跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.111) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/13 02:26
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:郭光泰
研究生(外文):Kuang-Tai Kuo
論文名稱:PGE2受體EP2與上皮間質轉化在食道鱗狀上皮細胞癌之腫瘤侵犯所扮演的角色
論文名稱(外文):The Roles of PGE2 Receptor EP2 and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Tumor Invasion in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
指導教授:王良順、周德盈
指導教授(外文):Liang-Shun Wang、Teh-Ying Chou
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:臨床醫學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:115
中文關鍵詞:第二型環氧化酵素、上皮間質轉化、食道鱗狀上皮細胞癌、免疫組織化學染色、侵犯性、淋巴血管侵犯、移行性、預後、前列腺素E2、前列腺素E2受體EP2、小髮夾式RNA、訊息傳導路徑
外文關鍵詞:Cyclooxygenase-2、Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition、Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma、Immunohistochemical staining、Invasion、Lymphovascular invasion、Migration、Prognosis、Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)、PGE2 receptor EP2、shRNA、Signaling pathway
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:422
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:14
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
食道癌是台灣男性十大癌症死因的第六名,每年將近有1500人死於食道癌。其五年存活率迄今仍小於20%。近年來,大家已經知道第二環氧化酶(cyclooxygenase-2, COX-2)在多種癌症之腫瘤進展中皆扮演重要的角色而PGE2與癌發生(carcinogenesis)的關係最密切。PGE2的直接作用對象是PGE2受體EP;截至目前為止,共發現EP1至EP4四種PGE2受體。在與食道癌有關的細胞株研究顯示,EP2的表現較其他三種EP強烈。
在本論文的第一部分,我們用免疫組織化學染色(immunohistochemical staining)分析了226位接受根除性食道癌切除手術(en bloc resection)的食道鱗狀上皮細胞癌(esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ESCC)病患之檢體中,EP2的表現情形與臨床及病理因子的相關性。結果顯示,EP2過度表現(overexpression)的比率為43.4% (98/226);而且與腫瘤侵犯深度T status呈正相關(p=0.016),同時與較差的預後有關(p=0.047)。在較早期的食道癌病人(T1-3N0M0)共84人中,EP2過度表現不但會導致較差的預後(p=0.027),而且在多變異分析中成為一個獨立因子(p=0.048)。
由於EP2過度表現與腫瘤侵犯深度T status呈正相關,因此與腫瘤侵犯(tumor invasion)有關的主題,自然成為研究重點。近年來,Snail被公認是上皮間質轉化(epithelial-mesenchymal transition, EMT)中一個關鍵的調節因子(key regulator)。在與Snail有關的研究中,曾有以頭頸部鱗狀上皮細胞癌(head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, HNSCC)為主的研究發現NBS1這個蛋白質的過度表現會引起Snail的表現增加,進而導致EMT的進行。由於頭頸部癌與食道癌主要皆為鱗狀上皮細胞癌,我們便想知道,上述關於NBS1與Snail的關係是否也存在於ESCC中呢?
在本論文的第二部分,我們先以免疫組織化學染色法,分析153位接受根除性食道癌切除手術的ESCC病患之檢體中,NBS1及Snail的表現與臨床及病理因子的相關性。結果顯示NBS1的過度表現與較佳的預後有關(p=0.002);另一方面,Snail的過度表現與較差的預後有關(p=0.036)。至於NBS1與Snail之間則是有負相關趨勢(相關係數為-0.14、p=0.084)。由前述的結果可得知, Snail與EP2過度表現在ESCC皆會導致較差的預後。由於EP2是上游的受體,而Snail是一個轉錄因子,令人感興趣的是,EP2與 Snail之間是否有什麼相關性呢?
