臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

知識累積是一種動態的過程，企業組織應瞭解如何進行知識的累積，以培養核心能力，創造競爭優勢。本研究的研究設計共分為兩大部分，第一部分採取循序漸進的方式進行產業分析，第二部分則針對產業進行量化的實證分析。本研究主要針對產業研發活動進行研發能量的分析，並導入以理論文獻為基礎之研究架構，藉由問卷調查的方式，實際針對目標產業進行調查，最後藉由統計工具分析，針對理論架構與實際情形進行比對，以對理論模型的適用性進行討論。
在產業分析部分，本研究發現：台灣TFT-LCD設備廠商所擁有的專利多屬於非核心三大製程的專利，對於高附加價值的設備，目前的供給能力仍然不足；且台灣TFT-LCD設備主要以志聖工業、東捷科技、陽程科技與均豪精密為主要的貢獻者，並且其公司規模與研發活動具有某一程度上的關係。
而根據實證分析結果顯示，外部獲取之外顯性知識，對技術實體與管理系統具有直接的累積效果，且外部獲取的外顯性知識，透過知識累積機制中的「系統(結構)化機制」與「互動協調機制」將更有助於外顯性知識的累積。另外，在干擾因素作用下的知識累積機制對知識累積具有正相關，尤其是在「組織的知識環境」作用下，能使「互動協調機制」更為明顯，且能對「技術實體與管理系統」與「員工的技能或能力」產生顯著性的作用；因此得出，內隱性知識透過干擾下的互動協調機制，能夠形成對知識累積的顯著路徑。內隱性知識的累積除了透過知識累積機制之外，更需要透過組織的知識環境來影響知識累積機制的作用情形。本研究結果顯示，組織越願意投入在組織知識環境的塑造上，越能促進更多的內隱性知識轉換，使得儲存在員工身上的寶貴經驗與知識，能夠獲的分享與傳遞，以至於最後形成一組織文化或工作氛圍，這樣就能真正的營造所謂的學習型組織，或是創新型的組織。

Knowledge accumulation is a dynamic process, and organizations should be aware of how to accumulate the knowledge in order to cultivate core competencies and create competitive advantages. Two major parts are included in this study. The first part is the theme of industrial analysis using the method of patent analysis. The second part is the theme of quantative research to verify and quantify the evidence of research framework in this study. This study adapts theoretical literature reviews, develops pratical research framework, and designs the questionnaire to actually analyze the capability of R&D in Taiwan’s TFT-LCD equipment industry. This study also uses statistical tools to test theoretical framework for the actual industrial situation and compare the applicability of the theoretical model with the actual industrial situation.
This study unveils that most patents owned by Taiwan’s TFT-LCD equipment vendors are only focused on three major non-core processes, and it is still insufficient for the current supplying capability of high value equipments in Taiwan’s TFT-LCD equipment industry. The main contributors in Taiwan''s TFT-LCD equipment industry are C SUN, Contrel Technology, USUN Technology and Gallant Precision Machining, and the firm sizes have certain relationships with respect to their R&D activities.
According to the results of empirical analysis, this study shows that the external explicit knowledge has a direct impact on the knowledge accumulation of technology entity and management system, and the knowledge accumulated through the mechanism of “systemization (structure)” and “interactive coordination” would contribute to the knowledge accumulation of external knowledge in firms. In addition, the interference mechanism of knowledge accumulation has a positive correlation on firm’s knowledge accumulation. Particularly, under the effect of “firm’s knowledge environment”, not only the “interactive coordination” is obvious to firm’s knowledge accumulation, but also “technology entity and management system” and “employees’ skills/ability” are significant in affecting firm’s knowledge accumulation.
In addition to the mechanism of knowledge accumulation, it is more important to build knowledge environment and influence the effect of knowledge accumulation mechanism. This study shows that the more organizations invest/cultivate the knowledge environment, the more it can obtain the goals of converting tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge and sharing/delivering the knowledge of employees’ valuable experiences and knowledge. Finally based on the organization’s knowledge environment, the organizational culture and work environment are formed to create a learning and innovative organization.

