跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/01 16:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林世棋
研究生(外文):Shih-Chi Lin
論文名稱:家庭暴力相對人之流行病學特徵
論文名稱(外文):The Epidemiological Characteristics of Domestic Violence Assailants
指導教授:周碧瑟周碧瑟引用關係
指導教授(外文):Pesus Chou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:公共衛生研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:120
中文關鍵詞:家庭暴力加害人特徵危險因子
外文關鍵詞:domestic violenceassailantscharateristicsrisk factor
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:1629
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:306
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:7
中文摘要
近年來,家庭暴力已廣受專家學者與政府單位的重視,成為一重要之公眾健康議題,政府更藉由家庭暴力加害人的處遇計畫,冀望能終止家庭暴力。然而不論在被害人之保護或是家暴加害人之處遇計畫之成效,皆有賴於對加害人特徵之了解。國內雖有許多關於家庭暴力加害人特徵之研究,但大多是透過被害人的陳述以獲得加害人之特徵,難免受到被害人主觀因素所影響,本研究採直接面對加害人收集其資訊,直接由加害人身上來了解其流行病學特徵。
本研究以立意集體抽樣收集過去四年來,北、中、南各一個法院之家庭暴力相對人(加害人)鑑定書內容,共有620份作為研究分析之樣本。研究發現絕大多數案件為親密關係暴力案件,高達444件(71.6%),其次為兒童虐待有70件(11.3%),大部分的相對人為男性計有592位(95.5%);年齡層集中在壯年居多(31~50歲),占71.3%,教育程度以國、高中居多(69.7%),大專程度以上的比例明顯低於一般人口(12.4% vs. 30.5%),值得注意的是有六成(60.1%)的相對人有酒精濫用的問題,明顯高於國內社區酒精濫用人口的比例(2.7%~7.7%),而大約三分之ㄧ的相對人曾有犯案前科。在排除136位資料不完整者,以logistic regression分析高再犯危險之家暴相對人之危險因子,可得男性(OR=4.29)、有子女者(OR=4.69)、身體暴力方式者(OR=2.93)、國中及高中教育程度(OR=2.88及4.57)、酒精濫用(OR=2.03;屬邊緣統計意義)均為高再犯危險之家暴相對人之特徵,值得注意的是大專以上之教育程度是高再犯危險的一個保護因子。在親密關係暴力與兒童虐待相對人流行病學特徵之比較上,兒虐相對人有較高的女性比例,年紀較輕,較多破裂的婚姻,且較高比例的性暴力事件。而兩組在職業種類、酒精濫用、有無犯罪前科、是否造成聲請人身體明顯傷害、對此次家暴事件承認與否等變項上,並無統計上之顯著差異。
結論:透過直接對家庭暴力相對人基本特徵與危險因素的瞭解,以提供加害人處遇計畫治療時之參考,達到防治家庭暴力之目標,並建議應及早著手規劃為數眾多的目睹兒童之評估與輔導,以及改善嚴重低估家暴中性侵害案件的問題。
關鍵詞:家庭暴力、相對人(加害人)、特徵、危險因子。
Abstract
Domestic violence (DV) has been considered as a major public health issue and the government leads a DV assailant treatment strategy in order to cease the violence. For achieving the goal of assailant treatment strategy or for protecting the victims, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of assailants. Although there were many studies to reveal the characteristics of assailants, most of the studies collected the assailant information from the victims. We conduct this study to recognize assailant characteristics from assailant themselves.
We collect 620 pre-sentence evaluations of DV assailants conducting in 2001 to 2004 from three different courts in Taiwan by purposeful cluster sampling. Most of DV are intimate partner violence (IPV)(71.6%) following by child abuse (11.3%). Male accounts for 95.5% of all assailants, and the education of all assailants are mostly junior or senior high school. But high education level (above college) is obviously less than general population (12.4% vs. 30.5%). The prevalence of alcohol abuse (60.1%) is prominent higher than that in general population (2.7% ~ 7.7%). After excluding 136 samples of incomplete information, there were 484 samples into logistic regression analysis for risk factors of high recidivism. Male (OR=4.29), having children (OR=4.69), physical violence (OR=2.93), junior and senior high school education level (OR=2.88 and 4.57 respectively), and alcohol abuse (borderline statistic significance) (OR=2.03) are risk factors for high recidivism of DV, however college-graduated education level or above is a protective factor. In comparing the characteristics of IPV and child abuse assailants, there were more female proportion, younger, more discord marital status, and more sex violence in child abuse group.
