跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.88) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/02/15 21:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林芸安
研究生(外文):Un-An Lin
論文名稱:主管部屬交換品質對員工心理及行為影響-主管部屬交換品質差異之調節效果驗證
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of LMX on Employee Psychology and Behavior: The Examination of Moderating Effect of LMX Differentiation
指導教授:熊欣華熊欣華引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsin-Hua Hsiung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
論文頁數:70
中文關鍵詞:主管部屬交換品質主管部屬交換品質差異相對剝奪感組織公民行為退縮行為
外文關鍵詞:leader-membership exchangeLMX differentiationrelative deprivationorganizational citizenship behaviorwithdrawal behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:420
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:93
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
主管與部屬交換關係一直是組織行為研究中重要的議題,因為主管對待部屬關係之異同可能會影響到組織中員工之行為與績效。過去主管部屬交換理論(leader-member exchange theory, LMX理論)傾向以正面觀點去探討高品質LMX產生的影響與後果。此外,多數研究主要是以個體層面來探討LMX對員工行為的影響。然而本研究認為,應以更周延的觀點瞭解LMX的影響。這意味著團隊成員間的相互影響已成為不可忽視的一部分。因此,本研究主要的目的在於探討LMX與相對剝奪感之關係。其次,本研究以主管部屬交換品質差異(leader-member exchange differentiation)作為團隊變數,藉以探討「LMX差異」是否會對LMX與員工的相對剝奪感間具有調節效果的影響,最後,探討相對剝奪感與兩種員工行為的關係(組織公民行為與退縮行為)。
本研究採取兩階段發放問卷的方式蒐集,以台北市與新北市地區之信義房屋直營店員工為主。經由兩階段調查配對取樣後,第一階段與第二階段的實際有效問卷共為76家分店,共319組問卷。由於在本研究中,變數可區分成個體層級與團體層級,因此在資料分析方法上採用階層線性模型分析(hierarchical linear modeling, HLM),作為本研究假設驗證之統計工具。
經過資料分析後,本研究結果發現:(1) LMX與員工相對剝奪感間具有負向關係。(2)「LMX差異」會調節「LMX」與「相對剝奪感」之間的關係,;當「LMX 差異」愈大時,「LMX」與「相對剝奪感」間的負向關係愈強,當「LMX差異」愈小時,「LMX」與「相對剝奪感」間的負向關係愈弱。(3) 相對剝奪感與組織公民行為間具有負向關係以及與退縮行為間有正向關係。以上結果有助於瞭解當相對剝奪感為中介時,LMX與員工行為變項間之歷程描述。此外,由於LMX與「LMX差異」間具有交互作用影響效果,因此本研究建議未來的LMX研究中宜從團隊層次角度來整體考量LMX對員工心理及行為的影響,以提供對LMX研究更周延的瞭解。
The relationship between leader and subordinate is always an important issue in organizational behavior research. That leaders treated subordinates similarly or differently may affect employees’ performances and behaviors in organizatios. Past leader-member exchange (LMX) studies tended to adopt a positive view to explore the impacts of high quality LMX and its consequences. In addition, most studies are based on individual-level perspective to explore the influences of LMX on employee behaviors. However, this study suggests to use a more comprehensive perspective to understand the influences of LMX. It means that the interactions among group members can not be ignored. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between LMX and relative deprivation. Furthermore, this study treats LMX differentiation as a group-level variable to examine its moderating effect on the relationship between LMX and relative deprivation. Finally, this study explores the relationship between relative deprivation and two kinds of employee behaviors (organizational citizenship behavior and withdrawal behavior).
This study adopted a two-stage design to collect data. The questionnaies were distributed to employees of a real estate company, whose branch stores were located in Taipei City and New Taipei City. Through matching from two-stage surveys, we obtained a valid sample of 319 employees from 76 stores. The variables of this study can be divided into the individual-level and group-level, therefore, we used the method of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) as the statistical tool.