在本論文的第三部分,我們首先分析CE48T (簡稱48T)、CE81T (簡稱81T)、CE146T (簡稱146T) 與CETE2 (簡稱TE2) 四株食道癌細胞株EP2的表現;無論是在信使RNA (mRNA)或蛋白質層次,48T與146T的EP2表現皆較81T與TE2為強。同時,無論以PGE2或EP2的增效劑(agonist) Butaprost刺激,48T與146T移行性與侵犯性的增加皆較81T與TE2為強。以48T及Lentivirus作為轉染的媒介,我們成功地將48T-sh-EP2(144147)-0.5與48T-sh-EP2(144147)-1的EP2表現量降至約只剩五成與三成。接著我們發現無論有無Butaprost的存在,48T-sh-EP2(144147)-1的移行性與侵犯性皆有顯著的降低。為了瞭解Butaprost是否對細胞生長(cell proliferation)產生影響,我們對細胞株進行SRB(Sulforhodamine B)的測試,結果發現其細胞生長並未因加了Butaprost而有所改變。
在本論文的第四部分,利用即時聚合酶鏈鎖反應(real-time quantitative PCR, Q-PCR)、MMP陣列、反轉錄聚合酶鏈鎖反應與西方點墨法,發現經Butaprost刺激後,Snail與Slug為增加,而E-cadherin則減少;而MMP的變化則不明顯。最後,以不同的抑制物(inhibitor)包括adenylyl cyclase (cAMP)抑制物SQ22536、PKA抑制物H89與PI3K抑制物LY294002合併Butaprost刺激48T後,結果發現SQ22536與LY294002皆有效地抑制了經Butaprost刺激後的48T之移行性與侵犯性,但H89則增加了48T的移行性與侵犯性。由此可以得知,除了cAMP?袈KA?彪REB的訊息傳導路徑外,PI3K/Akt?都]-catenin的訊息傳導路徑,可能也在 EP2?蛀MT的過程中,扮演重要的角色。
根據本研究的結果顯示,PGE2受體EP2確實在食道鱗狀上皮細胞癌的侵犯性扮演重要的角色。EP2可能透過不同的訊息傳導路徑,調節EMT指標中的Snail與Slug而產生上皮間質轉化,進而增加食道癌細胞的侵犯性。
Esophageal cancer is ranking the sixth most lethal cause for male cancer patients in Taiwan and is responsible for nearly 1,500 deaths per year. Currently, its 5-year survival is still less than 20%. Recently, it has been well known that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays an important role in tumor progression of several cancers and PGE2 is linked to carcinogenesis more closely than other prostaglandins. PGE2 elaborates its biological activities via PGE2 receptors, namely EPs, which are composed of four isoforms (EP1 to EP4). Regarding esophageal cancer, previous cell line studies have shown that the expression of EP2 was stronger than other EPs in esophageal cancer.
In the first part of this thesis, EP2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining in the surgical specimens in 226 patients of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing en bloc resection and the relationship between EP2 expression and clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed. The results showed that EP2 overexpression was found in 43.4% (98/226) of patients. Meanwhile, EP2 overexpression correlated positively with the T status (p=0.016) and was associated with a worse overall survival (p=0.047). EP2 overexpression also predicted a worse prognosis in 84 patients with earlier stages (T1-3N0M0, stage I and IIA) (p=0.027) and even became an independent factor under multivariate analysis among them (p=0.048).
Because EP2 overexpression was found to correlate positively with the depth of tumor invasion (T status) in ESCC, the topics regarding tumor invasion therefore became our interest of investigation. Recently, Snail is acknowledged as a key regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Regarding the studies investigating Snail, it has been reported that NBS1 overexpression induces EMT through up-regulation of Snail in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Because head and neck cancer and esophageal cancer are both composed of squamous cell carcinoma in majority, our question is whether the relationship between NBS1 and Snail in HNSCC also exists in ESCC.
