跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.60) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/06 02:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳燕慧
研究生(外文):CHEN,YEN-HUI
論文名稱:公務部門會計系統使用者滿意度之研究-以縣市公務預算會計資訊系統為例
論文名稱(外文):Analysis of User Satisfaction for Accounting Systems in Government Offices:The Case of County and City Offices
指導教授:阮金聲阮金聲引用關係林岳喬林岳喬引用關係
口試委員:簡建忠張碩毅
口試日期:2011-01-12
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:會計與資訊科技研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:96
中文關鍵詞:資訊系統成功模式使用者滿意度縣市公務預算會計資訊系統
外文關鍵詞:IS Success ModelUser Satisfaction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:860
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:172
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在今日資訊科技廣為運用的時代,如何運用各種高科技資訊提供高效能之創新服務,期使組織發揮更大效益,並具更優質的競爭力,是公、私部門極力思索與推動的課題。為使各縣市依循一致性及標準化作業規範,並為建立縣市預算會計作業共用資訊架構,避免各縣市個別開發,造成人力及經費重複投資,行政院主計處整合了各縣市需求,統一開發「縣市公務預算會計資訊系統」供各縣市使用。該系統之開發方向採資源共享,資料來源由原始資料提供者輸入,所以系統的使用者除了會計人員還有非會計人員。
本研究以DeLone and McLean於2003年所提出之資訊系統成功模式為基礎,加入使用者電腦自我效能,探討系統品質、資訊品質、服務品質及電腦自我效能與使用者滿意度之間的關係,及不同的系統使用者角色對這四項關係的調節效果。我們以14個目前已採用縣市公務預算會計資訊系統的縣市之使用者為調查對象,共得有效問卷280份,經統計分析結果如下:
1.「系統品質」、「資訊品質」及「服務品質」對「使用者滿意度」有顯著的影響。
2.「電腦自我效能」對「使用者滿意度」的影響不顯著。
3. 使用者角色對「系統品質」、「資訊品質」、「服務品質」及「電腦自我效能」與「使用者滿意度」關係的調節效果未達顯著水準。

With the immense use of information technology in the modern era, how to efficiently utilize information systems (IS) to provide efficient and innovative service has become a major concern of all the government offices. In order to provide an identical and standardized budgetary accounting information procedure for all the county and city offices to follow, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan compiled the needs of all the counties and cities to develop the “County and City Official Budget Accounting Information System (CCOBAIS)” to assure the achievement of the objective. It is a resource-sharing system for that the data is entered at the source and therefore not only the accountants but also the personnel of user departments are the users of the system.
Based on DeLone and McLean’s (2003) IS Success Model and incorporating user’s computer self-efficacy into a new model, we analyzed the impacts of system quality, information quality, service quality, and computer self-efficacy on user satisfaction. We also examined the moderating effect of user department on these relationships. Questionnaires were distributed to selected users of the CCOBAIS of 14 county and city offices and 280 valid questionnaires were returned. After analyzing the collected data, we draw the following conclusions:
1. System quality, information quality, and service quality have significant impacts on user satisfaction.
2. Computer self-efficacy does not have a significant impact on user satisfaction.
3. User department does not have a significant moderating effect.

