臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著經濟與社會的發展，營利組織和企業都開始重視企業社會責任相關活動，以達到回饋社會，並填補社會需求缺口。此外，企業社會責任也被視為能提升組織競爭力，進而達到永續經營。本研究在探討企業經營企業社會責任的相關活動之程度，分成三個構面組織、環境和社會來進行分析。整合「企業社會責任」、「組織類型」與「體制理論」相互結合，探討以企業社會責任為基礎之組織類型的差異與特色。研究結果發現顯示企業在三種不同體制壓力之下經營企業社會責任的程度呈現不同的面貌，形成三種類型的組織。通常，在單一體制壓力下，企業經營企業社會責任的意願較低，反之在三種層面的體制壓力下，包含法令體制壓力、規範壓力和認知壓力下，使企業經營企業社會責任漸趨完善。

With the development of economy and society, for-profit organizations and enterprises are starting to focus on corporate social responsibility activities to contributing to our society, and fill the gap between the needs of society. In addition, corporate social responsibility is considered to enhance organizational competitiveness, and achieve sustainable development. This study investigated the degree of enterprise’s involvement on CSR-related activities, and which was divided into three dimensions, namely organizational, environment and social for analysis. Drawing on the “Corporate Social Responsibility”, “Organization classification”, and “Institutional theory” perspectives, this study aims to explore the differences and features of organization classification on the basis of corporate social responsibility .The finding of this research showed that enterprises under the three different kind of institutional pressure would operate CSR differently. Under a single pressure enterprises operate CSR-related activities with a lower willingness, whereas under multiple institutional pressures, including regulative pressure, normative pressure and cognitive pressure, the CSR-related activities operated by the studied companies have gradually improved.

目錄
中文摘要
英文摘要
致謝
目錄
表目錄
圖目錄
一、緒論
1-1研究背景與動機
1-2研究目的
1-3研究對象與範圍
1-4研究流程
二、文獻探討
2-1企業社會責任的發展與定義
2-2營利組織定義與CSR在營利組織發展現況
2-3組織分類之型態與發展
2-4體制理論
2-5研究架構
三、研究設計與方法
3-1研究分析方法
3-2研究對象
3-3資料來源與彙整
3-4資料分析方法
四、個案分析
4-1組織類型一(企業營運活動和CSR完全無交集)：澳普林特股份有限公司
4-2組織類型二(企業營運活動和CSR部分交集)：谷崧集團企業
4-3組織類型三(企業營運活動和CSR完全交集)：台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司
五、研究結論與建議
5-1研究結論
5-2研究貢獻
5-3研究限制與未來建議
參考文獻

1.中文部分
呂朝賢(民100)。企業社會責任之特徵與反省：以臺灣為例。社會福利模式－從傳承到創新研討會論文集，臺北。
陳志遠，&胡哲生(民98)。社會企業本質、任務與發展。創業管理研究，4，1-28。
楊銘賢，吳濟聰，蘇哲仁，&高慈蕙(民98)。社會企業經營模式之建構。創業管理研究，4，57-38。
鄭勝分(民97)。社會企業治理之初探。多元開發就業方案─民間團體發展成為社會企業論述精選集，台中市。
天下雜誌(民101)。2012天下企業公民特別報導。http://issue.cw.com.tw/issue/csr/2012news.jsp。
台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司(民101)。台積公司榮獲2012年道瓊永續指數全球半導體類別領導者，http://www.tsmc.com/tsmcdotcom/PRListingNewsAction.do?action=detail&newsid=7221&language=C。
2.英文部分
Bowen, Howard Rothmann. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York,: Harper.
Byus, K., Deis, D., & Ouyang, B. (2010). Doing well by doing good: Corporate social responsibility and profitability. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 75(1), 44.
Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 497-505.
Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carroll, Archie B. (1981). Business and society : managing corporate social performance. Boston: Little, Brown.
Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International small business journal, 25(1), 5-26.
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Daft, Richard L. (2009). Understanding the Theory and Design of Organizations. South Western.
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), 364-376.
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.
Davis, Keith, & Blomstrom, Robert L. (1975). Business and society: environment and responsibility. New York,: McGraw-Hill.
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983).The iron cage revisited: Institutionalisomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.AmericanSociological Review, 48. 147–160.
Dimaggio, P.J.& Powell, W. W.(1991).The NewInstitutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago:University of Chicago.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54-61.
Friedman, M. (1971). Does business have a social responsibility. 47, 13-14.
Galaskiewicz,J.(1991).The newinstitutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago.
John L. Campbell(2007).Why World Corporations Behave In Socialy ResponsibleWays ? An Institutional Theory Of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3),946-967.
Li, S., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Lattemann, C., & Yeh, K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets. Management international review, 50(5), 635-654.
Lin, C.H., Yang, H.L., & Liou, D.Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31(1), 56-63.
MacGregor, S.P., Espinach, X., & Fontrodona, J. (2007). Social innovation: using design to generate business value through corporate social responsibility.The Comunicación presentada en la International Conference On Engineering Dessing.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1997). Institutionalized organizations: FormalStructure as Myth and Ceremony.American Journal of Sociology,(83),340-363.
Patton, Michael Quinn. (1995). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Schwartz, M.S., & Carroll, A.B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 503-530.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. California:Sage Publications.
Scott, W. R. (2001).Institutions and Organizations. California:SagePublications.
Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizationa: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems.Singapore : Prentice-Hall.
Selznick,P. (1996). Institutionalism old and new. Administratine ScienceQuarterly, 41(2),270-279, 1996.
Siegel, D.S., & Vitaliano, D.F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 773-792.
Suchman, M. C. (2006). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
Walton, Clarence Cyril, & American Assembly. (1977). The Ethics of corporate conduct. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
WBCSD. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility: Meeting Changing Expectations. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Developmen.
WBCSD. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
Yin, Robert K. (2009). Case study research : design and methods. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Zahra, S.A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D.O., & Shulman, J.M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532.