跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.221) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/03 00:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:魏慶林
研究生(外文):Ching-Lin Wei
論文名稱:貨幣市場與股市泡沫的動態分析
論文名稱(外文):A Dynamic Analysis of Money market and Stock Market Bubbles
指導教授:翁銘章翁銘章引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Jang Weng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄大學
系所名稱:應用經濟學系碩士班
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:英文
論文頁數:47
中文關鍵詞:股市泡沫、金融市場不穩定假說、自我預期實現、貝氏估計、馬可夫轉換
外文關鍵詞:financial instability hypothesis、stock market bubbles、self-fulfilling prophecy、Bayesian estimate、Markov regime-switching
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:899
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:195
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
由於金融市場有自我預期實現之特性,股市泡沫的增長與崩滅反映了市場對於泡沫信念之強化與削弱。由Minsky (1991)所提出的金融市場不穩定假說認為經濟體的波動有可能是來自金融市場的不穩定,而此不穩定不需藉由非預期到的外在力量來達成。由於貨幣市場主導了股票市場籌碼的增減與信用擴張之程度對未來景氣預期的影響,如果金融市場不穩定假說可以充分描述經濟體系的不穩定,那貨幣市場便有可能主導市場對於未來泡沫的預期。由於理性預期假說無法解釋經濟體的內在波動亦無法解釋為何泡沫完全崩滅後會再度形成,本研究主要目的便是檢驗究竟在金融市場不穩定假說的架構下,市場對於泡沫的重複形成與崩滅之信念是否由貨幣市場來主導。
因此,本研究在股利價格比的架構下,推導出當存在本質泡沫與只反映市場基要的共整合向量,用以過濾出市場對泡沫的信念。接著利用Probit模型去描述貨幣市場變數對先驗泡沫信念的影響,然後結合貝氏估計與馬可夫轉換下去估計共整合向量與Probit模型。藉由結合貝氏估計與馬可夫轉換,實證結果能夠顯示市場對於泡沫信念之強化與削弱的動態過程,並且能夠檢驗貨幣市場變數是否對股市泡沫的信念有顯著影響。
Since the financial market posses the feature of the self-fulfilling prophecy, the growth and collapse of stock market bubbles reflects the amplification and diminishing of the beliefs of bubbles. The financial instability hypothesis proposed by Minsky (1992) suggested that the fluctuation in the economy may be resulted from the instability of financial market and such instability could be triggered without exogenous disturbances. As the money market dominates the increases and decreases in stock market funds and the impact of credit amplification on the future expectation of the economy, the money market may be capable of dominating the expectation of bubbles in stock market if the economy system is characterized sufficiently by the financial instability hypothesis. Due to that the rational expectation hypothesis is unable to illustrate endogenous fluctuations in the economy and the reoccurrence of bubbles after complete collapse, the goal of this thesis is to examine whether the belief of repeated crash and arise on bubbles is dominated by the money market following the structure of the financial instability hypothesis.
Therefore, this thesis derives cointegration vectors which represent existing intrinsic bubbles and market fundamentals. These vectors can be utilized to filter out the market participant’s belief about bubbles. By using Probit model, the influence of monetary variables on the prior belief of bubbles can be depicted. These vectors and Probit model can be estimated by combining Bayesian econometric framework and Markov Regime-switching approach. The empirical result can display the dynamic process of beliefs of repeat crash and arise on bubbles and show how money market does play a crucial role to dominate these beliefs.
Acknowledgment i
Chinese abstract ii
English abstract iii
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature review 4
2.1 A review of the financial instability hypothesis and stock market bubbles 4
2.2 Methodologies for testing bubble 6
3. Econometric modeling 12
3.1 The background 12
3.2 Modeling framework 15
3.3 Estimation procedure 24
4. Empirical results 31
4.1 Data description and choice of the prior state variable 31
4.2 Estimation outcomes and their implication 33
5. Conclusions 39
References 40
Albert. J., and S. Chib, 1993a, Bayes inference via Gibbs sampling of autoregressive time series subject to Markov mean and variance shifts, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 11, pp.1-15.
Albert. J., and S. Chib, 1993b, Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 88, pp.669-679.
Bohl, M.T., 2002, Periodically collapsing bubbles in the US stock market? International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 12, pp.385–397.
Campbell, J., A. W. Lo, and A.C. MacKinlay, 1997, The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princetion University Press.
Campbell, J., and R.J. Shiller, 1988, The dividend–price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 1, pp.195–227.
Coakley, J., and A.M. Fuertes, 2005, Valuation ratios and price deviations from fundamentals, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 30 , pp.2325–2346.
Cochrane, J., H. 1992, Explaining the variance of price dividend ratios, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 5, pp.243-280.
