跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.221) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/02 17:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:楊惠婷
研究生(外文):Hung-Ting Yung
論文名稱:社區總體營造中國民小學所扮演的角色~以南投縣三個社區為例
論文名稱(外文):The role of an elementary school in the integrated community construction~ Three cases of Nantou’s county communityThe role of an elementary school in the integrated community construction~ Three cases of Nantou’s county communityThe role of an elemen
指導教授:林吉郎林吉郎引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:公共行政與政策學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:公共行政學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:164
中文關鍵詞:南投縣、社區總體營造、學校社區化、社區學校化
外文關鍵詞:The integrated community constructione、Nantou County、Rendring the school into community、Rendering community into school
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:428
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
國民小學是和社區最接近的學習場所,而社區又是學校學生的主要生活的範圍。學校擁有社區中相當的資源,而社區又擁有學校的學習資源,若能落實「學校社區化」、「社區學校化」,學校與社區將互蒙其利。本研究以南投縣的三個社區為例,
將探討學校的相關活動及人員支持上對於社區總體營造推動上所造成的影響。最後則希望透過本研究之結果能提出建議,供社區在推行社區總體營造和國民小學互動時的參考。
本研究有以下幾個研究目的:一、了解個案中的國民小學參與社區總體營造的情形;二、瞭解個案中國民小學之行政人員、老師及家長對社區總體營造的態度;三、分析社區總體營造和學校在活動的配合上所面臨的問題;四、瞭解學校相關資源的介入來加速社區總體營造的推動;五、歸納各項研究結果,提出相關的結論與建議;為了解以上幾個問題,研究者利用深度訪談法,對社區中實際執行及策劃各項計畫的社區總幹事或理事長以及學校中和社區互動較為密切的學校校長、主任進行訪談,希望透過實際的訪談結果了解到社區總體營造在推動的過程中實際和國民小學互動的情形是如何?
由學校代表及社區代表的訪談中得到以下的結論:
一、學校參與社區總體營造的情形來說,社區與學校都具有應該相互合作的理念,活動上的配合居多,互動的對象為社區理事長、總幹事和學校中的校長及主任居多。
二、學校人員在參與社區總體營造活動之態度來說,對於假日必須參加社區活動確實會有困難,但學校都能由協調的方式來解決問題,並給予補假。學生非常樂於參加社區的活動。
三、社區總體營造和學校相互配合的情形來說,互動情形都為正向,除了有因活動安排時間不恰當須協調外,學校都願意配合社區總體營造的活動,而社區方面也非常希望學校老師能加入社區總體營造的團隊。
四、其他資源介入社區總體營造與學校來說,學校和社區都會經由雙方的人際關係來幫忙解決雙方的困難。
五、學校資源的介入加速社區總體營造的推動方面,社區推動總體營造的過程中對於目前學校的配合上還算滿意,但若學校老師能夠對於社區的認識及人文的更加了解,便可讓社區活動及教學能更有意義。


關鍵字:南投縣、社區總體營造、學校社區化、社區學校化
” can be implemented, then both the school and community can be beneficial to this arrangement. This research adopted three communities in Nantou County as study cases, and to explore the impacts onto promoting the integrated community construction through relevant school activities and personnel support. Lastly, we hope that through the findings of this research, proposals will be made as references for communities that are promoting Community Empowerment and Development, and the interactions between the communities and elementary schools.

This research has the following research purposes: 1. Understand the participation of the integrated community construction by elementary schools under study; 2. Understand the attitudes of administration personnel, teachers and parents of elementary school under study towards the Community Empowerment and Development; 3. Analyze the coordination problems encountered between promoting the integrated community construction, and the school activities; 4. Understand the deployment of relevant resource in school so as to accelerate the promotion of the integrated community construction; 5. Summarize each and every research findings so as to propose relevant summarization and suggestion. In order to resolve the above mentioned problems, researchers applied in-depth interviewing skills and the interactions between community secretary-general or president of council who were actually responsible of executing and planning each project, in addition to school headmaster, directors who were closely interacting with the communities. And we hope that through actual interviewing findings, it is possible to understand the realities of interactions between the processes in promoting the integrated community construction and the elementary school.

