|
1. R-A. Dana, C. Le Van, and F. Magnien, “On the Different Notions of Arbitrage and Existence of Equilibrium”, Journal of Economic Theory 87, 169-193 (1999). 2. K. C. Border, ”Fixed point theorems with applications to economics and game theory”, (1985). 3. M. Florenzano and C. Le Van, A note on Gale-Nikaido-Debreu lemma and the existence of general equilibrium, Econ. Lett, 107-110 (1986). 4. G. Debreu, “Existence of Competitive Equilibrium” Chapter 15 in Handbook of Mathematical Economics, vol.Π, edited by M. D. Intrilligator and K. J. Arrow. (1982). 5. G. Debreu, “Theory of Value,” Wiley, New York, (1959). 6. J. M. Grandmont, Temporary general equilibrium theory, Econometrica 45, 535-572 (1977). 7. J. M. Grandmont, Temporary general equilibrium theory, in “Handbook of Mathematical Economics,Π,” pp.879-922, North-Holland, Amsterdam, (1982). 8. J. R. Green, Temporary general equilibrium in a sequential trading model with spot and future transactions, Econometrica 41, 1103-1123 (1973). 9. O. Hart, On the existence of an equilibrium in a securities model, J. Econ. Theory 9, 293-311 (1974). 10. F. Milne, Short selling, default risk and the existence of equilibrium in a securities model, Int. Econ. Tev. 21, 255-267 (1980). 11. P. J. Hammond, Overlapping expectations and Hart’s condition for equilibrium in a securities model, J. Econ. Theory 31, 170-175 (1983). 12. J. Werner, Arbitrage and the existence of competitive equilibrium, Econometrica 55, 1403-1418 (1987). 13. L. Nielsen, Asset market equilibrium with short selling, Rev. Econ. Stud. 56, 467-474 (1989). 14. F. H. Page, Jr., and M. H. Wooders, “Arbitrage with Price-Dependent Preferences: Equilibrium and Market Stability,” Working Paper, Department of Finance, Univer- sity of Alabama, (1995). 15. F. H. Page, Jr., and M. H. Wooders, A necessary and sufficient condition for compactness of individually rational and feasible outcomes and existence of an equilibrium, Econ. Let. 52, 153-162 (1996). 16. G. Chichilnisky, A topological invariant for competitive markets, J. Math. Econ. 28, 445-469 (1997).
|