跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.213) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/08 00:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃湘晴
研究生(外文):Hsiang-Ching Huang
論文名稱:EFL學生英語聽力理解策略與聽力困難之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of EFL Students’ Strategies on English Listening Comprehension and Their Listening Difficulties
指導教授:范燕姬范燕姬引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yen-Chi Fan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:應用英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文
論文頁數:207
中文關鍵詞:聽力理解認知策略後設認知策略聽力困難
外文關鍵詞:Listening comprehensionCognitive strategiesMetacognitive strategiesListening difficulties
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:947
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究旨在探究EFL學生在英語聽力理解過程中策略的使用與他們的聽力困難。此研究共有二百一十位來自義守大學應用英語學系的參與者 (二百零八位學生及兩位英語教師)。本研究使用兩項工具:一項為學生聽力策略之應用與其聽力困難探究之問卷;另一項為訪談問題,以調查學生及教師對於學生在英語聽力理解過程中,聽力策略的使用與其遇到的聽力困難之觀點。筆者透過描述性統計去分析問卷資料的結果,並從錄音檔中轉譯出訪談資料,以利於與問卷資料做三角測量,再進行討論及回答本研究中的兩個研究提問。

本研究主要發現概述如下:

(一) 在學生英語聽力理解過程中,最常使用的認知策略為:「以課文的重點來猜測不懂的字彙之意思」;此外,在學生英語聽力理解過程中,最顯著被應用的後設認知策略為:「有理解困難時,努力地專注在聽力課文上」。

(二) 「輸入因子」於每項聽力因子分類中持有最高頻率。「英語中不熟悉的重音及語調形式」在學生聽力過程中之輸入因子裡為主要的聽力困難。「當學生思考不熟悉的字彙或句子的意思時,便忽略了聽力課文後續的部分」在學生聽力過程中之聽者因子裡為主要障礙。然而,大部份的學生表示,在聽力過程中,他們很少遇到有關過程因子的聽力困難。

(三) 兩位英語教師對於學生英語聽力理解上重要的策略持有他們各自的見解。第一位老師指出:對學生而言,重要的聽力策略為了解課文中整體的大意與理解句子的結構;第二位老師回答:學生應接觸真實語言,且自基礎至高等階層循序漸進,並發展及應用他們自己的聽力策略。

(四) 關於兩位英語教師對學生聽力困難的見解,他們各自提出四項學生時常在英語聽力理解過程中遇到的主要困難。此外,兩位英語教師都認為學生聽力困難皆和言談表述形式與口音有關。

根據本研究的結果,關於英語聽力理解的一些教學啟示及對未來研究之建議,則提供在本論文最後章節裡。

The aims of this study are to explore EFL students’ strategies use and their listening difficulties in English listening comprehension process. There were 210 participants in total (208 students and two English instructors) attending this research, who came from the Department of Applied English, I-Shou University. Two instruments were applied to embark the study: One was the questionnaire for probing students’ employment of listening strategies and their listening difficulties, and the other was the interview questions for investigating both students’ and teachers’ viewpoints toward students’ utilization of listening strategies and listening difficulties they confronted in their process of English listening comprehension. The writer analyzed the results of the questionnaire data through descriptive statistics, and transcribed out the interview data from the recording files in order to triangulate with the questionnaire data for making discussions and answering two research questions in this research.

The major findings of the present study are summarized as below:

(1) The most frequently used cognitive strategy in students’ English listening comprehension process was guessing the meaning of unknown words through the main idea in the text; besides, the most saliently applied metacognitive strategy in students’ process of English listening comprehension was focusing harder on the listening text when they had trouble understanding.

(2) The “input factor” held the most frequency in each category of listening factor. The unfamiliar stress and intonation patterns of English was the major listening difficulty in input factor in students’ listening process. The neglect toward the listening text’s subsequent part as students made thinking the meaning of unfamiliar words or sentences caused the main obstacle in listener factor in students’ listening process. However, most of the students stated that they rarely confronted the listening difficulties with process factor in their listening process.

(3) Two English instructors held their own perspectives on the important strategies toward students’ English listening comprehension. The first teacher indicated that the important listening strategies to students were getting the general script of the text and understanding the sentence’s structure; the second teacher responded that students should be exposed to the authentic language from the basis to the advanced level, and then develop and apply their own listening strategies.

