臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要目的是探討領導部屬交換、團體成員交換、裡子與面子以及員工創造力的影響關係，因此，本研究以南部科學工業區廠商的員工為主要研究對象，總共發放400份研究問卷，共計341份有效問卷，有效問卷回收率為85.25%。同時，本研究透過敘述統計、因素分析、信度分析、效度分析與結構方程模式分析來驗證本研究各項假設。

研究結果發現，（1）領導部屬交換對裡子有顯著正向影響，（2）團體成員交換對裡子有顯著正向影響，（3）領導部屬交換對面子有顯著正向影響，（4）團體成員交換對面子有顯著正向影響，（5）領導部屬交換對員工創造力有顯著正向影響。

The main purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among leader member exchange, team member exchange, substantial content and saving face, and employee creativity. Therefore, this study took research objects from employees in Southern Taiwan Science Park (STSP). Out of the 400 questionnaires distributed, 341 valid ones were chosen for analysis. The usable survey response rate was 85.25%. Meanwhile, our research method adopted the descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, validity analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test our hypotheses.

The main findings were that: (1) leader member exchange was significant positive impacts on the substantial content; (2) team member exchange was significant positive impacts on the substantial content; (3) leader member exchange was significant positive impacts on the saving face; (4) team member exchange was significant positive impacts on the saving face; (5) leader member exchange was significant positive impacts on the employee creativity.

摘 要 I
Abstract II
誌 謝 III
目 錄 IV
表 目 錄 VI
圖 目 錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 3
第四節 論文結構 5
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 領導-成員交換理論 6
第二節 團體-成員交換理論 8
第三節 裡子與面子 10
第四節 員工創造力 12
第五節 各構面之影響關係 14
第三章 研究設計 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究假設 21
第三節 各構面操作型定義 22
第四節 問卷與抽樣設計 26
第五節 資料分析方法 28
第四章 統計分析結果 31
第一節 各構面之敘述統計 31
第二節 各構面之因素分析 37
第三節 各構面之信度分析 41
第四節 各構面之效度分析 44
第五節 結構方程模式分析 47
第五章 結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
第二節 後續研究建議 55
第三節 研究限制 56
第四節 研究貢獻 56
參考文獻 57
附錄一：問卷甲卷（A） 62
附錄二：問卷甲卷（B） 64
附錄三：問卷甲卷（C） 66
附錄四：問卷甲卷（D） 68
附錄五：問卷甲卷（E） 70
附錄六：問卷乙卷 72

