臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討影響企業社群網站採用因素，應用適配可行性模式與科技接受模式綜合理論框架，並採用「問卷調查法」進行資料蒐集，以台灣地區企業從業人員有使用社群網站或企業社群網站者為調查對象，使用SmartPLS進行「偏最小平方法」資料分析。本研究發現，虛擬社群意識、知覺有用與知覺易用對於社群網站使用態度有正向顯著的影響；適配度和可行性對於預期績效有正向顯著的影響；知覺易用和信任對於知覺有用有正向顯著的影響；信任對於知覺易用有正向顯著的影響；社群網站使用態度和預期績效對於企業社群網站採用意圖有正向的影響。本研究將討論上述發現在管理上的意涵，提供給企業社群網站的採用者及開發商參考建議。

The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that affect the use of enterprise social networking sites. In this study, the fit-viability model and technology acceptance model comprehensive theoretical framework.
This survey research employed to employees using social networking sites or enterprise social networking sites by survey in Taiwan. There were 150 questionnaires collected for this study. The partial least squares was used in the data analysis. The results showed that social networking sites uses attitude and perceived performance have significant effects on the factors that affect the use of enterprise social networking sites. Sense of virtual community, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have significant effects on the social networking sites uses attitude. Fit and viability have significant effects on the perceived performance. Perceived ease of use and trust have significant on the perceived usefulness. Trust have significant on the Perceived ease of use. This study discusses the implications of these findings in the management, available to adopters and developers reference to the proposed enterprise social networking sites.

目 次
壹、緒論 1
一、 研究背景與動機 1
二、 研究目的 3
三、 研究流程 5
四、 研究範圍與限制 6
五、 論文架構 7
貳、 理論發展 8
一、 企業社群網站(Enterprise Social Networking sites, ESNs) 8
二、 科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Model, TAM) 12
三、 信任(Trust) 14
四、 虛擬社群意識(Sense of Virtual Community, SoVC) 16
五、 適配可行性模式(Fit-Viability Model, FV Model) 19
參、 研究方法 25
一、 研究架構與假設 25
二、 操作型定義與衡量問項 27
三、 資料分析方法 37
肆、 研究結果 40
一、 敍述性統計分析 40
二、 信度與效度分析 43
三、 假設檢定 48
伍、 結論與建議 55
一、 研究結論 55
二、 管理實務上的建議 57
參考文獻 59
附錄 65
 
表目錄
表2-1：傳統投資與網際網路投資組合策略比較表 20
表3-1：研究假設一覽表 26
表3-2：虛擬社群意識之衡量題項 27
表3-3：信任之衡量題項 28
表3-4：知覺有用之衡量題項 29
表3-5：知覺易用之衡量題項 30
表3-6：適配度之衡量題項 31
表3-7：可行性之衡量題項 31
表3-8：預期績效之衡量題項 33
表3-9：社群網站使用態度之衡量題項 34
表3-10：企業社群網站採用意圖之衡量題項 35
表4-1：敘述性統計分析結果 40
表 4-2：各構面題項因素負荷量分析表 44
表4-3：潛在構面平均變異數萃取量、組合信度和Cronbach’s α值 46
表4-4：構面間之相關係數矩陣 47
表 4-5：模型路徑檢定表 (Bootstrapping n=1000) 51
表 4-6：研究假設檢定結果一覽表 52
 
圖目錄
圖1-1：研究流程圖 5
圖2-1：網際網路投資組合圖Internet portfolio map 21
圖2-2：行動商務科技採用的適配可行性架構 23
圖3-1：研究架構與假設示意圖 25
圖4-1：路徑關係圖 48
圖 4-2：完整理論模型之PLS路徑圖 53
圖 4-3：完整理論模型之PLS Bootstrapping方法分析路徑圖 54

