跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/26 11:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:許婉玲
研究生(外文):Wan-ling Hsu
論文名稱:台灣指定科考英文閱讀測驗之評析
論文名稱(外文):An Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Questions in the JCEE English Tests
指導教授:余光雄余光雄引用關係
指導教授(外文):Kuang-hsiung Yu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:英文
論文頁數:130
中文關鍵詞:英語閱讀技巧指定科考英文閱讀測驗
外文關鍵詞:reading skillsJCEEreading comprehension tests
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:738
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:173
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:11
論文摘要:
本研究主旨在探討近五年來台灣指定科考英文閱讀測驗之試題,以期了解閱讀測驗試題的內容並掌握考試的趨勢。此外,本研究希望能提供英語教師在閱讀教學上的一些啟示。
本研究以高雄市立三民高中兩班二年級學生計76位同學為研究對象,學生被分為高、中、低成就三組。學生在五週內做過去五年共18篇的指定科考英文閱讀測驗。本研究採用Windows Excel來分析各問題類型的出現頻率,各閱讀技巧的出現頻率及學生在各閱讀技巧的表現。採用CC Lang來分析過去五年指定科考有哪些類型的字,及有多少字超出大考中心7000單字表的範圍。
本研究結果如下:
1. 細節問題是最常被考的問題類型。
2. 學生在決定字的意思及找出特定細節的閱讀技巧上表現較佳,在推論方面的閱讀技巧較差。
3. 影響考試表現的因素有文章主題、單字、長度、正確選項單字的難易度、問題內容的具體性、答案選項和它在文章內容中出現的相似程度、要搜尋的資訊在文章中出現的位置。
4. 最常考的文章主題是名人。
5. 有19種類型的字出現在考試中,種類出現頻率由高至低為名詞,動詞,形容詞, 副詞,介係詞,及連接詞。有133字超出大考中心公布的單字表。
本研究希望能幫助英文老師更了解指定科考英文閱讀測驗的信度及效度,也希望協助老師了解學生在哪種英語閱讀技巧需改進或加強以準備指定科考的考試,及在閱讀時學生所面臨的困難。此外,希望能提供一些高中英語閱讀教學的方向及建議。
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to present the results of a qualitative analysis and a quantitative analysis of the reading comprehension test items on the 2000-2004 English JCEE tests. Specifically, this study is aimed to promote a better understanding of the content and construction of the reading comprehension section and the current tendencies in the English JCEE test. Furthermore, this study serves as a guide for English teachers in EFL reading instruction.
The subjects for the present study were 76 students from two different classes in the second grade of San Min Senior High School in Kahohsiung City. The subjects were divided into the high-proficiency group, the middle-proficiency group, and the low-proficiency group. During the ten weeks, the subjects have to do 18 passages of the reading comprehension tests adopted from the JCEE English exams in the past five years. The scores of the subjects’ JCEE English reading comprehension tests were collected, calculated, and analyzed. The statistical analysis was done by using the Windows Excel to demonstrate the frequency distribution of the question types, the reading skills that have been measured, and the examinees’ passing rate of each reading strategy. The CC Lang was used for word frequency count so as to know what type of words had been frequently used in JCEE reading comprehension tests in the past five years and how many words have gone beyond the scope of the Word List published by JCEE.
Based on the quantitative and qualitative data analysis, the findings of the study are summarized as follows:
1. The detail item is the major question type that appears in the past five years’ English JCEE Reading Comprehension Tests.
2. The subjects perform well in the reading skills of determining the meaning of words and finding specific details, and perform worst in the skill of drawing inferences.
3. There are some test variables accounting for item difficulty. They are subject matter, vocabulary recognition, the location of requested information, the number of details, the length of the text, the concreteness of the requested information, the degree of correspondence, the text/item overlap, and the word level of the correct option.
4. The themes of famous people are most frequently used to measure the students’ reading comprehension ability.
5. There are mainly 19 types of words appeared in the chosen texts in the tests. Noun is the major type of words, followed by verb, adjective, adverb, preposition, and conjunction.
The contributions of this study are: (1) help language teachers better understand the reliability & validity of the reading comprehension questions in the JCEE;(2) help the teachers to understand what type of reading strategies students need to improve or reinforce for the purpose of preparing for the entrance exam, and the difficulties they face while reading. (3) provide some practical guidelines for improving reading instruction in senior high schools.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Acknowledgements….…………………………………………………………….…i
Chinese abstract ……………………………………………………………………..ii
English abstract………………………………………………………………………iii

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
Background and Motivation………………………………………......1
Purposes of the Study………………………………………..…….…..2
Research Questions………………………………………..…….….....3
Significance of the Study………………………………...…………3
Limitations of the Study…………………………………...….….4

CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
Concepts of Reading Comprehension…………………….….......5
Definition of Reading Comprehension………………….…….…5
The Interactive View of Reading…………………………….…..6
Schema Theory……………………………………………………………….….7
Metacognition……………………………………………………………………8
Models of Reading Comprehension Process…………………………………………10
The Bottom-up Model…………………………………………………………..11
The Top-down Model…………………………………………………………...11
The Interactive Model…………………………………………………………..11
Studies in Learner’s Reading Skills ……………………………..13
Approaches to Measure Reading Comprehension……….…………………..15
Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Test………………………………...15
Criticisms of Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Test……………..16
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple-Choice Test……………..17
Guidelines for Multiple-Choice Reading Test……………………………..19
Cloze Test……………………………………………………………………….22
Ways of Making and Using Cloze Tests…………………………………...23
Advice on Creating Cloze Type Passages…………………………………27
Factors Affecting Reading Comprehension………………………………………….28
Guidelines for English Reading Instruction………………………………………….31
Language Testing…………………………………………………………………….37
Item Analysis……………………………………………………………………37
Item Discrimination……………………………………………………………..37
Item Facility…………………………………………………………………….38

CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY
Introduction………………………………………………………………………….39
Subjects……………………………………………………………………………….39
Instruments……………………………………………………………………….40
Procedures……………………………………………………………………………41
Data Analysis………………………………………………………………………...43

CHAPTER FOUR ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Introduction ……………………………………………………………….…44
Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Tests from 2000 to 2004………………….44
Analysis of the Question Types ……………………………………………………...74
Reading Skills that have been Measured ……………………………...……………..75
Students’ Performance on Each Reading Skill…………...…………………………..76
Comparison of the High and the Low Group on Each Reading Skill ……………….77
Discriminatory Power of the Reading Questions ……………………………………80
Variables Affecting the Students’ Performance ……………….……………………..81
Themes of the Chosen Texts in the Tests …………………………………………….84
Categories of the Types of Words…………………………………………………….85
Analysis of Frequently Used Words………………………………………………….87
Words beyond the Word List …………………………………………………….…..89
Number of Questions and Length of the Chosen Reading Texts ……………………91

CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS
Summary of Major Findings…………………………………………………………94
Pedagogical Implication……………………………………………………………...95
Guidelines for Taking Reading Comprehension Tests on the English JCEE.…..96
Suggestions for Future Research……………………………………………………..98

REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………...100

APPENDIX
Appendix A: Reading Comprehension Passages of the Year 2004……………..…..108
Appendix B: Reading Comprehension Passages of the Year 2003………………....112
Appendix C: Reading Comprehension Passages of the Year 2002.………..……….117
Appendix D: Reading Comprehension Passages of the Year 2001…………………121
Appendix E: Reading Comprehension Passages of the Year 2000…………………126
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Table 2.1 Categories of Reading Skills…………………………………………..…..15
Table 2.2 Categories of Question Type………………………………………………22
Table 2.3 List of Variables Contributing to Item Difficulty………………..………...30
Table 3.1 Three Groups of the Subjects………………………………….…………..40
Table 3.2 Number of the Reading Passages and Question Items………………….…40
Table 4.1 Analysis of the 2004 Reading Comprehension Test.……………..………..45
Table 4.2 Analysis of the 2003 Reading Comprehension Test.…………..…………..50
Table 4.3 Analysis of the 2002 Reading Comprehension Test.……..………………..56
Table 4.4 Analysis of the 2001 Reading Comprehension Test………...……………..62
Table 4.5 Analysis of the 2000 Reading Comprehension Test..……………………...69
Table 4.6 Analysis of the Question Types………...……………………………….....74
Table 4.7 Frequency of the Reading Skill……...………………………………….…76
Table 4.8 Passing Rate of Each Reading Skill….……………………………………77
Table 4.9 Comparison of Performance between the High and the Low Group on Each
Reading Skill…………..……………………………………………………..………78
Table 4.10 Discriminatory Power of Each Question Type …………………………..80
Table 4.11 Categories of Test Variables Found on the English JCEE……….……….81
Table 4.12 Themes of the Chosen Texts in the Tests………………….……….…….84
Table 4.13 Six Categories of the Type of Words ……………………………………86
Table 4.14 Analysis of Frequently Used Words……………………………………...87
Table 4.15 Words of the English JCEE Reading Comprehension Tests that have gone
beyond the Word List…………………………………………………………….…..89
Table 4.16 Numbers of Questions and the Length of the Chosen Reading Texts……91

