臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文以中國上市企業為研究樣本，探討家族企業與政治關聯性對於創新的影響。研究結果顯示，中國家族上市企業與研發有顯著正向關係，並發現若中國上市企業具備政治關聯性，可能會抑制創新研發的投入。

Using the Chinese listed companies as sample, this paper investigates whether the family firms and a firm’s political connection have impacts on innovation. The results of this study show that family firms have significant positive effects on R&D investments, and a firm’s political connection inhibits the R&D investments.

目錄
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
第一章 前言
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第四節 研究貢獻 5
第二章 文獻探討與假說發展
第一節 家族企業 6
第二節 中國的家族企業 9
第三節 創新 11
第四節 假說發展 12
第三章 研究設計
第一節 研究期間與樣本選擇 15
第二節 實證模型 16
第三節 變數定義 18
第四章 實證結果
第一節 敘述性統計量 22
第二節 相關係數矩陣 24
第三節 假說測試 26
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 30
第二節 政策意涵 31
第三節 研究限制 32
參考文獻 33
 
表目錄
表1 敘述性統計量表 23
表2 相關係數矩陣 25
表3 家族企業與創新之關聯性 27
表4 政治關聯性與創新投入 29

鄧建平與曹勇，2009，政治關聯能改善民營企業的經營績效嗎？中國工業經濟，2期：98-108。
李秀潭與胡修干，2004，中國私營經濟研究報告，北京：浙江人民出版社。
林嬋娟與張哲嘉，2009，董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性，會計評論，48期：1-33。
林穎芬、洪晨桓與陳羽甄，2011，家族與非家族企業之總經理替換與相對績效的關聯－以台灣上市公司為例，管理評論，30卷3期：25-47。
洪榮華、陳香如與林慧珍，2007，公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及公司績效之影響-研發密集產業之實證，中山管理評論，15卷1期：37-60。
蔡柳卿、楊朝旭與許慧雯，2012，高階管理團隊薪酬對資產減損敏感度之實證研究，中華會計學刊，8卷2期：165-216。
王夢奎，1999，中國經濟轉軌二十年，北京，外文出版社。
歐陽峰，呂和翔，曾靖，2016，政治關聯、政府補助與企業研發投入—基於中國創業板企業上市公司的實證分析，經濟與管理評論，5卷2期：35-44。
Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G.D., and Yeh, K.S. 2008. Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43(4): 385-399.
Ali, A., Chen, T., and Radhakrishnan, S. 2007. Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(9): 238-286.
Anderson, R. and Reeb, D. 2003. Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3): 1301-1328.
Astrachan, J.H. 2003. Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5): 567–572.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Chan, L., Lakonishok, J., and Sougiannis, T. 2001, The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56(6): 2431-2456.
Chrisman, J.J., and Patel, P.C. 2012. Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 976-997.
Family Firm Institute, Inc. 2012. Global Data Points. http://www.ffi.org/?page=GlobalDataPoints&hhSearchTerms=%22European+and+Family+and+Businesses%2c+and+2012%22. Accessed Dec. 12, 2016.
Gilson, R.J. and Gordon, J.N. 2003, Controlling controlling shareholders. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 152(2): 785-843.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Haynes, K.T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K.J.L., and Moyano-Fuentes, J. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 106-137.
Hambrick, D.C. 1998. Corporate coherence and the top management team. Navigating change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Handler, W.C. 1989. Methodological issues and considerations in studying family business. Family Business Review, 2(3): 257-276.
Harrison, D.A., and Klein, K.J. 2007. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1199-1228.
Holmstrom, B. 1989. Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(3): 305-327.
H. Lin, S.X. Zeng, H.Y. Ma, G.Y. Qi, Vivian W.Y. Tam. 2014. Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64: 63-72.
Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471-517.
Liang, Q., Li, X., and Yang, X. 2013. How does family involvement affect innovation in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 677-695.
Massis, A.D., Ding, S., Kotlar, J. and Wu, Z. 2016. Family involvement and R&D expenses in the context of weak property rights protection: an examination of non-state-owned listed companies in China. The European Journal of Finance, 1-26.
Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., and MacMillan, I.C. 2010. Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 205-222.
Murray, A.I. 1989. Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 125-141.
Neubauer, F. and Lank, A. 1998. The Family Business: Its Governance for Sustainability. London: Routledge.
Norburn, D., and Birley, S. 1988. The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(3): 225-237.
Papadakis, V.M., and Barwise, P. 2002. CEO versus top management team: which matters
more in strategic decision making? British Journal of Management, 13(1): 83-95.
Perel, M. 2002. Corporate courage breaking the barrier to innovation. Research-technology Management, 45(3): 9-17.
Stuart, T.E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8): 791-811.
Strategy&. 2016. Global Innovation 1000. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000. Accessed Apr. 3, 2017.
Tsai, K.H., and Wang, J.C. 2004. The R&D performance in Taiwan''s electronics industry: a longitudinal examination. R&D Management, 34(2): 179-189.
Wiersema, M.F., and Bantel, K.A. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(1): 91-121.