跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/09 09:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:Altai Sodnom
研究生(外文):Altai Sodnom
論文名稱:國外直接投資、出口值與經濟成長三者之間因果關係-蒙古國家實證
論文名稱(外文):The Triangular Causal Relationship between FDI Exports and Economic Growth: Evidence from Mongolia
指導教授:歐仁和歐仁和引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ou, Jenho Peter
口試委員:陳明麗蔡永順歐仁和
口試委員(外文):Chan, Min-LeeTsai, Yung-ShunOu, Jenho Peter
口試日期:2013-01-24
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:亞洲大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:39
中文關鍵詞:Causal relationship
外文關鍵詞:Causal relationship
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:398
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:10
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本文研究主要探討蒙古國:國外直接投資、出口以及經濟成長(GDP)三者之間的因果關係。研究期間從1990至2011年,使用時間序列方法檢測;探討經濟成長(GDP)、出口值以及國外直接投資。探討近期的文獻與測試個別時間序列資料後,利用三個變數的VAR與VECM估計發現許多Granger因果關係。經濟含意分析在結論會被探討。第四章實證結果發現長期的經濟成長會影響出口與國外直接投資,不過短期內結果沒有顯現出三者之間的關係。且研究結果發現,國外直接投資與出口有長期的因果關係。換句話說,本文意味著經濟成長會導致國外直接投資出口增加。出口成長對外蒙古國是有效的;國外投資增加會影響出口增加;出口會影響國外直接投資。
The purpose of this paper is to study the causality relations between FDI, exports, and economic growth (GDP) in Mongolia. These indicators are investigated by using time-series from 1990 to 2011, examined the Granger causality relations between GDP, exports, and FDI for Mongolia. After reviewing the current literature and testing the properties of individual time-series data, estimated the VAR and VECM of the three variables to find various Granger causal relations.
The empirical results obtained in this study demonstrate that, economic growth will have its affect on Export and FDI in long period, but results didn’t show short run causality relationship between variables. Also it found out that FDI and Export have bidirectional long run causality relationship.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT………………………………………………...………………I
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...II
CHINESE………………………………………………………………………………...II
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………….….III
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………IV
LIST OF FIGURES..…………………………………………………………………….VI
LIST OF TABLES..………………………………………………..…………………...VII
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………..………………...2
1.1 Research background……………………………………………………………...…..2
1.2 Research motivation……………………………………………………………...……5
1.3 Research purpose and objective…………………………..……………..…………….6
1.4 Research structure………………………………………………………………..…..10
CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………….11
2.1 Analytical framework………………………………………………………………..11
2.2 A review of recent empirical literature…………………………………….………...12
CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY AND DATA……………………………………18
3.1 Research limitations……………………………………………………..…………...18
3.2 Unit root test…………………………………………………………………………19
3.3 Cointegration test………………………………………………………………….…20
3.3.1 Trace test statistics…………………………………………………………21
3.3.2 Maximum Eigenevalue test………………………………………………..22
3.4 Vector error correction model (VECM)…………………………………………..…22
V
CHAPTER IV. EMPIRICAL RESULT AND RESEARCH FINDINGS……...…...25
4.1 Results of augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root test……………………………..……27
4.2 Results of Johansen’s cointegration test……………………………………...…..….29
4.3 Estimates for VECM regression and granger causality test……………………...….30
CHAPTER V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION………………..…………….…35
5.1 Research implications……………………………………………….……………….35
5.2 Discussions and research findings…………………………………………………...35
5.3 Summary conclusion…………………………………………………………………37
5.4 Suggestions for further research……………………………………………………..39
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………VIII
1.Ahmad, Mohsin Hasnain, Shaista Alam, and Mohammad Sabihuddin Butt (2004), “Foreign Direct Investment, Exports and Domestic Output in Pakistan”, 19th annual general Meeting, PIDE, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad
2.Alici, Asli Akgiic and Meltem Sengun Ucal (2003), “Foreign Direct Investment, Exports and Output Growth of Turkey: Causality Analysis,” European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Fifth Annual Conference. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid.
3.Awokuse T. O., 2007. “Causality between Exports, Imports and Economic Growth: Evidence from Transition Countries”, Economic Letters, 94, pp. 389-395.
4.Bhagwati, J., (1978) ‘Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regime’, Working Paper Series, NBER, New York.
5.Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
6.Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Alse, J., (1993) ‘Export Growth and Economic Growth: an Balassa, B., (1978) ‘Exports and Economic Growth: Further Evidence’, Journal of Development Economics, 5, pp. 181-189.
