跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.141) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/25 23:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:歐彥良
論文名稱:實驗室堆肥反應槽及戶外堆肥反應槽之食品廢棄物與綠色廢棄物混合堆肥
論文名稱(外文):Co-composting of Green Waste and Food Waste by Lab-scale and Field-scale Composting Reactors
指導教授:林志高林志高引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:環境工程系所
學門:工程學門
學類:環境工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:英文
論文頁數:72
中文關鍵詞:綠色廢棄物食品廢棄物混合堆肥戶外堆肥反應槽
外文關鍵詞:Food wasteGreen wasteCo-compostingField-scale composting reactor
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:777
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
綠色廢棄物及食品廢棄物為都市固體廢棄物中最大宗的有機物來源,此類廢棄物經過適當的處理之後,可以作為土壤改良劑或有機肥料。最常見的處理方式為土地掩埋或是焚化法。近年來,由於台灣土地取得困難,使得土地掩埋法的處理量逐漸下降;而食品廢棄物及綠色廢棄物中的高含水率若進入焚化爐,不僅降低焚化的效率,也會對焚化爐造成損害,甚至產生戴奧辛等二次污染。因此,低成本、低技術門檻及最終產物可再利用的堆肥法在近幾年逐漸成為熱門的技術。本研究主要目的為利用實驗室規模的堆肥反應槽來進行食品廢棄物及綠色廢棄物的混合堆肥,利用實驗設計的方式找出最佳操作條件,並設計一無電力及自動控制系統之戶外堆肥反應槽,測試此最佳操作條件是否適用於戶外堆肥反應槽。

實驗結果顯示,採用槽式堆肥之食品廢棄物及綠色廢棄物之混合堆肥能在12天內被分解,高於過去文獻之堆肥反應速率且達到相當高的去除效率 (>30%)。碳氮比及含水率為堆肥實驗之重要參數,藉由中央合成設計法調整碳氮比及含水率並利用反應曲面法可得到最佳操作條件。中央合成設計法及反應曲面法所得之結果顯示,食品廢棄物及綠色廢棄物之混合堆肥之最佳含水率為60%;碳氮比在本研究中並非顯著之因子,但碳氮比表示綠色廢棄物及食品廢棄物之比例,進而影響堆肥物種之孔隙率及氧氣傳輸效率,因此,含水率及碳氮比之交互作用之影響為顯著的。此外,總揮發性固體物之去除率符合二階模型,其R2 高於95%。

本實驗所使用之戶外堆肥反應槽可在無電力系統之環境下運作,其設計結構並無自動攪拌以及曝氣系統;實驗結果顯示,同樣之操作條件下,戶外堆肥反應槽可達到較高之溫度及較高之總揮發性固體物去除率。旋轉戶外堆肥反應槽本體以達到攪拌效果,並可提供較高之攪拌效率,因此也達到較佳之實驗結果。此結果顯示,在設計反應槽以及實驗時,攪拌方式比攪拌頻率以及攪拌時間更重要。除此之外,以蘿蔔種子進行之種子發芽率測試以及重金屬測試結果顯示,戶外堆肥反應槽之堆肥產品能直接利用做為土壤改良劑。
Both food and green wastes are the most organic sources in municipal solid wastes, which can be reused as soil amendments or organic fertilizer for land application after proper treatment. Land filling/dumping and incineration are the most common ways to treat these organic wastes. Several dumpsites have been closed down in recent years due to the confined land availability in various countries including Taiwan. Furthermore, the high moisture content of organic waste reduces the incineration efficiency, and damages the incinerator as well as the process performance, thus resulting in the secondary pollution. Therefore, composting has become more popular due to its low energy cost, low technology demand, as well as the reusability of the end product. The main objectives of this study are to convert green waste and food waste into stable reusable products using lab-scale composting at optimal operating conditions and to design a field-scale reactor to mimic these conditions.