一、中文
1.安鴻瑋(2012)，人格特質、領導成員交換關係、團隊成員交換關係與組織承諾之研究：以團隊私人關係為干擾變數，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
2.吳萬益(2011)，企業研究方法，台北：華泰文化事業。
3.李新民(2009)，大學回饋環境的裡子與面子層面分析及其與大學生學習表現之潛在關聯：形成性測量模式的應用，屏東教育大學學報，第33期，頁425-458。
4.汪美香、楊棠堯與黃國展(2009)，知識分享方式與團隊學習能力對團隊創造力之影響，資訊管理學報，第16卷第1期，頁181-202。
5.南部科學工業園區管理局(2013)，廠商分類，2013年2月25日取自http://www.stsipa.gov.tw/web/WEB/Jsp/Page/cindex.jsp?frontTarget=DEFAULT＆thisRootID=30
6.唐永泰(2006)，轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係，人力資源管理學報，第6卷第4期，頁47-66。
7.陳正男、丁學勤、林素吟與黃雯蓉(2003)，行銷相關工作的創造力需求與員工創造力績效受工作特性與組織特性之影響，人力資源管理學報，第3卷第3期，頁27-55。
8.陳高凌(2001)，義與面子在華人家庭暴力裡的運作及其對治療之啟示，本土心理學研究，第15期，頁63-111。
9.陳鉉文與劉欣芸(2008)，員工正負向情感對轉換型領導與員工創造力績效之干擾效果探討，建國科大學報，第29卷第1期，頁81-94。
10.熊欣華與陳欽洲(2012)，自己人更優惠，或是更辛苦？領導部屬交換關係中的矛盾，人力資源管理學報，第12卷第4期，頁25-52。
11.蔡松純、鄭伯壎、周麗芳、姜定宇與鄭弘岳(2009) ，領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行為：權力距離之調節效果，中華心理學刊，第51卷第1期，頁121-138。
12.賴鳳儀與高連亨(2011)，社會智能量表之驗證，商管科技季刊，第12卷第4期，頁413-449。
13.韓貴香與李美枝(2008)，捨近求遠的求助模式：面子威脅對華人選擇求助對象的影響，中華心理學刊，第50卷第1期，頁31-48。
14.羅新興、梁成明與余永章(2006)，領導者-成員交換關係品質與追隨者對領導者態度的關聯性：探討追隨者類型的干擾作用，清雲學報，第26卷第1期，頁1-11。
15.蘇珊筠與黃光國(2003)，退休老師與大學生在生活場域中的關係與面子，中華心理學刊，第45卷第3期，頁295-311。
二、英文
1.Amabile, T. M., (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do, California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
2.Anseel, F., ＆ Lievens, F., (2007). The Long-Term Impact of the Feedback Environment on Job Satisfaction: A Field Study in a Belgian Context, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(2), 254-266.
3.Bagozzi, R. P., ＆ Yi, Y., (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
4.Boies, K., ＆ Howell, J. M., (2006). Leader-Member Exchange in Teams: An Examination of the Interaction between Relationship Differentiation and Mean LMX in Explaining Team-Level Outcomes, Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246-257.
5.Chen, Z., Lam, W., ＆ Zhong, J. A., (2007). Leader-Member Exchange and Member Performance: A New Look at Individual-Level Negative Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Team-Level Empowerment Climate, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 202-212.
6.Dansereau, F., Graen, G. B., ＆ Haga, W. J., (1975). A Vertical Dyad Linkage approach to Leadership with Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
7.Davis, W. D., Carson, C. M., Ammeter, A. P., ＆ Treadway, D. C., (2005). The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Feedback Specificity on Task Performance, Human Performance, 18(4), 409-426.
8.Ford, L. R., ＆ Seers, A., (2008).Relational Leadership and Team Climates: Pitting Differentiation Versus Agreement, The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 258-270.
9.Gong, Y., Huang, J., ＆ Farh, J., (2009). Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-efficacy, Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
10.Goodman, J., ＆ Wood, R. E., (2005). Feedback Specificity, Learning Opportunities, and Learning, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 809-821.
11.Graen, G. B., ＆ Uhl-Bien, M., (1995). Relationship-Based approach to Leadership: Development of Leader Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective, The Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219-247.
12.Graen, G., Novak, M. A., ＆ Sommerkamp, P., (1982). The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Job Design on Productivity and Satisfaction: Testing a Dual Attachment Model, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131.
13.Gumusluoglu, L., ＆ İlsev, A., (2009). Transformational Leadership, Creativity, and Organizational Innovation, Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473.
14.Herold, D. M., ＆ Parsons, C. K., (1985). Assessing the Feedback Environment in Work Organizations: Development of the Job Feedback Survey, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 290-305.
15.Janssen, O., ＆ Van Yperen, N. W., (2004). Employees’ Goal Orientations, the Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction, Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368-384.
16.Kaiser, H. F., (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
17.Lam, W., Huang, X., ＆ Snape, E., (2007). Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Leader-Member Exchange: Do Supervisor-Attributed Motives Matter, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 348-363.
18.Rosen, C. C., Levy, P. E., ＆ Hall, R. J., (2006). Placing Perceptions of Politics in the Context of the Feedback Environment, Employee Attitudes, and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 211-220.
19.Scott, R. K., (1995). Creative Employees: A Challenge to Managers, Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(1), 64-71.
20.Seers, A., (1989). Team-Member Exchange Quality: A New Construct for Role-Making Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 118-135.
21.Seers, A., Petty, M. M., ＆ Cashman, J. F., (1995). Team-Member Exchange under Team and Traditional Management: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment, Group ＆ Organization Management, 20(1), 18-38.
22.Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., ＆ Snell, A. F., (2004). The Feedback Environment Scale: Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165-184.
23.Stoker, J. I., Grutterink, H., ＆ Kolk, N. J., (2012). Do Transformational CEOs always make the Difference? The Role of TMT Feedback Seeking Behavior, The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 582-592.
24.Tse, H. M. H., Dasborough, M. T., ＆ Ashkanasy, N. M., (2008). A Multi-Level Analysis of Team Climate and Interpersonal Exchange Relationships at Work, The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195-211.
25.Walle, D. V., (2003). A Goal Orientation Model of Feedback-Seeking Behavior, Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581-604.
26.Zhou, J., ＆ George, J. M., (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.