跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/06 09:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:趙守道
研究生(外文):Shou-Tao Chao
論文名稱:感官自明:喬哀思的美學研究
論文名稱(外文):Sensual Epiphanies: A Study of Aesthetics of James Joyce's Writing
指導教授:周曉青周曉青引用關係
指導教授(外文):Paul Chow
口試委員:馮翰士王惠茹
口試委員(外文):Henk VynckierHuei-ju Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:99
語文別:英文
論文頁數:83
中文關鍵詞:喬哀思自明性慾湯瑪斯 阿奎那互顯
外文關鍵詞:James JoyceEpiphanySexual DesireThomas AquinasMutual Revelation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:456
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:49
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
論文名稱: 感官自明:喬哀思的美學研究
校院系所: 國立暨南國際大學人文學院外國語文學系 頁數: 83
畢業時間: 西元2010年10 月 學位別: 碩士
研究生: 趙守道 指導教授: 周曉青

論文摘要
此論文主要在探究喬哀思的作品《一位藝術家的畫像》以及《尤里西斯》中的自明, 可分成三個部分討論:
第一章旨在探究喬哀思的作品中《年輕藝術家的畫像》以及《尤利西斯》,筆下的三個角色的性覺醒,他們的性覺醒獲得滿足的過程,進而延伸到產生「自明」。
第二章旨在探究喬哀思及其推崇的神學家湯瑪斯阿奎那的神學觀, 阿奎那對於上帝的存在,美,以及人類思考的觀點。
第三章旨在探究喬哀思從湯瑪斯阿奎那的美學觀點中的Claritas,闡述出來的概念「自明」,「自明」的產生主要在於雙方的互顯。此章並探究其筆下的三個角色,如何由性覺醒產生「自明」時刻。
從這三個章節我們可以知道, 由性慾所產生的「自明」就像是喬哀思本人對於藝術的追求一樣, 在追求的過程中,他會越加的成熟, 並且藉由不斷追求的過程, 而達到藝術以及感官上的極致。






關鍵詞: 喬哀思; 自明; 性慾; 湯瑪斯 阿奎那; 互顯

Title of Thesis: Sensual Epiphanies: A Study of Aesthetics of James Joyce’s Writing
Name of Institute: Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, College of Humanities, Chi Nan University Page: 83
Graduation Time: October, 2010 Degree Conferred: Master
Student Name: Shou-Tao Chao Advisor Name: Prof. Hsiao-Ching Chow
Abstract
The major argument to the M. A. thesis is to redefine the process of achieving epiphany in James Joyce’s work A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Ulysses, and it may be divided into three chapters.
In the first chapter, it aims to discuss about the three characters’ sexual awakening, the process of fulfilling their sexual desires, and how it leads to the moments of epiphanies.
The second chapter talks about Thomas Aquinas’s idea of God, beauty ,and human intellect.
The third chapter aims to argue about James Joyce’s epiphany and how the three characters’ moments of epiphanies may be achieved.
By the three chapters, it is obvious to know the process of achieving sensual epiphany is like Joyce’s process of seeking for beauty of art. By the process, he may become more mature and may achieve the sublime of art and senses.






Key words: James Joyce; Epiphany; Sexual Desire; Thomas Aquinas; Mutual Revelation

Table of Contents

Acknowledgement.…………………………………………………………………...i.
Chinese Abstract………………………………………………………………...……ii.
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………...….iii.
Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………..…iv
Introduction………………………………………..………………………………….1
Chapter One: James Joyce’s Sexual Awakening: three characters’ Sexual Awakenings..................................................................................................................11
Chapter Two: Thomas Aquinas’s theology: His idea of God, Beauty, and Intellect……………………………………………………………………………....35
Chapter Three: James Joyce’s Aesthetics: His Epiphany and the Three Characters’s
Epiphanic Moments.....……………………………………………………………….48
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………74
Works Cited………………………………………………….……………………….78




