跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.75) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/19 05:06
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃荷軒
研究生(外文):He-Syuan Huang
論文名稱:結合社會臨場感理論與信任承諾理論探討直播購物之關係行銷
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the Relationship Marketing of Live-Streaming Shopping based on Social Presence Theory and Commitment-Trust Theory
指導教授:皮世明皮世明引用關係李國誠李國誠引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shih-Ming PiKuo-Chen Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:資訊管理研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:51
中文關鍵詞:社會臨場感信任承諾理論關係行銷直播購物
外文關鍵詞:Social PresenceCommitment-Trust TheoryRelationship MarketingLive- Streaming Shopping
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:336
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
現在的科技越來越發達,人們購物的模式也越來越多變,從一開始的實體店面到網路上的電子商務,再到現在是可以透過網路直接和賣家互動的網路直播購物,然而這種非實體店面的購物對顧客來說,仍有一些對賣家的不信任,因此本研究希望透過探討直播這項科技的特性,並結合信任承諾理論,來探討顧客是否會因為藉由網路直播的方式,提高對賣家的信任和建立良好關係,進而提高購買意圖。本研究採用調查法,針對在網路直播購物模式中,曾有過觀看網路直播經驗之閱聽者,對於網路直播賣家信任程度的情況與感受。研究對象為曾有過觀看或購買經驗之閱聽者,針對各項因子設計問卷,並採用PLS及SPSS兩個統計軟體作為分析工具,進行樣本資料分析、測量模型分析與結構模型分析,最後分析結果為關係利益及關係終止成本沒有顯著影響承諾;另他人意見影響沒有顯著影響信任,而其他研究假說皆有顯著支持。
Nowadays, the technology is more and more developed, and people''s shopping patterns are changing more and more. From the physical storefront at the beginning to the e-commerce on the Internet, it is now a live webcast that can interact directly with sellers through the Internet. However, this non-physical storefront shopping still has some distrust of the seller. Therefore, this study hopes to explore whether the customer will use the network by discussing the characteristics of the live broadcast technology and combining the trust commitment theory. The way of live broadcasting, improve the trust of the seller and establish a good relationship, thereby increasing the purchase intention. This study uses the survey method, in the online live shopping mode, there have been readers who have experienced the experience of webcasting, and the feelings and feelings of trust to the webcast sellers. The research subjects are those who have had experience in viewing or purchasing. They designed questionnaires for various factors and used PLS and SPSS statistical software as analysis tools to analyze sample data, measure model analysis and structural model analysis. Finally, analyze As a result, the relationship benefits and relationship termination costs did not significantly affect the commitment; the influence of others'' opinions did not significantly affect trust, while other research hypotheses were significantly supported.
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 III
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與問題 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 關係行銷 5
2.2 信任承諾理論 6
2.3 社會臨場感理論 8
第三章 研究方法 10
3.1 研究模型與假說 10
3.2 研究變數與操作型定義 13
3.3 研究對象與資料蒐集 14
3.4 問卷設計 14
第四章 資料分析 19
4.1 樣本資料分析 19
4.2 部分最小平方法分析 27
4.2.1 測量模型分析 27
4.2.2 結構模型分析 32
4.3 研究假說檢定 33
第五章 結論與建議 35
5.1 研究結論 35
5.2 研究貢獻 36
5.2.1 學術貢獻 36
5.2.2 實務貢獻 36
5.3 研究限制與未來方向 37
參考文獻 38
附錄 43

圖 1:研究模型 10
圖 2:結構模型分析圖 32

表 1:研究變數與操作型定義 13
表 2:關係利益之衡量問項 15
表 3:關係終止成本之衡量問項 16
表 4:共享價值之衡量問項 16
表 5:雙向互動性之衡量問項 17
表 6:感受真實性之衡量問項 17
表 7:他人意見影響之衡量問項 17
表 8:承諾之衡量問項 18
表 9:信任之衡量問項 18
表 10:直播購買意圖之衡量問項 18
表 11:性別比例 20
表 12:年齡分布 20
表 13:職業分布 20
表 14:教育程度 21
表 15:網路直播賣家得知管道 21
表 16:曾在直播中「觀看」過何種類型之商品 22
表 17:購買經驗 23
表 18:透過網路直播的購物次數 23
表 19:曾在直播中「購買」過何種類型之商品 23
表 20:沒有透過網路直播購物之原因 25
表 21:各變數敘述性統計資料 25
表 22:信度與效度分析 28
表 23:各變項交叉負荷矩陣 29
表 24:各構念相關係數矩陣 30
表 25:結構模型分析表 33
[1]Beldad, A., De Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2010). How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust. Computers in human behavior, 26(5), 857-869.
