跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.44) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/05 13:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪肇谷
研究生(外文):Hung Chao Ku
論文名稱:恐懼訴求典型性與事實訊息線索對廣告效果之影響
論文名稱(外文):The effects of fear appeal and factual information cue on the advertising effects
指導教授:凌儀玲凌儀玲引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:行銷與流通管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:恐懼訴求典型性事實訊息線索自覺健康信念自我保健行為
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:268
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
恐懼訴求常被運用在公益廣告、政令宣導上,以勸阻大眾從事違規、危險事宜,其所產生的廣告效果是無庸置疑的,但恐懼訴求又如何控制的得宜才有效果,這就是本研究的目的。有研究指出,對於服務廣告,行銷人員必須特別強調廣告中的事實訊息。這是導因於服務的特殊本質與消費者知覺風險而產生的論點。因此對於服務而言,若廣告中的事實訊息線索高低不同,所能產生的廣告效果又是如何。
本研究將典型性作為區分的準則,導入兩變數中,形成2×2的受試者間實驗設計方式,共製作四組不同的廣告海報,透過牙周病病徵與虛擬的牙醫診所,針對嘉義市居民檢測其情感、意圖上的效果。控制變數為恐懼訴求典型性(典型、非典型)與事實訊息線索(高、低),其中並探究是否受試者的自覺健康信念及自我保健行為會影響情感與態度。
實驗總共發放300份問卷,有效問卷271份。研究的結果(一)驗證了本研究的恐懼訴求典型性與事實訊息線索之操弄成功;(二)恐懼訴求典型性對於情感反應、內容反應有顯著影響;(三)事實訊息線索高低對於情感與意圖無顯著影響;(四) 恐懼訴求典型性與事實訊息線索不同之組合,對於意圖的「就診意願」、「信任感覺」有顯著的影響;(五)自覺健康信念對於整體情感態度與意圖態度皆呈現顯著之影響;(六)自我保健行為對於整體情感態度有顯著之影響,但對於整體意圖態度並沒有顯著之影響。
Fear appeal is always using in public welfare advertisement. The purpose of this research is trying to find a concept to distinguish fear appeal into low or high. Study had pointed out, for service advertisement, marketing personnel must especially emphasize the factual information in the advertisement. So as to service, if the factual information clue level in the advertisement is different, what is the advertising result produced?
This research regards typicality as the criterion distinguished, putting into two parameters, and forms the experiment design among experimenters of 2×2. Author makes four groups of different advertisement altogether, by periodontal disease and fictitious dentist's clinic, and measures the result on its emotion and intention to residents in Chia-Yi city. Otherwise, if experimenters' conscientious health beliefs and self-health care behavior will influence the emotion and intention.
Totally, research grants 300 questionnaires, 271 effective questionnaires altogether in this experiment. The result (1) studied has proved that the manipulation of typicality and factual information cue of this research is successful. (2) Emotional responses and content responses that had been proved were effected by fear appeal. (3) The factual information clue level apparent to the emotion and intention is influenced. (4) There is no interaction which from fear appeal and factual information cue the effects the intention. (5)Conscientious health beliefs apparently influences on the whole emotion attitude and intention attitude. (6) Self-health care behavior only apparently influences on the whole emotion attitude, but does not influences on whole intention attitude.
目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題 4
第三節 研究目的 5
第四節 研究流程圖 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 廣告訴求 7
一、廣告訴求之內涵 7
二、恐懼訴求 8
三、典型性 15
三、小結 22
第二節 事實訊息線索 23
一、事實訊息線索之內涵 23
二、事實訊息線索之相關研究 24
三、小結 27
第三節 廣告效果 28