After data analysis, several findings are derived as follows: (1) LMX is negatively associated with employees’ relative deprivation; (2) LMX differentiation moderates the relationship between LMX and relative deprivation; when LMX differentiation is higher, LMX has a stronger negative effect on employees’ relative deprivation; when LMX differentiation is lower, LMX has a weaker negative effect on employees’ relative deprivation; (3) relative deprivation has a negative association with organizational citizenship behavior and a positive association with withdrawal behavior. These findings help to understand the process between LMX and employees’ behaviors. In addition, because LMX and LMX differentiation have an interaction effect, this study suggests that future LMX research should use team-level perspective to consider the impacts of LMX on employees’ psychology and behaviors, in order to provide a more comprehensive understanding for LMX research.
摘要 ii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 LMX與LMX差異 7
第二節 LMX之影響探討 13
第三節 LMX差異之相關研究與實證 17
第四節 理論架構與假設 23
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究對象與資料蒐集 27
第二節 研究構念衡量 28
第三節 資料分析方法 31
第四章 研究結果 33
第一節 敘述性統計分析與相關分析 33
第二節 問卷之信效度分析 37
第三節 研究假設之驗證分析 43
第五章 研究結果與建議 49
第一節 研究假設之分析結果 49
第二節 理論貢獻與實務意涵 51
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 54
參考文獻 55
附錄(一) 各變數之衡量題項 65
附錄(二) 研究問卷 67

表目錄
表2- 1 LMX之後果變數研究整理 15
表2- 2 LMX差異之相關變數研究整理 20
表4- 1 問卷基本資料分析 35
表4- 2 各研究變數敘述統計與相關矩陣 36
表4- 3 研究構念信度分析結果彙整 37
表4- 4 驗證性因素分析結果 40
表4- 5 階層線性模型分析結果:LMX的主效果以及LMX差異之干擾效果 44
表4- 6 階層線性模型分析結果:相對剝奪感對組織公民行為及退縮行為之影響 46
表4- 7 階層線性模型分析結果:LMX對於組織公民行為及退縮行為之影響 47
表4- 8 階層線性模型分析結果:相對剝奪感對LMX與組織公民行為以及退縮 48
表5-1 研究結果整理:相關假設檢驗 49

圖目錄
圖 1 - 1 研究流程圖 5
圖 2 - 1 LMX理論關係圖 8
圖 2 - 2 LMX與LMX差異模式 11
圖 2 - 3 研究架構圖 23
圖 4 - 1 CFA模型分析圖 42
圖 4 - 2 LMX差異對LMX與相對剝奪感之關係的調節效果 45
圖 4 - 3 LMX差異對LMX與相對剝奪感之關係的調節效果 45
Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 2: 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
Adler, S., & Golan, J. 1981. Lateness as withdrawal behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 544-554.
Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K.M. 2001. Further examination of the sources of feedback scale. Journal of Business Communication, 38: 206-226.
Ballinger, G. A., Schoorman, F. D., & Lehman, D. W. 2009. Will You Trust Your New Boss? The Role of Affective Reactions to Leadership Succession. Leadership Quarterly, vol. 20, 219-232.
Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 587-595.
Bluedorn, A. C. 1982. A Unified Model of Turnover from Organizations, Human Relations, 35: 135-153.
Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. 2006. Leader-member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 246–257.
Bolino, M.C., & Turnley, W.H. 2009. Relative deprivation among employees in lower-quality leader-member exchange relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 276–286.
Crosby, F. 1976. A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83: 85-113.
Crosby, F. 1984. Relative deprivation in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 51–93.
Dalal, S. R. 2005. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior And Counterproductive Work Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90(6): 1241-1255.
Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., & Graen, G. 1973. Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10:184-200.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W.J. 1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 46-78.
Davis, J. A. 1959. A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22: 280-296.
Deluga, R. J. 1994. Supervision trusts building, leader-member exchange and organ- izational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(4): 315-326.
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. 1986. Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11:618–634.
Eibner, C., & Evans, W. N. 2005. Relative deprivation, poor health habits, and mortality. Journal of Human Resources, 40: 591–620.
Ellaway, A., McKay, L., Macintyre, S., Kearns, A., & Hiscock, R. 2004. Are social comparisons of homes and cars related to psychosocial health? International Journal of Epidemiology, 33: 1065–1071.