Conclusion: Through direct recognize the characteristics and risk factors of DV assailants, it provides important reference materials for DV assailant treatment plan to achieve the goal of preventing domestic violence. It is worthy to formulate the evaluation and counseling for the children of witness of DV and worthy to keep an eye on the low ratio of sexual abuse of DV.
Keywords: Domestic violence (DV), assailant, characteristic, risk factor.
目 錄
致謝 1
研究團隊 2
中文摘要 3
Abstract 5
第一章 緒論 8
第一節 研究動機 8
第二節 研究目的與問題 15
第三節 名詞界定 16
第二章 文獻探討 20
第一節 家庭暴力的含義 20
第二節 家暴暴力發生之原因 22
第三節 家庭暴力加害人特質的相關研究 25
第三章 研究方法 38
第一節 研究的取向與方法 38
第二節 研究對象 39
第三節 研究工具與研究變項 40
第四節 資料整理與分析 42
第四章 研究結果 44
第一節 所有家庭暴力相對人之流行病學特徵 44
第二節 家暴相對人精神疾病與人格評估 52
第三節 再犯危險性之相關危險因子的評估 55
第四節 比較親密關係(婚姻)暴力相對人與兒童虐待者間特質之異同 60
第五章 討論 66
第六章 結論與建議 75
第一節 結論 75
第二節 研究限制 76
第三節 對家庭暴力相對人裁定前鑑定與處遇計畫之建議 77
第七章 參考文獻 78
第八章 附錄 92
附錄一、文獻回顧一覽表 92
附錄二、家庭暴力相對人鑑定報告書 100
附錄三、衛生署研究計畫審核通過及人體試驗委員會審核通 110
第七章 參考文獻
1.World Health Organization. World report on violence and health. Geneva:WHO,2002.www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/full_en.pdf (accessed 27 Jun 2005).
2.Edleson JL. Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. J Interpers Violence. 1999;14:839–870.
3.吳秋月。子女知覺父母婚姻暴力經驗、社會支持及共依附之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,1999。
4.Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottemoeller M. Endingviolence against women. Population Reports. 1999; Vol. XXVII, Number 4. Population Information program, Center for Communication Programs, The John Hopkins UniversitySchool of Public Health.
5.Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R. World report on violence and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.
6.Gracia E. Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jul;58(7):536-7.
7.Erez E. Domestic violence and the criminal justice system: an overview. Online J Issues Nurs. 2002;7(1):4.
8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Intimate partner violence injuries--Oklahoma, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Oct 21;54(41):1041-5.
9.U.S. Department of Justice (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, or girlfriends. Washington. DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
10.Gelles RJ, Straus MA. Intimate Violence. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998.
11.Paulozzi LJ, Saltzman LE, Thompson MP, Holmgreen P. Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners--United States, 1981-1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2001 Oct 12;50(3):1-15.
12.Bent-Goodley TB. Perceptions of domestic violence: a dialogue with African American women. Health Soc Work. 2004 Nov;29(4):307-16.
13.張錦麗。NYCAAP紐約暴力改變協助方案(New York City Alternative Assistance Program)。行政院衛生署會議報告, 2001。
14.Kyriacou DN, Anglin D, Taliaferro E, Stone S, Tubb T, Linden JA, Muelleman R, Barton E, Kraus JF. Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence against women. N. Engl. J. Med, 1999; 34: 1892-8.
15.周煌智。性侵害犯罪加害人裁判前鑑定、家庭暴力相對人審前鑑定、與涉案之精神病犯精神鑑定比較。刑事法雜誌,2002; 46: 33-58。
16.內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會統計資料(2005)。「各直轄市、縣市政府家庭暴力防治中心累計表」。詳見網站http://www.moi.gov.tw/violence/。
17.Bureau of Justice Statistics. Domestic Violence—Violence Between Intimates. 1994, pp.5.
18.Houry D, Kaslow NJ, Thompson MP. Depressive symptoms in women experiencing intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2005 Nov;20(11):1467-77.
19.Coker AL, Weston R, Creson DL, Justice B, Blakeney P. PTSD symptoms among men and women survivors of intimate partner violence: the role of risk and protective factors. Violence Vict. 2005 Dec;20(6):625-43.
