臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

由於國內師資面臨供需失衡之問題，修習教育學程之人數有限，因此要如何適切選才、甄選具備教師性向的學生，以提升教育學程整體培訓效益與教師素質實為重要。有鑒於國內目前尚缺乏教師教學情境之測驗工具，因此擬訂編製一份「多媒體教學情境判斷測驗」做為教育學程甄選過程之參考依據。編擬之多媒體教學情境判斷測驗將結合情境判斷測驗，使受試者在模擬的情境中進行角色扮演，設法解決情境中發生的各種與教學。透過受試者所採用的各種問題解決方案，評估受試者是否具備教師應有的教學能力。

Cause of Teachers’ supply excess the demand that was still a problem. University schools want to limit to the quantity of educational programs. How to choice the talent of having teacher’s instructional capability? Recently, we need to upgrade training beneficial result and teachers’ instructional capability on teachers’ selection. We have no testing tool to help ourselves, so that we can design a Test of the Teacher’s instructional capability for selecting the students of educational programs. Using Situational Judgment Test of the instructional capability make user who was role-play in the situated simulation solve the problems of instructional and daily. We make the test to evaluate ability of the teacher by way of all problem solving.

目錄 -------------------------------------------------i
圖目錄 -----------------------------------------------iii
表目錄 ------------------------------------------------iv
第一章 緒論----------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究動機-------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究目的-------------------------------------------3
第二章 文獻探討-------------------------------------------4
第一節 情境判斷測驗----------------------------------------4
第二節 教師重要特質與能力之研究------------------------------9
第三章 測驗編製-------------------------------------------13
第一節 測驗編製過程---------------------------------------13
第二節 系統設計理念、架構與功能-----------------------------19
第三節 系統架構-------------------------------------------20
第四節 系統開發技術---------------------------------------23
第五節 系統功能介紹---------------------------------------24
第六節 研究工具-------------------------------------------37
第七節 研究程序-------------------------------------------37
第四章 結果與討論-----------------------------------------38
第一節 信度分析-------------------------------------------38
第二節 效度分析-------------------------------------------41
第三節 討論----------------------------------------------50
第五章 結論與建議-----------------------------------------54
第一節 結論----------------------------------------------54
第二節 建議----------------------------------------------55

一、中文部份

王朝茂(1996)。教師信念量表。台北市：心理出版社。

王文中、陳雪珠(1999)。新進國中教師主要工作內容之分析。教育與心理研究，22(1)，87-111

朱苑瑜(2001)。國中實習教師實習期間教師信念變化與其影響因素之研究。國立中山大學未發表之碩士論文。

朱苑瑜、葉玉珠(2001)。教師信念量表之編製。

宋曜廷(2008)。教育學程選才最適化。

柯俊吉(2004)。創意教學應用於九年一貫數學教學。逢甲大學應用數學研究所，未出版，台北。

高博銓(2007)。班級經營的社會學基礎。中等教育，58(3)，56-71。

高薰芳(2002)。師資培育—職前教師教學系統發展。台北：高等教育

翁全志(2003)。九年一貫自然與生活科技能力指標之網路多媒體教材與測驗評量研究。國立交通大學網路學習學程碩士論文，未出版，新竹。

孫玉融(2005)。員工甄選計畫之介紹。Training & Development (T&D)，40，1-9。

馮莉雅(2004)。中小學教師人格特質量表之發展。南大學報，38(2)，115-130。

莊奇勳(1991)。模擬式電腦輔助教學腳本設計探討。嘉義師院學報，5，283-312

黃一峰、鄭怡君(2004)。情境判斷測驗：訓練考核的可行途徑。Training & Development (T&D)，20，1-9。

路君約(1971)。教師性向測驗的編製報告。心理與教育，5，1-10。

葉玉珠、彭月茵、林志哲、蔡維欣、鍾素香(2008)。「情境式科學創造力測驗」之發展暨科學創造力之性別與年級差異分析。測驗學刊，55(1)，33-60

謝沛珊(2004)。情境模擬數位教材設計之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所。未出版，台北。

謝臥龍(民86)。優良國中教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊，5(3)，14-28。

蔡福興、游光昭、洪國勳(2004)。引發學習動機的多人線上遊戲式學習系統。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育系，未出版，台北。

鍾任琴(1994)。國小實習教師教育專業信念發展之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版，台北。

鍾瑞國、楊寶華(2006)。發展企業數位學習成效評鑑指標之研究。人力資源管理學報。6(1)，123-140。

二、英文部份

Aguinis, H., Henle, C. A., & Beaty, J. C. (2001). Virtual reality technology: A new tool for personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 70-83.

Barrett, R. S. (1998). Challenging the myths of fair employment practices. Westport,
Connecticut: Quorum Books.

Bess, T. L. (2001). Exploring the dimensionality of situational judgment: task and
contextual knowledge.

Bergeron, B. (2006). Developing serious game. Hingham, Massachusetts: Charles River Media, INC.

Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pancil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143-159.

Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job perfprmance. Human Performance, 15, 233-254.

Howard, A., & chio, M. (2000). How do you assess a manager's decision-making abilities? The use of situational inventories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(2), 85-88.

Latham, G. P. (1989). The reliability, validity, and practicality of the situational interview. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 169-182). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. M., Sarri, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.

Lievens, F., & Coetsier, P. (2002). Situational tests in student selection: An examination of predictive validity, adverse impact, and construct validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 245-257.

Lievens, F., Buyse, T., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). The operational validity of video-based situational judgment test for medical college admissions: Illustrating the importance of matching predictor and criterion construct domains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 442-452.

McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Bruhn-Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., & Braverman, E. P. (2001). Predicting job performance using situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730-740.

McDaniel, M. A., & Whetzel, D. L. (2005). Situational judgment test research: Informing the debate on practical intelligence theory. Intelligent, 33(5), 515-525

McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., & Schmidt, F. L. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616.

Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., &Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.

Morath, R., Curtin, P., Brownstein, E., & Christopher, C. (2003). Situational judgment tests: Recent Innovations in development and scoring. Caliber Associates.

Northrop, L. C. (1989). The psychometric history of selected ability constructs. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Oswald, F. L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B. H., Ramsay, L. J., & Gillespie, M. A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187-207.

Peeters, H., & Lievens, & F. (2005). Situational Judgment Tests and their Predictiveness of College Students’ Success: The Influence of Faking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(1), 70-89

Raybourn, E.M. (2004). Designing intercultural agents for multicultural interactions. In: Sabine, P., Robert, T. (Eds.), Agent Culture: Human–Agent Interaction in a Multicultural World. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 267–285.


Render, B., & Stair, R.M. (1997). Quantitative analysis for management (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Snellen, J.E. & Murray, S.L. (1991). Computers in Instructional Simulation: A Report on the Research and Development of Instructional Simulation. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Development.

Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50, 912-926.

Thorndike, R. L., & Stein, S. (1937). An evaluation of the attempts to measure social intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 275-285.

Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers. Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178

Wagner, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 49, 436-458.

Weekley, J. A., & Jones, C. (1997). Video-based situational testing. Personnel Psychology, 50, 25-49.

Weekley, J. A., and Jones, C. (1999). Further studies of situational tests. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 679-700.