[1]財團法人資訊工業策進會，<我國家庭寬頻應用現況與需求調查>，網址：http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=345 ，上網日期：2013年11月20日。
[2]陳照森，〈社群網站信任與科技接受模式之實證研究〉，全球商業經營管理學報，第四期，頁53-66，ISSN:2076-9474，2012年9月。
[3]陳道發，《社群網站使用動機及前置因素之研究 ─以Facebook為例》，碩士論文，國立東華大學企業管理學系，2012。
[4]梁定澎，《資訊管理理論》，新北市：前程，ISBN：9789866264597，2012。
[5]葉逸萱，《企業採用資訊科技之配適-可行性延伸模式》，博士論文，國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所，2011。
[6]Abdul-Rahman, A., & Hailes, S., “Supporting trust in virtual communities,” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000, Maui, Hawaii, p. 9 pp. vol. 1.
[7]Ajzen, Icek., Fishbein, Martin, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
[8]Barnetta, A., Fortune 500 companies in second life. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Fortune-500-Companies-In-Second-Life-374838.html , accessed 2013/11/18.
[9]Baym, N. K., Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside an electronic fan culture, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1997.
[10]Blanchard, A. L. “Developing a sense of virtual community measure,” CyberPsychology & Behavior (10:6), 2007, pp. 827-830.
[11]Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. "The experienced "sense" of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes," ACM SIGMIS Database, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 64-79, Winter 2004.
[12]Bradley, A. J., & McDonald, M. P., Most organizations still fear social media - harvard business review. http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/07/most-organizations-still-fear/ , accessed 2013/11/12.
[13]Butow, E., & Taylor, K., How to succeed in business using LinkedIn: Making connections and capturing opportunities on the world''s# 1 business networking site, AMACOM, NY, 2008.
[14]Charlene Li, Report: Making the business case for enterprise social networks.
http://www.altimetergroup.com/2012/02/making-the-business-case-for-enterprise-social-networks.html , accessed 2013/9/20.
[15]Chin, W.W. “Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling,” MIS Quarterly (22:1), 1998, pp. 7–16.
[16]Clint Boulton, Facebook, twitter use in the enterprise sparks hot debate.
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Messaging-and-Collaboration/Facebook-Twitter-Use-in-The-Enterprise-Sparks-Hot-Debate/ , accessed 2013/9/12.
[17]Davis, F. D. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319-340.
[18]DeMers, J., The top 7 social media marketing trends that will dominate 2014 - orbes.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2013/09/24/the-top-7-social-media-marketing-trends-that-will-dominate-2014/ , accessed 2013/10/18.
[19]DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M., “Motivations for social networking at work,” In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Nov. 2008, pp. 711-720.
[20]Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. “Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context,” The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 171-185, Mar. 1998.
[21]Drury, G. “Opinion piece: Social media: Should marketers engage and how can it be done effectively,” Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice (9:3), 2008, pp. 274-277.
[22]Ellonen, H., Kosonen, M., & Henttonen, K. “The development of a sense of virtual community,” International Journal of Web Based Communities (3:1), 2007, pp. 114-130.
[23]Fishbein, Martin., & Ajzen, Icek, Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior : An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1975.
[24]Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:1), 1981.
[25]Fraser, M., & Dutta, S., Throwing Sheep in the Boardroom: How Online Social Networking Will Transform Your Life, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley, 2008.
[26]Gefen, D., “Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers,” ACM SIGMIS Database, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 38-53, summer 2002.
[27]Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. “Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model,” MIS Quarterly (27:1), 2003, pp. 51-90.
[28]Goodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. “User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance,” The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 87-101, Dec. 2000.
[29]Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. “Task-technology fit and individual performance,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), 1995, pp. 213-236.
[30]Granovetter, M. “The strength of weak ties,” American Journal of Sociology (78:6), 1973, pp. 1360-1380.