Craine, R., 1989, Asset prices and economic fundamentals: A new test, manuscript, Berkeley.
Diba, B.T., and H.I. Grossman, 1998a, Explosive rational bubbles in stock prices? American Economic Review, vol. 78, pp.520–530.
Diba, B.T., and H.I. Grossman, 1998b, The theory of rational bubbles in stock price, Economic Journal, vol. 98, pp.746–754.
Enders, W., and C.W.J. Granger, 1998, Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 16, pp.304–311.
Enders, W., and P.L. Siklos, 2001, Cointegration and threshold adjustment, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 19, pp.166–176.
Evans, G.W., 1991, Pitfalls in testing for explosive bubbles in asset prices, American Economic Review, vol. 81, pp.922–930.
Filardo, A.J., and S.F. Gordon, 1998, Business cycle durations, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 85, pp. 99-123.
Flood, R.P., and P.M. Graber, 1980, Market fundamentals versus price-level bubbles: The first tests, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, pp.745-770.
Froot, K.A., and M. Obstfeld., 1991, Intrinsic bubbles: The case of stock prices, The American Economic Review, vol. 81, pp.1189-1214.
Fukuta, Y., 1998, A simple discrete time approximation of continuous time bubbles, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 22, pp.937-954.
Gallagher, L.A., and M.P. Taylor, 2001, Risky arbitrage, limits of arbitrage, and nonlinear adjustment in the dividend–price ratio, Economic Inquiry, vol. 39, pp.524-536.
Hall, S.G., Z. Psaradakis, and M. Sola, 1999, Detecting periodically collapsing bubbles: A Markov-switching unit root test, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 14, pp.143–154.
Hamilton, J.D., 1986, On testing for self-fulfilling speculative price bubbles, International Economic Review, vol. 27, pp.545-552.
Hamilton, J., 1989. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle, Econometrica, vol. 57, pp.357-384.
Hansen, L., and T.J. Sargent, 1979, Formulating and estimating dynamic linear rational expectations models, Working Paper, University of Carnegie-Mellon, Graduate School Indus. Admin.
Manzan, S., 2004, Nonlinear Mean Reversion in Stock Prices, Working Paper, University of Amsterdam, Department of Quantitative Economics.
Minsky, H.P., 1992, The financial instability hypothesis, Working Paper, The Jerome Levy Economics Institute of Brad College.

Poterba, J.M., and L.H. Summers, 1986, The persistence of volatility and stock market fluctuations, American Economic Review, vol. 76, pp.1142-1151.
Singleton, K., 1979, On the estimation of linear macroeconomic models with rational expectations, Working Paper, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
Timmermann, A., 1995, Cointegration tests of present value models with a time-varying discount factor, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 10, pp.17-31.
Vanden, J.M., 2005, Equilibrium analysis of volatility clustering. Journal of Empirical Finance, vol. 12, pp.374–417
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 王保進 (1991) 臺灣地區國民教育發展型態之研究,教育與心理研究,14:207-234。
2. 林素菁 (2004) 台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計,住宅學報,13 (1) :15-34。
3. 林俊傑 (2004) 偏遠地區英語教師的焦慮,師友月刊,440:34-37。
4. 林文達 (1983) 教育機會公平性之研究,國立政治大學學報,48:87-115。
5. 周仁尹、曾春榮 (2006) 從弱勢族群的類型談教育選擇權及教育財政革新,教育研究與發展期刊,2 (3) :93-122。
6. 李敦仁、余民寧 (2005) 社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證:以TEPS 資料庫資料為例,臺灣教育社會學研究,5 (2) :1-47。
7. 王勝賢 (1984) 國民中小學學生越區就學的效果及其相關問題之探討,教育心理學報,17:151-176。
8. 胡夢鯨 (1995) 臺灣地區城鄉國民小學教育資源分配之比較,國立中正大學學報,6 (1) :1-35。
9. 孫志麟 (1994) 臺灣地區各縣市國民小學教育資源分配之比較,教育與心理研究,17:175-202。
10. 馬信行 (1993) 臺灣地區近四十年來教育資源之分配情況,國立政治大學學報,67 (上) :19-56。
11. 馬信行 (1998) 臺灣鄉鎮市區社會地位指標之建立,教育與心理研究,21 (上) : 37-83。
12. 張明貴 (1998) 自由主義評價,哲學與文化,24 (11) :1027-1040.
13. 郭明堂、羅瑞玉 (1995) 教育機會均等與城鄉差異問題之探討:國民小學教育資源城鄉差異之比較,教育學刊,11:245-277。
14. 陳進成 (1997) 談偏遠地區國小教師的教學輔導與進修,研習資訊,14 (3) :57-63。
15. 童敏雯 (1999) 家長教育選擇權。教育社會學通訊,17:17-18。