Figure 4.1 Frequency of the Question Types………………………..…………..……75
Figure 4.2 Comparison of Performance between the High and Low Group on Each
Reading Skill………….……………………………………………………….……..79
REFERENCES
English References
Partnership for Reading. Available:
www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/adult_reading/glossary/glossary.html.
Glossary: Effective Teaching Terms and Links. Available:
http://www.usu.edu/teach/glossary.htm.
Alderson, J.C. (1996). “The testing of reading.” In C. Nuttall (Ed.), Teaching reading
skills in a foreign language, 212-228. Oxford: Heinemann.
Anderson, Neil J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: issues and strategies.
Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 2-20.
Anderson, R. C. (1994). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, &H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 469-482). Netwark, DE: International Reading Association.
Azar, B. S. (1985). Fundamentals English grammar. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prince-Hall.
Abraham, R.G. & Chapelle, C. A. (1992). The meaning of cloze test scores: An item
difficulty perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 468-477.
Alderson, J. C. (1979). The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign
language. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 219-227.
Alderson, J. C. (1996). The testing of reading. In Nuttall, C. (Eds.), Teaching
reading skills in a foreign language (p. 211-228). Reed Educational and
Professional Publishing Limited.
Alderson, C., Claphan, C. & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and
evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, D. (1989). Language testing: A critical survey and practical guide. London:
Edward Arnold.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills in reading. In P. D. Pearson
(Ed.), Handbook of reading research (p. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Carver, David. (1978). “Reading comprehension–Is there such a thing?” English Language Teaching, 32(4), 291-297.
Carrell, P.L., & Eisterhold, J.C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
Carrell, P. (1983). “Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge in second language comprehension.” Reading in a Foreign Language, 1(2):81-92.
Carrell, P. L. (1988a). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In Carrell, P. L., Devine, J. & Esdey, D. (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (p.101-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727-752.
Chabot, R.J., Zehr, H.D., Prinzo, O.V., & Petros, T.V. (1984). “The speed of word recognition sub-processes and reading achievement in college students.” Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2): 147-161.
Chang, W. C. (Ed.). (1996). English test item development project in the year of 1995-Frequent English vocabulary list for senior high school students. Taipei, Taiwan: College Entrance Examination Center.
Chen, L.J. (1995). An analysis of listening and reading strategies training on EFL students: A study of cadets from Chinese Military Academy. Unpublished Dissertation.
Chen, L.J. (1991). Using the interactive model to foster reading comprehension. Chinese Military Academy, 40, 55-60.
Cheng, C. C. (1999). CC Lang: Language processing (a computer program). Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A. : University of Illinois.
Chen, L. Yuan-shan. (1990). Literature review of reading strategies: Background
knowledge and vocabulary. Journal of Ling Tung College, 11, 361-382.
Dijk. T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Dubin, F.D., Eskey, D.E., & Grabe, W. (Eds.). (1986). Teaching second language for academic purposes. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62-85.
Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English. Cambridge: University Press.
Farr, R., Pritchard, R. & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209-226.
Farhady, H. & Keramati, M. N. (1996). A text-driven method for the deletion procedure in cloze passages. Language Testing, 13(2), 191-207.
Fotos, S. S. (1991). The cloze test as an integrative measure of EFL proficiency: A substitute for essays on college entrance examination? Language Learning, 41(3), 311-336.
Forrest, D. L., & Waller, T. G. (1979). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco.
Fusaro, J. A. (1993). A meta-analysis of the effect of sentence-combining on reading comprehension. Reading Improvement, 30(4), 228-231.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 4, 126-135.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quaterly, 25(3), 375-406.
Grabe, w. (1986). “The transition from theory to practice in teaching reading.” In Dubin, Eskey, and Grabe (Eds.), Teaching Second Language Reading for Academic Purposes, 25-48.
Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a second language. New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company.
Harris, T. L., & Hodges, P. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of
reading and writing. Netwark, DE: International Reading Association.
Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research.
Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Huang, Tsan-sui. (1994). A qualitative analysis of the JCEE English tests. Taipei: The
Crane Publishing Company.
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Huang, Chin-Cheng. (2002). The reliance of reading comprehension: More
vocabulary knowledge or background knowledge. Studies in English language
and literature, 10, 71-79.
Huang, Tsan-suei. (1994). A qualitative analysis of the JCEE English tests. Taipei: Crane.
Huang, Tzyh-lai. (1993). New horizons in English language teaching. Taipei: Crane.
