臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著時代的變遷，企業社會責任越來越受到消費者的重視，甚至影響到消費者對企業的看法與購買行為，使得企業開始積極思考如何履行企業社會責任，「善因行銷」一種新型態的促銷手法，公司藉由從產品或服務中所獲得的收益，捐助固定的比例給特定的慈善團體，來達成個人或組織的目標，企業不僅可以從中獲利、善盡企業社會責任、更可以幫助需要援助的弱勢團體，消費者也因此提升對企業的正面觀感，達到一種三贏的局面。
本研究提出品牌知名度、善因配適度兩個變數，研究在何種情境下採用善因行銷能達到最大的效用，針對不同年齡受試者共發放320份問卷，分為2×4 (品牌知名度低、品牌知名度高) × (無善因行銷、配適度低、配適度高、災害救助相關議題)，共八種不同的情境，並採用不同的應變數，對善因行銷進行深入的了解。從結果可以得知：

一、採用善因行銷較不採用善因行銷更有效果
二、對善因行銷而言，高知名品牌較低知名牌更有效果
三、對善因行銷而言，善因配適度高較善因配適度低更有效果
四、採用災害救助相關議題的善因行銷對善因配適度低、善因配適度高並沒有顯著差異
五、對善因行銷而言，女性比男性更有效果
六、消費者知覺企業動機會對善因行銷產生顯著影響
七、對低知名品牌而言，採用善因行銷較不採用善因行銷更有效果
八、善因配適度高較無善因行銷能有效的提升消費者購買傾向、口碑、品牌態度、知覺品質、消費者認知公司企業社會責任。

As times change, consumer are becoming more concerned with corporate social responsibility, which also influence attitude about company and consume behaviors, hence companies start actively thinking about performing corporate social responsibility.
"Cause-related marketing(CRM)" is a new form of sales promotion, which is an offer from a part of profit purchasing the firm’s products or service to contribute a specified amount to a designated cause that satisfy organizational and individual objectives, for achieving to improve corporate profit, performing corporate social responsibility, helping the worthy causes ,and influencing consumer attitude about company. Therefore, CRM achieves a win-win-win situation.
This study proposed brand awareness, brand-cause fit as two independent variables to learn how to achieve maximum effect on CRM. The study used 320 questionnaires to collect data in different ages. A total of eight different scenarios are divided into 2 × 4 (low brand awareness, high brand awareness) × (without CRM, low brand-cause fit, high brand-cause fit, disaster relief related issues).This study chose different independent variables to realize CRM in depth .The main results are as follows :

First, the use of CRM is more effective than without CRM.
Second, high brand awareness is more effective than low on CRM.
Third, high brand-cause fit is more effective than low on CRM.
Fourth, disaster relief related issues have no significant differences to high brand-cause fit and low brand-cause fit.
Fifth, female is more effective than male on CRM.
Sixth, perceived motivation of the firm’s support for the cause is significant on CRM.
Seventh, in terms of low brand awareness, the use of CRM is more effect than without CRM.
Eighth, high brand-cause fit than those without CRM can effectively enhance purchase intention, brand attitude, word of mouth,perceived quality, corporate social responsibility.