In the second part of this thesis, NBS1 and Snail expression was evaluated in the surgical specimens in 153 patients of ESCC undergoing en bloc resection by immunohistochemical staining and the relationship between NBS1, Snail expression and clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed. NBS1 overexpression was found to associate with better overall survival (p=0.002). On the other hand, Snail overexpression was associated with worse overall survival (p=0.036). Interestingly, NBS1 overexpression correlated inversely with Snail overexpression marginally (correlation coefficient: -0.14, p=0.084). From the abovementioned results, we found that both EP2 and Snail were associated with worse prognosis in ESCC. Because EP2 is an upstream receptor and Snail is a transcription factor, it is interesting to know whether there exists some relationship between EP2 and Snail.
In the third part of this thesis, the expression of EP2 was evaluated in 4 ESCC cell lines including CE48T (or 48T), CE81T (or 81T), CE146T (or 146T) and CETE2 (or TE2). It was found that at both mRNA and protein level, the 48T and 146T cell lines exhibited stronger expression of EP2 than 81T and TE2. Subsequently, it was shown that treating with PGE2 or the selective EP2 agonist Butaprost caused significant increase of migration and invasion in 48T and 146T but not in 81T and TE2. Using 48T and viral transfection with Lentivirus, the protein expression of EP2 was successfully knocked down to 50% and 30% of original level in clone 48T-sh-EP2(144147)-0.5 and 48T-sh-EP2(144147)-1, respectively. Further studies revealed that irrespective of the treatment of Butaprost, migration and invasion of 48T-sh-EP2(144147)-1 decreased significantly. To elucidate whether Butaprost influences cell proliferation of ESCC cells, the SRB (Sulforhodamine B) test was also conducted on cell lines and it was found that cell proliferation was not significantly changed by the treatment of Butaprost.
In the fourth part of this thesis, using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) array, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and Western blot analysis, it was found that Snail and Slug increased, whereas E-cadherin decreased, after treatment of Butaprost. The changes of MMPs were not remarkable. Finally, different inhibitors including SQ22536 (inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase), H89 (inhibitor of PKA) and LY294002 (inhibitor of PI3K) were applied in combination with Butaprost to treat 48T cells and it was found that SQ22536 and LY294002 both inhibited migration and invasion of 48T cells after treating by Butaprost but H89 increased migration and invasion. Based on the results, it was speculated that apart from the cAMPàPKAàCREB pathway, the PI3K/Aktàβ-catenin pathway also plays an important role in the process of EP2àEMT.
To sum up, our current study showed that the PGE2 receptor EP2 does play an important role in tumor invasion in ESCC cells. EP2 may mediate Snail, Slug and subsequent EMT through different signaling pathways to increase invasiveness of ESCC cells.
English Abstract …………………………………………………………… 4
Chinese Abstract …………………………………………………………… 8
List of Abbreviations …………………………………………………………… 11

Introduction ………………………………………… 13
? Specific Aims …………………………………………………………… 22
Materials and Methods …………………………………………………………… 23
? Patients
? Tissue Core Array
? Immunohistochemical Staining
? Evaluation of Immunostaining
? Clinicopathologic Variables and Statistical Analysis
? Western Blot Analysis
? Cell Lines and Cell Cultures
? RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
? Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (Q-PCR)
? Transwell Migration Assay
? Matrigel Invasion Assay
? Cyclic-AMP Assay
? shRNA and Viral Infection to Establish Transformed ESCC Clones
? Wound Healing Assay
? Sulforhodamine B (SRB) Cell Proliferation Assay
? MMP Array Evaluation
? Chemicals and Treatment
? Statistical Analysis
Results …………………………………………………… 41
? Results for the First Specific Aim …… 41 ? Clinical Data
? EP2 Immunostaining and Western Blot
? Relationship between EP2 Expression and Clinicopathologic Variables
? Survival Analysis
? Results for the Second Specific Aim …… 43
? Clinical Data
? Immunostaining of NBS1, Snail and Western Blot
? Relationship between NBS1, Snail Expression and Clinicopathologic Variables
? Survival Analysis
? Results for the Third Specific Aim …… 47
? Strength of EP2 Expression Correlated Positively with Migration and Invasion of ESCC Cells after PGE2 Stimulation
? Increase in cAMP Correlated Positively with Migration and Invasion of ESCC Cells after PGE2 Stimulation
? Knocking Down EP2 Decreased Migration and Invasion in CE48T Cells
? Butaprost Treatment Did Not Influence Proliferation of ESCC Cells
? Results for the Fourth Specific Aim…… 49
? Increased Expression of mRNA of MMP-1, MMP-2 and Slug after Butaprost Treatment
? MMP Assay Showed No Significant Increase of MMPs after Butaprost Treatment
? Expression of Slug and Snail Increased after Butaprost Treatment
? Inhibition of cAMP and PI3K Significantly Decreased Migration and Invasion Caused by EP2 Activation
Discussion …………………………………………… 53
Conclusion …………………………………………… 64
Perspectives ………………………………………… 65
References …………………………………………… 66
Figures and Tables ………………………………… 80
Publications ………………………………………… 115

1. Department of Health, the Executive Yuan, Republic of China. Statistics of Causes of Death and Cancer Registry Annual Report in Taiwan area, 2011.
2. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK. The changing epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 1999,26:2-8.
3. Lin CC, Hsu CH, Cheng JC, Wang HP, Lee JM, Yeh KH, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with twice weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 2007,18:93-98.
4. Berger AC, Farma J, Scott WJ, Freedman G, Weiner L, Cheng JD, et al. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival. J Clin Oncol 2005,23:4330-4337.
5. Law S, Kwong DL, Kwok KF, Wong KH, Chu KM, Sham JS, et al. Improvement in treatment results and long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: impact of chemoradiation and change in treatment strategy. Ann Surg 2003,238:339-347; discussion 347-338.
6. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010,60:277-300.
7. Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Heath CW, Jr. Aspirin use and reduced risk of fatal colon cancer. N Engl J Med 1991,325:1593-1596.
8. Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Calle EE, Flanders WD, Heath CW, Jr. Aspirin use and risk of fatal cancer. Cancer Res 1993,53:1322-1327.
9. Heath CW, Jr., Thun MJ, Greenberg ER, Levin B, Marnett LJ. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and human cancer. Report of an interdisciplinary research workshop. Cancer 1994,74:2885-2888.
10. Thun MJ. NSAID use and decreased risk of gastrointestinal cancers. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996,25:333-348.
11. Nozoe T, Ezaki T, Kabashima A, Baba H, Maehara Y. Significance of immunohistochemical expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg 2005,189:110-115.
12. Kuo KT, Chow KC, Wu YC, Lin CS, Wang HW, Li WY, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2003,76:909-914.
13. Heeren P, Plukker J, van Dullemen H, Nap R, Hollema H. Prognostic role of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 2005,225:283-289.
14. Sivula A, Buskens CJ, van Rees BP, Haglund C, Offerhaus GJ, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Prognostic role of cyclooxygenase-2 in neoadjuvant-treated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Cancer 2005,116:903-908.
15. Buskens CJ, Van Rees BP, Sivula A, Reitsma JB, Haglund C, Bosma PJ, et al. Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase 2 expression in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology 2002,122:1800-1807.
16. Pai R, Szabo IL, Soreghan BA, Atay S, Kawanaka H, Tarnawski AS. PGE(2) stimulates VEGF expression in endothelial cells via ERK2/JNK1 signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001,286:923-928.
17. Fukuda R, Kelly B, Semenza GL. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression in colon cancer cells exposed to prostaglandin E2 is mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cancer Res 2003,63:2330-2334.
18. Sheng H, Shao J, Washington MK, DuBois RN. Prostaglandin E2 increases growth and motility of colorectal carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 2001,276:18075-18081.
19. Buchanan FG, Wang D, Bargiacchi F, DuBois RN. Prostaglandin E2 regulates cell migration via the intracellular activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem 2003,278:35451-35457.
20. Coleman RA, Smith WL, Narumiya S. International Union of Pharmacology classification of prostanoid receptors: properties, distribution, and structure of the receptors and their subtypes. Pharmacol Rev 1994,46:205-229.