一、廣告效果 28
二、廣告態度中介模式 31
三、小結 33
第四節 自覺健康信念 34
一、自覺健康信念之內涵 34
二、小結 35
第三章 研究方法 36
第一節 研究架構與假設 36
一、研究架構 36
二、研究假說 37
第二節 變數之操作性定義 38
一、自變數 38
二、依變數 39
三、干擾變數 40
第三節 研究設計 41
一、實驗設計 41
二、實驗工具 41
三、研究標的物之選擇 42
四、實驗之操弄設計 43
五、研究對象 45
六、問卷設計 45
第四節 問卷前測 47
一、前測抽樣 47
二、前測結果 47
第五節 抽樣設計 50
一、實際抽樣與實驗操作 50
二、問卷回收與分析 51
三、資料分析工具 53
第六節 信度與效度檢測 54
一、信度分析 54
二、效度分析 54
三、廣告之操弄檢測 57
第四章 研究結果 59
第一節 描述性統計分析 59
一、自身健康狀況 59
二、情感態度 60
三、意圖態度 61
第二節 恐懼訴求與事實訊息線索對廣告效果之影響分析 62
一、情感態度分析 62
二、意圖態度分析 64
第五章 結論與建議 70
第一節 研究發現 70
一、恐懼訴求典型性之操弄 70
二、事實訊息線索之操弄 70
三、恐懼訴求典型性與事實訊息線索對廣告效果之影響 71
四、自覺健康信念與自我保健行為之干擾影響 73
第二節 研究建議 75
一、行銷理論意涵 75
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 77
一、研究限制 77
二、未來研究建議 78
中文參考文獻 79
英文參考文獻 81
附錄-本研究問卷與海報 87

圖目錄
圖1-1本研究流程圖 6
圖2-1層級效果模式 29
圖2-2廣告態度中介模式之情感轉移假說 31
圖2-3廣告態度中介模式之雙重中介假說 32
圖2-4廣告態度中介模式之相互中介假說 32
圖2-5廣告態度中介模式之獨立影響假說 33
圖2-6第一階段醫療服務利用行為模式 35
圖3-1研究架構圖 36


表目錄
表 2-1恐懼訴求之相關研究(一) 12
表 2-2恐懼訴求之相關研究(二) 13
表 2-3典型性之相關研究(一) 17
表 2-4典型性之相關研究(二) 19
表 2-5層級效果模式之整理表 30
表 3-1本研究實驗組合彙整表 41
表 3-2牙周病病徵-恐懼訴求高低 44
表 3-3事實訊息線索高低 45
表 3-4自身牙齒健康狀況之信度分析 48
表 3-5對牙周病感覺之信度分析 48
表 3-6對德安牙醫診所想法之信度分析 49
表 3-7實驗人數分配表 51
表 3-8樣本結構表 52
表 3-9實驗之信度整理表 54
表 3-10情感態度之因素分析表 55
表 3-11意圖態度之因素分析表 56
表 3-12因素萃取整理表 57
表 3-13恐懼訴求操弄檢測整理表 57
表 3-14事實訊息線索操弄檢測整理表 58
表 4-1自身牙齒健康狀況之描述性分析表 59
表 4-2情感態度之描述性統計分析 60
表 4-3意圖態度之描述性分析 61
表 4-4情感態度之多變量檢定 62
表 4-5三個情感態度子構面之共變數分析 63
表 4-6意圖態度之多變量檢定 64
表 4-7三項意圖態度子構面之共變數分析 64
表 4-8「就診意願」之平均數整理表 66
表 4-9交互作用對就診意願之影響(一) 66
表 4-10交互作用對就診意願之影響(二) 67
表 4-11「信任感覺」之平均數整理表 68
表 4-12交互作用對信任感覺之影響 68
表 4-13交互作用對信任感覺之影響 69
中文參考文獻
1.Stewart, W. David & Shamdasani, N. Prem(1998),「焦點團體:理論與實務-Focus Group:Theory and Practice」,初版,弘智文化
2.于家珩(2003),「影響女性乳癌篩檢因素之分析-以某區域教學醫院門診民眾為例」,中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
3.王紹遠(2003),「感性訴求廣告對廣告效果影響路徑之研究-以行動電話服務廣告為例」,私立銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
4.吳泓哲(2001),「直接經驗與廣告對消費者認知、情感及行為意圖之效果-以台灣國產品牌水果為個案研究」,國立中興大學行銷所碩士論文。
5.李孟麗、徐村和(1999),「廣告學:策略與管理」,五南圖書出版公司。
6.林建瑋(2004),「廣告代言人、事實訊息線索與知識結構對廣告訊息理解效果之影響」,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
7.邱皓政(2003),「社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析」,五南圖書出版公司,台北。
8.徐達光(2003),「消費者心理學-消費者行為的科學研究」,東華書局,台北。
9.徐靜儀(2001),「廣告訴求對廣告效果之研究-以網頁廣告為例」,私立東吳大學企業管理研究碩士論文。
10.祝鳳岡(1995),「廣告學研究」,三民書局,台北。
11.祝鳳岡(1996),「廣告理性訴求之策略分析」,廣告學研究,第十集,國立政治大學廣告學系。
12.張志桂(1980),「廣告訴求方式對消費者態度影響之研究」,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
13.許士軍(1994),「管理學」,東華書局,台北。
14.陳尚永、洪雅慧、蕭富峰(2002)編譯,「廣告學」,華泰文化事業公司。
15.陳俊傑(2001),「訊息典型性、訊息正反性與認知需求對相費者品牌態度之影響」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
16.陳敏郎(2001),「廣告代言人對推薦品牌廣告效果影響之研究」,國立交通大學經營管理所碩士論文。
17.楊勝凱(2004),「媒體資訊、品牌態度與住宅偏好對購屋意圖效果之研究」,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
18.趙珮琁(2003),「老榮民自覺健康狀況、憂鬱狀態及生活品質相關性之探究」,中國醫藥學院護理學研究所碩士論文。
19.劉美琪、許安琪、漆梅君、于心如(2000),「當代廣告:概念與操作」,學富文化事業有限公司,台北。
20.樊志育(1996),「廣告學」,三民書局,台北。
21.練乃華(2001),「產品資訊典型性對消費者評估過程之影響」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。

英文參考文獻
1.Abernethy, A. M. and Daniel D. B. (1992), “Advertising Information: Services versus Products,” Journal of Retailing, 68(4), pp.398-419.