[2]Berenguer-Contrí, G., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Gil-Saura, I. (2009). Relationship benefits and costs in retailing: A cross-industry comparison. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 8(1), 57-66.
[3]Blau, H. (1964). The impossible theater: a manifesto. Macmillan.
[4]Chang, S. H., Wang, K. Y., Chih, W. H., & Tsai, W. H. (2012). Building customer commitment in business-to-business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(6), 940-950.
[5]Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of marketing research, 48(2), 238-254.
[6]Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.
[7]Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
[8]Christopher, M., Payne, A., & Ballantyne, D. (1991). Relationship marketing: bringing quality customer service and marketing together.
[9]Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard business review, 79(9), 72-81.
[10]Copulsky, J. R., & Wolf, M. J. (1990). Relationship marketing: positioning for the future. Journal of Business Strategy, 11(4), 16-20.
[11]Crosby, L. A., & Stephens, N. (1987). Effects of relationship marketing on satisfaction, retention, and prices in the life insurance industry. Journal of marketing research, 404-411.
[12]Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. The journal of marketing, 68-81.
[13]Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2007). The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-service environments. Interacting with computers, 19(1), 43-56.
[14]Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85-116.
[15]Dupont, R. (1998). Relationship marketing: a strategy for consumer-owned utilities in a restructured industry. Management Quarterly, 38(4), 11.
[16]Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of marketing, 11-27.
[17]Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication research, 14(5), 529-552.
[18]Gambetta, D. (2000). Can we trust trust. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, 13, 213-237.
[19]Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 1-19.
[20]Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424.
[21]Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., Das, S., Dellarocas, C., Pfeiffer, B., ... & Verlegh, P. (2005). The firm''s management of social interactions. Marketing letters, 16(3-4), 415-428.
[22]Hajli, N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M. O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71, 133-141.
[23]Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8), 689-708.
[24]Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Ju, C. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of the impact of social presence on website trust, usefulness and enjoyment. International Journal of Electronic Business, 7(6), 625-641.
[25]Hrebiniak, L. G. (1974). Effects of job level and participation on employee attitudes and perceptions of influence. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 649-662.
[26]Hsu, C. L., Liu, C. C., & Lee, Y. D. (2010). Effect of commitment and trust towards micro-blogs on consumer behavioral intention: A relationship marketing perspective. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(4), 292.
[27]Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 195-204.
[28]Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2002). Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of business research, 55(6), 441-450.
[29]Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision support systems, 44(2), 544-564.
[30]Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in human behavior, 26(2), 254-263.
[31]Lewin, J. E., & Johnston, W. J. (1997). Relationship marketing theory in practice: a case study. Journal of Business Research, 39(1), 23-31.
[32]Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social forces, 63(4), 967-985.
[33]Lu, B., Fan, W., & Zhou, M. (2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225-237.
[34]Marsden, P. (2010). Social commerce (english): Monetizing social media. Grin Verlag.
[35]McDonald, P. (1981). The biochemistry of silage. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
[36]McKnight, D. H., Chervany, N. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1996). Trust formation in new organizational relationships. Management Information Systems Research Center, Curtis L. Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota.
[37]Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 81-101.
[38]Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The journal of marketing, 20-38.
[39]Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2007). Role of electronic trust in online retailing: A re-examination of the commitment-trust theory. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9/10), 1173-1202.
[40]Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090-1098.
[41]Ogonowski, A., Montandon, A., Botha, E., & Reyneke, M. (2014). Should new online stores invest in social presence elements? The effect of social presence on initial trust formation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 482-491.
[42]Park, C. H., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. International journal of retail & distribution management, 31(1), 16-29.
[43]Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS quarterly, 105-136.
[44]Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American psychologist, 35(1), 1.
[45]Schurr, P. H., & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on exchange processes: Buyers'' preconceptions of a seller''s trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of consumer research, 11(4), 939-953.
[46]Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications.
[47]Smith, J. B., & Barclay, D. W. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 3-21.
[48]Straub, D., & Karahanna, E. (1998). Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organization science, 9(2), 160-175.
[49]Vatanasombut, B., Igbaria, M., Stylianou, A. C., & Rodgers, W. (2008). Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking. Information & Management, 45(7), 419-428.
[50]張蕙娟 (2016),網路直播產業分析。2018/05/21取自http://www.bpaper.org.tw/uncategorized/38-04/。
[51]曾光華. (1995). 顧客資料庫與關係行銷. 第二屆中小企業管理研討會論文集 (下). 台北: 經濟部中小企業處. 頁, 129-137.
[52]資策會 (2017),2017年台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告。2018/05/21取自https://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20170721e.pdf。
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