跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.135) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/26 22:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:曾云
研究生(外文):Yun Tseng
論文名稱:建立非對稱交叉價格敏感度之替代品與 對稱互補性之互補品重新探討RCM 和CC
論文名稱(外文):Re-investigating RCM and Category Captainship for substitute products under non-symmetric cross-price sensitivity and complementary products under the symmetric complementarity
指導教授:沈國基沈國基引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:工業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:102
中文關鍵詞:零售商品類管理品類統帥非對稱交叉價格敏感度對稱互補性互補品品類管理
外文關鍵詞:category managementCategory CaptainshipRCMnon-symmetric cross-price sensitivitythe symmetric complementarity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:136
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究採用Singh and Vives (1984)的效用函數推導出非對稱交叉價格敏感度之替代品需求函數,以此非對稱的替代品需求函數重新探討兩種品類管理, Retail Category Management(RCM) 和Category Captainship (CC) 情境下的管理議題。我們提出相關的議題包含了在兩種品類之下, 零售商如何配置品類的貨架空間、最佳批發價的制定、零售商或category captain該如何為兩替代品制定零售價等。 最後,本研究以數值分析說明在不同的貨架空間成本、兩替代品的非對稱交叉價格敏感度和不同的聯盟利潤分配等情境下,零售商、Category Captain和Non-captain製造商應該選擇RCM或CC品類管理對其較有利的管理意涵。
Singh and Vives (1984)的效用函數可以解釋兩產品之間不同的替代程度與互補程度,亦能夠達成本研究目的。故本研究藉由Singh and Vives (1984)的效用函數建立對稱互補性之互補品需求函數,並使用Category Captain管理方式探討兩個互補性品類的問題,命名為“Complementary Category Captainship”,簡稱CCC。本研究模型化品類管理CCC的機制將延用 Kurtulus and Toktay (2011)的作法。
最後,本研究提出互補品的數值分析,說明在不同的貨架空間成本、兩互補品的對稱互補性、不同的聯盟利潤分配等情境下,零售商、Category Captain和Non-captain製造商應該選擇RCM或CCC對其較有利的管理意涵。
In this research, we will model a non-symmetric cross-price sensitivity demand function derived from the utility function (Singh and Vives, 1984). And we use this non-symmetric demand function to re-investigating the relative management issues including the retailer category shelf space allocation, the optimal wholesale price set by manufacturers, and retail prices set by the retailer or Category captain in RCM and CC scenario. Finally, we proposed a numerical analysis to explain the different situations including the different opportunity cost of shelf space, different product cross-price sensitivity, different profit sharing of CC alliance, etc. And we will provide management implications for the retailer, category captain and non-captain manufacturer in different cases of RCM and CC.
The utility function from Singh and Vives (1984) can explain the degree of substitution and complementarity between products, it can achieve the purpose of this research. Hence, we adopted the utility function of Singh and Vives (1984) to construct the complementary product demand function under the symmetric complementarity, and we study two complementary categories by using Category Captain management, named as “Complementary Category Captainship” (CCC). We will extend the CC mechanism from Kurtulus and Toktay (2011) to construct a CCC scenario.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivation 1
1.1.1 Substitute products under non-symmetric cross-price sensitivity in RCM and CC scenarios 4
1.1.2 Complementary products under the symmetric complementarity in “Complementary Category Captainship” (CCC) 6
1.2 Research objectives 9
1.3 Research Methodology 12
Chapter2. Literature review 14
2.1 Researches for Utility Function and Demand Function problems 14
2.2 Researches for category captainship 17
Chapter3. Substitute products demand function in RCM and CC 19
3.1 The Model - Non-Symmetric Demand Functions of Substitute products 19
3.2 Propositions- Substitute products under non-symmetric cross-price sensitivity 22
Chapter 4. Complementary products demand function in CCC 32
4.1 The Model - Symmetric Demand Functions of Complementary products 32
4.2 Propositions- Complementary products under the Symmetric complementarity. 33
Chapter 5. Numerical Analysis for Substitute products 37
5.1 Numerical Analysis 38
5.2 Remark 43
Chapter 6. Numerical Analysis for Complementary products 49
6.1 Numerical Analysis 50
6.2 Remark 53
Chapter 7. Conclusions 56
References 58
Appendix A 60
Appendix B.1 61
Appendix B.2 (Wholesale Price Game in RCM) 64
Appendix B.3. Proof of Proposition 1 68
Appendix C.2 (Second Manufacturer’s Wholesale Price in CC) 73
Appendix C.3. Proof of Proposition 2 75
Appendix D 82
Appendix E: Numerical analysis of substitutes and complementary products 91
Appendix F: The auxiliary expressions for the equations shown in the Propositions 92
[1] Amir, R., & Jin, J. Y. (2001). Cournot and Bertrand equilibria compared: substitutability, complementarity and concavity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(3), 303-317.
[2] Basuroy, S., Mantrala, M. K., & Walters, R. G. (2001). The impact of category management on retailer prices and performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 16-32.
[3] Blattberg, R. C., Fox, E. J. (1995). Category Management: A Series of Implementation Guides. Research Department, Food Marketing Institute.
[4] Bucklin, R.E., and S. Gupta. (1999). "Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives." Marketing Science 18 (3) 247-273.
[5] Choi, S. C. (1991). Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Marketing Science, 10(4), 271-296.
[6] Kurtulus, M., Toktay, L. B. (2007). Category captainship: Outsourcing retail category management. Available at SSRN 956577.
[7] Kurtuluş, M., Toktay, L. B. (2008). Category captainship practices in the retail industry. In Retail Supply Chain Management (pp. 79-98). Springer US.
[8] Kurtuluş, M., Nakkas, A., Ülkü, S. (2014). The value of category captainship in the presence of manufacturer competition. Production and Operations Management, 23(3), 420-430.
[9] Kurtuluş, M., Toktay, L. B. (2011). Category captainship vs. retailer category management under limited retail shelf space. Production and Operations Management, 20(1), 47-56.
[10] McGuire, T. W., Staelin, R. (1983). An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing science, 2(2), 161-191.
[11] Misra, K. (2009). Selecting a category captain: The impact on manufacturers, retailers, and consumers (Doctoral dissertation, School of Management, University of California, San Diego).
[12] Misra, K. (2012). Should retailers outsource category management to a category captain? (Doctoral dissertation, School of Management, University of California, San Diego).
[13] Niraj, R., Narasimhan, C. (2004). Vertical information sharing in distribution channels. Available at SSRN 903988.
[14] Qiu, L. D. (1997). On the dynamic efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria. Journal of economic theory, 75(1), 213-229.
[15] Singh, N., Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 546-554.
[16] Vives, X. (1984). Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. Journal of economic theory, 34(1), 71-94.
[17] Vives, X. (1985). On the efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria with product differentation. Journal of Economic Theory, 36(1), 166-175.
[18] Wang, S. Y., Sheen, G. J., Yeh, Y. (2015). Pricing and shelf space decisions with non-symmetric market demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 233-239.
[19] Wang, Y., Raju, J. S., & Dhar, S. K. (2003). The choice and consequences of using a category captain for category management. Office of Research, Singapore Management University.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top