than that of the European Union. It is identified that high-risk aviation events in Taiwan are runway excursion (RE), controlled flight into/toward terrain (CFIT), system/component failure or malfunction (non-power plant) (SCF-NP) and loss of control–inflight (LOC-I), listed in sequence. These high-risk events deserve the authority to allocate appropriate resources for improvement.
口試委員會審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第 1 章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究目標 1
1.3 研究方法 3
1.4 研究範圍 3
1.5 本文架構 4
第 2 章 文獻回顧 6
2.1 國內相關文獻 6
2.2 航安風險預測 7
第 3 章 研究方法 8
3.1 預測模型 8
3.2 多屬性效用模型及篩選決策 12
3.3 不確定性節點 14
3.3.1 事故發生次數 14
3.3.2 死亡人數 14
3.3.3 輕重傷人數 15
3.3.4 飛航器損害和機場關閉 15
第 4 章 資料分析 17
4.1 事故發生數 17
4.2 死亡人數 17
4.3 輕重傷人數 21
4.4 飛航器損害與機場關閉 24
4.5 風險象限圖 27
第 5 章 結論 32
5.1 結論 32
5.2 研究限制與未來研究方向 32
參考文獻 33
附錄一 飛航事故資料分類 36
[1]EASA, Annual Safety Review, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Cologone, 2016.
[2]ASC, Taiwan Aviation Occurrence Statistics 2008-2017, Aviation Safety Council (ASC), Taipei, 2018.
[3]B. Vasigh, K. Fleming, and T. Tacker, Introduction to Air Transport Economics: From Theory to Applications, Routledge, 2018.
[4]E. S. Ayra, D. R. Insua, M. E. Castellanos, and L. Larbi, "Risk analysis for unintentional slide deployment during airline operations," Risk Analysis, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1652-1662, 2015.
[5]ICAO, Safety Management Manual, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 2013.
[6]M. Ayres, Jr., Safety Management Systems for Airports, Volume 2: Guidebook, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
[7]FAA, A Introduction to Safety Management Systems (SMS) for Airport Operators, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), AC 150/5200-37, 2007.
[8]G. R. McIntyre, "The application of system safety engineering and management techniques at the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)," Safety Science, vol. 1, no. 40, pp. 325-335, 2002.
[9]C. Cioacă, "Qualitative risk analysis methods in aviation projects," Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77-84, 2011.
[10]C. Edwards, M. Westcott, and N. Fulton, "The application of hazard risk assessment in defence safety standards," in Proceedings of Improving Systems and Software Engineering Conference, pp. 135-146, 2009.
[11]L. A. Cox, Jr., "What''s wrong with risk matrices?" Risk Analysis: An International Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 497-512, 2008.
[12]S. French and D. R. Insua, Statistical Decision Theory, Wiley, 2000.
[13]B. J. M. Ale, L. J. Bellamy, R. van der Boom, J. Cooper, R. M. Cooke, L. H. J. Goossens, A. R. Hale, D. Kurowicka, O. Morales, A. L. C. Roelen, and J. Spouge, "Further development of a causal model for air transport safety (CATS): building the mathematical heart," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1433-1441, 2009.
[14]交通部民用航空局,〈第十篇:民用航空〉,107年度交通年鑑,2018。
[15]許尚華,〈由事故分析談人為因素對飛航安全之影響〉,中華民國八十三年航空安全研討會,1994。
[16]李克聰、魏宇明、周倩如,〈飛航安全內在環境因素之研究分析〉,中華民國運輸學會第十屆學術研討會,1995。
[17]程建榮,開放天空後航空業管理結構、營運績效及飛航安全之研究,國立成功大學交通管理學研究所碩士論文,1995。
[18]交通部運輸研究所,台灣地區飛航安全概述,1996。
[19]林盈合,航空公司飛安風險因素之探討,國立成功大學交通管理學研究所碩士論文,2003。
[20]李文魁,航空安全風險評估模式之研究,國立成功大學交通管理學研究所博士論文,2005。
[21]蕭瑋,商務航空器飛航安全因素之探討,開南大學空運管理學研究所碩士論文,2009。
[22]印標元,飛行員對危害飛行安全因子之分析與研究,開南大學空運管理學研究所碩士論文,2010。
[23]林詩瑄,飛安相關事件之風險分析,國立交通大學管理學院運輸物流學程碩士論文,2011。
[24]于守勳,以國籍航空飛安統計資料探討飛安事件預防對策,國立成功大學交通管理學研究所碩士論文,2014。
[25]C.M. Belcastro and J.V. Foster, "Aircraft loss-of-control accident analysis," in Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 2010-8004, 2010.
[26]K. J. Clancy, "Fatalities in aircraft crashes - a contractual basis of recovery," Journal of Air Law and Commerce, vol. 27, issue 3, pp. 262-267, 1961.
[27]J. G. Grabowski, S. P. Baker, and G. Li, "Ground crew injuries and fatalities in US commercial aviation, 1983-2004," Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1007-1011, 2005.
[28]A. Pikaar, M. Piers, and B. Ale, External Risk Around Airports: A Model Update, Nationaal Luchten Ruimtevaartlaboratorium, 2000.
[29]P. Janssen and B. Ale, "Safety around airports: a comparison of three computational approaches," Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM5), Osaka, Japan, 2000.
[30]J. Thorpe, "Fatalities and destroyed civil aircraft due to bird strikes, 1912-2002," Proceedings from the 26th Annual Meeting of the International Bird Strike Committee, Warsaw, Poland, 2003.
[31]M. Dambier and J. Hinkelbein, "Analysis of 2004 German general aviation aircraft accidents according to the HFACS model," Air Medical Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 265-269, 2006.
[32]D. O’Hare, D. Chalmers, and P. Scuffham, "Case-control study of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal injury in crashes of civil aircraft," Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1061-1066, 2003.
[33]P. Ipeirotis, and L. S. and Dreams, "LogDirichletDensity-alpha_0.3_to_alpha_2.0," 2010. [Online]. Available: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/狄利克雷分布. (accessed 06/25/2019).
[34]O. Čokorilo, S. Gvozdenović, L. Vasov, and P. Mirosavljević, "Costs of unsafety in aviation," Technological and Economic Eevelopment of Economy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 188-201, 2010.
[35]J. González-Ortega, V. Radovic, and D. R. Insua, "Utility elicitation," in Elicitation - The Science and Art of Structuring Judgement, pp. 241-264, ed. L. C. Dias, A. Morton, J. Quigley, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Book Series (ISOR, volume 261), Springer, 2018.
[36]J.-L. Liou, Effect of Income Heterogeneity on Value of Statistical Life in Taiwan, Working Paper Series No.2018-5, Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei, Taiwan, 2018.
[37]DOT, Guidance on Treatment of the Economic Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) in U.S. Department of Transportation Analyses, revised 2013, Department of Transportation (DOT), Washington D. C., 2013.
[38]P. L. de Matos, A. Tautz, P. Andribet, and P. Merlo, Standard Inputs for EUROCONTROL Cost Benefit Analyses, ed. 8, European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL), EUROCONTROL Headquarters, Brussels, 2018.
[39]D. R. Insua, C. Alfaro, J. Gomez, P. Hernandez-Coronado, and F. Bernal, "Forecasting and assessing consequences of aviation safety occurrences," Safety Science, vol. 111, pp. 243-252, 2019.
[40]I. Giagkiozis and P. J. Fleming, "Pareto front estimation for decision making," Evolutionary computation, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 651-678, 2014.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