Erdogan, B. 2001. LMX Differentiation Fairness: Evidence of a New Construct. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington D.C.
Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. 2002. Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim(Eds.), Leadership: 65–114. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. 2010. Differentiated leader-member exchange: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95:1104–1120.
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. 1999. The Impact of Relational Demography on the Quality of Leader-Member Exchanges and Employees Work Attitudes and Well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 237-240.
Feldman, D.C., & Turnley, W. H. 2004. Contingent employment in academic careers: relative deprivation among adjunct faculty. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64: 284-307.
Festinger, L. 1954. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7: 117-140.
Ford, L. R., & Seers, A. 2006. Relational leadership and team climates: Pitting differentiation versus agreement. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 258–270.
George, J. M. 1989. Mood and absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.74: pp.317-324.
George, J. M. 1990. Personality; affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107-116.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. 1992. Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, vol.112: 310–329.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. 1997. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827-844.
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25: 161–178.
Grant, P. R. & Brown, R. 1995. From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(3): 195-212
Graen, G., & Cashman, J. 1975. A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.). Leadership Frontiers (pp. 143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
Graen, G. 1976. Role making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Graen, G.B., & Schiemann, W. 1978. Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 206-212.
Graen,G . B., Liden, R., & Hoel,W. 1982. Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 868-872.
Graen, G. B., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. 1982. The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 109-131.
Graham, J. 1991. Servant–leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral. Leadership Quarterly, 2: 105−119.
Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. 1996. Demographic and organizational influences on lead er-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66: 203–214.
Greenleaf, R. K. 1977. Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Gurr, T. R. 1968. Urban disorder, perspectives from the comparative study of civil strife. In L. H. Masotti & D. R. Bowen (Eds.), Riots and rebellion: Civil violence in the urban comm- unity. Beverly Hills, Calif. : Sage,
Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. 2008. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1208–1219.
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. 2009. LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 517–534.
Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. 2008. Beyond personal leader-member exchange quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadership Quarterly, 19: 20–30.
Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. 1990. Job attitudes and organizational withdrawal: Anexamination of retirement and other voluntary withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37: 60-78.
Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. 1991. General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37: 60-78.
Hyman, H. H. 1942. The psychology of status. Archives of Psychology, 269.
Keith, P., & Schafer, R. 1985. Role Behavior, Relative Deprivation and Depression among Women in One- and two-job Families. Family Relations, 343: 227-233.
Karl, P., Alan, C., & Nigel, G.,(2010). Formal Development Opportunities and Withdrawal Behaviors by Employees in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3): 281–301
Lee, J. 2001. Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice, and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14: 574−589.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. 2002. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.87: 131- 142.
Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. 2010. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1090–1109.
Liden, R., & Graen, G. 1980. Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 451-465.
Liden, R., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. 1993. A longitudinalstudy on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology,78: 662-674.
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. 1998. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1): 43-73.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. 2006. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 723-746.
Luttmer, E. F. P. 2005. Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120:963–1002.
Ma, L., & Qu, Q. 2010. Differentiation in leader-member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5): 733-744.
Martin, J. 1981. Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of 58shrinking resources. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior,vol.3: 53-107. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. 1987. The leader/member attribution process. Academy of Management Review, 12: 235–249.
Marwell, G., Ratcliff, K., & Schmitt, D. R. 1969. Minimizing differences in a maximizing difference game.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12: 158-163.
Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. 2005. LMX differentiation: key concepts and related empirical findings. In G. Graen & J. A. Graen (Eds.), Global organizing designs, LMX leadership: The series, Vol. 3 (pp. 73−98). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 738–748.
Ma, L., & Qu, Q. 2010. Differentiation in leader-member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadership Quarterly, 21: 733-744.
McClane, W. E. 1991. Implications of member role differentiation: Analysis of a key concept in the LMX model of leadership. Group and Organization Studies, 16: 102–113.
Messick, D. M., & Thorngate, W. B. 1967. Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3: 85-101.
Morse, S. J., & Gergen , K. J. 1970. Social comparisons, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16: 148-156.
Mummendey, A., Kessler, M., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. 1999. Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 229-245.
