跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/16 06:09
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃群淵
研究生(外文):Benjamin Huang
論文名稱:運用韻文增進國小學童英語音韻覺識能力與學習動機之研究
論文名稱(外文):Using Nursery Rhymes to Enhance Phonological Awareness & learning Motivation in Primary School Students
指導教授:陳淑惠陳淑惠引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-hui Eileen Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北教育大學
系所名稱:兒童英語教育學系碩士班
學門:教育學門
學類:普通科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:114
中文關鍵詞:童謠韻文國小四年級學童音韻覺識學習動機
外文關鍵詞:nursery rhymesgrade four primary school studentsphonological awarenesslearning motivation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:1627
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:516
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:23
本研究旨在探討童謠韻文教學對國小四年級學童音韻覺識表現及英語學習動機的影響。本研究採單因子(童謠韻文教學與否)設計之準實驗研究法,以苗栗縣某國小四年級學童作為研究對象,採立意取樣選取兩組英語能力相當的學童,同時排除參加校外補習英語的學童,實驗組採用童謠韻文做為教材並進行音韻覺識教學,控制組採用一般課文對話做為教材並進行音韻覺識教學,分別進行每週兩節課共八十分鐘,為期八週共計六百四十分鐘的實驗教學。
測驗工具包括:音韻覺識測驗及英語學習動機量表。實驗前,首先進行音韻覺識前測確定實驗組控制組的音韻覺識能力並無顯著差異,實驗教學後,利用音韻測識後測與英語學習動機量表來蒐集資料,並以描述統計、獨立樣本t考驗、相依樣本t考驗來分析學生學習變化之情形。
研究結果發現,在音韻覺識表現上,實驗組和控制組組間後測表現達顯著差異,實驗組和控制組學童組內前後測表現也達顯著差異,但由平均數的進步分數得知,實驗組學童的進步表現優於控制組。此外,由英語學習動機量表的分析探討,實驗組學童對童謠韻文此種教學方式亦抱持正面肯定的態度,最後,根據研究發現提出具體建議作為國小英語教學之參考。
The study aimed to investigate the effects of using nursery rhymes instruction on fourth-grade students’ English phonological awareness and learning motivation. This study adopted a one-factor quasi-experimental design. Forty fourth graders from an elementary school in Miaoli county were recruited and were assigned as the experimental group and the control group respectively, with similar level of English learning achievement. Meanwhile, the subjects did not take any English lessons outside school during the experimental period. The experimental group received nursery rhymes English teaching with phonological awareness training, while the control group received the conventional English teaching with phonological awareness training.
The instruments used in this study included the pre/post English Phonological Awareness Tests and Learning Movitation Questionnaire. Before the experiment, phonological awareness test was conducted, which revealed that there was no significant difference in the performance between the two group. After the experimental period, which lasted for 8 weeks, each with 80 minutes for two classes, data collected from phonological awareness post-test and Learing Motivation Questionnaire were analyzed quantitatively with descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests and dependent-samples t-tests.
The results showed that by between-group comparison, the experimental group performed significantly better than the control group in English Phonological Awareness test. Post-test within group comparison suggested that the experimental group made significantly more progress in phonological awareness performance than the control group, although both group did make improvement between pre- and post- test of phonological awareness test. In addition, data collected from Learning Motivation Questionnaire also indicated that the experimental group developed a very positive and supportive attitude toward the adoption of nursery rhymes instruction in their English teaching. Based on the findings of this study, suggestions for the directions of further research and for those who are interested in the implementing of nursery rhymes and other subject areas were offered at the end.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 重要名詞釋義 4
第四節 研究範圍與重要性 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 韻文在英語教學的地位 7
第二節 音韻覺識 10
第三節 學習動機 17
第四節 韻文與音韻覺識、學習動機之相關研究 23
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究時程及架構 28
第二節 研究對象 31
第三節 研究工具 32
第四節 韻文教學研究歷程 37
第五節 資料處理與分析 45
第四章 研究結果 46
第一節 組間實驗前測表現分析 46
第二節 組內實驗前、後測表現分析 49
第三節 組間實驗後測表現分析 52
第四節 英語童謠韻文教學對學習動機之影響 55
第五章 討論與建議 70
第一節 討論 70
第二節 建議 74
參考文獻 77
中文部份 77
西文部份 79
附錄 84
附錄一 韻文教學調查表 84
附錄二 音韻覺識測驗題目 85
附錄三 音韻覺識測驗答案卷 90
附錄四 英語學習動機量表使用同意函 91
附錄五 英語學習動機量表 92
附錄六 韻文教學教案設計 94
附錄七 韻文教學學生書面資料 108
中文部份
史嘉琳(民88)。進入教學的世界,體驗童謠的趣味。敦煌英語教學雜誌,21, 38-43。
江慧英(民92)。國小級任老師以歌謠韻文將英語融入各科教學之模式研究~以一個四年級的班級為例。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
李詠吟、單文經(民86)。教學原理(第三版)。台北:遠流出版社。
沈傳緒(民71)。從歌謠、音樂到英語教學。英語教學季刊,6 (4),45-52。
吳曉雯(民90)。成就一個「聲色俱全」的英語教室:研究教師與研究者運用歌曲韻文於國小英語教學之協同行動研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
胡潔芳(民91)。淺談「舞音弄韻」在外語習得之重要性。國教新知,(49)1,19-28。
施玉惠、周中天、陳淑嬌、朱惠美(民86)。國民小學實施英語教學之可行性探討。台北 :教育部。
施玉惠、朱惠美(民88)。國小英語課程之精神與特色。教育研究資訊,7(2),1-5。
孫麗瑛(民91)。國小學童英文聲韻覺識能力及認字能力之相關研究。台中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所碩士論文
梁中行(民91)。讓歌唱把歡樂帶入英語教室中。屏縣教育集刊,10,6-11。
許西玲(民92)。運用多元智慧理論在國小英文童謠教學之行動研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
張玉茹(民86)國民中學學生英語學習動機、英語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
張春興(民85)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐(修訂版)。台北市:東華書局。
張淑婷、黃秀霜、劉信雄(民87)。國小一年級學童兒歌熟悉度、音韻覺知能力及注音符號學習成就之相關研究。八十八學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集。
張湘君(民87)。JAZZ CHANTS 與兒童英語發音教學。國民教育,39(1),17-21。
張湘君(民88)。Krashen之語言習得理論及其對台灣國小英語教學之啟示。台北師院語文集刊,4,85-102。
張湘君(民89)。英文童謠創意教學。台北:東西出版事業有限公司。
莊坤良(民88)。兒童文學與英語教學:兒童歌謠、圖畫童書、簡易故事書與分章故事書 。戴維揚主編:國民小學英語科教材教法,284-298。台北:文鶴書局出版有限公司。
教育部(民89)。九十年度五年級開始實施之英語課程(標準版)。國民中小學九年一貫課程(第一學習階段)暫行綱要。台北:教育部編。
詹餘靜、柳雅梅(民 89)。國小英語教學實施情况與探討:以國立嘉義師院實小爲例。第九届中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集,650-660。臺北:文鶴書局出版有限公司。
簡麗真(民91)。台灣學童英語語音覺識、拼字能力及閱讀能力之發展研究。國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所碩士論文。
簡麗真、陳淑惠(民91)。台灣英語學童語音自覺及拼字能力之發展研究。英語教學。27(1) ,41-66。
顏慈怡(民93)。英語韻文及唸謠的不同教學法對初學英語的台灣學童尾韻覺識的影響。私立東海大海外國語文研究所碩士論文。