The following summations were from the interviews conducted on school and communities representatives:

1. As for the overall situations for schools participating in the integrated community construction, both the community and school possess needed concepts and values in cooperation with the end results that were predominantly accommodating each others. And the interactive subjects were primarily community president of council, secretary-general and headmasters and directors in schools.

2. The attitudes for school personnel participating in activities of the integrated community construction did display some difficulties in the specific dates of participation like holidays or weekends. Nevertheless, the school could resolve these problems through coordination efforts and granting day-offs to those did participate during holidays and weekends. However the students involved were extremely positive about participating in community activities.

3. As for the situation of coordination between the integrated community construction with schools, all interactions showed positive indications except a few activities that were not scheduled appropriately and needing further coordination efforts. Schools were willing to accommodate the the integrated community construction activities, and on the other hand, the communities were extremely welcoming the participation from school teachers as members for community empowerment and development.

4. As for subjects like other resources injecting into the integrated community construction versus the schools, human relationship helps from both the school and community were solicited to resolve difficulties faced by both parties.

5. The intervening of school resource would accelerate the promotion efforts for community empowerment and development. In the process of promoting the integrated community construction, current school’s accommodation was rated satisfactory. Still, if school teachers can be more understanding about the community recognition in addition to human culture, it would be more significant and beneficial to the community activities and teaching e
Elementary school and community itself are the closest learning ground available. And the community is also the major living environment for students in school. School possesses considerable community resource in addition to community also owning learning resources for the school in return. Therefore if somehow “Rendering the school into community” and “Rendering community into school” can be implemented, then both the school and community can be beneficial to this arrangement. This research adopted three communities in Nantou County as study cases, and to explore the impacts onto promoting the integrated community construction through relevant school activities and personnel support. Lastly, we hope that through the findings of this research, proposals will be made as references for communities that are promoting Community Empowerment and Development, and the interactions between the communities and elementary schools.

This research has the following research purposes: 1. Understand the participation of the integrated community construction by elementary schools under study; 2. Understand the attitudes of administration personnel, teachers and parents of elementary school under study towards the Community Empowerment and Development; 3. Analyze the coordination problems encountered between promoting the integrated community construction, and the school activities; 4. Understand the deployment of relevant resource in school so as to accelerate the promotion of the integrated community construction; 5. Summarize each and every research findings so as to propose relevant summarization and suggestion. In order to resolve the above mentioned problems, researchers applied in-depth interviewing skills and the interactions between community secretary-general or president of council who were actually responsible of executing and planning each project, in addition to school headmaster, directors who were closely interacting with the communities. And we hope that through actual interviewing findings, it is possible to understand the realities of interactions between the processes in promoting the integrated community construction and the elementary school.

The following summations were from the interviews conducted on school and communities representatives:

1. As for the overall situations for schools participating in the integrated community construction, both the community and school possess needed concepts and values in cooperation with the end results that were predominantly accommodating each others. And the interactive subjects were primarily community president of council, secretary-general and headmasters and directors in schools.

2. The attitudes for school personnel participating in activities of the integrated community construction did display some difficulties in the specific dates of participation like holidays or weekends. Nevertheless, the school could resolve these problems through coordination efforts and granting day-offs to those did participate during holidays and weekends. However the students involved were extremely positive about participating in community activities.

3. As for the situation of coordination between the integrated community construction with schools, all interactions showed positive indications except a few activities that were not scheduled appropriately and needing further coordination efforts. Schools were willing to accommodate the the integrated community construction activities, and on the other hand, the communities were extremely welcoming the participation from school teachers as members for community empowerment and development.

4. As for subjects like other resources injecting into the integrated community construction versus the schools, human relationship helps from both the school and community were solicited to resolve difficulties faced by both parties.

5. The intervening of school resource would accelerate the promotion efforts for community empowerment and development. In the process of promoting the integrated community construction, current school’s accommodation was rated satisfactory. Still, if school teachers can be more understanding about the community recognition in addition to human culture, it would be more significant and beneficial to the community activities and teaching efforts.