(4) With regard to two English instructors’ perceptions of students’ listening difficulties, they proposed four primary difficulties respectively that students often encountered in their English listening comprehension process; besides, there were some common grounds between two English instructors’ own viewpoints to students’ listening difficulties, which were problems of the speech patterns and the accent.

Based on the results of the present research, some pedagogical implications and suggestions for the further studies about English listening comprehension are given in the last chapter of this thesis.

Abstract (Chinese) i
Abstract (English) iii
Acknowledgements v
Table of Contents vi
List of Tables and Figures x
Chapter One: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background Knowledge and Motivation 1
1.2 Purposes of the Study 4
1.3 Research Questions 5
1.4 Significance of the Study 5
1.5 Limitations of the Study 5
1.6 Definition of Related Terms 6
Chapter Two: LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 English Listening Comprehension 8
2.1.1 Importance of English Listening and Listening Comprehension 8
2.1.2 Characteristics of English Listening 10
2.2 Listening Strategies 12
2.2.1 Definition of Term and Importance toward Second Language or Foreign Language Learning Strategies 12
2.2.2 Taxonomy of Language Learning Strategies 13
2.2.3 Strategies on Second Language or Foreign Language Listening Comprehension 15
2.2.3.1 Definition of Term 15
2.2.3.2 Importance of Listening Comprehension Strategies 15
2.2.3.3 Efficiency of Strategies on Listening Comprehension 16
2.2.3.4 Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies 22
2.3 Students’ English Listening Difficulties 25
Chapter Three: METHODOLOGY 32
3.1 Participants 32
3.2 Sampling Strategies 33
3.3 Instruments 34
3.3.1 Questionnaire of Strategies’ Use in English Listening Comprehension Process and Listening Difficulties 34
3.3.2 Interview Questions for Students and Teachers 36
3.4 The Pilot Test 37
3.5 Procedures of Data Collection 38
3.6 Data Analysis 40
Chapter Four: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 42
4.1 Demographic Information to Participants 42
4.2 Results of Strategies’ Use in Students’ Listening Comprehension Process 47
4.2.1 Analysis of Questionnaire Data 48
4.2.2 Analysis of Interview Data 54
4.3 Results of Students’ Listening Difficulties 69
4.3.1 Analysis of Questionnaire Data 70
4.3.2 Analysis of Interview Data 76
Chapter Five: CONCLUSION 93
5.1 Summaries of Findings in the Present Study 93
5.2 Pedagogical Implications 99
5.3 Suggestions for the Further Studies 100
References 102
Appendices 110
Appendix A: Consent Form (Students) 110
Appendix B: Questionnaire of Strategies’ Use in English Listening Comprehension Process and Listening Difficulties (English) 111
Appendix C: Questionnaire of Strategies’ Use in English Listening Comprehension Process and Listening Difficulties (Chinese) 115
Appendix D: Interview Questions (for Students, English) 118
Appendix E: Interview Questions (for Students, Chinese) 119
Appendix F: Consent Form (Teachers) 120
Appendix G: Interview Questions (for Teachers) 121
Appendix H: Transcription (Students) 122
Appendix I: Transcription (Teachers) 183
Appendix J: Statistics of the Reliability 193