目錄....................................................i
圖目錄................................................iii
表目錄.................................................iv
第一章 緒論.............................................1
第一節 研究動機.........................................1
第二節 研究目的.........................................3
第三節 研究範圍與限制...................................3
第四節 研究流程.........................................4
第二章 文獻回顧.........................................6
第一節 知識理論基礎.....................................6
一、產業中知識的定義....................................6
二、知識累積的意涵......................................9
三、知識累積的機制.....................................12
第二節 TFT-LCD設備機台開發.............................19
一、產品的研發活動.....................................19
二、設備機台的研發流程.................................23
三、開發流程所伴隨的知識行為...........................25
第三章 研究方法........................................27
第一節 研究設計........................................27
一、產業分析工具.......................................27
二、量化統計分析工具...................................29
第二節 研究假設與研究架構..............................30
一、外部獲取知識對組織的知識累積.......................31
二、知識累積機制的扮演角色.............................33
三、組織的知識環境對知識累積機制的干擾.................35
第三節 研究變項之操作型定義............................37
第四節 目標與調查對象..................................39
第五節 問卷量表設計....................................40
一、認知性問項.........................................40
二、基本資料問項.......................................41
第四章 研究結果與分析..................................42
第一節 台灣TFT-LCD設備產業分析.........................42
一、TFT-LCD設備產業動態................................42
二、TFT-LCD生產的主要技術與機台........................43
三、台灣TFT-LCD設備產業之技術能力分析..................46
第二節 調查樣本敘述統計................................53
一、樣本資料收集.......................................53
二、敘述性統計分析.....................................57
第三節 探索性因素分析與信度............................62
一、探索性因素分析.....................................62
二、信度分析...........................................68
三、研究假設之修正.....................................70
四、Pearson相關係數分析................................71
第四節 驗證性因素分析..................................74
一、量測模式之分析與適配度指標.........................74
二、外部獲取知識的特性量測模式之ㄧ階驗證性因素分析.....76
三、知識累積機制量測模式之ㄧ階驗證性因素分析...........78
四、組織的知識環境量測模式之ㄧ階驗證性因素分析.........81
五、知識累積程度量測模式之ㄧ階驗證性因素分析...........82
六、知識環境干擾下之知識累積機制量測模式...............84
第五節 結構方程式分析..................................89
一、結構模式之分析與鑑定...............................89
二、外部知識獲取對組織知識累積的結構模式...............90
三、知識累積機制對外部獲取的知識進行知識累積的中介模式.92
四、組織的知識環境對知識累積機制的干擾模式.............97
五、結構模式的分析與假設結果..........................103
第五章 結論與管理意涵.................................106
第一節 研究結果與發現.................................106
一、台灣TFT-LCD設備產業的發展現況.....................107
二、知識理論的調查實證結果............................109
第二節 管理意涵.......................................112
一、產業佈局與技術發展................................112
二、內部知識管理......................................113
第三節 後續研究.......................................114
參考文獻..............................................116
◎中文參考文獻........................................116
◎英文參考文獻........................................117
◎參考網站............................................124
附件：施測問卷........................................125

◎中文參考文獻
1.方世杰、方世榮，2000，知識管理─觀念架構的建立，商管科技季刊，第1卷，第3期，頁355-374。
2.方世杰、蔡淑梨、羅育如，2005，從知識市場效率觀點探討組織知識創造，中山管理評論，第13卷，第2期，頁695-719。
3.朱文儀、黃延聰，2002，國際策略聯盟中廠商間知識移轉與廠商能力發展，台灣管理學刊，第1卷，第2期，頁105-124。
4.李元敦、吳濟民、艾昌瑞、凃嘉峪，2007，組織學習、知識分享與產品開發績效關係之研究：台灣知識密集產業之證實，科技管理學刊，第12卷，第1期，頁55-86。
5.吳明隆，2008，結構方程式模式─AMOS的操作與應用，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
6.周延鵬，2006，虎與狐的智慧力，台北：天下文化。
7.陳忠仁、蔡淑茹，2005，知識創造來源、知識管理能力及知識屬性對創新績效影響之研究─組織學習理論觀點，中山企管評論，第13卷，第2期，頁389-416。
8.陳達仁、黃慕萱，2002，專利資訊與專利檢索，台北：文華。
9.邱皓政，2008，量化研究與統計分析－SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析，第四版，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
10.張保隆、陳文賢、蔣明晃、姜齊、盧昆宏、王瑞琛，1997，生產管理，華泰書局。
11.張紹勳，2003，研究方法，修訂版，台中：滄海書局。
12.黃識銘、方世榮，2003，行銷通路成員之夥伴關係長期導向與組織間績效之研究，管理評論，第22卷，第2期。
13.傅承偉、張淵傑、賴文祥，2008，以專利分析探討台灣TFT-LCD設備之發展策略，中華民國科技管理學會年會暨論文研討會，國立政治大學。
14.楊朝旭、蔡柳卿，2006，人力資源系統、創新與企業經濟附加價值關聯性之研究，管理評論，第25卷，第3期，頁41-68。
15.國家科學委員會，2007，科學技術統計要覽。
16.鄭景華、王怡舜、湯宗益，2005，知識整合創新能力對組織創新績效影響之研究，電子商務研究，第3卷，第3期，頁215-240。
17.劉信宏，2007，2007機械產業年鑑，經濟部ITIS專案辦公室。
18.蔡敦浩、李慶芳，2006，疆界管理：探索情境知識本質與知識轉移，科技管理學刊，第11卷，第3期，頁89-118。