Keywords: Nantou County, The integrated community construction, Rendering the school into community, Rendering community into school
一、中文部分
于國華(2002),「社區總體營造」理念的探討:全球化趨勢下的一種地方文化運動。國立臺北藝術大學碩士論文。
方瓊瑤(2005),社區總體營造政策的政治經濟分析。國立台灣大學政治學系政府與公共事務碩士在職專班碩士論文。
朱桂芬,台北市都會弱勢地區國民中學校長課程領導區域合作計畫:完全中學語社區學校之互動語資源共享,現代教育論壇第十五期,511-517。
江明修(1997),社區意識與公民參與。教育研究,51,41-49。
周愫嫻(2002),社區校政。台北:教師天地,第108期。
宋鎮照(1997),社會學。台北:五南。
沈華海、林俊彥(2000),學校社區化的經營理念及策略。 高中教育雙月刊,12期,47-51。
吳宗立(1999),學校與社區關係的經營,中等教育,50 卷6 期,11-13。
吳雅玲(1998),學校與社區結合之困境及突破之道,教育資料文摘,87 期,119-127。
吳麗琴(2001),國民小學實施學校社區化可行性認同度之研究— 以台北市為例,台灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。
吳俊憲(2006),社區總體營造融入學校課程發展之研究—以一所國民小學為例。台中教育大學學報,39-62。
李美枝(1986),社會心理學— 理論研究與應用,台北:大洋出版社。
李麗日(1999),論學校與社區的結合— 以學校社區化、社區學校化之角度觀之,社會科學教育研究,4 期,183-203。
李永展(1995),社區環境權與社區發展,社區發展季刊,69 期,53-61。
李永展、馬立文(1996),台北縣市居民社區意識及環境認知之探討,台灣土地金融季刊,33(1):75-89。
李建興(1995),「學校應成為社區文化堡壘」,學校社區化。中華民國社區教育學會主編,台北:師大學苑。
余安邦、林民程等(2002),社區有教室—學校課程與社區總體營造的遭逢與對話。台北:遠流出版公司。
呂祝義(1993),國民中學學校環境、社區環境與效能關係之研究,國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
林吉郎(民96),邁向永續社區發展的地方治理模式以竹山鎮大安社區為例,研習論壇月刊,第七十四期,32-44。
林明地(2002),學校與社區關係。台北:五南。
林振豐(2002),社區總體營造再奢區主一形成過程中的瓶頸。東海大學公共事務碩士學程碩士論文(未出版)。
林瑞欽(1994),社區意識的概念-測量與提振策略,社區發展研究學刊,31 期,1-21。
林瑞欽(1995),「社區意識」凝聚之道,社會福利,118 期,8-17。
林振春(1994),如何凝聚社區意識,整建社區社會,理論與政策,69 期,117-129。
林振春(1997),學校社區化,國民教育,37 卷6 期,7-15。
林振春(1998),社區營造的教育策略。台北:師大書苑。
林振春(1999),從社區與學校互動談如何落實學校社區化,中等教育,50 卷6 期,7-12。
林振春(1999),台灣社區教育發展之研究,台北:師大書苑。
林振春(2000),學校與社區結合的模式與可行的作法,教師天地,108 期,8-14。
林振春(2002),學習型社區的願景與系統動力營造策略。載於中華民國社區教育學會,社區教育的突破與創新。臺北:師苑。
林錫恩(2006),國小校長轉型領導、交易領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。花蓮教育學報,22期,1-28。
洪秀容(1989),屏東縣三地鄉居民社區教育需求及相關因素之研究。國立
台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市
清水義弘(1983),子どものしつけと学校生活 - 東京大学出版会。東京:東京大學。
尾島邦江(1997),日本生涯學習與社區營造。台北市:教育部。
邱天助(1994),推展社區學校教育落實終生教育理念。八十三年度社區教育研討會
論文集,38-49。
許水德(1994),學校社區化— 教育改革的方向,社教雙月刊,64 期,8-10。
秦孟蘭(1999),社區參與與學校經營之趨勢,北縣教育,21 期,22-27。
徐 薇(1999),台北縣國民小學教師運用社區教學資源之調查研究,國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
徐 震(1979),社區一詞的用法及其演進,社區發展季刊,6 期,8-12。
徐 震(1980),社區與社區發展,台北:正中書局。
張永進(2000),許社區總體營造一個未來。社教雙月刊,98,頁35~38。
張立科(2002),國民小學教職員工社區意識與學校社區化態度關係之研究-以屏東
市國民小學為例。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論
文。
張幸愉(1994),國民小學運用社區資源之研究,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士
論文。
張春興、林清山(1981),教育心理學。台北市:東華書局。
張碩玲(2001),台北市國民小學與社區資源共享之研究,國立政治大學教育研究所
碩士論文。
張德永(1995),學校社區化、社區學校化— 創造學校社區雙贏的新時代。學校社區化,中華民國社區教育學會主編,台北:師大學苑。
陳向明(2000),質的研究方法與社會科學研究。北京:教育科學出版社。
陳其南(1995/02/19),「經營大台灣從小社區做起」,中國時報,第11 版。
陳其南(1996),學校、社區與地方的教育學習體系,教改通訊,17/18,19-21。
陳其南(1997),社區總體營造與生程學習。臺北:文化環境基金會。
陳其南 (2003),社區總體營造概述。
陳國軒(2004),國立高級中等學校與社區互動關係之研究,國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳熔釧(1996),國民小學與社區溝通之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究