20.Lipsky S, Field CA, Caetano R, Larkin GL. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and comorbid depressive symptoms among abused women referred from emergency department care. Violence Vict. 2005 Dec;20(6):645-59.
21.湯靜蓮、蔡怡佳。我痛!--走出婚姻暴力的陰影。台北:張老師文化事業,1997。
22. Dutton MA, Green BL, Kaltman SI, Roesch DM, Zeffiro TA, Krause ED. Intimate Partner Violence, PTSD, and Adverse Health Outcomes. J Interpers Violence. 2006 Jul;21(7):955-68.
23.Brown JR, Hill HM, Lambert SF. Traumatic stress symptoms in women exposed to community and partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2005 Nov;20(11): 1478-94.
24.Bradley R, Schwartz AC, Kaslow NJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among low-income, African American women with a history of intimate partner violence and suicidal behaviors: self-esteem, social support, and religious coping. J Trauma Stress. 2005 Dec;18(6):685-96.
25.Laffaye C, Kennedy C, Stein MB. Post-traumatic stress disorder and health-related quality of life in female victims of intimate partner violence. Violence Vict. 2003 Apr;18(2):227-38.
26.Margolin G, Gordis EB. Co-occurrence between marital aggression and parents' child abuse potential: the impact of cumulative stress. Violence Vict. 2003 Jun;18(3):243-58.
27.Wahl RA, Sisk DJ, Ball TM. Clinic-based screening for domestic violence: use of a child safety questionnaire. BMC Med. 2004 Jun 30;2:25.
28.Margolin, G., & Gordis, E. (2000). The effects of family and community violence on children. Annual Reviews Psychology, 2000;51:445–479.
29. Dube SR, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Edwards VJ, Williamson DF. Exposure to abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction among adults who witnessed intimate partner violence as children: implications for health and social services. Violence Vict. 2002 Feb;17(1):3-17.
30. Delsol C, Margolin G. The role of family-of-origin violence in men's marital violence perpetration. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Mar;24(1):99-122. Review.
31.沈慶鴻。婚姻暴力代間傳遞之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文,1997。
32.Wolfe, D.A., Crooks, C.V., Lee, V., McIntyre-Smith, A., & Jaffe, P.G. The Effects of Children’s Exposure to Domestic Violence: A Meta-Analysis and Critique. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2003 Sep;6(3):171-87.
33.彭淑華等合譯。家庭暴力。台北市:洪葉文化,1999。
34.Carden, A. Wife abuse and wife abuser: review and recommendations. Couns Psychol. 1994;22(4):539-582.
35.Hansen, M., Harway, M., & Cervantes, N. Therapists’perceptions of severity in cases of family violence. Violence Vict. 1991;6:225-35.
36.黃志中。台灣婚姻暴力之臨床現況與發現。內政部家庭暴力防治委員會主辦,2000。
37.內政部家庭暴力防治委員會。家庭暴力加害人處遇裁定及執行狀況。家庭暴力相對人鑑定及加害人處遇工作檢討會,2001。
38.張惠立。台灣台中地方法院辦理相對人鑑定工作現況說明,家庭暴力相對人鑑定及加害人處遇工作檢討會。台北市:內政部家庭暴力防治委員會,2001。
39.林慈玲。家庭暴力相對人鑑定之功能與流程。家庭暴力相對人鑑定專業人員訓練手冊。台北:內政部家庭暴力防治委員會,2001。
40.周月清。家庭暴力與婦女虐待之定義及迷思探討。律師雜誌,1997,216 ,第25 頁。
41.鄭瑞隆。家庭暴力成因、特質與防治策略。青少年兒童福利學刊,1999,21,88 。
42.陳殿輝。家庭暴力犯罪法律規範及其實施現況檢討之研究。國立成功大學法律學研究所碩士論文,2002。
43.Schecter S, Ganley A. Understanding domestic violence. In Domestic Violence: A national curriculum for family preservation practitioners. San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund, 1995.
44.周月清。婚姻暴力-理論分析與社會工作處置。台北:巨流圖書公司,1995。
45.余漢儀。兒童虐待─現象檢視與問題反思。臺北:巨流圖書公司,1995。
46.黃怡瑾。婚暴中的權力控制—個人自覺與社會結構的互動歷程。婦女與兩性學刊,2001,12,95-137。
47.Steinmets SK. Family vilence: Past, present, and future. In M.B. Sussman & S.K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspective (pp. 593-624). New York: Basic Books, 1987.