7.Basu Parantap, Chandana Chakroborty, and Derrick Peagle (2003), “Liberalization, FDI, and Growth in Developing Countries: A Panel Cointegration Approaches,” Economic Inquiry, 41(3). 510-516
8.Blomstrom, Magnus, eds. Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics. 195-220
9.Carkovic. Maria; Ross Levine (2005), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Economic Growth?” in Moran, Theodore H; Graham, Edward M;
10.Caves, Rechard E. and Ronald W. Jones (1973), World trade and payments, An introduction. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
11.Coe David T. & Helpman Elhanan (1995) "North-South R&D Spillovers," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
12.Cho, Kyoohong (2005), Studies on Knowledge Spillovers, Trade, and Foreign Direct Investment – Theory and Empirics, Ph.D. thesis, Boulder, CO: Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Boulder.
13.Chow, P.C.Y., 1987, ‘Causality between Export Growth and Industrial Performance: Evidence from the NIC's’, Journal of Development Economics, 26, pp. 55-63.
14.Christopoulos, D. K., & Tsionas, E. G. (2003). “A reassessment of balance of payments constrained growth: Results from panel unit root and panel cointegration tests.” International Economic Journal, 17(3). 39-54.
15.Chakraborty, C. and Basu, P. (2002), ‘Foreign Direct Investment and growth in India a Cointegration approach’, Applied Economics, 34, 1061-1073.
16.Cuadros, Ana, Vicente Orts, and Maite Alguacil (2004), “Openness and Growth: Re-Examining Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Output Linkages in Latin America,” The Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 167-192
17.Davidson, R., and MacKinnon, J. G. (2004). Econometrics theory and methods. NY: Oxford University Press.
18.Darrat, A.F., 1987, ‘Are Exports an Engine of Growth? Another Look at the Evidence’, Applied Economics, 19, pp. 277-83.
19.De Mello, L. R., Jr. (1999), “Foreign Direct Investment-led growth: Evidence from time series and panel data,” Oxford Economic Papers, 51(1), 133-151.
20.Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A., 1979, ‘Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74,366, pp. 427-431.
21.Dritsaki, Melina, Chaido Dritsaki and Adamopoulos Antonios (2004), “A Causal Relationship between Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Economic Growth for Greece” American Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(3) 230-235.
22.Easterly, W. R., 2007, ‘Free Market and Economic Development’, Presentation International Symposium, on the Poverty Reduction and Beyond Development Strategies for Low Income Countries.
23.Edwards, Sebastian (1993), “Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries,” Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), 1358-1393.
24.Elbeydi Abdulbaset, M., Khaled, R.M., Hamuda, Vladimir, Gazda, 2010, ‘The Relationship between Export and Economic Growth in Libya Arab Jamahiriya’, Theoretical and Applied Economics, XVII, 1, 542, pp. 69-76.
25.Ericsson, J. and Irandoust, M. (2001), ‘On the causality between foreign direct investment and output: a comparative study’, International Trade Journal 15, 1-26.
26.Fan, Emma Xiaoqin (2002), “Technological Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment - A Survey” Asian Development Bank ERD Working Paper Series No. 33.
27.Feder, G., 1982, ‘On Exports and Economic Growth’, Journal of Development Economics, 12, pp. 59-73.
28.Frankel, Jeffrrey A., and David Romer, (1999) “Does Trade Cause Growth?” American Economic Review, 89, 379-399.
29.Frankel, Jeffrey A., David Romer, Teresa Cyrus (1996), “Trade and Growth in East Asian Countries: Cause and Effects?” NBER Working Paper 5732.
30.Giles, Judith A. and Cara L. Williams (2000), ‘Export-led Growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some non-causality results. Part I,’ Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 9(3). 261-337.
31.Gray, H. P. (1998), ‘International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment: the Interface,’ in J. H. Dunning, ed. Globalization, Trade and Foreign Direct Investment, Oxford: Elesvier 19-27.
32.Greenaway, David, and Wyn Morgan (1998), “Trade Orientation and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence,” New York, NY: St. Martin Press. Chapter 9
Greene, William H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
33.Grossman, Gene, M. and Elhanan Helpman (1997), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.Helpman E., Krugman P.R., (1985). “Market Structure and Foreign Trade”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35.Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P., (1996), ‘Export-Led Growth or Growth-Driven Exports?: The Canadian Case’ Canadian Journal of Economics, XXIX, 3, pp. 540-555.
36.Hsiao, Frank S.T. and Mei-Chu W. Hsiao (1987), “Tests of Causality and Exogeneity between Exports and Economic Growth: The Case of Asian NICs,” Journal of Economic Development, 12(2). 143-159.
37.Hsiao, Frank S.T. and Mei-Chu W. Hsiao (2004), “The Chaotic Attractor of Foreign Direct Investment--Why China? A Panel Data Analysis,” Journal of Asian Economics. 15. 641-670.
