臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

文明是靠問題的不斷解決所演進而來，決策者藉一生的學識經驗，結合既有數據及資訊，對面臨的問題提出因應作為，這些解決問題的方法及執行流程即為人類創造的「知識資產」。但這些資產如未能有效累積與運用，則往往是發散性的，因此在知識運用的領域中常將「外顯知識」與「內隱知識」相互轉化，並以專家知識庫建立及推論流程控制來對特定的專業領域知識進行整合，藉以提升決策效率，解決迫切的問題。
本文提出以本體論為基礎之知識整合架構，並藉由專業領域、工作領域及執行方法等方面之領域知識之獨立設計，引用基礎述詞邏輯、專家系統模糊推理評估函式，藉案例庫本體之橋接整合，期建構最通適性之問題解決模式(Problem-Solving Method, PSM)。同時導入國軍通信故障問題解決案例，俾驗證所提模式運作之效益。
在推論過程中亦援引知識規則庫建立工具軟體Protégé-2000及專家系統應用程式語言CLIPS之輔助，以對本研究所提模式作進一步正形化表達，且整合可靠度工程專業領域之失效模式與效應分析技術(Failure Model & Effects Analysis, FMEA)，為本模式之於通信故障問題解決之實務運用，奠立更強固之立論基礎。

Civilization was be progressed by problem solving. When facing some problems, the reactions of decision maker will combines data and information with his whole life. Therefore the method and procedure for problem-solving will be the “knowledge assets” that created by human beings. It will be dissipated if there are no applications and accumulations efficiency. So, it used to transfer the explicit knowledge to tacit in applied domain. We could promote the efficiency of decision and solving urgent problems to merge specific domain knowledge using by building expert knowledge based and inference procedure control.
In this paper we provide a structure of knowledge merge that based on ontology. We expect to construct a common Problem-Solving Method (PSM) by using case adaptor to merge the independent knowledge design of domain, task, method, logic expression and fuzzy inference evaluate functions. At the same time, we import a communication problem case to verify the efficiency of this model.
We will use some tools just like protégé-2000 & CLIPS to formalize the model in the inference process. We also using the Failure Model & Effects Analysis (FMEA) technology of reliability engineering to applied the communication problem case and make the research more worthy.

第一章 緒論------------------------------------------1
第一節　研究背景---------------------------------------1
第二節　研究目的---------------------------------------2
第三節　研究方法---------------------------------------3
第四節　論文架構---------------------------------------4
第二章 知識的整合-------------------------------------5
第一節 知識的認知與程序-------------------------------5
第二節 知識的分類及排序-------------------------------9
第三節 知識管理--------------------------------------12
第四節 知識整合之基礎-本體論-------------------------15
第三章 問題解決模式----------------------------------22
第一節 領域知識整合的技術----------------------------26
第二節 問題解決模式設計------------------------------35
第三節 問題解決模式描述------------------------------37
第四節 問題解決模式實例推論--------------------------67
第四章　通信故障實例應用------------------------------75
第一節 案例說明--------------------------------------75
第二節 導入推論與驗證--------------------------------77
第三節 成效研討--------------------------------------88
第五章　結論------------------------------------------90
第一節　研究成果--------------------------------------90
第二節　未來研究方向----------------------------------91
參考文獻----------------------------------------------94
附錄一------------------------------------------------98
附錄二------------------------------------------------99
附錄三-----------------------------------------------100
附錄四-----------------------------------------------101
附錄五-----------------------------------------------102