48.陳鳳如。從夫妻間的權力互動看婚姻關係。諮商與輔導,1998,147,2-6。
49.黃富源。警政單位對婚姻暴力及性暴力防治工作現況與展望。社會福利,1999,130,14-20。
50.Jennings KD, Stagg V, Connors RE. Social networks and mothers’ interactions with their preschool children. Child Dev. 1991;62:966-78.
51.Riggs DS, Caulfield MB, Street AE. Risk for Domestic violence: Factors associated with perpetration and victimization. J Clin Psychol. 2000 Oct;56(10):1289-316.
52.Garner J, Fagan J. Victims of domestic violence. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio & W. G. Skigan (Eds.), Victim of Crime (2nd ed.). CA: Sage Pub, 1997.
53.黃翠紋。婚姻暴力嚴重性影響因素之研究。犯罪學期刊,2004,7,127-154。
54.周煌智,林世棋,李俊穎,黃志中,王富強。精神鑑定之原則、施行步驟與相關法律意涵。醫事法學,2005;13(3-4):94-101。
55.Saunders EA, Edelson JA. Attachment style, traumatic bonding, and developing relational capacities in a long-term trauma group for women. Int J Group Psychother. 1999 Oct;49(4):465-85.
56.Hotaling GT, Sugarman DB. A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives. J Fam Violence. 1990;5:1-13.
57.Peek-Asa C, Zwerling C, Young T, Stromquist AM, Burmeister LF, Merchant JA. A population based study of reporting patterns and characteristics of men who abuse their female partners. Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):180-5.
58.馮燕。我國目前婚姻暴力狀況。台北市政府社會局北區婦女福利服務中心提供,1990。
59.台灣省政府社會處。台灣省婦女生活狀況調查。台灣省社政府會處印,1994。
60.王麗容。台灣地區婦女福利需求初探政策芻議。社區發展季刊,1994,67,157-162。
61.內政部家庭暴力防治委員會。家庭暴力防治中心服務案件累計表。台北市:內政部家庭暴力防治委員會,2003。
62.O’Leary KD, Barling J, Arias I, Rosenbaum A, Malone J, Tyree A. Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57:263-8.
63.Field CA, Caetano R. Longitudinal model predicting partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Sep;27(9):1451-8.
64.Leonard KE, Senchak M. Prospective prediction of husband marital aggression within newlywed couples. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105:369-380.
65.Pan HS, Neidig PH, O’Leary KD. Predicting mild and severe husband-to-wife physical aggression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:975-81.
66.Sugarman DB, Aldarondo E, Boney-McCoy S. Risk marker analysis of husband-to-wife violence: A continuum of aggression. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996;26:313-37.
67.Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, Nature and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Report No. NCJ 18186. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
68.National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 2003.
69.Duque LF, Klevens J, Ramirez C. Cross sectional survey of perpetrators, victims, and witnesses of violence in Bogota, Colombia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):355-60.
70.Eisenstat SA, Bancroft L. Domestic violence. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 886–892.
71.Joshua RV, Catlin TK, Chen JJ, Brownson RC. Multistate Analysis of Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence. Am J Prev Med,2002;22:156-164.
72.John R, Johnson JK, Kukreja S, Found M, Lindow SW. Domestic violence: prevalence and association with gynaecological symptoms. BJOG, 2004;111:1128–1132.
73.Johnson JK, Haider F, Ellis K, Hay DM, Lindow SW. The prevalence of domestic violence in pregnant women. Br. J. Obstet Gynaecol 2003;110:272-275.
74.Hillard PA. Physical abuse in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol, 1985;66(2):185–90.
75.Diaz-Olavarrieta C, Ellertson C, Paz F, Ponce de Leon S, Alarcon-Segovia D. Prevalence of battering among 1780 outpatients at an internal medicine institution in Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(9):1589-602.
76.Berger LM. Income, family characteristics, and physical violence toward children. Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Feb;29(2):107-33.
77.Murphy CM, Stosny S, and Morrel TM. Change in Self-Esteem and Physical Aggression During Treatment for Partner Violent Men. J Fam Violence. 2005; 20(4): 201 - 210 .
78.Prince JE, Arias I. The role of perceived control and the desirability of control among abusive and nonabusive husbands. Am J Fam Ther. 1994;22: 126-134.
