臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

非審計性服務對盈餘品質之影響至今尚未形成一致性結論，就會計師獨立性角度而言，部分文獻主張會計師提供非審計性服務將增加會計師對審計客戶的經濟依存度，損及獨立性而對會計資訊的品質有負面的影響(獨立性假說)；就審計效率的角度而言，會計師提供非審計性服務將有助於對審計客戶的瞭解，提高審計效率與降低審計風險，產生知識外溢效果增進會計資訊的品質(產業知識外溢假說)。本研究擬以會計資訊價值攸關性的角度，透過Ohlson (1995)模式檢測會計師對其簽證之審計客戶提供非審計性服務時，對會計資訊的價值攸關性之影響。其次，文獻顯示產業專精之會計師，因其產業專業知識較充分，審計品質較非產業專精之會計師高，推論由產業專精之會計師提供非審計性服務，其知識外溢效果相較於非產業專精之會計師而言較大，審計及盈餘品質亦較佳，因此財務報表之價值攸關性也會提升。故本研究擬以審計產業的專精程度作為中介變數，將會計師事務所區分為產業專家及非產業專家，並預期因產業專家具有知識外溢效果，在提供非審計性服務時會使盈餘資訊價值攸關性提升，非產業專家則因知識外溢效果較小，在提供非審計性服務時其獨立性會受損，導致盈餘品質下降，預期盈餘資訊之價值攸關性會下降。就權益帳面價值變數而言，因文獻顯示盈餘變數與權益帳面價值變數的相對價值攸關性呈現凸性函數關係，預期權益帳面價值的相對價值攸關性將呈現反方向變動。
實證結果顯示：結合非審計性服務與會計師的產業專精變數，就盈餘資訊的價值攸關性觀察，歸類為有高非審計性公費之會計師對盈餘資訊的價值攸關性有負面的影響，而產業專家對盈餘價值攸關性之負面影響小於非產業專家對盈餘價值攸關性之負面影響。就權益帳面價值而言，如預期地，發現有高非審計性公費之會計師其權益帳面價值的價值攸關性呈上升現象，而產業專家相對於非產業專家，其權益帳面價值之價值攸關性增加幅度較小。本研究進行若干敏感性測試，證實本研究的實證結果有穩固性。

So far the argument about the effects of non-audit services on the value-relevance has not reached a consistent conclusion. From the view of auditor’s independence perspective, prior studies argue that by providing non-audit services will raise auditor’s economic bonds on the clients. The damage of the independence will therefore have negative influences on the quality of accounting information. (Independence Hypothesis) From the view of audit efficiency enhancement perspective, providing non-audit services will contribute to the understanding of the audit clients, increase audit efficiency and decrease auditing risks, and produce knowledge spillover to promote the quality of accounting information. (Knowledge Spillover Hypothesis) This study firstly examines the influences of the value-relevance of accounting information when the auditor provides non-audit services for the attestation client through Ohlson model (1995). Moreover, it is found that the industrial expertise auditor has better auditing quality than the non-expertise one. It is expected that the knowledge spillover of non-audit services provided by the industrial expertise will dominate the independence impairment, and therefore have more positive influences on earnings component than that by non-expertise. Thus, the auditing and earning quality will also be better, and thus promote the value-relevance of financial statements.
This study divides auditor firms into exclusively two sub-samples: the industrial expertise group and non-expertise group. It is expected that the value-relevance of earning information will be raised when the industrial expertise provides non-audit services. On the contrary, the non industrial expertise will damage the independence when providing non-audit services due to the smaller effect on knowledge spillover, which leads to the decrease of the quality of earning. Since prior studies suggest that the relative value-relevance of earning variables and book value variables appears a convex function relationship, the relative value-relevance of the book value is expected to change in opposite direction for the industrial expertise group and non-expertise group, respectively.
The empirical result indicates that from the observation of the value-relevance of earning information on the interactive variable of dummy variable of non-audit fees ratio and variable of the industrial expertise, the auditor firms with high non-auditor fees will have negative influences on the value-relevance of earning information. Nonetheless, the negative influences on the value-relevance of earning information of the industrial expertise are smaller than of the non-industrial expertise. As expected, the study finds that the value-relevance of book value of equity of the auditor with high non-auditor fees decreases. Compared to the non-industrial expertise, the increasing level of the value-relevance of book value of the industrial expertise is smaller. The present study demonstrates some diagnostic checks and evidences the empirical results are robust to the various specifications.

目錄
摘要 I
Abstract III
誌謝 V
目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
圖目錄 IX
第一章　緒論 1
第一節　研究動機 1
第二節　研究目的 3
第三節　研究架構 4
第二章　文獻探討與研究假說 6
第一節　非審計性服務之相關文獻 6
第二節　財務報表價值攸關性之文獻 8
第三節　審計專家之相關文獻 9
第三章　研究設計 11
第一節　研究假說 11
第二節　資料來源與樣本選取 13
第三節　模型的建立與變數的定義 15
第四章　實證結果 18
第一節　敘述性統計 18
第二節　迴歸模式實證結果 21
第五章　敏感性測試 26
第一節　不同衡量基礎之產業專家(25%與15%)之測試 26
第二節　刪除RATIO變數為1與0之樣本測試 29
第六章　結論 30
參考文獻 30