19.賴文祥、傅承偉，2008，台灣企業知識累積與累積能力，第五屆跨領域學術與實務研討會，東海大學。
20.簡俊成、洪清德，2003，外部知識移轉之研究─以台灣上市上櫃製造業為例，管理學報，第20卷，第5期，頁929-964。

◎英文參考文獻
1.Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L. and Varga, A., 2002. Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge. Research Policy, 31, pp. 1069-1085.
2.Afuah, A., 1998. Innovation management: strategies, implementation, and profits. Oxford University press.
3.Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. 2001., Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), pp.107-136.
4.Andersen B., 1998. The evolution of technological trajectories 1890-1990. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 9, pp. 5-34.
5.Atuahene-Gima, K., 1992. Inward technology licensing as an alternative to international R&D in new product development: An conceptual framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management, (9), pp. 156-167.
6.Badaracco, J., 1991. The knowledge link: how firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School.
7.Bader, M.A., 2007. Extending legal protection strategies to the service innovations area: review and analysis. World Patent Information, 29(2), pp. 122-135.
8.Barry, B. and Stephens, C.U., 1998. Objections to an Objectivist Approach to Integrity. Academy of Management Review, 23(1).
9.Barkema, H. and Vermeulen, F., 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 7-26.
10.Bentler, P.M., 1995. EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
11.Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V., 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowledge. Organization Science, 6(4), pp. 350-372.
12.Bonora, E.A. and Revang, 1991. A Strategic Framework for Analyzing Professional Service Firms-Development Strategies for Sustained Performance. Strategic Management Society Inter organizational Conference, Toronto, Canada.
13.Booz, Allen and Hamilton, 1968. Management of New Products. New York : Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc.
14.Brouwer E. and Kleinknchu A., 1999. Innovative output and a firm’s propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, (28), pp. 615-624.
15.Byrne, B.M., 1998. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.Canto, J. and Gonzalez, I., 1999. A Resource-based Analysis of the Factors Determining a Firm’s R&D Activities. Research Policy, (28), pp. 894-905.
17.Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity; A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152.
18.Cooper, R.G., 1983. A process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management.
19.Cusumano, M.A. and Elenkov, D., 1994. Linking international tech-nology with strategy and management: A literature commentary. Research Policy, 23(2), pp. 195-215.
20.Darden, W.R., 1983. Review of behavioral modeling in marking. In W. R. Darden, K. B. Monroe & W. R. Dillon (eds.), Research methods and causal modeling in marking. Chicage: American Marketing Association.
21.Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L., 1998. Working knowledge: How organizations management what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22.De Boer, M., Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W., 1999. Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), pp. 379-398.
23.Drucker, P.F., 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford, Harper Business, London.
24.Fabry, B., Ernst, H., Langholz, J. and Köster, M., 2006. Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities—an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry. World Patent Information, 28(3), pp. 215-225.
25.Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(4), pp. 39-50.
26.Gherardi, S., 2000. Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7, pp. 329-349.
27.Griliches, Z., 1989. Patents: Recent Trends and Puzzles. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. Microeconomics, pp. 3291-330.
28.Griliches Z., 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, pp. 1661-1707.
29.Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481-510.
30.Grant, R.M., 1996a. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), pp. 375-388.
31.Grant, R.M., 1996b. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 109-122.
32.Grupp, H. and Schmoch U., 1999. Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation. Research Policy, 28(4), pp. 377-396.