21. Pierce KL, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002,3:639-650.
22. Neves SR, Ram PT, Iyengar R. G protein pathways. Science 2002,296:1636-1639.
23. Mills GB, Moolenaar WH. The emerging role of lysophosphatidic acid in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003,3:582-591.
24. Marinissen MJ, Gutkind JS. G-protein-coupled receptors and signaling networks: emerging paradigms. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001,22:368-376.
25. Dorsam RT, Gutkind JS. G-protein-coupled receptors and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007,7:79-94.
26. Hino S, Tanji C, Nakayama KI, Kikuchi A. Phosphorylation of beta-catenin by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase stabilizes beta-catenin through inhibition of its ubiquitination. Mol Cell Biol 2005,25:9063-9072.
27. Castellone MD, Teramoto H, Williams BO, Druey KM, Gutkind JS. Prostaglandin E2 promotes colon cancer cell growth through a Gs-axin-beta-catenin signaling axis. Science 2005,310:1504-1510.
28. Pai R, Soreghan B, Szabo IL, Pavelka M, Baatar D, Tarnawski AS. Prostaglandin E2 transactivates EGF receptor: a novel mechanism for promoting colon cancer growth and gastrointestinal hypertrophy. Nat Med 2002,8:289-293.
29. Sonoshita M, Takaku K, Sasaki N, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F, Narumiya S, et al. Acceleration of intestinal polyposis through prostaglandin receptor EP2 in Apc(Delta 716) knockout mice. Nat Med 2001,7:1048-1051.
30. Han S, Roman J. Suppression of prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP2 by PPARgamma ligands inhibits human lung carcinoma cell growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004,314:1093-1099.
31. Chang SH, Ai Y, Breyer RM, Lane TF, Hla T. The prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 is required for cyclooxygenase 2-mediated mammary hyperplasia. Cancer Res 2005,65:4496-4499.
32. Sung YM, He G, Hwang DH, Fischer SM. Overexpression of the prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 results in enhanced skin tumor development. Oncogene 2006,25:5507-5516.
33. Piazuelo E, Jimenez P, Strunk M, Santander S, Garcia A, Esteva F, et al. Effects of selective PGE2 receptor antagonists in esophageal adenocarcinoma cells derived from Barrett's esophagus. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2006,81:150-161.
34. Yu L, Wu WK, Li ZJ, Wong HP, Tai EK, Li HT, et al. E series of prostaglandin receptor 2-mediated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/activator protein-1 signaling is required for the mitogenic action of prostaglandin E2 in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008,327:258-267.
35. Steeg PS. Tumor metastasis: mechanistic insights and clinical challenges. Nat Med 2006,12:895-904.
36. Friedl P, Brocker EB. The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Cell Mol Life Sci 2000,57:41-64.
37. Huber MA, Kraut N, Beug H. Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005,17:548-558.
38. Thiery JP, Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006,7:131-142.
39. Van Aken E, De Wever O, Correia da Rocha AS, Mareel M. Defective E-cadherin/catenin complexes in human cancer. Virchows Arch 2001,439:725-751.
40. Cano A, Perez-Moreno MA, Rodrigo I, Locascio A, Blanco MJ, del Barrio MG, et al. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol 2000,2:76-83.
41. Batlle E, Sancho E, Franci C, Dominguez D, Monfar M, Baulida J, et al. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat Cell Biol 2000,2:84-89.
42. Comijn J, Berx G, Vermassen P, Verschueren K, van Grunsven L, Bruyneel E, et al. The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion. Mol Cell 2001,7:1267-1278.
43. Eger A, Aigner K, Sonderegger S, Dampier B, Oehler S, Schreiber M, et al. DeltaEF1 is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin and regulates epithelial plasticity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2005,24:2375-2385.
44. Gupta GP, Massague J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell 2006,127:679-695.
45. Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2002,2:442-454.