目錄
中文摘要------------------------------------------------ Ⅰ
英文摘要------------------------------------------------ Ⅱ
誌謝---------------------------------------------------- Ⅲ
目錄---------------------------------------------------- Ⅳ
表目錄-------------------------------------------------- Ⅶ
圖目錄-------------------------------------------------- Ⅸ
第一章 緒論 --------------------------------------------- 1
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------- 1
第二節 研究背景 --------------------------------------- 1
第三節 研究動機 --------------------------------------- 2
第四節 研究目的與問題 --------------------------------- 3
第五節 研究流程 --------------------------------------- 3
第二章 文獻回顧 ----------------------------------------- 5
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------- 5
第二節 善因行銷起源------------------------------------ 5
第三節 善因行銷的定義和模式---------------------------- 6
第四節 善行銷國內外實例-------------------------------- 8
第五節 善因行銷對企業、非營利組織的影響---------------- 9
一、 對企業的影響------------------------------------ 9
二、 對非營利組織的影響----------------------------- 10
第六節 消費者對善因行銷的態度------------------------- 11
第七節 配適度的介紹和對善因行銷的影響----------------- 13
第八節 品牌知名度的定義和對善因行銷的影響------------- 14
第九節 小結------------------------------------------- 16
第三章 研究假設與方法 ---------------------------------- 17
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------ 17
第二節 研究假設 -------------------------------------- 17
一、 善因行銷的影響效果----------------------------- 17
二、 品牌知名度對善因行銷的影響--------------------- 17
三、 善因配適度對善因行銷的影響--------------------- 18
四、 災害救助相關議題對善因行銷的影響--------------- 18
五、 性別對善因行銷的影響--------------------------- 19
六、 消費者知覺企業動機對善因行銷的影響------------- 19
七、 善因行銷對低知名品牌的影響--------------------- 19
第三節 研究設計--------------------------------------- 19
第四節 前測------------------------------------------- 21
一、 前測一----------------------------------------- 21
二、 前測二----------------------------------------- 22
第五節 研究變數之操作性定義--------------------------- 24
一、 自變數----------------------------------------- 24
二、 應變數----------------------------------------- 24
三、 個人差異變數----------------------------------- 26
第六節 問卷設計與發放--------------------------------- 27
第四章 研究結果分析 ------------------------------------ 29
第一節 前言 ------------------------------------------ 29
第二節 信度分析--------------------------------------- 29
第三節 樣本背景分析----------------------------------- 29
第四節 潛在共變數檢驗--------------------------------- 30
第五節 研究假設之檢驗 -------------------------------- 32
一、 自變數顯著性檢定------------------------------- 33
二、 善因行銷的影響效果----------------------------- 33
三、 品牌知名度對善因行銷的影響--------------------- 36
四、 善因配適度對善因行銷的影響--------------------- 38
五、 災害救助相關議題對善因行銷的影響--------------- 39
六、 性別對善因行銷的影響--------------------------- 41
七、 消費者知覺企業動機對善因行銷的影響------------- 43
八、 善因行銷對低知名品牌的影響--------------------- 44
九、 品牌知名度和善因配適度的綜合分析--------------- 46
第六節 小結------------------------------------------- 51
第五章 結論與建議 -------------------------------------- 52
第一節 前言------------------------------------------- 52
第二節 研究結果討論 ---------------------------------- 52
第三節 研究貢獻 -------------------------------------- 55
一、 理論貢獻 -------------------------------------- 55
二、 實務貢獻 -------------------------------------- 55
第四節 研究限制 -------------------------------------- 56
一、 實驗設計法------------------------------------- 56
二、 單一產品類別----------------------------------- 56
第五節 未來研究建議 ---------------------------------- 56
ㄧ、捐款金額的影響---------------------------------- 56
二、善因行銷和價格促銷的比較------------------------ 57
三、善因行銷的後續影響------------------------------ 57

參考文獻 ----------------------------------------------- 58
附錄一 品牌知名度前測問卷------------------------------- 64
附錄二 善因配適度前測問卷------------------------------- 65
附錄三 正式問卷 ---------------------------------------- 66

1. 蕭思文（1999）。非營利組織採行善因行銷行為之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立台灣大學商學學系碩士論文，台北
2. 黃韋仁（2002）。形象策略、品牌權益與顧客終身價值關係之研究－以咖啡連鎖店類型之實證。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文
3. Aaker ,David A .,and Kevin L. Keller (1990),“Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions”, Journal of Marketing, 54(1),27–41