79.Burazeri G, Roshi E, Jewkes R, Jordan S, Bjegovic V, Laaser U. Factors associated with spousal physical violence in Albania: cross sectional study. BMJ 2005;331:197–201
80.Parish WL, Wang T, Laumann EO, Pan S, Luo Y. Intimate partner violence in China: national prevalence, risk factors and associated health problems. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004 Dec;30(4):174-81.
81.Kronbauer JF, Meneghel SN. Profile of gender violence by intimate partners. Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Oct;39(5):695-701.
82.Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Nocera M. Longitudinal follow-up of families and young children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):1291-7.
83.Haj-Yahia MM, Abdo-Kaloti R. The rates and correlates of the exposure of Palestinian adolescents to family violence: toward an integrative-holistic approach. Child Abuse Negl. 2003;27:781–806.
84.Cunradi CB, Caetano R, Schafer J. Alcohol-related problems, drug use, and male intimate partner violence severity among US couples. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2002; 26:493–500.
85.Ehrensaft MK, Cohen P, Brown J, Smailes E, Chen H, Johnson JG. Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:741–753.
86.Langhinrichsen-Rohling J. Top 10 greatest "hits": important findings and future directions for intimate partner violence research. J Interpers Violence. 2005 Jan;20(1):108-18.
87.Lipsky S, Caetano R, Field CA, Larkin GL. Psychosocial and substance-use risk factors for intimate partner violence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Apr 4;78(1):39-47.
88.Jewkes R, Levin J, Penn-Kekana L. Risk factors for domestic violence: findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1603-1617.
89.Rhodes KV, Lauderdale DS, He T, Howes DS, Levinson W. Between me and the computer: increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2002;40:476–484.
90.Grisso JA, Schwarz DF, Hirschinger N, Sammel M, Brensinger C, Santanna J, Lowe RA, Anderson E, Shaw LM, Bethel CA, Teeple L. Violent injuries among women in an urban area. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999; 341:1899–1905.
91.Stuart GL, Meehan JC, Moore TM, Morean M, Hellmuth J, Follansbee K. Examining a conceptual framework of intimate partner violence in men and women arrested for domestic violence. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jan;67(1):102-12.
92.Eckhardt C, Barbour KA, Stuart GL. Anger and hostility in maritally violent men: Conceptual distinctions, measurement issues, and literature review. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997;17(4):333-58.
93.Holtzworth-Munroe A, Bates L, Simutzler N, Sandin E. A brief review of the research on husband violence, Part I: Maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1996.
94.Dunn LL, Oths KS. Prenatal predictors of intimate partner abuse. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1):54-63.
95.Vivian D, Malone J. Relationship factors and depressive symptomatology associated with mild and severe husband-to-wife physical aggression. Violence Vict. 1997 Spring;12(1):3-18.
96.Hegarty K, Gunn J, Chondros P, Small R. Association between depression and abuse by partners of women attending general practice: descriptive, cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2004 Mar 13;328(7440):621-4.
97.Jordan BK, Marmar CR, Fairbank JA, Schlenger WE, Kulka RA, Hough RL, Weiss DS. Problems in families of male Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Dec;60(6):916-26.
98.Savarese VW, Suvak MK, King LA, King DW. Relationships among alcohol use, hyperarousal, and marital abuse and violence in Vietnam veterans. J Trauma Stress. 2001 Oct;14(4):717-32.
99.Leahy T, Pretty G, Tenenbaum G. Perpetrator methodology as a predictor of traumatic symptomatology in adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Interpers Violence. 2004 May;19(5):521-40.
100.Haller DL, Miles DR. Victimization and perpetration among perinatal substance abusers. J Interpers Violence. 2003 Jul;18(7):760-80.
101.Dutton DG. Personality dynamics of intimate abusiveness. J Psychiatr Pract. 2002 Jul;8(4):216-28.
102.Shalev AY, Greedman S, Peri T, Brandes D, Sahar T, Orr SP, Pitman RK. Prospective study of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 May;155(5):630-7.
103.Van Den Bosch LM, Verheul R, Langeland W, Van Den Brink W. Trauma, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress disorder in female borderline patients with and without substance abuse problems. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;37(5):549-55.
104.Aldorondo E, Sugarman DB. Risk marker analysis of the cessation and persistence of wife assault. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Oct;64(5):1010-9.
105.Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet. 2002 Apr 20;359(9315):1423-9.
106.Bauserman, S.K., Arias, I. Relationships among marital investment, marital satisfiction, and marital commitment in domestically victimized and nonvictimized wives. Violence Vict. 1992 Winter;7(4):287-96.