[31]Grover, V., & Goslar, M. D. “The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in U.S. organizations,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 141-163, Jun. 1993.
[32]Hoover, J. N., Social networking: A time waster or the
next big thing in collaboration.
http://www.informationweek.com/news/201808149?queryText=hoover+enterprise+2.0 , accessed 2013/9/20.
[33]Jones, A. P., & James, L. R., “Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions,” Organizational behavior and human performance (23:2), 1979, pp. 201-250.
[34]Liang, T., Huang, C., Yeh, Y., & Lin, B. “Adoption of mobile technology in business: A fit-viability model,” Industrial Management & Data Systems (107:8), 2007, pp. 1154-1169.
[35]Liang, T., & Wei, C. “Introduction to the special issue: Mobile commerce applications,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 7-17, Spring 2004.
[36]McKenna, K. Y., & Green, A. S. “Virtual group dynamics,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice (6:1), 2002, pp. 116-127.
[37]McLure Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. ““It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems (9:2), 2000, pp. 155-173.
[38]McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. “Sense of community: A definition and theory,” Journal of Community Psychology (14:1), 1986, pp. 6-23.
[39]Misztal, B., Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order, Polity, Cambridge, UK, 2013.
[40]Mohan, S., Choi, E., & Min, D., “Conceptual modeling of enterprise application system using social networking and web 2.0 ‘social CRM system,’” In Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 2008. ICHIT''08. International Conference on, pp. 237-244, 2008.
[41]Morris, P., Glimpses of community on the web. http://matei.org/ithink/2007/10/14/glimpses , accessed 2013/10/10.
[42]Pirouz, Dante M. An Overview of Partial Least Squares. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1631359 , accessed 2013/10/27.
[43]Powell, J., 33 million people in the room: How to create, influence, and run a successful business with social networking, Que Publishing, NJ, 2009.
[44]Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. “The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation,”
Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117-135, Mar. 2001.
[45]Ravichandran, T., Lertwongsatien, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. “Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 237-276, Spring 2005.
[46]Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. “Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities,” Organization Studies (28:3), 2007, pp. 377-408.
[47]Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A., SmartPLS-Version 2.0.M3.
http://www.smartpls.de , accessed 2013/8/22.
[48]Rheingold, H., A slice of my life in my virtual community, MIT Press Cambridge, MA, 1996.
[49]Rooksby, J., Social networking and the home office.
http://lscits.cs.bris.ac.uk/docs/socialNetworkingHomeOffice.pdf accessed 2013/12/13.
[50]Rutledge, P. A., The Truth About Profiting from Social Networking, FT Press, NJ, 2008.
[51]Solis, B., Enterprise Social Network is More Than Facebook Behind a Firewall. http://www.briansolis.com/2012/03/enterprise-social-network/ , accessed 2013/10/18.
[52]Spears, R., & Lea, M., Social influence and the influence of the''social''in computer-mediated communication, Harvester Wheatsheaf, England, 1992.
[53]Tapscott, D., Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world, McGraw-Hill, NY, 2008.
[54]Terdiman, D., The entrepreneur''s guide to second life: Making money in the metaverse, Sybex, NJ, 2007.
[55]Tjan, A. K., “Finally, a way to put your internet portfolio in order,” Harvard Business Review (79:2), 2001, pp. 76-85.
[56]Tonteri, L., Kosonen, M., Ellonen, H., & Tarkiainen, A., “Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community,” Computers in Human Behavior (27:6), 2011, pp. 2215-2223.
[57]Turban, E., Bolloju, N., & Liang, T. P., “Enterprise social networking: Opportunities, adoption, and risk mitigation,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce (21:3), 2011, pp. 202-220.
[58]Tuten, T. L., Advertising 2.0: Social media marketing in a web 2.0 world, Greenwood, NY, 2008.
[59]Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. “Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (6:3), 2005, pp.72-101.
[60]Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. “Net surfers don''t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities,” Networks in the Global Village, 1999, pp. 331-366.
[61]Yellowfinbi., Social and collaborative Business Intelligence.
http://www.yellowfinbi.com/YFSalesDocs.i4?cat=white , accessed 2013/10/8.