中文部分
[1]吳琮璠、謝清佳，資訊管理，智勝，台北市，2000年5月四版。
[2]廖平，邱惠琪，管理資訊系統突破，儒林，台北市，2001年11月四版。
[3]曹中天，資訊管理系統，鼎茂，台北市，2002年3月。
[4]杜聲鋒，皮亞傑及其思想，台北，遠流，1997。
[5]張春興，教育心理學，台北，東華，1997。
[6]車文博，西方心理學史，台北，當華，1996。
[7]盧欣欣，基於本體論之故障診斷架構，碩士論文，國防大學國防
管理學院國防資訊所，2002年5月
[8]何建輝，資訊創新趨勢下資訊策略規劃，碩士論文，國防大學國
防管理學院國防資源管理研究所，2002年5月
[9]吳心寧，影響知識管理與行政績效關聯性之研究，碩士論文，南
華大學管理研究所，2003年6月
[10]王宗華，可靠度工程技術手冊，中華明國品質協會，台北市，2002年7月。
[11]梁定澎，決策支援系統與企業智慧，智勝，台北市，2002年9月。
[12]林信成、彭啟峰，Oh!Fuzzy模糊理論剖析，台北，第三波，1994
年。
[13]林信成、蕭勝文，模糊詮釋資料及其在圖書館分類學編目之應用
，教育資料與圖書館學，第四十一卷，第一期，ppt.61-76，2003
年9月。
[14]鄭宏昇，結合本體論與擴散促動模式以加強資訊檢索，碩士論文，台灣科技大學，2001年6月。
[15]李建中，本體論為基礎之電子化知識管理模式-以國軍資訊組織導入12207與J2EE為例，碩士論文，國防大學國防管理學院國防資訊所，2003年6月。
[16]Mint(經營情報研究會)著，劉雅涵編譯，系統分析、設計與開發導論，博碩，台北縣，2002年12月ppt.167~182。
英文部分
[17]Badaracco, J. L. Jr., Alliances Speed Knowledge Transfer. Planning Review, 19, 10~16, 1991.
[18]Bernaras, A., Laresgoiti, I., Bartolome, N., and Corera, J., “An Ontology for Fault Diagnosis in Electrical Network,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power System(ISAP’96), 1996, pp. 198-205.
[19]Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., and Benjamins, V. R., “What are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them?,” IEEE Intelligent System, vol. 14, no. 1, pp.20-26,Jan.-Feb. 1999.
[20] Coelho, E.&Lapalme, G.Describling reusable problem-solving methods with a method ontology. In Gaines, B.R. & Musen,M. A.,(Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledfe-Based System Workshop, Alberta, Canada. pp.3.1-3.20,1996.
[21]Durkin J., Expert Systems : Design and Development, Macmillan Publishing Company, U.S.A.,pp.363-383, 1994.
[22] Fensel, D., Motta, E., Decker, S. and Zdrahal, Z., “Using Ontologies
for Defining Tasks, Problem-Solving Methods, and Their Mappings,” in Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (EKAW''97), pp. 113-128, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
[23] Fensel, D.;Ontology-based knowledge management Computer , Volume: 35 Issue: Page(s): 56 —59. 11 , Nov. 2002.
[24] Fensel, D.; Schnogge, A.;Using KIV to specify and verify architectures of knowledge-based systems, Automated Software Engineering, 1997. Proceedings., 12th IEEE International Conference , Page(s): 71 —80, 1-5 Nov, 1997.
[25] Fensel, D.; Motta, E.; Structured development of problem solving methods Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on , Volume: 13 Issue: 6 , Page(s): 913 —932. Nov.-Dec. 2001 .
[26]Giarratano, Joseph C., Riley, Gary, Expert System: Principles and Programming, 2nd ed., MA:PWS, U.S.A, 1994.
[27]Gruber, T., “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5.pp.199-221,1993.
[28]Ikujiro Nonaka,Hirotaka Takeuchi,The Kowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, 1995.
[29]Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, 2003.
International Conference on Year: Sept. 30-Oct. 4, 2003.
[30]Mullen, E. J., & Noe, R. A., The Mentoring Information Exchange : when do mentors seek information from their protege, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(2), 233~242, 1999.
[31]Nonaka, I. A Dynamic Theory of Organization Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14~37, 1994.
[32]Oscar Dieste, Natalia Juristo, Ana.M. Moreno, Juan Pazos., Conceptul Modelling in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering :Concept,Techniques and Trends., World Scientific Publishing Company, year:2000.
[33]Purser, R. E. & Pasmore, W. A., Organizing for Learning In Pasmore, William a, and Woodman, Richard W(ed.). Research in Organization Change and Development. London: JAI Press Inc, 37~114, 1992.
[34] Poole, David, “Representing Knowledge for Logic-based Diagnosis,” Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 1994.
[35]Quinn, J. B., Intelligent Enterprise, Free Press, New York, 1992.
[36]Shavelson, R. J., Methods for examining representations of a subject matter structure in a student’s memory, Journal of Research in Science Teaching,11(3), 231~249, 1974.
[37]Studer, R., Benjamins, V. R., and Fensel, D., “Knowledge Engineering:Principles and Methods,” Data and Knowledge Engineering, vol.25, pp.161-197, 1998.
[38]Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M., “Ontologies:Principles, Methods and Applications,” Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp.540-549, 1996.
[39]Winston, Patrick H., Artificial Intelligence, 3rd ed. Addison Wesley, 1992.
[40]Xu Zhang Weiming，..etc. “study and Implementation of Semantic Information Query System Based on Ontology”， IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
[41]Zellweger, P. A knowledge-based model to database retrieval
Page(s): 747- 753。
參考網站:
[42]http://www.ieee.org/
[43]http://protégé.Stanford.edu/
[44]http://www.ontology.org/main/papers/
[45]http://www.ghg.net/clips/
[46]http://www.socialwork.com.hk/psychtheory/theory_psy/cognition/
[47]http://www.bio.ncue.edu.tw/window.htm
[48]http://www.fuzzy.org.tw/papers.htm