2.Andersen, R. (1995), “Revisting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Dose it matter?,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, pp.1-10.
3.Barsalou, L. W. (1985), “Ideals, Central Tendency and Frequency of Instation as Determinants of Graded Structure in Categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11(4), pp.629-648.
4.Berry, L. L. (1980), “Services Marketing Is Different,” Business, 30, pp.24-29.
5.Berry, L. L. and A. Parasuraman (1991), Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality, New York: The Free Press.
6.Berry, L. L. and T. Clark (1986), “Four Ways to Make Services More Tangible,” Business, 36(4), pp.53-54.
7.Blackman, B. A. (1985), “Making A Service More Tangible Can Make It More Manageable,” in J. A. Czeplel, M. R. Solomon and C. F. Surprenant, (eds.), The Service Encounter Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
8.Boush, D. M. and B. Loken (1991), “A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28, pp.16-28.
9.Bovee, C. L. and W. F. Arens (1989), Contemporary Advertising, The Irwin series in marketing.
10.Chandy, R. K., G. J. Tellis, D. J. Macinnis and P. Thaivanch (2001), “What to Say When:Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38, pp.399-414.
11.Clow, K. E., D. Baack and C. Fogliass (1998), “Reducing Perceived Risk Through Advertising Service Quality Cues,” Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 16, pp.151-162.
12.Cox, D. F. (1967), Risk-Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University.
13.Cutler, B. D. and R. G. Javalgi (1993), “Analysis of Print Ad Features: Service Versus Product,” Journal of Advertising Research, 33(2), pp.62-69.
14.Eagly, A. and S. Chaiken (1993), The psychology of attitudes, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15.Eklund, R. B., Jr. and R. D. Tollison (2000), Economics, Private Markets and Public Choice, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.Engel, J. F., M. R. Warshaw, T. C. Kinnear and B. B. Reece, (2000), Promotional Strategy, Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Resource, Inc.
17.Fiske, S. T. (1982), “Schema-Triggered Affect: Applications to Social Perception,” 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, pp.171-190.
18.Fiske, S. T. and M. A. Pavelchak (1986), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behavior, New York: Guilford Press, pp.167-203.
19.George, W. R. and L. L. Berry (1981), “Guidelines for Advertising Services,” Business Horizons, 24, pp.52-56.
20.Gronroos, C. (1990), Services Management and Marketing, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
21.Grove, S. J., G. M. Pickett and D. N. Laband (1995), “An Empirical Examination of Factual Information Content among Service Advertisements,” The Services Industries Journal, 15(2), pp.216-233.
22.Hale, J. L. and J. P. Dillard (1995), “Fear Appeals in Health Promotion Campaigns,” Designing Health Messages: approaches from communication theory and public health practice, London: SAGE.
23.Hill, D. J. and N. Gandhi (1992), “Services Advertising: A Framework to its Effectiveness,” The Journal of Services Marketing, 6(4), pp.63-76.
24.Hovland, C. I. (1959), “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change,” American Psychologist, 14, pp.8-17.
25.Hovland, C. I., I. Janis and H. Kelley (1953), Communication and Persuasion, New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
26.James, E. L. and B. G. V. Berg (1990), “An Information Content Comparison of Magazine Ads Across a Response Continuum From Direct Response to Institutional Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 19(2), pp.23-29.

27.Janis, I. L. and S. Feshbach (1953), “Effects of Fear-Arousing Communications,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, pp.78-92.
28.Johnson, E. M., E. E. Scheuing and K. A. Gaida (1986), Profitable Services Marketing, Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones/Irwin.
29.Laband, D. N. (1989), “The Durability of Information Signals and the Content of Ad,” Journal of Advertising, 18(1), pp.13-18.
30.LaTour, M. and R. E. Pitts (1989), “Using fear appeals in advertising for AIDS prevention in the college-age population,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 9(3), pp.5-14.
31.Lavidge, R. J. and G. A. Steiner (1961), “A Model for Predictive Measurement of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 25, pp.59-62.
32.Leventhal, H. (1970), “Findings and theory in the study of fear communications,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, pp.119-186.
33.Lien, N. H. and D. M. Stayman (1998), “Memory-Based Judgments: The Roles of Information Typicality and Processing Ability,” Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 3, pp.94-99.
