|
1. Acedo, F. J., C. Barroso, J. L. Galan, 2006. “The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends”, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 621-636
2. Agarwal, R; Prasad, J, 1999. “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391
3. Agarwal, R; Venkatesh, V, 2002. “Assessing a firm's Web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability”, Information Systems Research, 13(2), 168-186
4. Ahn, T; Ryu, S; Han, I, 2007. “The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing”, Information & Management, 44(3), 263-275
5. Alavi, Maryam & Leidner, Dorothy E, 2001. “Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136
6. Al-Gahtani, SS; King, M, 1999. “Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology”, Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(4), 277-297
7. Amoako-Gyampah, K; Salam, AF, 2004. “An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment”, Information & Management, 41, 731-745
8. Bagozzi, RP; Davis, FD; Warshaw, PR, 1992. “Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage”, Human Relations, 45(7), 659-686
9. Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ, 1986
10. Bhattacherjee, A, 2001. “Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model”, MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 351-370
11. Bhattacherjee, A, 2001. “An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance”, Decision Sciences, 32, 201-214
12. Briggs, RO; De Vreede, GJ; Nunamaker, JF, 2003. “Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with group support systems”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 31-64
13. Bruner, GC; Kumar, A, 2005. “Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices”, Journal of Business Research, 58, 553-558
14. Burton-Jones, A; Hubona, GS, 2006. “The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 43(6), 706-717
15. Carter, L; Belanger, F, 2005. “The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors”, Information Systems Journal, 15, 5-25
16. Castaneda, JA; Munoz-Leiva, F; Luque, T, 2007. “Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience”, Information & Management, 44(4), 384-396
17. Chang, Man Kit, 1998. “Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1825-1834
18. Chau, PYK; Hu, PJH, 2001. “Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach”, Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699-719
19. Chau, PYK; Hu, PJH, 2002. “Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories”, Information & Management, 39, 297-311
20. Chen, LD; Gillenson, ML; Sherrell, DL, 2002. “Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective”, Information & Management, 39, 705-719
21. Chin, WW; Todd, PA, 1995. “On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution”, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246
22. Chiu, CM; Wang, ETG, 2008. “Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value”, Information & Management, 45(3), 194-201
23. Culnan, Mary J., 1986, “The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972-1982: A Co-Citation Analysis”, Management Science, 32(2), 156-172
24. Curley, J; Cohen, P, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1975
25. Cyr, D; Head, M; Ivanov, A, 2006. “Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce”, Information & Management, 43(8), 950-963
26. Davis, F.D., 1986. “A technology acceptance model for emperically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results”, doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA
27. Davis, FD, 1989. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, 12(3), 319-340
28. Davis, FD; Venkatesh, V, 1996. “A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 19-45
29. Devaraj, S; Fan, M; Kohli, R, 2002. “Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics”, Information Systems Research, 13(3), 316-333
30. Dishaw, MT; Strong, DM, 1999. “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs”, Information & Management, 36, 9-21
31. Diney, T; Hart, P, 2006. “An extended privacy calculus model for E-commerce transactions”, Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80
32. Doll, WJ; Hendrickson, A; Deng, XD, 1998. “Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis”, Decision Sciences, 29(4), 839-868
33. Edelmann, F, 1981, "Managers, Computer Systems, and Productive", MIS Quarterly, 5:3, 1-19
34. Featherman, MS; Pavlou, PA, 2003. “Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 451-474
35. Gefen, D; Karahanna, E; Straub, DW, 2003. “Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model”, MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90
36. Gefen, D; Straub, DW, 1997. “Gender differences in the perception and use of E-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model”, MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400
37. Gefen, D; Karahanna, E; Straub, DW, 2003. “Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust“, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 307-321
38. Gefen, D; Keil, M, 1998, “The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model”, Data Base For Advances in Information Systems, 29(2), 35-49
39. Grandon, EE; Pearson, JM, 2004. “Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses”, Information & Management, 42, 197-216
40. Ha, I; Yoon, Y; Choi, M, 2007. “Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment”, Information & Management, 44(3), 276-286
41. Hackbarth, G; Grover, V; Yi, MY, 2003. “Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use”, Information & Management, 40, 221-232
42. Hasan, B, 2006. “Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance”, Information & Management, 43(5), 565-571
43. Hong, WY; Thong, JYL; Wong, WM; Tam, KY, 2001. “Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124
44. Hsu, CL; Lu, HP, 2004. “Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience”, Information & Management, 41, 853-868
45. Hu, PJ; Chau, PYK; Sheng, ORL; Tam, KY, 1999. “Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology”, Journal of Management, Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112
46. Lee, MKO; Cheung, CMK; Chen, ZH, 2005. “Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation”, Information & Management, 42, 1059-1104
47. Lin, JCC; Lu, HP, 2000. “Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site”, International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197-208
48. Lucas, HC; Spitler, VK, 1999. “Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations”, Decision Sciences, 30(2), 391-311
49. Jarneving, B, 2005. “A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front”, Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263
50. Igbaria, M; Zinatelli, N; Cragg, P; Cavaye, ALM, 1997. “Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model”, MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-302
51. Igbaria, M; Iivari, J, 1995. “Effects of self-efficacy on computer usage”, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 23(6), 587-605
52. Jackson, CM; Chow, S; Leitch, RA, 1997. “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system”, Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357-389
53. Kamis, A; Koufaris, M; Stern, T, 2008. “Using an attribute-based decision support system for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation”, MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 159-177
54. Kamis, AA; Stohr, EA, 2006. “Parametric search engines: What makes them effective when shopping online for differentiated products?”, Information & Management, 43(7), 904-918
55. Karahanna, E; Agarwal, R; Angst, CM, 2006. “Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research”, MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781-804