107.鄧純芳。藍鬍子現身--揭開加害人面具的婚姻暴力加害人處遇計畫。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文,2000。
108.吳慈恩。邁向希望的春天--婚姻暴力受虐經驗之分析與防治實踐。高雄市:高雄家協,2000。
109.黃志中、吳慈恩、高皓雲、姬瑪娜。家庭暴力防治法對於婚姻暴力續犯者的影響。千禧年全國兩性平等教育學術研討會,2000。
110.陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩、黃志中。裁定前鑑定家庭暴力相對人特徵與施暴的心理社會歸因。中華輔導學報,2004;16:147-178。
111.汪美鳳。家庭暴力臨床實務工作模式現況運用及暴力相關因素探討。澄清醫護管理雜誌,2005;2:26-33。
112.Yang MS, Yang MJ, Chou FH, Yang HM, Wei SL, Lin JR. Physical abuse against pregnant aborigines in Taiwan: prevalence and risk factors. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jan;43(1):21-7.
113.郭麗安、潘才學。婚姻暴力的脈絡研究—從家暴違法者的眼光。家庭暴力與性侵害學術論文研討會論文集,2001,120-156。
114.陳高德。臺灣婚姻暴力之男性加害人。臺北醫學大學醫學研究所碩士論文,2003。
115.李芝儀、吳奉儒譯。質的評鑑與研究,台北桂冠出版社,1990。Patton M Q. Qualitative evaluation and research menthods2nd ED. Newbury Park, CA :Sage.
116.林佩旋。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所主編,質的研究方法,2000,199-221。高雄:麗文。
117.Campbell J. No programming required. Mobile PCs can help physicians work more efficiently, especially when the application is designed to fit the practice. Healthc Inform. 2000 Sep;17(9):107-8.
118.Goodman LA, Dutton MA, Bennett L. Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. J Interpers Violence, 2000;15:63-72.
119.林明傑、沈勝昂。我國婚姻暴力加害人之危險評估—DA量表在我國適用之研究。犯罪學期刊,2003;6:177-216。
120.YM Li, CK Shaw. A Telephone Survey of Health Behavioral Risk Factors in Hualien County. 慈濟醫學雜誌, 1997;9(4):241-248.
121.Vest JR, Catlin TK, Chen JJ, &Brownson RC: Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Apr;22(3):156-64.
122.潘淑滿(2001)。婚姻暴力現象與制度的反思。社區發展季刊,49,134-146。
123.Hindin M J, Adair LS. Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Phillipines. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Oct;55(8):1385-99.
124. Mills LD, Mills TJ, Taliaferro E, Zimbler A, Smith D. The prevalence of female-to-male intimate partner violence in an urban emergency department.
J Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;25(2):215-8.
125.劉秀娟譯。原著Richard J. Gelles & Claire Pedrick Cornell:家庭暴力。揚智出版社,1996。
126.Alper Z, Ergin N, Selimoglu K, Bilgel N. Domestic violence: a study among a group of Turkish women. Eur J Gen Pract. 2005 Jun;11(2):48-54.
127.陳明志。警察機關執行家庭暴力防治工作問題之研究—以台北市政府警察局為例。中央警大學行政警察研究所碩士論文,2002。
128.Connolly C, Huzurbazar S, Routh-McGee T. Multiple parties in domestic violence situations and arrest. J Crim Justice. 2000;28:181-8.
129.Ernst AA, Nick TG, Weiss SJ, Houry D, Mills T. Domestic violence in an inner-city ED. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):190-7.
130.Jacobson NS, Gottman JM, Shortt JW. The distinction between type 1 and type 2 batterers further considerations: Reply to Ornduff et al. 1995, Margolin et al. 1995 and Walker 1995. J Fam Psychol. 1995;9:272–9.
131.Walker LEA. Current perspectives on men who batter women – implications for intervention and treatment to stop violence against women. Comment on Gottman et al. 1995. J Fam Psychol. 1995;9:264–7
132.Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Synopsis of psychiatry. Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry, 9th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2003.
133.Gondolf E. Limitation of experimental evaluations of batterer programs. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2001;2:79–88.
134.Babcock JC, Green CE, Robie C. Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;23(8):1023-53.
135.O’Leary KD, Schumacher JA. The association between alcohol use and intimate partner violence: linear effect, threshold effect, or both? Addict Behav. 2003 Dec;28(9):1575-85.