Works Cited
Attridge, Derek. “‘Suck was a queer word’: Language, sex, and the remainder in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” Joyce Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. 59-77.
---. The Cambridge Companion to James Joyce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Aubert, Jacques. “The Pola Notbook and Aquinas.” The Aesthetics of James Joyce. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1992. 100-09.
Baldick, Chris. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001.
Barth, John. Lost in the Funhouse. New York: Anchor Books, 1988.
Benejam, Valerie. “Molly Inside and Outside ‘Penelope’.” Ed. Richard Brown. Joyce, “Penelope” and the Body. New York: Rodopi, 2006. 63-74.
Benstock, Bernard, ed. The Seventh of Joyce. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1982.
Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Co. and Penguin Books. 1972.
Block, Haskell M. “The Critical Theory of James Joyce.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 8.3 (1950): 172-84.
Bolt, Sydney. A Preface to James Joyce. London: Longman, 1992.
Bourke, Vernon J. The Pocket Aquinas. New York: Washington Square Press, 1960.
---.“Beauty and Art.” The Pocket Aquinas. New York: Washington Square Press, 1960. 261-66.
Brivic, Sheldon. “The Gaze.” The Veil of Signs: Joyce, Lacan, and Perception. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1991. 96-113.
Brown, Richard. “Love and Marriage.” James Joyce and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. 11-49.
---.“Sexual Dimorphism.” James Joyce and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985. 96-102.
---. “The Dominant Sex.” James Joyce and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambrudge UP, 1985.107-116.
Chang, Li-ping. and Cheng Kao. “Sexual Desire: A Picassoresque Reading of ‘Penelope’ in James Joyce’s Ulysses.” Journal of Nanya Institute of Technology 25 (2005): 95-108.
Chayes, Irene Hendry. “Joyce’s Epiphanies.” Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Joyce’s Portrait Criticisms and Critiques. New York: Meredith Publishing Company, 1962. 204-220.
Chow, Paul H. C. “Thomas Aquinas’s Aesthetical Theory Reflected.” Diss. Chi Nan U, 2008.
Connolly, Thomas E. Joyce’s Portrait Criticisms and Critiques. New York: Meredith Publishing Company, 1962.
---. “Joyce’s Aesthetic Theory.” James Joyce’s Books, Portraits, Manuscripts, Notebooks, Typescripts, Page Proofs. New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 1997. 229-34.
Costello, Peter. “Sin and Salvation.” James Joyce: The Years of Growth, 1882-1915. New York: Pantheon Books, 1992. 134-45.
C. Hugh Holman. A Handbook to Literature. Indiana: Prentice Hall, 1980.
Davies, Brian. ed. Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. New
York: Oxford UP, 2002.
Deane, Seamus. “Joyce the Irishman.” The Cambridge Companion to James Joyce. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. 31-53.
Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Science.” Ed. Hazard Adams and Leroy Searle. Critical Theory since Plato. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005. 1206-15.
Dimock, Marshall. “Creativity.” Public Administration Review 46.1 (1986): 3-7.
Eco, Umberto. Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
Ernst, Cornelius. Multiple Echo Explorations in Theology. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2007.
Frye, Northrop, Sheridan Baker, and George Perkins. The Harper Handbook to Literature. 2 ed. New York: Longman, 1997.
Goldberg, S. L. “Art and Freedom: The Aesthetic of Ulysses.” ELH 24.1 (1957): 44-64.
Haavio-Mannila, Elina, Roos, J. P., and Kontula, Osmo. “Repression, Revolution, and Ambivalence: The Sexual Life of Three Generations.” Acta Sociologica. 39.4 (1996): 409-30.
Hamilton, Edith. Mythology: Timeless Tales of Gods and Heroes. Taiwan: Bookman Publishers, 1940.
Harmon, Melissa Burdick. “A Portrait of the Artist’s Home: James Joyce’s Dublin.” Biography 3.1 (1999): 90.
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1962.
---. “The Thing.” Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper& Row, 1962. 163-80.
Henke, Suzette. “Stephen Dedalus and Women: A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Misogynist.” Ed. Suzette Henke and Elaine Unkeless, Women in Joyce. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982. 82-107.
Hoffman, Paul. “St. Thomas Aquinas on the Halfway State of Sensible Being.” The Philosophical Review 99.1 (1990): 73-92.