46. Ohkubo T, Ozawa M. The transcription factor Snail downregulates the tight junction components independently of E-cadherin downregulation. J Cell Sci 2004,117:1675-1685.
47. Martin TA, Goyal A, Watkins G, Jiang WG. Expression of the transcription factors snail, slug, and twist and their clinical significance in human breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005,12:488-496.
48. Elloul S, Elstrand MB, Nesland JM, Trope CG, Kvalheim G, Goldberg I, et al. Snail, Slug, and Smad-interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005,103:1631-1643.
49. Miyoshi A, Kitajima Y, Kido S, Shimonishi T, Matsuyama S, Kitahara K, et al. Snail accelerates cancer invasion by upregulating MMP expression and is associated with poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2005,92:252-258.
50. Natsugoe S, Uchikado Y, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, Setoyama T, Tamotsu K, et al. Snail plays a key role in E-cadherin-preserved esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2007,17:517-523.
51. Bachelder RE, Yoon SO, Franci C, de Herreros AG, Mercurio AM. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is an endogenous inhibitor of Snail transcription: implications for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol 2005,168:29-33.
52. Bhowmick NA, Ghiassi M, Bakin A, Aakre M, Lundquist CA, Engel ME, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell 2001,12:27-36.
53. Avizienyte E, Fincham VJ, Brunton VG, Frame MC. Src SH3/2 domain-mediated peripheral accumulation of Src and phospho-myosin is linked to deregulation of E-cadherin and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Biol Cell 2004,15:2794-2803.
54. Venkov CD, Link AJ, Jennings JL, Plieth D, Inoue T, Nagai K, et al. A proximal activator of transcription in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest 2007,117:482-491.
55. Mani SA, Yang J, Brooks M, Schwaninger G, Zhou A, Miura N, et al. Mesenchyme Forkhead 1 (FOXC2) plays a key role in metastasis and is associated with aggressive basal-like breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007,104:10069-10074.
56. Wu X, Chen H, Parker B, Rubin E, Zhu T, Lee JS, et al. HOXB7, a homeodomain protein, is overexpressed in breast cancer and confers epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res 2006,66:9527-9534.
57. Wang X, Zheng M, Liu G, Xia W, McKeown-Longo PJ, Hung MC, et al. Kruppel-like factor 8 induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition and epithelial cell invasion. Cancer Res 2007,67:7184-7193.
58. Vandewalle C, Comijn J, De Craene B, Vermassen P, Bruyneel E, Andersen H, et al. SIP1/ZEB2 induces EMT by repressing genes of different epithelial cell-cell junctions. Nucleic Acids Res 2005,33:6566-6578.
59. Wheelock MJ, Shintani Y, Maeda M, Fukumoto Y, Johnson KR. Cadherin switching. J Cell Sci 2008,121:727-735.
60. Tsujii M, Kawano S, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human colon cancer cells increases metastatic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997,94:3336-3340.
61. Sternlicht MD, Werb Z. How matrix metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2001,17:463-516.
62. Pai R, Nakamura T, Moon WS, Tarnawski AS. Prostaglandins promote colon cancer cell invasion; signaling by cross-talk between two distinct growth factor receptors. FASEB J 2003,17:1640-1647.
63. Spinella F, Rosano L, Di Castro V, Natali PG, Bagnato A. Endothelin-1-induced prostaglandin E2-EP2, EP4 signaling regulates vascular endothelial growth factor production and ovarian carcinoma cell invasion. J Biol Chem 2004,279:46700-46705.
64. Han C, Wu T. Cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandin E2 promotes human cholangiocarcinoma cell growth and invasion through EP1 receptor-mediated activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and Akt. J Biol Chem 2005,280:24053-24063.
65. Han C, Michalopoulos GK, Wu T. Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP1 transactivates EGFR/MET receptor tyrosine kinases and enhances invasiveness in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Physiol 2006,207:261-270.
66. Wu J, Zhang Y, Frilot N, Kim JI, Kim WJ, Daaka Y. Prostaglandin E2 regulates renal cell carcinoma invasion through the EP4 receptor-Rap GTPase signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem 2011,286:33954-33962.