所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳慧玲(1994),學校公共關係。台北:師大書苑。
陳建州(2001),重探學校教育功能--家庭背景因素影響力變化之研究。南華大學教育社會學研究所碩士論文。
陳浙雲、余安邦(2002),社區有教室:九年一貫課程與社區學校化的實踐。教育研究資訊,10卷,3期,29-48頁。
郭明堂(1990),高雄市國民小學學校公共關係之調查研究。教育資料文摘,147 ,122-154。
梁尚勇(1995),「學校社區化」綜合研討會紀實,中華民國社區教育學會主編,台北:師大學苑。
黃世孟(1996),國民學校與社區共享模式之研究,85 年度建築與都市規劃研究計畫聯合研討會報告。
黃世孟、馮正民(1996)。國民學校與鄰近社區資源共享模式之研究。內政部建築研究所專題計畫成果報告書,未出版。
黃基森(1995),談社區與環境保護,社區發展季刊,69 期,62-66。
黃昆輝(1991),教育行政學。台北:東華書局。
黃煌雄、林時機、郭石吉(2001)。社區總體營造總體檢調查報告書。臺北:遠流。
黃鴻文(1995),社區與學校的結合模式。社教雙月刊,64,25-28。
湯梅英(1997),學校社區化— 舊觀念?新口號?教育資料與研究,19 期,2-8。
湯志民和王馨敏(2000),學校建築與社區空間資源共享之探討。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,二十一世紀的學校建築與設施第163-184頁。
湯賓等譯(1991),有效公共關係。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
曾燕春(1998),學校社區化的內在驅力與相應措施,國立編譯館通訊,40期,14-20。
楊千儀(2003),國民中小學在社區總體營造中所扮演角色之研究,國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文。
楊如晶(1993),臺北縣市國民中學公共關係之研究 。 國立臺灣師範大學教育研究
所碩士論文 。
詹雪梅(2004),永樂社區發展協會推動社區總體營造之參與學習研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
劉仲成(2000),學校社區化新探討。南投文教9月,76-87。
蔣玉嬋(2001),學習型組織理論運用於社區總體營造之研究。政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭熙彥(1985),學校教育與社區發展,高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
賴昭樺(2004),社區做為大教室 -民生社區國小戶外教學空間模式之研究。中原大學室內設計學系碩士學位論文。
蔡瑞榮(1995),學校社區化、社區學校化的理念與作法。學校社區化,中華民國社區教育學會主編,台北:師大學苑。
蔡祈賢(1996),社區意識與社區發展,社會福利,124 期,21-26。
蔡祈賢(1997),學校社區化、社區學校化-學校與社區關係的新探討,教師天地,86 期,頁6-10。
蔡秀美(1999),學習型社區理念的探討,社會教育學刊,28期,1-19。
謝文全(1993),教育行政-理論與實務,台北:文景出版社。
韓榮姿(1998),社區發展政策中民眾參與情形之研究-以臺北市發展協會為例。中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
閻自安(1999),學校社區化基本理念、策略與實施。國教學報,11期,307-331。
蘇進棻(2007),研習資訊雙月刊,第24卷 第二期,27-35。
蕭玉煌(1996),社區學校化與社區發展,社區學校化,台北心理出版社。
嚴仁鴻 張雅櫻 劉淑如(2005)學習型組織理論於社區總體營造之應用研究, 吳鳳學報第十三期,頁121-142。
龔鵬程(1999),中國傳統的「社」、「會」觀,「1999年社區美學」研討會,台北:文建會。
中華民國社區教育學會(1995)。學校社區化。台北:師大書苑。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996),第一次研討會會議記錄。
行政院文化建設委員會(1999)。台灣社區總體營造的軌跡。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
教育部公報(2000),21 世紀教育願景系列座談,33 期,54。
大南投旅遊網:http://nantou.travel-web.com.tw/
內政部,2001/12/15,內政統計資訊服務網,統計年報,「社2005台閩地區社區發展工作成果」 (http//www.moi.gov.tw/w3/stat)。
台灣社區通,http://www.hometown.org.tw
教育基本法(1999),民93年9月11日,取自:http://www.edu.tw/rules/index.html
南投市文山國小,http://ms1.wsps.ntct.edu.tw/
竹山鎮富州國小,http://ms1.cchps.ntct.edu.tw/
中寮鄉永平國小,http://ms1.clinps.ntct.edu.tw/
竹山鎮公所網站,http://www.chushang.gov.tw/
南投市公所網站,http://www.ntc.gov.tw/
中寮鄉公所網站,http://village.nantou.gov.tw/chungliao/
二、英文部分
Brown, D. J. (1990). Decentralization and school-based management. New York: The Falmer Press.
Blau, P. M., and R. W. Scott. 1962. A General Work in Organization Theory which