4. Aaker, David（1991）,“Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name”, The Free Press, N.Y.
5. Aaker ,D. A .,(1996),“Measuring brand equity across products and markets”, California Management Review, 38(3),102-120
6. Adkins, S. (1999),“Cause Related Marketing: Who Cares Wins”, Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman
7. Andreasen, A. R. (1996),“Profits for Nonprofits: Find a Corporate Partner”, Harvard Business Review, Non-Dec, 47-62
8. Arora, N., T. Henderson.(2007),“Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective”, Marketing Sci. 26(4), 514–531
9. Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A.,（2000）,“Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context”, Journal of Service Research,3(2) ,166-177
10. Barnes, N. G. (1991),“Philanthropy, Profits, and Problems; The Emergenceof Joint Venture Marketing”, Akron Business ＆ Economics Review, 22,78-86
11. Barone, Michael J., Anthony D. Miyazaki and Kimberly A. Taylor (2000),“The Influence of Cause-Related marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One GoodTurn Deserve Another?”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2),248–262
12. Benezra, K. (1996),“Cause and effects marketing”, Brandweek, 37,38-41
13. Berger, I., Peggy, C. and Kozinets, R. (1996),“The processing of CRM claims: cues, bias or motivators”, AMA Summer Educators Conference, 7, 71-2
14. Berkhout, T. (2005),“Corporate Gains”, Alternatives Journal, 31(1), 15-18
15. Bitta, J. D., Monroe, K. B. and McGinnis, J. M. (1981),“Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements”, Journal of Marketing Research ,18,416-427
16. Bloom, P. N., S. Hoeffler, K. L. Keller, C. E. Basturto Meza. (2006), “How social-cause marketing affects consumer perceptions”,
17. Bronn, P. S., and Vrioni, A. B. (2001),“Corporate Social Responsibility and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview”, International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222
18. Brown, Tom J. and Peter Dacin (1997),“The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses”, Journal of Marketing ,61(1), 68–84
19. Brown, Tom J., Peter A. Dacin, Michael G. Pratt, and David A. Whetten (2006),“Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 99–106
20. Cornwell, T. B., and Coote, L. V. (2005),“Corporate Sponsorship of a Cause: The Role of Identification in Purchase Intent”, Journal of Business Research, 58(3),268-276
21. Cotte, J., Coulter, R. A., and Moore, M. (2005),“Enhancing or Disrupting Guilt: The Role of Ad Credibility and Perceived Manipulative Intent”, Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 361-368
22. Dahl, D.W. and Lavack, A.M. (1995), “Cause-related marketing: impact of size of cause-related promotion on consumer perceptions and participation”, paper presented at American Marketing Association Educator’s Winter Conference, 476-81
23. Darke PR, Chung CMY (1995),“Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it”, Journal of retailing, 81(1),35-47
24. Deshpande, S. and Hitchon, J.C. (2002), “Cause-related marketing ads in the light of negative news”, Journal and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 905-26
25. Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “ Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, 28(8), 307-319
26. Drumwright, M. (1996), “Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria”, Journal of Marketing, 60, 71-87
27. Ellen, P.S., Mohr, L.A. and Webb, D.J. (2000), “Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?”, Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393-406
28. Forehand, M.R. and Grier, S. (2003), “When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3),349-56
29. Gray, R. (2000),“Developing a Good Fit is Crucial to CRM”, Marketing (UK), 4(5), 37-38
30. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan (1998), “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions”, Journal of Marketing, 62(2),46-59
31. Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006),“The Company-Cause-Customer Fit Decision in Cause-Related Marketing”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314-326
32. Hall, Holly (2009), “Corporate and Individual Giving: What to Expect in Coming Months”, Chronicle of Philanthropy, 21(9), 3
33. Hawkins, S.A., Hoch, S.J. and Meyers-Levy, J. (2001), “Low-involvement learning: repetition and coherence in familiarity and belief”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 1-11
34. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. （1991）,“Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information of Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4),454-462
35. Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. (2002),“Building Brand Equity through Corporate Societal Marketing”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21(1), 78-89
36. Hoyer, W. D. and Brown, S. P.(1990),“Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2),141-148
37. Hoyer, Wayne D. and Steven P. Brown (1990),“Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141-148
38. Irwin, R. L., Lachowetz, T., Comwell, T. B., and Clark, J. S. (2003), “Cause-Related Sport Sponsorship: An Assessment of Spectator Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intentions”, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(3), 131-139
39. Kamins, M. A., & Gupta, K. (1994),“ Congruence between Spokesperson and Product Type: A Matchup Hypothesis Perspective”,Psychology and Marketing, 11(6), 569-586
40. Kingston, J. and Bolton, M. (2004), “New approach to funding not-profit organizations”,International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9(2), 112
41. Kotler＆Alan R. Andreasen(1996),“ Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations”, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
42. Lafferty, B. A., R. E. Goldsmith.(1999),“ Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad.”, J. Bus. Res. 44(2) 109–116
43. Lafferty, B.A., Goldsmith, R.E., Tomas, G. and Hult, M. (2004),“The impact of the alliance on the partners: a look at cause-brand alliances”, Psychology & Marketing, 21(7) ,509-27
44. Lafferty, B. A., and Goldsmith, R. E. (2005) ,“Cause-Brand Alliances: Does the Cause Help the Brand or Does the Brand Help the Cause?”, Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423-429
45. Lanying Du, Jundong Hou and Yupeng Huang (2008), Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 92-104
46. Laurent, G., Kapferer, J. N. and Roussel, F.(1995),“The underlying structure of brand awareness scrores”, Marketing Science, 14(3), 170-179
47. Lorge, S. (1998), “Is cause-related marketing worth it?”, Sales & Marketing Management, 5, 72
48. Lovelock, C. H.,(2001),Services Marketing, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall
49. Maria, K. (2005),“Choose wisely: partnering for cause-related marketing”, Public Relations, 12(8), 1
50. Menon, S. and Kahn, B.E. (2003),“Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: when do they impact perception of sponsor brand?”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3),316-27