The results showed that food waste and green waste can be decomposed in 12 days with in-vessel composting, a shorter composting time than in previously published literature, and produced better total volatile solids (TVS) reduction ratio (>30%). A central composite design and response surface method were applied to obtain optimal operating conditions at different design moisture contents and carbon to nitrogen ratios. The central composite design and response surface method results indicated that the optimal moisture content for co-composting of food waste and green waste was 60%. Whereas the change in moisture content was a highly significant factor, the central composite design and response surface method results indicated that the carbon to nitrogen ratio was not. The TVS reduction ratio was modeled by a second-order equation with a correlation R2 value higher than 95%.

A field-scale composting reactor was designed without an agitator or aeration pump to save on electrical power use. The performance of the field-scale reactor yielded better results than the lab-scale reactor, producing a higher temperature and TVS reduction ratio. The better performance of the field-scale reactor is due to the increase in agitation efficiency. The results indicated that the agitation type is more important than agitation time when designing a composting reactor. The samples collected from the field scale reactor have nearly reached the value of standard germination index of radish seed, which shows that compost produced in this study can be applied as soil amendment.
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.1.1 Solid Waste Generation 1
1.1.2 Collection System 1
1.2 Conventional Solid Waste Disposal Methods 3
1.3 Composting 3
1.4 Composting Methods/Types 4
1.5 End Product of Composting 5
1.6 Objectives 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1 Factors Affecting the Composting 6
2.2 Changes in Physical/Chemical Properties during Composting 8
2.3 Central Composite Design 9
2.4 World Research Scenario 11
Chapter 3 Materials and Methods 13
3.1 Composting Reactor 13
3.1.1 Lab-scale Composting Reactor 13
3.1.2 Field-scale Composting Reactor 14
3.2 Composting Substrates and Methods 14
3.2.1 Feeding Materials 14
3.2.2 Composting Methods 15
3.2.3 Experimental Design 17
3.2.4 Analytical Measurements 18
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion 21
4.1 Effect of Moisture Content and C/N on Composting 21
4.1.1 Profile of Temperature 24
4.1.2 Profile of pH 25
4.1.3 Profiles of TOCw and TKNw Concentrations 29
4.1.4 Profile of TVS Reduction Ratio during Composting 32
4.1.5 Identification of Optimal Operating Condition 36
4.2. Modeling the Optimal Conditions for Co-composting of Green Waste and Food Waste 39
4.3 Application of Field-Scale Reactor for Co-composting of Green Waste and Food Waste 42
4.3.1 Profiles of Temperature and pH 43
4.3.2 Profiles of TOCW and TKNW Concentrations 44
4.3.3 Profile of TVS Reduction Ratio 46
4.4 Analysis of End Product of Composting 50
Chapter 5 Conclusions 53
References 55
Appendix …………………………………………………………….…………….…61
Agnew, J.M. and Leonard, J.J. (2003) Literature Review: The physical properties of compost. Compost Science and Utilization 11, 238-264.
Barrington, S., Choiniere, D., Trigui, M. and Knight, W. (2003) Compost convective airflow under passive aeration. Bioresource Technology 86, 259-266.
Bech-friis, B., Smars, S., Jonsson, H. and Kirchmann, H. (2001) Gaseous emissions of carbon dioxide, ammonia and nitrous oxide from organic household waste in a compost reactor under different temperature regimes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 78, 423-430.
Benito, M., Masaguer, A., Moliner, A., and Antonio, R.D. (2006) Chemical and physical properties of pruning waste compost and their seasonal variability. Bioresource Technology 97, 2071-2076.
Bernal, M.P., F’aredes, C., Monedero, M.A.S. and Cegarra, J. (1997) Maturity and Stability parameters of composts prepared with a wide range of organic wastes. Bioresourcr Technology 63, 91-99
Bertran, E., Sort X., Soliva, M. and Trillas, I. (2004) Composting winery waste: sludges and grape stalks. Bioresource Technology 95, 203-208.
Biey, E.M., Mortier, H. and Verstraete, W. (2000) Nitrogen transfer from grey municipal solid waste to high quality compost. Bioresource Technology 73, 47-52.
Cekmecelioglu, D., Demirci, A., Graves, R.E. and Davitt, N.H. (2005) Applicability of Optimised In-vessel Food Waste Composting for Windrow Systems. Biosystems Engineering 91, 479-486.
Chang, J.I., Tsai, J.J. and Wu, K.H. (2006) Thermophilic composting of food waste. Bioresource Technology 97, 116-122.