136.王行。台灣地區已婚男性對夫妻性別角色觀念之研究。東吳社會工作學報,1997;3:47-78。
137.鄭秀津。婚姻暴力加害人之生態系統分析--以嘉義地區受保護管束者為例。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文,2002。
138.李宜靜。婚姻暴力加害人心理經驗之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,2001。
139.Rumm PD, Cummings P, Krauss MR, Bell MA, Rivara FP. Identified spouse abuse as a risk factor for child abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2000;24: 1375-81.
140.Martin SL. Moracco KE. Garro J. Tsui AO. Kupper LL. Chase JL. Campbell JC. Domestic violence across generations: findings from northern India. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:560-72.
141.Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, Desai S, Sanderson M, Brandt HM, Smith PH. Physical and Mental Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence for Men and Women. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Nov;23(4):260-8.
142.吳秀敏。預防兒童受虐的家庭教育介入模式與輔導策略。諮商與輔導,2004;220:18-21。
143.黃翠紋。兒童受虐致死事件之特性及其原因之探討。中央警察大學警學叢刊,2002;32:21-58。
144.陳增穎。從女性主義觀點看中國歷史上的婚姻家庭與性別。諮商與輔導,2005;233:2-8。
145.Levine M, Freeman J, Compaan C. “Maltreatment-related fatalities: issues of policy and prevention.” Law Policy. 1994;16:449-58.
146.Lejoyeux M, Zillhardt P, Chieze F, Fichelled A, Loughlina MM, Poujade A, Ades J. Screening for domestic violence among patients admitted to a French emergency service. Eur Psychiatry. 2002; 17: 479-83
147.Mezey G, Bacchus L, Bewley S, White S. Domestic violence, lifetime trauma and psychological health of childbearing women. BJOG. 2005;112:197–204.
148.Worley KO, Walsh S, Lewis K. An examination of parenting experiences in male perpetrators of domestic violence: A qualitative study. Psychol Psychother. 2004 Mar;77(Pt 1):35-54.
149.Chilamkurti C, Milner JS. Perceptions and evaluations of child transgressions and disciplinary techniques in high- and low-risk mothers and their children. Child Dev. 1993 Dec;64(6):1801-14.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 48.陳鳳如。從夫妻間的權力互動看婚姻關係。諮商與輔導,1998,147,2-6。
2. 46.黃怡瑾。婚暴中的權力控制—個人自覺與社會結構的互動歷程。婦女與兩性學刊,2001,12,95-137。
3. 40.周月清。家庭暴力與婦女虐待之定義及迷思探討。律師雜誌,1997,216 ,第25 頁。
4. 53.黃翠紋。婚姻暴力嚴重性影響因素之研究。犯罪學期刊,2004,7,127-154。
5. 15.周煌智。性侵害犯罪加害人裁判前鑑定、家庭暴力相對人審前鑑定、與涉案之精神病犯精神鑑定比較。刑事法雜誌,2002; 46: 33-58。
6. 33.謝明祥, 2004, 本國銀行發行混合資本工具之探討, 建華金融季刊,119
7. 49.黃富源。警政單位對婚姻暴力及性暴力防治工作現況與展望。社會福利,1999,130,14-20。
8. 54.周煌智,林世棋,李俊穎,黃志中,王富強。精神鑑定之原則、施行步驟與相關法律意涵。醫事法學,2005;13(3-4):94-101。
9. 60.王麗容。台灣地區婦女福利需求初探政策芻議。社區發展季刊,1994,67,157-162。
10. 110.陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩、黃志中。裁定前鑑定家庭暴力相對人特徵與施暴的心理社會歸因。中華輔導學報,2004;16:147-178。
11. 111.汪美鳳。家庭暴力臨床實務工作模式現況運用及暴力相關因素探討。澄清醫護管理雜誌,2005;2:26-33。
12. 119.林明傑、沈勝昂。我國婚姻暴力加害人之危險評估—DA量表在我國適用之研究。犯罪學期刊,2003;6:177-216。
13. 122.潘淑滿(2001)。婚姻暴力現象與制度的反思。社區發展季刊,49,134-146。
14. 136.王行。台灣地區已婚男性對夫妻性別角色觀念之研究。東吳社會工作學報,1997;3:47-78。
15. 142.吳秀敏。預防兒童受虐的家庭教育介入模式與輔導策略。諮商與輔導,2004;220:18-21。