56. Karahanna, E; Straub, DW, 1999. “The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use”, Information & Management, 35, 237-250
57. Kim, SH, 2008. “Moderating effects of Job Relevance and Experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals”, Information & Management, 45(6), 387-393
58. King, William R. & He, Jun, 2006. “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 43, 740-755
59. King, WR; He, J, 2006. “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755
60. Koufaris, M, 2002. “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior”, Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223
61. Kwahk, KY; Lee, JN, 2008. “The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation”, Information & Management, 45(7), 474-481
62. Lai, VS; Li, HL, 2005. “Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis”, Information & Management, 42, 373-386
63. Lederer, AL; Maupin, DJ; Sena, MP; Zhuang, YL, 2000. “The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web” Decision Sciences, 29, 269-282
64. Legris, P; Ingham, J; Collerette, P, 2003. “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 40, 191-204
65. Luarn, P; Lin, HH, 2005. “Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking”, Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 873-891
66. Mao, E; Palvia, P, 2008. “Exploring the effects of direct experience on IT use: An organizational field study”, Information & Management, 45(4), 249-256
67. Moon, JW; Kim, YG, 2001. “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context”, Information & Management, 38, 217-230
68. Morris, MG; Dillon, A, 1997. “How user perceptions influence software use”, IEEE Software, 14(4), 58-64
69. Nerur, Sridhar P.; Rasheed, Abdul A.; Natarajan, Vivek, 2008. “The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336
70. Nysveen, H; Pedersen, PE; Thorbjornsen, H, 2005. “Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(3), 330-346
71. Ong, CS; Lai, JY; Wang, YS, 2004. “Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies”, Information & Management, 41, 795-804
72. Pagani, M, 2006.”Determinants of adoption of High Speed Data Services in the business, market: Evidence for a combined technology acceptance model with task technology fit model”, Information & Management, 43(7), 847-860
73. Pavlou, PA, 2003. “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134
74. Pavlou, PA; Fygenson, M, 2006. “Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior”, MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143
75. Plouffe, CR; Hulland, JS; Vandenbosch, M, 2001. “Research report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system”, Information Systems Research, 12(2), 210-222
76. Ramos-Rodr´ıguez AR, Ru´ız-Navarro J, 2004. “Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000”, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981-1004
77. Riemenschneider, CK; Harrison, DA; Mykytyn, PP, 2003. “Understanding it adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories”, Information & Management, 40, 269-285
78. Premkumar, G; Ramamurthy, K; Liu, HN, 2008. “Internet messaging: An examination of the impact of attitudinal, normative, and control belief systems”, Information & Management, 45(7), 451-457
79. Saade, R; Bahli, B, 2005. “The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 42, 317-327
80. Saeed, KA; Abdinnour-Helm, S, 2008. “Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of information systems”, Information & Management, 45(6), 376-386
81. Schepers, J; Wetzels, M, 2007. “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects”, Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103
82. Shang, RA; Chen, YC; Shen, L, 2005. “Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line”, Information & Management, 42, 401-413
83. Sharda, R., Barr, S.H., and McDonnell, J.C., 1988, "Decision Support System Effectiveness: A Review and Empirical Test", Management Science, 34(2), 139-159
84. Shin, DH, 2009. “Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: An implication for IP-based technologies”, Information & Management, 46(1), 16-22
85. Shih, HP, 2004, “An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web”, Information & Management, 41, 351-368
86. Straub, D; Limayem, M; Karahannaevaristo, E, 1995. “Measuring system usage: implication for IS theory testing”, Management Science, 41(8), 1328-1342
87. Straub, D; Keil, M; Brenner, W, 1997. “Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study”, Information & Management, 33, 1-11
88. Sussman, SW; Siegal, WS, 2003. “Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption”, Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47-65
89. Szajna, B, 1996. “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Management Science, 42(1), 85-92
90. Taylor, S ;Todd, PA, 1995. “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”, Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176
91. Taylor, S; Todd, P, 1995. “Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience”, MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570
92. Thompson. R. L.; Higgins, C.; and Howell, J. M., 1991, "Personal Computing: Towards a Conceptual Model of Utilization", MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143
93. Vallerand, Robert J.; Deshaies, Paul; Cuerrier, Jean-Pierre; Pelletier, Luc G.; Mongeau, Claude, 1992., “Ajzen and Fishbein's theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 98-109
94. van der Heijden, H, 2004. “User acceptance of hedonic information systems”, MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704
95. van der Heijden, H, 2003. “Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands”, Information & Management, 40, 541-519
96. Venkatesh, V; Davis, FD, 2000. “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, 46(2), 186-204
97. Venkatesh, V; Morris, MG; Davis, GB; Davis, FD, 2003. “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478
98. Venkatesh, V, 2000. “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research,11(4),342-365
99. Venkatesh, V; Davis, FD, 1996. “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test”, Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481
100. Venkatesh, V; Morris, MG, 2000. “Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions?Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior”, MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139
101. Venkatesh, V, 1999. “Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation”, MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260
102. Venkatesh, V; Brown, SA, 2001. “A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges”, MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102
103. Vijayasarathy, LR, 2004. “Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 41, 747-762
104. Walczuch, R; Lemmink, J; Streukens, S, 2007. “The effect of service employees' technology readiness on technology acceptance”, Information & Management, 44(2), 206-215
105. Wixom, BH; Todd, PA, 2005. “A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance”, Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102
106. Wu, JH; Wang, SC, 2005. “What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 42, 719-729
107. Xiao, B; Benbasat, I, 2007. “E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact”, MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137-209
108. Yi, MY; Hwang, YJ, 2003. “Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431-449
109. Yu, J; Ha, I; Choi, M; Rho, J, 2005. “Extending the TAM for a t-commerce”, Information & Management, 42, 965-976
|