臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

根據過去探討閱讀英語文章之研究，顯示字彙能力對於閱讀和理解英語文章是一個很大的影響因素。而在近幾年來的眼動行為研究，顯示其閱讀和眼動行為有其關聯性，其研究對象多以第一語言之受測者。本研究以字彙能力作為因子，閱讀材料使用全民英檢初級文章，研究對象是以英語為第二語言之受測者，探討不同字彙能力對文章理解程度之關係，及在閱讀文章上眼動行為之差異。其結果顯示，字彙能力較好者平均第一向前凝視時間較短、平均向前掃視距離較長；字彙能力較差者平均第一向前凝視時間較長，平均向前掃視距離較短。由迴歸分析之結果顯示，平均第一凝視時間可以預測字彙能力的高低，有28%解釋能力。不論是字彙能力較好或較差者，皆會隨著字母數越多，所停留的時間越長，但在字彙能力較好者在不同字母數之間的平均第一凝視時間差異較小，較有集中的趨勢，而字彙能力較差者在不同字母數之間的平均第一凝視時間差異較大，且隨著字母數越多，差異越明顯。

Past studies have explored the reading of English articles and have shown that readers’ vocabulary abilities have great impact on English comprehension performance levels. Recent studies of eye movement behavior have demonstrated that eye movement behavior has relevance to reading performance; however, these studies have considered readers working on articles written in the readers’ first language. This study is concerned with subjects who read English as a second language; in particular, this study is concerned with comprehension performance in the General English Performance Test (GEPT). The data shows that reader vocabulary levels relate to eye movement behavior and comprehension. A statistical regression analysis of all subjects shows an R-value of .279 between fixation duration and vocabulary level. For subjects with larger vocabularies, the average first fixation duration is shorter, and the average saccade length is longer; for subjects with small vocabularies, the average first fixation duration is longer, and the average saccade length is shorter. Regardless of vocabulary level, words with many letters produced longer fixation durations. Thus, there was always some variance in fixation durations. However, subjects with larger vocabularies had small variances and subjects with smaller vocabularies had large variances.

誌謝 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與問題 1
1.3 研究之重要性 2
第二章 文獻探討 3
2.1眼球移動方式 3
2.2眼球追蹤技術 3
2.2.1 眼球追蹤研究之發展 3
2.2.2眼球追蹤之技術 4
2.2.3眼球追蹤之測量指標 5
2.3 閱讀的眼動行為研究 6
2.3.1閱讀之眼動行為 6
2.3.2 影響閱讀理解的相關研究 7
第三章 研究方法 10
3.1 實驗方法 10
3.2研究結果與討論 12
3.2.1平均第一凝視時間 14
3.2.2平均向前掃視距離 16
3.2.3文字之凝視點分析 17
第四章 結論與未來研究方向 22
4.1結論 22
4.2未來研究方向 23
參考文獻 24
附錄 27

蔡介立、嚴妙璇、汪勁安(2005)。眼球移動測量及在中文閱讀研究之應用。「應用心理學刊」，第28期，91-104頁。陽明大學神經科學研究所。認知神經科學實驗室。

詹益綾（2005），從眼動資料探討連接詞與閱讀歷程之關係，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。

柯華葳 陳明蕾 廖家寧，（2005），詞頻、詞彙類型與眼球運動型態：來自篇章閱讀的證據，中華心理學刊，47卷，4期，381-398頁。

張靜維（2005），從眼動資料探討字形與聲旁在篇章閱讀的效果，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。

張信賢（2006），汽車特徵意象及其在視覺上的研究，成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。

簡志忠（1998），光學式瞳位追蹤器之人機介面系統研製，逢甲大學自動控制工程研究所碩士論文。

陳啟鈞（2002），跳視眼球運動之模擬，成功大學醫學工程研究所碩士論文。

曾筱婷 (2006)，EFL大學生閱讀英文的眼動資料分析，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。
鐘政勳 (2008)，分析眼動軌跡以自動量測閱讀理解程度，國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文。

陳郁夫、羅明、蔡方之、高千惠、曾昱翔、胡志偉（2004）。從眼動資料看讀者背景知識對其閱讀歷程的影響。第43屆台灣心理學年會會議手冊暨會議論文摘要。台北市：政治大學。

英語教育電子月刊，取自http://ejee.ncu.edu.tw/showarticles.asp?CO_no=958。

Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1983). What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in Reading: Perceptual and language processes, 275-307. New York: Academic Press.

Collewijn, H., van der Mark, F., and Jansen, T. C. (1975). Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Research,15,447-450.
Cornsweet, T. N., & Crane, H. D. (1973). Accurate two dimensional eye tracker using first and fourth Purkinje images. Journal of the Optical Society of America,63,921-928.

Juhasz, B. J, & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1312-1318.

Just, M. A.,＆ Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review, Vol 87, No 4, 329-354.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.

Kandel, E. R., James H. S., & Thomas M. J. (2000). Principles of neural science. New York:McGraw-Hill.

Kumar, A., & Krol, G.. (1992). Binocular infrared oculography. Laryngoscope, 102(4),367-378.

Lefton, L. A., Nagle, R. J., Johnson, G., & Fisher, D. F. (1979). Eye movement dynamics of good and poor readers: Then and now. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(4), 319-328.

Mueller, P. U., Cavegn, D., d''Ydewalle, G., & Groner, R. (1993). A comparison of a new limbus tracker, corneal reflection technique, Purkinje eye tracking and electro-oculography. In d''Ydewalle, Gery (Ed); Van Rensbergen, Johan (Ed). (1993). Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research. Studies in visual information processing, Vol. 4, 393-401. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers. xvi, 420.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movement in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 372-422.

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201

Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. J. (2004). Eye movement in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340-352.

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. NJ: Englewood Cliffs.

Rayner, K., & Sereno, J. (1994). Eye movements in reading. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 57-81. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Rayner,K., & Chace. K. H., &Slattery. T. J., & Ashby. J. (2006)Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading. In Journal of Scientific Studies of Reading, Vol.10,No.3, 241–255.

Sun, F., Morita, M., & Stark, L. W. (1985). Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 37(6), 502-506.

van der Geest, J. N., & Frens, M. A. (2002). Recording eye movements with video-oculography and scleral search coils: a direct comparison of two methods. Journal of Neuroscience Method,114, 185-195.

Williams, R. S. & Morris, R. K. (2004). Eye movements, word familiarity and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 312-339.