Chikae, M., Kerman K., Nagatani N., Takamura, Y. and Tamiya E. (2007) An electrochemical on-field sensor system for the detection of compost maturity. Analytica Chimica Acta 581, 364-369.
Diaz, M.J., Eugenio, M.E., Jiménez, L., Madejón, E. and Cabrera, F. (2003) Modelling vinasse/cotton waste ratio incubation for optimal composting. Chemical Engineering Journal 93, 233-240.
Epstein, E. (1997) The science of composting. Technomic publishing co. INC., U.S.A.
Fang, M., Wong, J.W.C., Ma, K.K. and Wong, M.H. (1999) Co-composting of sewage sludge and coal fly ash: nutrient transformations. Bioresource Technology 67, 19-24.
Georgakakis, D. and Krintas, T. (2000) Optimal use of the Hosoya system in composting poultry manure. Bioresource Technology 72, 227-233
Guardia, A. de, Petiot, C., Rogeau, D. and Druilhe, C. (2007) Influence of aeration rate on nitrogen dynamics during composting. Wastes Management 28, 575 - 587
Hamoda, M.F., Qdais, H.A.A. and Newham, J. (1998) Evaluation of municipal solid waste composting kinetics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 23, 209-223.
Hassouneh, O., Jamrah, A. and Qaisi, K. (1999) Sludge stabilization by composting: a Jordanian case study. Bioprocess Engineering 20, 413-421.
Hernandez, R.S., Chaparro, V.M.O., Valdes, G.S.B., Lopez, D.J.P. and Bolon, J.S. (2007) Chemical characteristics of several vermicomposts in Mexico. Compost Science and Utilization 15, 47-52.
Hoyos, S.E.G., Juarez, J.V., Ramonet, A.C., Lopez, G.J., Rios, A.A. and Uribe, G. E. (2002) Aerobic thermophilic composting of waste sludge from gelatin-grenetine industry. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 34, 161-173.
Huang G.F., Wong, J.W.C., Wu, Q.T. and Nagar, B.B. (2004) Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Management 24, 805-813.
Iyengar , S.R. and Bhave, P.P. (2006) In-vessel composting of household wastes. Waste Management 26, 1070-1080.
Jouraiphy A., Amir, S., Gharous, M.E., Revel, J.C. and Hafidi, M. (2005) Chemical and spectroscopic analysis of organic matter transformation during composting of sewage sludge and green plant waste. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 56, 101-108.
Kalbasi, A., Mukhtar, S., Hawkins, S.E. and Auvermann, B.W. (2005) Carcass composting for management of farm mortalities: a review. Compost Science and Utilization 13, 180-193.
Kim, J.D., Park, J.S., In, B.H., Kim, D. and Namkoong, W. (2007) Evaluation of pilot-scale in-vessel composting for food waste treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.023.
2Kim, K.Y., Kim, H.W., Han, S.K., Hwang, E.J., Lee, C.Y. and Shin, H.S. (2007) Effect of granular porous media on the composting of swine manure. Waste Management. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.015.
Kulcu R. and Yaldiz, O. (2007) Effects of air flow directions on composting process temperature profile. Waste Management. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.026.
Kwon, S.H. and Lee D.H. (2004) Evaluation of Korean food waste composting with fed-batch operations I: using water extractable total organic carbon contents (TOCw). Process Biochemistry 39, 1183-1194.
Laos, F., Mazzarino, M.J., Walter, I., Roselli, L., Satti, P. and Moyano, S. (2002) Composting with fish offal and biosolids in northwestern Patagonia. Bioresource Technology 94, 179-186.
Leiva, M.T.G., Casacuberta, A.A. and Ferrer, A.S. (2003) Application of experimental design technique to the optimization of bench-scale composting conditions of municipal raw sludge. Compost Science and Utilization 14, 321-329.
Lemus, G.R. and Lau, A.K. (2002) Biodegradation of lipidic compounds in synthetic food wastes during composting. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 44, 633-639.
Leth, M., Jensen, H.E.K. and Iverson, J.J.L. (2001) Influence of different nitrogen sources on composting of miscanthus in open and closed systems. Compost Science and Utilization 9, 197-205.