表目錄
表 1　樣本選取表 14
表 2　樣本敘述性統計量 19
表 3　相關係數矩陣 20
表 4　非審計性服務對會計資訊價值攸關性影響之迴歸結果—基本模式 22
表 5　非審計性服務對會計資訊價值攸關性影響之迴歸結果—產業審計專家模式 25
表 6　非審計性服務對會計資訊價值攸關性影響之迴歸結果—25%與15%基礎 28
表 7　非審計性服務對會計資訊價值攸關性影響之迴歸結果—刪除樣本之迴歸結果 30


圖目錄
圖 1　研究流程圖 5

1. 李建然、許書偉與陳政芳(2003)。非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究。會計評論。第37期，1-30。
2. 施妙樺(2003)。審計公費、非審計公費與財務報表裁量性應計數之關連，政治大學會計學碩士論文。台北。
3. 范宏書、陳慶隆與吳靜宜(2007)。審計客戶重要性與會計師的產業專精程度對公司盈餘品質之影響：審計組別之證據。文大商管學報。第十二卷(1)，75-108。
4. 徐清俊與陳宜鋒(2004)。經理人、分析師盈餘預測準確度與盈餘管理之關聯性研究。玄奘管理學報。第二卷(1)，25-49。
5. 張文瀞與吳幸螢(2005)。品牌聲譽、產業專業化與審計人員市場占有率關連性：取消審計公費下限分析。會計評論。第四十期，91-118。
6. 張文瀞、周玲臺與林修葳(2003)。審計品質與自願預測公司裁量性應計數。臺大管理論叢。第十一卷(1)，1-46。
7. 許家源(2006)。會計師產業專精程度對現金增資公司盈餘報導行為之影響。朝陽科技大學會計系碩士論文。台中。
8. 陳耀宗、劉若蘭與林坤霖(2003)。產業專家、客戶滿意度與審計公費關連性之研究。會計評論。第三十七期，31-52。
9. Antle, R., Elizabeth, G., Ganapathi, N. & Zhou, L. (2002). The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Working paper, Yale University.
10. Arrunada, B. (1999). The economics of audit quality: private incentives and the regulation of audit and non-audit service. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 159-177.
12. Balsam, S., Krishnan, J. & Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22 (2), 71-97.
13. Bedard, J. & Biggs, S. (1991). Pattern recognition, hypothesis generation and auditor performance in an analytical task. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 622-642.
14. Bonner, S. E. & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(3), 1-20.
15. Burgstahler, D. C., & Dichev, I. D. (1997). Earnings, adaptation and equity value. The Accounting Review, 72, 187-215.
16. Casterella, J., Francis. J., Lewis, B. & Walker, P. (2004). Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 123-140.
17. Cho, H. & Brown, K. F. (2006). Do nonaudit services enhance value？Evidence from the capital markets. Working Paper, Drexel University, Rutgers University at Camden, and Wright State University.
18. Collins, D. W., Pincus, M. & Xie, H. (1999). Equity valuation and negative earnings: the role of book value of equity. The Accounting Review, 4, 29-61.
19. Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L. & Weiss, I. S. (1997). Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24, 39-67.
20. Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R. & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Audit brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297-322.
21. DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183-199.
22. DeFond, M. L., Francis, J. R. & Wong, T. J. (2000). Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing：A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19 (1), 49-66.
23. DeFond, K., Raghunandan, R. & Subramanyam, K. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence？Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1247-1274.
24. Dopuch, N., King, R. & Schwartz, R. (2001). An experimental investigation of retention and rotation requirements. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 93-117.
25. Fan, H. S., Chen, C. L. & Jung, T. (2009). Non-audit services and the value-relevance of accounting information in Taiwan. International Journal of Revenue Management, Forthcoming.
26. Firth, M. (1997).The provision of non-audit services by accounting firms to their audit clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14, 1-21
27. Francis, J. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6, 133-151.
28. Jan, C. & Ou, J. (1995). The role of negative earnings in the valuation of equity stock’s, Working Paper, Santa Clara University.
29. Kend, M. (2006). The market for non-audit services: The influence of client industry audit expertise. Working Paper, Australian National University.
30. Krishnan, G. V. (2003). Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons, 17, 1-16.
31. Lim, C. Y. & Tan, H. T. (2007). Non-audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization. Working Paper, Nanyang Technological University.
32. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book value, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 661-687.
33. Ou, J. A., & Sepe, J. F. (2002). Analysts’ earnings forecasts and the roles of earnings and book value in equity valuation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29, 287-316.
34. Palmrose, Z. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.
35. Palmrose, Z. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63, 55-73.
36. Parkash, M. & Venable, C. (1993). Auditee incentives for auditor independence: the case of non-audit services. The Accounting Review, 68, 113-133.
37. Pitt, L. & Birenbaum, B. (1997). Serving the public interest：A new concept framework for audit independence. New York：NY American institute of certified public accountants.
38. Simon, D. & Francis, J. (1988). The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review, 63, 255-269.
39. Simunic, D. (1984). Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 679-702.
40. Solomon, I., Shields, M. D. & Whittington, O. R. (1999). What do industry-specialist auditors know? Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 191-208.