51. Monroe, K. B.,(2003),“Pricing : Making Profitable Decisions”, Boston : McGraw-Hill.
52. Nelson, M., and Vilela, A. (2006),“Values: Better than Sex Segmentation Strategy for Cause-Related Marketing Messages”, Paper presented in International Communication Association, 16 Jun
53. Polonsky, M. J., and Macdonald, E. K. (2000),“Exploring the Link Between Cause-Related Marketing and Brand Building”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 5(1), 46-57
54. Polonsky, M. J., and Speed, R. (2001),“Linking Sponsorship and Cause Related Marketing: Complementarities and Conflicts”, European Journal of Marketing,35(11/12), 1361-1385
55. Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004),“ The Role of Brand/Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns”, Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635
56. Ptacek, J. P., & Salazar, G. (1997),“Enlightened Self-interestl：Selling Business On the Benefits of Cause-related Marketing”, Nonprofit World, 15(4), 9-13
57. Rifon, Nora J., Sejung Marina Choi, Carrie S.Trimble and Hairong Li (2004),“Congruence Effects in Sponsorship: The Mediating Role of Sponsor Credibility and Consumer Attributions of Sponsor Motive”, Journal of Advertising, 33(Spring), 29–42
58. Rossiter, J.R., and Percy, L. (1987), Advertising and Promotion Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
59. Roy, D. P., and Graeff, T. R. (2003) ,“Consumer Attitudes Toward Cause-Related Marketing Activities in Professional Sport”, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(3),163-172
60. Samiee, S.,(1994),“Customer evaluation of products in a global market,” Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 579-604
61. Shimp, Terence A. and William Bearden（1982）,“Warrant and other Extrinsic Cue Effect on Consumer Risk Perception”, Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1).38-46
62. Silverman, S. N., Sprott, D. E. and Pascal, V. J.(1999),“Relating consumer-based sources of brand equity to market outcomes”, Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1),352-358
63. Steenkamp, J. B.,(1990) ,“ Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process”, Journal of Business Research, 21,309-333
64. Strahilevitz, M., and Myers, J. G. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell”, Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446
65. Strahilevitz, M. (2003),“The Effects of Prior Impressions of a Firm's Ethics on the Success of a Cause-Related Marketing Campaign: Do the Good Look Better While the Bad Look Worse?”, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,11(1), 77-92
66. Szykman, Lisa R., Paul N. Bloom and Jennifer Blazing (2004),“Does Corporate Sponsorship of a Socially-Oriented Message Make A Difference? An Investigation of the Effects of Sponsorship Identity on Responses to an Anti-Drinking-And-Driving Message”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1–2), 13–20
67. Varadarajan, P. R. (1986), “Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion: A Frameworkfor Classification and Additional Perspectives”, Journal of Marketing, 50(2),61-73
68. Varadarajan, P.R. and Menon, A. (1988),“Cause-related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy”, Journal of Marketing, 52,58-74
69. Webb, D.J. and Mohr, L.A. (1998),“A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: from skeptics to socially concerned”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,17(2),226-38
70. Wilkie, W. L. (1986), Consumer Behavior, New York: John Wiley and Sons
71. Xiaoli N., and Kwangjun H. (2007), “Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives”, Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63-74