Honeyfield, J. (1977). Word frequency and the importance of context in
vocabulary learning. RELC Journal, 8(2), 35-42.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly. 16(4), 503-516.
Johnson, B. E. (1994). The reading edge: Thirteen ways to build reading comprehension. Taipei: Bookman Books.
Jongsma, E. A. (1980). Cloze instruction research: A second look. International Reading Association.
Klein-Braley, C. (1983). A cloze is a cloze is a question. In J. Oller, Jr. (Ed.), Issues in language testing research (pp. 218-228). Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.
Klein-Braley, C. (1997). C-tests in the context of reduced redundancy testing: An appraisal. Language Testing, 14(1), 47-84.
Lange, D. L., & Clausing, G. (1981). An examination of two methods of generating and scoring cloze test with students of German of three level. Modern Language Journal, 65, 254-261.
Liang, Shu-fang. (2002). The reading comprehension strategies of junior college EFL students. Journal of Cheng-Shiu Institute of Technology, 15, 225-238.
Mo, Chien-ching. (1987). A study of English reading comprehension and general guidelines for testing reading. Journal of National Chengchi University, 55, 173-206. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Madsen, H. S. (1983). Techniques in testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meyer, R. & Tetrault, E. (1986). Open your CLOZED minds: Using cloze exercises
to teach foreign language reading. Foreign Language Annuals, 19(5), 409-415.
Maker, J. & Lenier, M. (1982). Keys to a powerful vocabulary. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Morgan, J. & Rinvolucri, M. (1988). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6, 199-215.
O’Malley, J.M., A. U. Chamot. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oller, J. W. (1989). Language tests at School. Longman Inc., NY.
Paris, S. G. & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (p. 333-349). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
Phillips, P.D. (1985). “Practical implications of recent research in reading.” Foreign Language Annals, 17(4), 285-296.
Perkins, K. (1992). The effect of passage topical structure types on ESL reading comprehension difficulty. Language Testing, 9, 163-172.
Redman, S., & Ellis, R. (1989). A Way with words: Vocabulary development activities for learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Sprio, Bertram C. Bruce, & W. F. Brwer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. (p.33-58). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbum.
Raygor, A. L. & Raygor R. D. (1985). Effective reading: Improving reading rates and comprehension. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Rye, J. (1982). Cloze procedures and the teaching of reading. Heinemann Educational Books Inc, NH.
Rupley, W.H., & Nichols, W. D. (1996). Content domain and word knowledge: Relationship to comprehension of narrative and expository text. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 419-432.
Salaberry, M. R. & Lopez-Ortega, N. (1998). Accurate L2 production across language tasks: Focus on form, focus on meaning, and communicative control. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 514-532.
Shih, Yu-hwei. (1994). The impact of the joint college entrance examination on English teaching and learning in Taiwan. Studies in English Literature & Linguistics, 1994, 53-84.
Sun, Ching-Hui. (1993). Reading strategies in English as a foreign language for Taiwan students. Journal of Tatung Institute of Commerce and Technology, 7, 207-226.
Swain, M. (1985). “Communicative competence: Some roles for comprehensive input and comprehensive output in its development.” In S. Grass, & C. Madden, Input in Second Language Acquisition, Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
Tierney, R., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Learning to learn from text: A frame work for improving classroom practices. In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp.496-513). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Tsai Chih-Hung & Chen Yeonhwan. (2000). Using cloze tests in assessing ESL/EFL
reading proficiency. Journal of Tajen Institute of Technology, 18, 339-352.
Tsai, A. (1990). Strategies of reading comprehension in second language acquisition. Journal of Chien-Kuo Institute of Technology, 19(1), 257-264.
Valette, Rebecca M. (1977). Modern language testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Whimbey, A. (1975). Intelligence can be taught. New York: Dutton.
Wu, Huei-chu. (2000). An item analysis of the 2000 English Subject Ability Test. Taipei: CEEC.
Witte, P. L. ((1985). A guidebook for teaching reading. Newton, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yu, Min-nin (1997). Educational measurement and evaluation: Achievement measurement and teaching evaluation. Taipei: Psychology Publisher.
Yu, G. K-H. (1995). New tendencies in reading proficiency tests: Implications from reading comprehension research. Paper presented at the Tenth English Conference on English Teaching and Learning in Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yang, Pen-li. (2002). A qualitative analysis and comparison between the 2001 English test of Joint College Entrance Examination and That of Subject Proficiency Tests for applying to Colleges. Journal of The Kaohsiung Municipal Kaohsiung Senior High School, 5, 75-98.

Chinese References
盧珍予 (民91)。 台灣學科能力閱讀測驗之評析及其教學啟示。 國立政治大學
英國語文學系在職碩士班碩士論文。
郭文泉(民92)。 高/低成就學生在克漏字測驗作答策略上的差異:個案研究。 
國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文。
黃燦遂。 (1994)。 大學聯考英文試題分析。 文鶴書局。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top