Lu, L.A., Kumar, M., Tsai, J.C. and Lin, J.G. (2008) High-rate composting of barley dregs with sewage sludge in a pilot scale bioreactor. Bioresource Technology 99, 2210 - 2217
Means, N.E., Starbuck, C.J., Kremer, R.J. and Jett, L.W. (2005) Effects of a food waste-based soil conditioner on soil properties and plant growth. Compost Science and Utilization 13, 116-121.
Plaza, C., Senesi, N., Brunetti, G. and Mondelli, D. (2005) Co-composting of sludge from olive oil mill wastewater mixed with cuttings. Compost Science and Utilization 13, 217-226.
Pullicino, D.S., Erriquens, F.G. and Gigliotti, G. (2007) Changes in the chemical characteristics of water-extractable organic matter during composting and their influence on compost stability and maturity. Bioresource Technology 98, 1822-1831.
Ramos, S.M.C., Bernal, D.A., Tapia, N.T. and Dendooven, L. (2004) Composting of tannery effluent with cow manure and wheat straw. Bioresource Technology 94, 223-228.
Saludes, R.B., Iwabuchim K., Kayanuma, A. and Shiga, T. (2007) Composting of dairy cattle manure using a thermophilic–mesophilic sequence. Biosystems Engineering 98, 198-205.
Satisha, G.C. and Devarajan, L. (2007) Effect of amendments on windrow composting of sugar industry pressmud. Wastes Management 27, 1083-1091.
Sellami, F., Jarboui, R., Hachicha, S., Medhioub, K. and Ammar E. (2008) Co-composting of oil exhausted olive-cake, poultry manure and industrial residues of agro-food activity for soil amendment. Bioresource Technology 99, 1177-1188.
Smith, D.R., Cawthon, D.L., Sloan, J.J. and Freeman, T.M. (2006) In-vessel, mechanical rotating drum composting of institutional food residuals. Compost Science and Utilization 14, 155-161.
Sullivan, D.M., Bary, A.I., Nartea, T.J., Myrhe. E.A., Cogger, C.G. and Fransen, S.C. (2003) Nitrogen availability seven years after a high-rate food wastes compost application. Compost Science and Utilization 11, 265-275.
Sundberg , C., Smars, S. and Jonsson, H. (2004) Low pH as an inhibiting factor in the transition from mesophilic to thermophilic phase in composting. Bioresource Technology 95, 145-150.
Techapun, C., Charoenrat, T., Watanabe, M., Sasaki, K. and Poosaran, N. (2002) Optimization of thermostable and alkaline-tolerant cellulase-free xylanase production from agricultural waste by thermotolerant Streptomyces sp. Ab106, using the central composite experimental design. Biochemical Engineering Journal 12, 99-105.
Tiquia, S.M. and Tam, N.F.Y. (2000) Fate of nitrogen during composting of chicken litter. Environmental Pollution 110, 535-541.
Tiquia, S.M., Tam, N.F.Y. and Hodgkis, I.J. (1997) Effect of bacterial inoculum and moisture adjustment on composting of pig manure. Environmental Pollution 96, 161-171.
Tiquia, S.M., Tam, N.F.Y. and Hodgkis, I.J. (1996) Effect of composting on phytotoxicity of spent pig-manure sawdust litter. Environmental Pollution 93, 249-256.
Wang, W., Wang, X., Liu, J., Ishii, M., Igarashi, Y. and Cui, Z. (2007) Effect of oxygen concentration on the composting process and maturity. Compost Science and Utilization 15, 184-190.
Wong, J.W.C., Mak, K.F., Chan, N.W., Lam, A., Fang, M., Zhou, L.X., Wu, Q.T. and Liao, X.D. (2001) Co-composting of soybean residues and leaves in Hong Kong. Bioresource Technology 76, 99-106.
Zhang, Y. and He, Y. (2006) Co-composting solid swine manure with pine sawdust as organic substrate. Bioresource Technology 97, 2024-2031.
Zucconi, F., Forte, M., Monaco, A. and Beritodi, M. (1981) Biological evaluation of compost maturity. Biocycle 22, 27-29.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top