Holy Bible: New International Version. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994.
Hope, A. D. “The Esthetic Theory of James Joyce.” Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Joyce’s Portrait Criticisms and Critiques. New York: Meredith Publishing Company, 1962. 183-203.
Irigaray, Luce. “Women on the market.” This Sex Which Is Not One. New York: Cornell University Press, 1977. 170-91.
Iser, Wolfgang. “Asymmetry Between Text and Reader.” The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1978. 163-71.
Joyce, James. A Portrait of the artist as a Young Man. Taipei: Bookman, 1916.
---. Dubliners. New York: Penguin Books, 2000.
---. Ulysses. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.
Kanjo, Judith. “Portrait of a Class in Search of Modernism.” The English Journal 81.1 (1992): 32-34.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. London: The Everyman Library, 1993.
Kerr, Fergus. After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
Kimball, Jean. “Freud, Leonardo, and Joyce: The Dimensions of a Childhood Memory.” Ed. Bernard Benstock. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1982. 57-73.
Kullmann, Wolfgang. “Gods and Men in the Iliad and Odyssey.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89 (1985): 1-23.
Levenson, Michael. “Stephen’s Diary in Joyce’s Portrait—The Shape of Life.” ELH 52.4 (1985): 1017-35.
Levin, Harry. “The Two Keys.” James Joyce. New York: New Directions Publishing, 1960. 65-99.
Maclean, Hugh, and Ann Lake Prescott. Edmund Spenser’s Poetry. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1993.
Mahaffey, Vicki. “Joyce’s Short Works.” Ed. Derek Attridge. The Cambridge Companion to James Joyce. 2ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. 172-95.
Mauro, Jason. “The Shape of Despair: Structures and Vision in Keats’s ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn.'” Nineteenth-Century Literature 52.3 (1997): 289-301.
Mason, Michael. “Why is Leopold Bloom a cuckold?” ELH 44.1 (1977): 171-88.
McBrien, Richard P. Catholicism. Minneapolis: Winston Press, 1980.
McCabe, Herbert. God Matters. London: Continuum, 1987.
Mullin, Katherine. “‘True manliness’: policing masculinity in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” James Joyce, Sexuality and Social Purity. New York: Cambridge UP, 2003. 83-115.
Norris, Margot. Joyce’s Web. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992.
O’Brien, Alyssa J. “The Molly Blooms of ‘Penelope’: Reading Joyce Archivally.” Journal of Modern Literature 24.1 (2000): 7-24.
O’Meara, Thomas Franklin. Thomas Aquinas Theologian. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.
---. “Traditions, Schools, and Students.” Thomas Aquinas Theologian. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997. 152-200.
Pasternak, Boris. Doctor Zhivago. Milan: Everyman’s Library, 1991.
Pegis, Anton C., ed. The Wisdom of Catholicism. New York: Random House, 1949.
Pierce, David. Reading Joyce. New York: Pearson Longman, 2008.
Prescott, Joseph. “James Joyce’s Epiphanies.” Modern Language Notes 64.5 (1949): 346.
Reichert, Klaus. “The European background of Joyce’s writing.” Ed. Derek Attridge. The Cambridge Companion to James Joyce. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. 55-82.
Reinisch, June M. The Kinsey Institute New Report on Sex. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.
Reuben, David R. Everything you always wanted to know about sex, but were afraid to ask. New York: David Mckay Company, 1970.
Reynolds, Mary T. ed. James Joyce: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1993.
Scholes, Robert. “Joyce and the Epiphany: The Key to the Labyrinth.” In Search of James Joyce. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992. 59-69.
Scott, Bonnie Kime. Joyce and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
Splitter, Randolph. “Watery Words: Language, Sexuality, and Motherhood in Joyce’s Fiction.” ELH 49.1 (1982): 190-213.
Squillace, Robert. The Odyssey. New York: Barnes and Noble Classics, 2003.
Steinberg, Charles Side. “The Aesthetic Theory of St. Thomas Aquinas.” Philosophical Review 50.5 (1941): 483-97.
Williams, Bruce. “Molly Bloom: Archetype or Stereotype.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 33.3 (1971): 545-46.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. “Lectures on Aesthetics.” Ludwig Wittgenstein: Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1966. 1-36.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top