67. Donnini S, Finetti F, Solito R, Terzuoli E, Sacchetti A, Morbidelli L, et al. EP2 prostanoid receptor promotes squamous cell carcinoma growth through epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and iNOS and ERK1/2 pathways. FASEB J 2007,21:2418-2430.
68. Tian M, Schiemann WP. PGE2 receptor EP2 mediates the antagonistic effect of COX-2 on TGF-beta signaling during mammary tumorigenesis. FASEB J 2010,24:1105-1116.
69. Itatsu K, Sasaki M, Yamaguchi J, Ohira S, Ishikawa A, Ikeda H, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 is involved in the up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in cholangiocarcinoma induced by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Am J Pathol 2009,174:829-841.
70. Yang MH, Chiang WC, Chou TY, Chang SY, Chen PM, Teng SC, et al. Increased NBS1 expression is a marker of aggressive head and neck cancer and overexpression of NBS1 contributes to transformation. Clin Cancer Res 2006,12:507-515.
71. Yang MH, Chang SY, Chiou SH, Liu CJ, Chi CW, Chen PM, et al. Overexpression of NBS1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and co-expression of NBS1 and Snail predicts metastasis of head and neck cancer. Oncogene 2007,26:1459-1467.
72. Chrzanowska KH, Kleijer WJ, Krajewska-Walasek M, Bialecka M, Gutkowska A, Goryluk-Kozakiewicz B, et al. Eleven Polish patients with microcephaly, immunodeficiency, and chromosomal instability: the Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1995,57:462-471.
73. van der Burgt I, Chrzanowska KH, Smeets D, Weemaes C. Nijmegen breakage syndrome. J Med Genet 1996,33:153-156.
74. Varon R, Vissinga C, Platzer M, Cerosaletti KM, Chrzanowska KH, Saar K, et al. Nibrin, a novel DNA double-strand break repair protein, is mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Cell 1998,93:467-476.
75. D'Amours D, Jackson SP. The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002,3:317-327.
76. Chiang YC, Teng SC, Su YN, Hsieh FJ, Wu KJ. c-Myc directly regulates the transcription of the NBS1 gene involved in DNA double-strand break repair. J Biol Chem 2003,278:19286-19291.
77. Chen YC, Su YN, Chou PC, Chiang WC, Chang MC, Wang LS, et al. Overexpression of NBS1 contributes to transformation through the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt. J Biol Chem 2005,280:32505-32511.
78. Wang LS, Chow KC, Wu CW. Expression and up-regulation of interleukin-6 in oesophageal carcinoma cells by n-sodium butyrate. Br J Cancer 1999,80:1617-1622.
79. Hung JJ, Yang MH, Hsu HS, Hsu WH, Liu JS, Wu KJ. Prognostic significance of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, TWIST1 and Snail expression in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 2009,64:1082-1089.
80. David O, Jett J, LeBeau H, Dy G, Hughes J, Friedman M, et al. Phospho-Akt overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer confers significant stage-independent survival disadvantage. Clin Cancer Res 2004,10:6865-6871.
81. Uchikado Y, Natsugoe S, Okumura H, Setoyama T, Matsumoto M, Ishigami S, et al. Slug Expression in the E-cadherin preserved tumors is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005,11:1174-1180.
82. Wang YF, Chow KC, Chang SY, Chiu JH, Tai SK, Li WY, et al. Prognostic significance of nm23-H1 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2004,90:2186-2193.
83. Hu CP, Hsieh HG, Chien KY, Wang PY, Wang CI, Chen CY, et al. Biologic properties of three newly established human esophageal carcinoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1984,72:577-583.
84. Nishihira T, Kasai M, Mori S, Watanabe T, Kuriya Y, Suda M, et al. Characteristics of two cell lines (TE-1 and TE-2) derived from human squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Gann 1979,70:575-584.