第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的與問題 3
1.3 研究步驟 4
1.4 研究範圍與對象5
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1 政府會計 6
2.1.1會計制度 6
2.1.2政府會計組織 6
2.1.3普通公務單位會計制度之一致規定實施之範圍7
2.1.4普通公務單位會計制度之一致規定內容要點 7
2.2 會計資訊系統 9
2.2.1會計資訊系統 9
2.2.2會計資訊系統與會計人員的關係 10
2.2.3會計資訊系統對組織的影響 10
2.3 縣市公務預算會計資訊系統 11
2.3.1縣市行政資訊作業整體規劃 11
2.3.2 縣市預算會計資訊系統 11
2.4 資訊系統成功模式16
2.4.1資訊系統16
2.4.2 資訊系統成功模式16
2.4.3 資訊系統成功模式之應用22
2.4.4系統品質 23
2.4.5 資訊品質 24
2.4.6 服務品質 25
2.5 使用者滿意度與影響因素 27
2.5.1使用者滿意度 27
2.5.2資訊系統使用者角色 31
2.5.3 電腦自我效能 34
第三章 研究方法 37
3.1 研究模型架構 37
3.2 研究假說 39
3.3 研究變數之操作性定義 41
3.4 縣市公務預算會計資訊系統簡介 42
3.4.1 縣市公務預算會計資訊系統 42
3.4.2彰化縣推動縣市公務預算會計系統之現況 43
3.5 問卷設計與寄發 44
3.5.1 問卷設計與前測 44
3.5.2 問卷發放對象 44
3.5.3 發放問卷與催收 44
3.6 資料分析方法 45
第4章 資料分析與結果 47
4.1 問卷的發放與回收 47
4.2 研究對象基本資料分析 48
4.3 信度分析 50
4.4 效度分析 51
4.5各研究變項之描述性統計及差異性分析 54
4.5.1研究變數基本統計分析 54
4.5.2個人屬性與各研究變項之差異分析 55
4.5.3縣市別對各研究變數之差異性分析 64
4.6研究假說檢定 67
4.6.1複共線性檢定 67
4.6.2 複廻歸分析(Multiple Regression) 68
4.6.3 研究假說檢定 69
第5章 結論與建議 73
5.1 研究結果 73
5.2 研究貢獻 75
5.3 研究限制 76
5.4 未來研究方向與建議 77
參考文獻 78
一、中文部份 78
二、英文部分 79
三、網站部份 84
附錄一:總預算編列(含特別預算、追加(減)預算)作業程序 85
附錄二:單位預算執行及帳務作業程序 86
附錄三:總會計作業程序 87
附錄四:公務預算會計資訊系統使用者滿意度問卷調查表 88


一、中文部份

山口俊之,民 89,工作支援與資訊系統的關聯-電腦化現場管理(林怡君譯),中衛發展中心。
王明洲,民98,會計資訊系統使用者滿意度之研究-以國立大學校務基金資訊系統為例,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
王保進,民95,中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市 : 心理出版社。
皮世明、許通安、范錚強,民90,影響資訊系統服務品質的因素研究,資訊管理研究,第3卷第1期。
李城忠,民 97,應用統計學—SPSS完全功略,台北:新文京開發出版股份有限公司。
何昆展,民98,探討資訊系統成功模型中資訊系統使用相關行為之角色-以大學甄選入學資訊系統為例,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
吳明隆,民96,SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務,台北:五南。
邱皓政,民95,量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析,台北:五南。
林材煒,民 91,銀行業不同部門與職務之資訊系統使用者滿意度差異分析,銘傳大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
姚登元,民95,電腦自我效能對ERP系統使用績效之影響,國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
張允文,民 91,環境、策略與組織內部特質對會計資訊系統效能之影響,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文。
張世敏、鍾俊仁,民97,管理資訊系統概論,台北:華泰,頁9。
張瑞當、張允文、倪豐裕,民 89,工作特性與會計資訊系統特徵對使用者滿意度影響之實證研究,亞太管理評論,頁 287-298。
張靜妙,民 86,使用者在資訊系統發展中的角色對工作滿意度的影響,國立成功大學工 業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳專塗、柯瓊鳳,民 94,會計資訊系統第五版,台北:新陸。
袁鳳清,民95,ERP會計資訊系統與實務,台中:滄海書局,頁4-11。
曾明淳,民 91,策略、任務不確定性與管理會計系統關係之研究,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
郭宏益,民 95,影響電腦整合製造資訊系統使用者滿意之差異分析:管理者與作業者之觀點比較,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
顧裔芳、范懿文、鄭漢鐔,民 90,會計資訊系統初版,台北:三民,頁 2-18,24-26,
30-31,48-49,175-176。
劉永彬,民94,影響會計資訊品質因素之研究–以國立大專校院會計資訊系統使用者為例,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
蔡松益,民 97,應用差異理論來探討影響放射線部門使用PACS系統之滿意度-以台灣區域級以上醫院實際建置經驗為例,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
劉淑娟,民 94,應用差異理論探討資訊系統使用者滿意度之研究-以中正大學會計資訊系統為例,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
縣市行政作業規範整體規劃報告書。
縣(市)行政資訊作業─公務預算會計作業規範書。

二、英文部分

Bailey, J. E. and Pearson, S. W. 1983. Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer Use Satisfaction. Management Science 29 (5): 530-545.

Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37:122-147.

Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84 (2): 191-215.