38.Hsiao, Frank S.T. and Mei-Chu W. Hsiao (2003a), “‘Miracle Growth’ in the Twentieth Century--International Comparisons of East Asian Development,” World Development, 31(2), 227-257.
39.lHsiao, Frank S.T. and Mei-Chu W. Hsiao (2006), “FDI, Exports, and Growth in East and Southeast Asia - Evidence from Time-Series and Panel Data Causality Analyses” International Conference Korea and the world Economy V, July 7-8
40.IGusti N. A. 2009, Time series data analysis using Eviews. John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd.
41.Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels.” Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.
42.International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development (ICSEAD) (2003). East Asian Economic Perspectives. Special issue, February.
43.Kim, K. S., 1993, ‘Economic Implications of NAFTA for East Asia—With Special Reference to US and East Asian Trade and Investment Flows’, paper presented at the Korea Economic Institute and Princeton University Symposium, Princeton University, September.
44.Kohpaiboon, Archanun (2003), “Foreign Trade Regimes and FDI-Growth Nexus: A Case Study of Thailand,” The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2).
45.Kojima, Kiyoshi (1973), “A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 14(1), 1-21.
46.Konya, L., 2006. “Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach”, Economic Modeling 23, pp. 978-992.
47.Krueger, A., (1978) ‘Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Liberalization Attempts and Consequence’, Working Paper Series, NBER, New York.
48.Krueger, A., (1990) ‘Asian Trade and Growth Lessons’, American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 80, pp. 108-12.
49.Krugman, P. (1995) ‘Growing World Trade: Causes & Consequences’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Issue 1, pp. 327-333
50.Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002). “Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties.” Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.
51.Lim, Ewe-Ghee (2001), “Determinants of, and the Relation Between, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: A Summary of the Recent Literature,” IMF Working Paper, WP/01/175.
52.Liu, Xiaohui, Peter Burridge, and P.J.N. Sinclair (2002) Relationships between economic growth, Foreign Direct Investment and trade: Evidence from China/ Applied Economics. 34, 1433-1440.
53.Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). “A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–52.
54.Maddison, Angus (2003), The World Economy: Historical Statistics, Paris: OECD Development Center.
55.Makki, Shiva S. and Agapi Somwaru (2004), “Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade on Economic Growth: Evidence from Developing Countries,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3), 795-801
56.Marin, D. (1992) “Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for industrialized countries”. Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 678-88.
57.Markusen, James R. and Venables, A. J. (1998), “Multinational Firms and the New Trade Theory,” Journal of International Economics, 46, 183-203.
58.Mishra P. K., (2010) ‘The Dynamics of Relationship between exports and economic growth in India’, International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research 4 (2): 53-70
59.Nair-Reichert, Usha, and Diana Weinhold (2000), “Causality Tests for Cross-Country Panels: New Look at FDI and Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 64, 153-71.
60.Petri,.Peter A. and Michael G. Plummer (1998), “The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey with Applications to the United States,” Chapter 7 New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.Hiro Lee and David W. Roland- Holst, (1998) Economic Development and Cooperation in the Pacific Basin: Trade, Investment, and Environmental Issues, New York: Cambridge University Press.
62.Rivera-Batiz L. and Romer P.M., (1991). “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 531-555.
63.Rodriguez, F. and D. Rodrik (2000), “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-National Evidence”, Macroeconomics Annual, 2000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.Roman Kozhan (2010) Financial Econometrics. Roman Kozhan &Ventus Publishing ApS.
65.Serletis, A. (1992) “Export growth and Canadian economic development”. Journal of Development Economics 38, 133-45.
66.Tang, T. C., (2006) ‘New Evidence on Export Expansion, Economic Growth and Causality in China’, Applied Economics Letters, 13, pp. 801-803.
67.Toda, H.Y. and Yamamoto, (1995) ‘Statistical inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes’, Journal of Econometrics, 66, pp. 225-250.
68.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2003 and various years), World Investment Report, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
69.Ullah, Zaman, Farooq and Javid., (2009) ‘Cointegration and Causality between Exports and Economic Growth in Pakistan’, European Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 2, pp.264-272.
70.Vernon, Raymond (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,“ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
71.Vohra, R., (2001) ‘Export and Economic Growth: Further Time Series Evidence from Less Developed Countries’, International Advances in Economic Research, 7, 3, pp. 345- 50.
72.Wernerheim, C. Micheal (2000), “Cointegration and Causality in the Exports-GDP Nexus: The Postwar Evidence for Canada,” Journal Empirical Economics. 25, 111-125.
73.William E.G., Carter H.R., Guay C.L. (2008) Using Eviews. For principles of Econometrics. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
74.Yamada, H. (1998) “A note on the causality between exports and productivity: an empirical reexamination”. Economics Letters 61, 111-4.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top