蘇姿云(民93)。童謠教學對幼兒聲韻覺識影響之研究。私立樹德科技大學幼兒保育研究所碩士論文。
西文部份
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Adams, M. J. (1991). A talk with Marilyn Adams. Language Arts, 68(March), 206- 212.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barker, T. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1995). An evaluation of computer assisted instruction in phonological awareness with below average readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(1), 89-103.
Bentin, S., & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It's a two way street. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 19, 148-158.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read - A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
Brophy, J. E. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivation students to learn. Education Leadership, 45, 40-48.
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles in language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bryant, P. & Bradley , L. (1985). Children’s reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bryant, P., Bradley, L. MacLean, M. & Crossland, J. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading. Journal of Child Language, 16, 407-428.
Chard, D. J. & Dickson, S. V. (1999). Phonological awareness: Instructional and assessment guidelines. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 261-270.
Catherine, M. C. & Wanger, R. K. (1997). Growth modeling of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 621-630.
Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: findings and implications. Elementary School Learning, 85, 5-20.
Cossu, G., Rossini, F., & Marshall, J. C. (1993). When reading is acquired but phonemic awareness is not: A study of literacy in Down’s syndrome. Cognition, 46, 129-138.
Dowd, F. S. (1991). Mother Goose Goes to School. Childhood Education, 18(1), 6- 12.
Gatbonton, E. & Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 473-492.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological and lexical process. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 251-284. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hardin, E. E., Kowal, S., & O'Connell, D. C. (1998). Reading aloud from logographic and alphabetic texts: Comparisons between Chinese and German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 413-420.
Hootstein, E. (1998). Motivating the unmotivated child. Teaching Pre K-8, 29(3), 58-60.
Hsu, J. M. (1986). Attitude, motivation and achievement in EFL: A case study of Chinese junior high school students. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Huerta, T. (1979). Motivation in secondary school. English Teaching Forum, 17(3), 13-15.
Jordano, K., & Callella, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness songs & rhymes-Fall, Winter, Spring (3 book series). Cypress, CA: Creative Teaching Press.
Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103-147.
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L. & Grougy, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of lietracy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243-255.
Keller, J. M. (1987b). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., MacLean, M. & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224-245.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London:Longman.
MacDonald, G. W., & Cornwall, A. (1995). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading and spelling achievement eleven years later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 523-527.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Mattingly, I. G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In J.F. Kavanaugh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye, 133-148. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. NY: Appleton.
Morais, J. (1991). Phonological awareness: A bridge between language and literacy. In D. J. Sawyer, & B. Fox (Eds.), Phonological awareness in reading: The evolution of current perspective, (pp. 31-71.) New York: Springer-Verlag.
Paris, S. G. & Turner, J. C. (1994). Situated motivation. In Paul R. Pintrich, Donald R. Brown, & Claire Ellen Weinstein(Eds.)Student motivation, cognition, and learning, 213-237. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Sawyer, W., & Comer, D. E. (1991). Growing up with literature. New York: Delmar.
Share, D. L. & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accomodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Contributions From Educational Psychology, 1, 1-57.
Sparks, R.,Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179-195.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability, Journal of Experimental Child psychology, 38, 37-51.
Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T. & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children , Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 364-370.
Treiman, R. (1991). Children's spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters , Journal of Educational-Psychology, 83(3), 346-360.
Tunmer, W. E., & Rohl, M.(1991). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. In D. J. Sawyer & B. Fox (Eds.), Phonological awareness in reading: The evolution of current perspectives, 1-30. New York: Springer- Verlag.
Wolf, M. & Vellutino, F. (1993). A psycholinguistic account of reading. In J. B. Gleason & N.B. Ratner (Eds.), Psycholinguistics (pp. 352-387.) Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177.
Yopp, H. K. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45(9), 696-703.
Yopp, H. K. & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top