Abdalhamid, F. (2012). Listening comprehension strategies of Arabic-speaking ESL learners (Unpublished master’s thesis). Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Al-Alwan, A., Asassfeh, S., & Al-Shboul, Y. (2013). EFL learners’ listening comprehension and awareness of metacognitive strategies: How are they related? International Education Studies, 6(9), 31-39. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n9p31
Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. New York: Oxford University Press. as cited in Chen, H. L. (2009).
Bidabadi, F. S., & Yamat, H. (2011). The relationship between listening strategies used by Iranian EFL freshman university students and their listening proficiency levels. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 26-32.
Boyle, J. P. (1984). Factors affecting listening comprehension. ELT Journal, 38(1), 34-38.
Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. in Mendelsohn and Rubin 1995: 113-28. as cited in Goh, C. C. M. (2008).
Cai, D. (2007). Facilitating English major’s listening comprehension through metacognitive strategy training. Journal of Zhaotong Teacher’s College, 29(3), 43-46.
Carrier, K. A. (2003). Improving high school English language learners’ second language listening through strategy instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 383-408. as cited in Chamot, A. U. (2005).
Chamot, A. U. (1995). Learning strategies and listening comprehension. in Mendelsohn and Rubin 1995: 13-130. as cited in Goh, C. C. M. (2008).
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
Chen, H. (2011). Brief analysis of strategies to improve English listening comprehension competence among non-English undergraduate students. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 68-71.
Chen, H. L. (2009). The effect of different repeated listening models on English listening performance in college (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng, Y. P. (2004). An investigation of listening difficulties encountered by EFL students in senior high schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman, London. as cited in Graham, S. (2006).
Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55-75.
Goh, C. C. M. (2005). Second language listening expertise. Expertise in second language learning and teaching, 64-84.
Goh, C. C. M. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213. doi: 10.1177/0033688208092184
Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165-182. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001
Hamouda, A. (2012). Listening comprehension problems–Voices from the classroom. Language in India, 12(8), 1-49.
Hamouda, A. (2013). An investigation of listening comprehension problems encountered by Saudi students in the EL listening classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 113-155.
Holden, W. R. (2004). Facilitating listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. Bulletin of Hokuriku University, 28, 257-266.
Jou, Y. J. (2010). A study of English listening strategies applied by technological university students. Journal of TOKO University, 4(2), 1-16.
Lai, P. H. (2009). The correlation between JHS students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the difficulty levels in English listening comprehension (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Lin, S. H. (2000). A study of English listening comprehension strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Lin, Y. J. (2011). Student interpreters’ listening strategy use and listening difficulties (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Liu, H. J. (2008). A study of the interrelationship between listening strategy use, listening proficiency levels, and learning style. ARECLS, 5, 84-104.
Lotfi, G. (2012). A questionnaire of beliefs on English language listening comprehension problems: Development and validation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(4), 508-515.
Mendelsohn, D. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101. as cited in Goh, C. C. M. (2008).
Morchio, M. (2009). Listening as an easy skill: Analysis of a particular context. International Journal of English Studies, 9(1), 29-41.
Nakata, Y. (1999). The effects of listening strategy training on listening competence. Paper, AILA, Tokyo. as cited in Teng, H. C. (2003).
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46. as cited in Teng, H. C. (2003).
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985b). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557-584.
Oxford, R. L. (1986). Second language learning strategies: Current research and implications for practice. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, and Los Angeles: Center for Education and Research of the University of California at Los Angeles.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know? Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (1994). Language learning strategies: An update. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, Center for Applied Linguistics.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Mouton de Gruyter.
Ross, S., & Rost, M. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachability. Language Learning, 41(2), 235-273. as cited in Chamot, A. U. (2005).
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and Researching Listening. London: Longman. as cited in Hamouda, A. (2013).
Rubin, J. (1988). Improving foreign language listening comprehension (Project No. 017AH70028).Washington, DC: US Department of Education. as cited in Vandergrift, L. (1999).
Serri, F., Boroujeni, A. J., & Hesabi, A. (2012). Cognitive, metacognitive, and social/affective strategies in listening comprehension and their relationships with individual differences. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 843-849. doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.4.843-849
Sun, K. C. (2002). Investigation of English listening difficulties of Taiwan students. In A paper presented at the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching–English Teachers’ Association/ROC, Taipei. as cited in Yang, M. N., & Chen, S. C. (2007).
Teaching listening: Strategies for developing listening skills. Retrieved from http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/listening/stratlisten.htm
Teng, H. C. (1998). A study of EFL listening comprehension strategies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422 745).
Teng, H. C. (2002). An investigation of EFL listening difficulties for Taiwanese college students. In A paper presented at the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching–English Teachers’ Association/ROC, Taipei. as cited in Yang, M. N., & Chen, S. C. (2007).
Teng, H. C. (2003). Teaching EFL listening strategies to college students in Taiwan. In Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 385-394).
Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342.
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25. doi: 10.1017/S0267190504000017
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462.
Yagang, F. (1994). Listening: Problems and solutions. In T. Kral (ed.) Teacher development: Making the right moves. Washington, DC: English Language Programs Division, USIA.
Yang, M. N., & Chen, S. C. (2007). An investigation on junior college students’ learning problems in English-learning programs on the radio. Samara AltLinguo E-Journal, 2, 1-5.
Yen, A. C. (1987). An assessment of listening comprehension difficulties encountered by Chinese college English majors (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan. as cited in Yang, M. N., & Chen, S. C. (2007).

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