34.Loken, B. and J. Ward (1987), “Measures of the Attribute Structure Underlying Product Typicality,” Advances in Consumer Research, 14, pp.22-26.
35.Loken, B. and J. Ward (1990), “Alternative Approached to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17, pp.111-126.
36.Lutz, R. J. and L. Swasy (1977), “Integrating Cognitive Structure and Cognitive Response Approaches to Measuring Communication Effects,” Advances in Consumer research, 4, pp.363-371.
37.Mackenzie, S. B., R. J. Lutz and G. E. Belch (1986), “The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23, pp.130-143.
38.Mervis, C. and E. Rosch (1981), “Categorization of Natural Objects,” Annual Review of Psychology, 32, pp.89-115.
39.Mitchell, A. A. and J. C. Olson (1981), “Are Product Attribute Belidfs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitudes?” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.318-322.

40.Murray, K. B. and J. L. Schlacter (1990), “The Impact of Services Versus Goods on Consumer’ Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), pp.51-65.
41.O’keefe, D. J. (1994), Persuasion Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks: London, Sage Publications.
42.Ogilvy, D. (1963), Confessions of an Advertising Man, New York NY: Atheneum Publishers.
43.Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry (1985), “Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 49, pp.33-46.
44.Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, 64, pp.12-40.
45.Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo (1979), “Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall, and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp.97-107.
46.Pickett, G. M., S. J. Grove, and D. N. Laband (2001), “The Impact of Product Type and Parity on the Informational Content of Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(3), pp.32-43.
47.Puto, C. and W. D. Wells (1984), “Information and Transformational Advertising: The Differential Efforts in Time,” Advances in Consumer Research, 11, pp.638-643.
48.Resnik, A. and B. L. Stern (1977), “An Analysis of Information Content in Television Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 41(1), pp.50-53.
49.Rips, L. J., E. Shoben and E. E. Smith (1973), “Semantic Distance and the Verification of Semantic Relations,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, pp.1-20.
50.Rosch, E. and C. Mervis (1975), “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories,” Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp.573-605.
51.Saunders, D., S. Tax, J. Ward, K. Court and B. Loken (1991), “The Family Resemblance Approach to Understanding Categorization of Products: Measurement Problems, Alternative Solutions and Their Assessment,” Advances in Consumer Research, 18, pp.84-89.
52.Scultz, P. E., D. Martin and W. P. Brown (1984), Strategic Advertising Campaigns, Chicago: Crain Books, Division of Crain Communication Inc.
53.Shostack, G. L. (1977), “Breaking Free from Product Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 41, pp.73-80.
54.Smith, E. E. (1990), Foundations of Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.Smith, E. E. and K. C. Gray (1992), “Mechanisms of Conceptual Combination ,” Unpublished Manuscript, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
56.Smith, E. E., D. N., Osherson, L. J. Rips and M. Keane (1988), “Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model,” Cognitive Science, 12, pp.485-527.
57.Smith, E. E., E. J. Shoben and L. J. Rips (1974), “Structure and Process in Semantic Memory: A Featural Model for Semantic Decisions,” Psychological Review, 81(3), pp.214-241.
58.Snipes, R. L., M. S. LaTour and S. J. Bliss (1999), “A model of the effects of self-efficacy on the perceived ethicality and performance of fear appeals in advertising,” Journal of Business Ethics, 19(3), pp.273-285.
59.Sujan, Mita (1985), “Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12, pp.31-46.
60.Thorson, Chi and Leavitt (1992), “Attention, Memory, Attitude and Conation: A Test of the Advertising Hierarchy,” Advances in Consumer Research, 19(1), pp.366-379.
61.Tversky, A. (1977), “Features of Similarity,” Psychological Review, 84, pp.327-352.
62.Ward, J. and B. Loken (1986), “The Quintessential Snack Food: Measurement of Product Prototypes,” Advances in Consumer Research, 13., pp.126-131.
63.Wheatley, J. J. and S. Oshikawa (1970), “The Relationship between Anxiety and Positive and Negative Advertising Appeals,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7, pp.85-89.
64.Witte, K. (1992), “Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model,” Communication Monographs, 59, pp.329-349.

65.Witte, K. (1993), “Message and Conceptual Confounds in Fear Appeals: The Role of Threat, Fear, and Efficacy,” Southern Communication Journal, 58, pp.147-155.
66.Witte, K. (1994), “Fear Control and Danger Control: A Test of The Extended Parallel Process Model(EPPM),” Communication Monographs, 61, pp.112-134.
67.Yi, Y. and K. C. Gray (1996), “Revisiting Attribute Diagnosticity in the Context of Product Typicality,” Psychology & Marketing, 13(6), pp.605-632.
68.Zajonc, R. B. (1984), “On the Primacy of Affect,” American Psychologist, 39, pp.117-123.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top