33.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C., 1992. Multivariate Data Analysis. 4thed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
34.Hall, B.H. and Ham R.M., 1999. The Patent Paradox Revisited: Determinants of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1980-94. Cambridge.
35.Hedlund, G., 1994. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 73-90.
36.Hendriks, P., 1999. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivationfor knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), pp. 91-100.
37.Huber, G.P., 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 88-115.
38.Hsiao, R.L., Tsai, D.H., and Lee, C.F., 2006. The problems of embeddedness: knowledge transfer, coordination and reuse in information systems. Organization Studies, (forthcoming).
39.Iwata, S., Kurokawa, S. and Fujisue, K., 2006. An Analysis of Global R&D Activities of Japanese MNCs in the US from the Knowledge-Based View. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 53(3), pp. 361-379.
40.Jöresk, K.G. and Sorbom, D., 2000. LISREL VI, Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods. 7thed., Mooresville, IN, Scientific Software.
41.Kogut, B. and Zander, U., 1992. Knowledge of the firm, integration capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, pp. 383-397.
42.Kostova, T., 1999. Transformational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), pp. 308-324.
43.Leonard-Barton, D., 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Massachusetts: Harvard Business school.
44.Miele, A.L., 2000. Patent Strategy: The Manager''s Guide to Profiting from Patent Portfolios. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
45.Mogee, M.E., 1991. Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Research Technology Management, 34, pp. 43-49.
46.Nonaka, I., 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), pp. 14–37.
47.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.
48.Nonaka, I. and Konno, N., 1998. The concept of ba: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 46.
49.Nordhaus, W., 1969. An Economics Theory of Technological Changes. Amer. Econ. Rev., 59(2), pp. 18-28.
50.Papows, J., 1999. Enterprise.com, Market Leadership in the Information Ages. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.
51.Pavitt, K. and Soete, L., 1981. International Differences in Economics Growth and International Location of Innovation. in Emerging Technological: Consequences for economics growth, structural change, and employment. Ed: Herbert Gierch. Institut for Welteirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel, Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 105-44.
52.Petrash, G., 1996. Dow''s journal to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal, 14(4), pp. 365-373.
53.Polanyi, M., 1967. The Tacit Dimension. New York: M.E. Sharp Inc.
54.Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
55.Rogers, E.M., 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd Ed. New York: The Free Press.
56.Ronkainen, I.A., 1985. Using decision-dystems analysis to formalize product development processes. Journal of Business Resreach, 13, pp. 97-106.
57.Roos, G. and Roos, J., 1997. Measuring Your Company''s Intellectual Performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), pp. 413-426.
58.Saren, M.A., 1984. A Classification and Review of Models of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process. R&D Management, 14, pp. 11-24.
59.Schmookler, J., 1951. Invention and Economics Development. Unpub. Ph.D. Dissertation. U. of Pennsylvania.
60.Simoin, B.L., 1995. Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: An empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), pp. 463-490.
61.Spear, B., 2008. James Watt: the steam engine and the commercialization of patents. World Patent Information, 30(1), pp. 53-58.
62.Stern, S., Poter, M.P. and Furman J.L., 2000. The determinants of national innovative capacity. NBER working paper, pp. 1-55.
63.Stewart, T.A., 1998. Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
64.Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 509-533.
65.Teng, J.T.C., Grover, V. and Güttler, W., 2002. Information Technology Innovations: General Diffusion Patterns and Its Relationships to Innovation Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), pp. 13-27.
66.Thompson, M.P.A., and Walsham, G., 2004. Placing knowledge management in context. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), pp. 725-747.
67.Trott, P., 1998. Innovation management and new product development. University of Portsmouth Business School.
68.Vermeulen, B., Patent Strategy [online]. Available from: http://www.corp21.com/PatentStrategy030726.pdf.
69.Welteirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel, Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 105-44.
70.WIPO, 2000. Regional Seminar on the Benefits of the Intellectual Property System for Universities, University Researches and Research and Development Organizations. World Intellectual Property Organization.
71.Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. and Sapienza, H.J., 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), pp. 587-613.
◎參考網站
1.USPTO：http://www.uspto.gov/
2.TIPO：http://twpat.tipo.gov.tw/
3.EPO：http://ep.espacenet.com/?locale=en_EP
4.SIPO：http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo2008/
5.工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心IEK：http://www.iek.itri.org.tw/
6.公開資訊觀測站http://newmops.tse.com.tw/
7.經濟部工業局http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/