Nystrom, P. C. 1990. Vertical exchanges and organizational commitments of American business managers. Group and Organization Studies, 15: 296-312.
Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., Meen, J., & Robertson, D. J. 1995. The preconditions and consequences of relative deprivation: Two field studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25: 944–964.
Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational Citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Pettigrew, T. F. 2002. Summing up: Relative deprivation as a key social psychological concept. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 351–374). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Pham-Kanter, G. 2009. Social comparisons and health: Can having rich friends and neighbors make you sick? Social Science and Medicine, 69: 335–344.
Podsakoff, P . M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1: 107-142.
Robert, C., Liden, Sandy, J., Wayne & Dean, S. 1993. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol 78(4): 62-674.
Runciman, W. G. 1966. Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England . Berkeley, University of California Press.
Smith, H. J., & Ortiz, D. J. 2002. Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation: Group-based deprivation involve fair outcomes or fair treatment to the “I”? Perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 91–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, R. A., & Bruning, N. S. 1985. Quality of verticaldyad linkages: Congruence of supervisor and subordinate competence and role stress as explanatory variables. Group and Organization Studies, 10: 81-94.
Scandura, T.A., Graen, G.B., & Novak, M.A. 1986. When managers decide not to decide autocratically. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 106.
Schyns, B., & Day, D. V. 2010. Critique and review of leader-member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 1-29.
Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. W., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: vol. 1. Adjustment during army life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer- rsity Press.
Stumpf, S.A., & Hartman, K. 1984. Individual exploration to organizational commitment or withdrawal. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 308-329.
Slater, T. F. 1965. Biochem. J. 97, 22c.
Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. 2002. Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 542–548.
Schriesheim, C. A. 1995. Multivariate and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA) using hierarchical linear multiple regression. The Leadership Quarterly, 6: 1−18.
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., Zhou, X. T., & Yammarino, F. J. 2001. The folly of theoriezing “A” but testing “B”: A selective level-of-analysis review of the field and a detailed leader–member exchange illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 12: 515−551.
Schyns, B. 2006. Are group consensus in leader-member exchange and shared work values related to organizational outcomes? Small Group Research, 37: 20–35.
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. 1996. Social exchange in organizations: Perceivedorganizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 219-227.
Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. 2002. Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 542–548.
Sias, P. M., & Jablin, F. M. 1995. Differential superior-subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and coworker communications. Human Communication Research, 22: 5−38.
Snyder, R.A., & Bruning, N.S. 1985. Quality of vertical dyad linkages: Congruence of supervisor and subordinate competence and role stress as explanatory variables. Group and Organization Studies, 10: 81-94.
Stewart, M. M., & Johnson, O. E. 2009. Leader-member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and team performance. Group and Organization Management, 34: 507–535.
Stogdill, R. M. 1959. Individual Behavior and Group Achievement. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1986. The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel and L. W. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chigago: Nelson-Hall.
Tansky, J. W. 1993. Justice and organizational citizenship behavior: What is the relationship? Employees Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6: 195–207.
Toh, S.M., & Denisi, A.S. 2003. Host Country National Reactions to Expatriate Pay Policies: A Model and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 608–21.
Tougas, F., & Beaton, A. M. 2002. Personal and group relative deprivation: Connecting the “I” to the “I.” Perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 119–135). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. 2000. Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. New York: Psychology Press.
Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. 2001. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings, 205−227. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Useem, M. 1975. Protest movements in America. NewYork: Bobbs-Merrill.
Vecchio, R. P. 1986. Are you in or out with your boss? Business Horizons, 29: 76−78.
Vecchio, R. P. 1995. It's not easy being green: jealous and envy in the workplace. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, vol.13: 201-244. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Walker, I., & Mann, L. 1987. Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13: 275–283.
Walker, I. 1999. Effects of personal and group relative deprivation on personal and collective self-esteem. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2: 365–380.
Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. 2002. Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. 1993. The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46: 1431-1440.
Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M., & Liden, R.C. 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 82-111.
Yulk, G. 1994. Leader in Organizations, 3th ED., Englewood Cliffs, NJ;Prentice-Hal1.
Yukl, G. 2006. Leadership in organizations, 6th edition. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