Bandura, A. and Jurden, F. J. 1991. Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Governing the Impact
of Social Comparison on Complex Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (6): 941-951

Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. 1994. Measuring User Participation, User Involvement and User Attitude. MIS Quarterly, 59-82.

Baroudi, J. J. and Orlikoski, W. J. 1988. A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: A psychometric evaluation and notes on use. Journal of Management Information System 4 (3): 44-59.

Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. Understanding Information Systems Continuance:An
Expectation-Confirmation Model, MIS Quarterly 25 (3): 351-370.

Bruwer, P. J. S. 1984. A Descriptive Model of Success for Computer-Based Information
Systems, Information and Management 7 (2): 63-67.

Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., and Norman, K. L. 1988. Development of a Tool Measuring User Satisfaction of the Human-Computer Interface, Management Science.
Choe, J. M. 1996. The relationship among performance of accounting information systems, influence factors, and evolution level of information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (4): 215-239.

Coffin, R. J. and MacIntyre, P. D. 1999. “Motivational influences on computer-related affect states, Computers in Human Behavior, 15: 549-569.

Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A. 1995. Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test, MIS Quarterly, June: 189-211,453,457.

Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., and Huff, S. 1999. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology, A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly
23 (2): 145-158.

Copper, D. R. and Schindler, P. S. 1998. Business Research Methods, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance
of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, G. J. 1985. A typology Management Information Systems Users and Its Implications for User of Management Information Systems Information Satisfaction Research, Communications of the ACM 85 (5) : 152-164.

DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information
Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4): 9-30.

DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for theDependent Variable, Information Systems Research 3 (1): 60-95.

Dickson. G. W. and Simmons, J. K. 1970. The Behavior Side of MIS, Business Horizons, 50-71.

Doll, W. J. and Torkzadeh, G. 1988. The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction, MIS Quarterly, 259-274.

Galletta, D. F. and Lederer, A. L. 1989. Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction, Decision Sciences 20: 419-438.

Gelderman, M. 1997. The Relation between User Satisfaction, Usage of Information Systems and Performance, Information and Management 34 (1):11-18.

Gist, M. E. and Mitchell, T. R. 1992. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability, Academy of Management Review 17 (2): 183-211.

Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., and Rosen, B. 1989. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training, Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (6), 884-891.

Goodhue, D. L. 1998. Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit
Instrument for User, Decision Science, 105-138.

Goodhue, D. L. and Thompson, R. L. 1995. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly, 19 (2): 213- 236.

Gravill, J. I., Compeau, D.R., and Marcloin, B. L. 2002. Metacognition in IT:The influence of self-efficacy and self-awareness. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems.

Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., and Segars, A. H. 1996. Information Systems Effectiveness: The
Construct Space and Patterns of Application, Information and Management 31 (4):
177-191.

Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis (6th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N. L. 1981. Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness, Part I. Comparing Alternative Approaches, MIS Quarterly 5 (3): 55-69

Hollis, Landrum a,1, Victor, R. Prybutok b,* 2004. A service quality and success model for the information service industry. European Jorunal of Operational Research, 156: 628-642

Hung, S. Y. 2003. Expert versus novice use of the executive support systems: an empirical study. Information and Management 40: 177–189.

Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J. 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer Usage, Omega 23 (6): 587-605.

Igbaria, M. and Tan, M. 1997. The Consequences of Information Technology Acceptance on Subsequent Individual Performance, Information and Management 32 (3):113-121.

Ives, B., Olson, M. H., and Baroudi, J. J. 1983. The measurement of user information satisfaction, Communications of the ACM 26: 785-793.

Kaiser, H.F. 1974.Anindex of factorial simplicity. Psychometrics, 39 ,31-36.

Karsten, K. and Roth, R. M. 1998. The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (1): 14-24.

Kerlinger, F. N. 1986. Foundations of behavior Research 3rd ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kettinger W.J. and Lee, C. C. 1994. Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function, Decision Sciences 25 (5, 6): 737-766.

Laudon, K. C. & Laudon, J. P. (1994), Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology, 3rd ed。

Li, E. Y. 1997. Perceived Importance of Information System Success Factors: A Meta Analysis of Group Differences, Information and Management 32 (1): 15-28.

Lucas, H. C. 1975. Why Information Systems Fail, Columbia University Press, NY.

Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., and Johnson, R. D. 1998. The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research, Information Systems Research 9 (2): 126-163.

Mason, R. O. 1978. Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems Approach, Information and Management 1 (5): 219-234.

McGill,T., Hobbs, V., and Klobas, J. 2003. User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean's model, Information Resources Management Journal 16 (1): 24-46.

McKeen, J. D. and Guimaraes, T. 1997. Successful Strategies for User Participation in System Development, Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (2): 133-150.

McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T., and Wetherbe, J. C. 1994. The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors, MIS Quarterly, 427-451.

McKinney, V., K. Yoon, et al. (2002). "The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach." Information Systems Research 13(3): 296-315.

Melone, N. P. 1990. A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research, Management Science 36 (1): 76-91..

Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., and Prybutok, V. R. 1997. A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information systems assessment, Information Resources Management Journal, Winter: 6-25.

Nedovic-Budic, Z. 1999. Evaluating the Effects of GIS Technology: Review of Methods, Journal of Planning Literature 13 (3): 284-295.

Panko, R. R. and Sprague, R. H. Jr. 1984. Implementing Office Systems Requires a New DP Outlook, Data Management, DPMA, 40-42.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. 1988. SERVQUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing 64 (1): 12-40.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. 1985. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing 49 (3): 41-50.

Pearson, S. 1977. Measurement of Computer User Satisfaction, Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.

Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., and Kavan, C. B. 1995. Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness, MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 173-187.

Raghunathan, B. and Raghunathan, T. S. 1994. Adaptation of a Planning System Success Model to Information Systems Planning, Information Systems Research 5 (3):326-340.

Rai, A., Lang, S. S., and Welker, R. B. 2002. Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models:An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis, Information Systems Research, forthcoming., Information Systems Research 13 (1): 50-69.

Raymond, L. (1987). Validating and Applying User Satisfaction as a Measure of MIS Success in Small Organizations. Information & Management, Vol.12 No.4.

Roldan, J. L. and Millan, A. L. 2000. Analysis of the Information Systems Success Dimensions Interdependence: An Adaptation of the DeLone and McLean’s Model in the Spanish EIS Field, BITWorld, Conference Proceedings.

Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., and Chowa, C. 2004. Information Systems Success: Dimensions and Determinants, Unpublished working paper, College of Business Administration, University of Missouri-St. Louis.

Saeed, K. A., Hwang, Y., and Yi, M. Y. 2003. Toward an Integrative Framework for Online Consumer Behavior Research: A Meta-Analysis Approach, Journal of End User Computing 15 (4): 1-26.

Sanders, G. L. and Garrity, E. J. 1995. Dimensions of Information System Success, Working paper, Jacobs School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo.

Seddon , P. B. 1997. A Respecification and Extension of DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success, Information Systems Research, 240-252.

Seddon, P. B. and Kiew, M. Y. 1996. A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS success, Australian Journal of Information Systems 4 (1):90-109.

Segars, A. H. and Grover, V. 1998. Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: AnInvestigation of the Construct and Its Measurement, MIS Quarterly 22 (2): 139-163.

Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, 1st
ed. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Swanson, E.B. 1994. Information Systems Innovation among Organizations, Management Science, 1069-1092.

Torkzadeh, G. and Koufteros, X. 1994. Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement 54 (3):813-821.

Treacy, M. E. 1985. An Empirical Examination of A Causal Model of User Information Satisfaction,CenterforInformation Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA gement, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Webster, J. and Martocchoio, J. J. 1992. Microcomputer playfulness: Development ofa measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16 (2): 201-226.

Yap, C. S., Soh, C. P. P., and Raman, K. S. 1992. Information System Success Factors in
Small Business, The International Journal of Management Science 20 (5-6):597-609.

Yoon, Y., Guimares, T., and O’Neal, Q. 1995. Exploring the Factors Associated with Expert Systems Success, MIS Quarterly 19 (1): 83-106.

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. 1996. The Behavioral Consequences
of Service Quality, Journal of Marketing 60: 31-46.

Zmud, R. W. 1979. Individual differences and MIS success: A Review of the empirical literature, Management Science 25 (10): 966-979.


三、網站部份

Taiwan techh管理資訊系統實驗室知識管理系統網站
http://mis.cs.ntust.edu.tw/mislab/
行政院主計處網站
http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=17504&ctNode=4892


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top