85. Chu YW, Yang PC, Yang SC, Shyu YC, Hendrix MJ, Wu R, et al. Selection of invasive and metastatic subpopulations from a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1997,17:353-360.
86. Vichai V, Kirtikara K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat Protoc 2006,1:1112-1116.
87. Watabe A, Sugimoto Y, Honda A, Irie A, Namba T, Negishi M, et al. Cloning and expression of cDNA for a mouse EP1 subtype of prostaglandin E receptor. J Biol Chem 1993,268:20175-20178.
88. Honda A, Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Watabe A, Irie A, Negishi M, et al. Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype. J Biol Chem 1993,268:7759-7762.
89. Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Honda A, Hayashi Y, Negishi M, Ichikawa A, et al. Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP3 subtype. J Biol Chem 1992,267:6463-6466.
90. Miyata Y, Kanda S, Nomata K, Eguchi J, Kanetake H. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and EP4 receptor in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 2005,173:56-60.
91. Hsu DS, Chang SY, Liu CJ, Tzeng CH, Wu KJ, Kao JY, et al. Identification of increased NBS1 expression as a prognostic marker of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer Sci 2010,101:1029-1037.
92. Ehlers JP, Harbour JW. NBS1 expression as a prognostic marker in uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005,11:1849-1853.
93. Gao J, Zhang H, Arbman G, Sun XF. RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 proteins in relation to tumour development and prognosis in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Histol Histopathol 2008,23:1495-1502.
94. Soderlund K, Stal O, Skoog L, Rutqvist LE, Nordenskjold B, Askmalm MS. Intact Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex predicts good response to radiotherapy in early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007,68:50-58.
95. Regan JW. EP2 and EP4 prostanoid receptor signaling. Life Sci 2003,74:143-153.
96. Yu L, Wu WK, Li ZJ, Li HT, Wu YC, Cho CH. Prostaglandin E(2) promotes cell proliferation via protein kinase C/extracellular signal regulated kinase pathway-dependent induction of c-Myc expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 2009,125:2540-2546.
97. Payner T, Leaver HA, Knapp B, Whittle IR, Trifan OC, Miller S, et al. Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 regulates human glioma cell growth via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent activation of type II protein kinase A. Mol Cancer Ther 2006,5:1817-1826.
98. Dohadwala M, Yang SC, Luo J, Sharma S, Batra RK, Huang M, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2-dependent regulation of E-cadherin: prostaglandin E(2) induces transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and snail in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2006,66:5338-5345.
99. Chakraborti S, Mandal M, Das S, Mandal A, Chakraborti T. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases: an overview. Mol Cell Biochem 2003,253:269-285.
100. Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 2010,141:52-67.
101. P OC, Rhys-Evans PH, Eccles SA. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors correlates with invasion and metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001,127:813-820.
102. Mathew R, Khanna R, Kumar R, Mathur M, Shukla NK, Ralhan R. Stromelysin-2 overexpression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: potential clinical implications. Cancer Detect Prev 2002,26:222-228.
103. Miyata Y, Iwata T, Maruta S, Kanda S, Nishikido M, Koga S, et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-10 in renal cell carcinoma and its prognostic role. Eur Urol 2007,52:791-797.
104. Frederick LA, Matthews JA, Jamieson L, Justilien V, Thompson EA, Radisky DC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-10 is a critical effector of protein kinase Ciota-Par6alpha-mediated lung cancer. Oncogene 2008,27:4841-4853.
105. Van Themsche C, Alain T, Kossakowska AE, Urbanski S, Potworowski EF, St-Pierre Y. Stromelysin-2 (matrix metalloproteinase 10) is inducible in lymphoma cells and accelerates the growth of lymphoid tumors in vivo. J Immunol 2004,173:3605-3611.
106. Deraz EM, Kudo Y, Yoshida M, Obayashi M, Tsunematsu T, Tani H, et al. MMP-10/stromelysin-2 promotes invasion of head and neck cancer. PLoS One 2011,6:e25438.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