includes a brief discussion of voluntary associations as one of a number oforganization types. In Formal Organizations: A comparative approach.
Coleman, M. T. 1988. The Division of Household Labor: Suggestion for Future Empirical Consideration and Theoretical Development. In Journal of Family Issue 9(1): 132-148.
Calfee, C. Wittwer, F. & Meredith, M. (1998). Building a Full-service school: A step-by-step guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
DeStefano, J. R., Van Hook, M. A., & Draht, S. (2000). The future Connection. American School & University. 72(5), P.P24~25.
Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice(p.429),by Hoy,W.K., and Miskel, C.G., 2001, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Gallagher, D. R., Bagin, D., and Kindred, L.W. (1997). The school and community
relations(6th .). Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Goldring, E. B. (1995). Striking a balance: Bounnndary spanning and environmental management in schools. In: S. B. Bacharach and B. Mundell(eds.), Images of schools: Structures and roles in oranizational behavior (pp.283-314). Thousand Oaks,CA: Cowin Press. Gonder, P. O. (1997). Linking schools and the community. Virginica: National School Public Relations Association
Fehrmann. Keith & Reimers,1987)
Herman, J. L., & Yeh, J. P. (1983). Some effects of parent involvement in school. The Urban Review, 15(1), 11-17
Kowalski, T.J. (1996). Public relations in educational organizations: Practice inan age of information and reform. New Jersey: Merrill.
Merz, C., and Furman, G. (1997). Community and schools: Promise & paradox. New York, N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
Mckinney, J. R. (1996). Legal and ethical aspects of public relations. In: T. J. Kowalski (ed), Public relations in educational organizations (pp. 92-116).
Parsons, C. (1999). Education, exclusion and citizenship. New York: Routledge.
Poplin, O. E.(1977). Communities: A Survey of Theories and Methods of Research, Marry State University.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco :
Jossey-Bass.
Sanoff, H.(2002). School designed with community participation. Retrieved May 7,From http://www.edfacilities.org/pubs/sanoffschools.pdf
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass Publishers
U. S. Department of Education (2003). Schools as centers of community: A citizens guide for planning and design. Retrieved May 7, 2003, from http://www.edfpi.org/pdf/schools.pdf
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 江明修(1997),社區意識與公民參與。教育研究,51,41-49。
2. 周愫嫻(2002),社區校政。台北:教師天地,第108期。
3. 沈華海、林俊彥(2000),學校社區化的經營理念及策略。 高中教育雙月刊,12期,47-51。
4. 吳雅玲(1998),學校與社區結合之困境及突破之道,教育資料文摘,87 期,119-127。
5. 李麗日(1999),論學校與社區的結合— 以學校社區化、社區學校化之角度觀之,社會科學教育研究,4 期,183-203。
6. 李永展(1995),社區環境權與社區發展,社區發展季刊,69 期,53-61。
7. 李永展、馬立文(1996),台北縣市居民社區意識及環境認知之探討,台灣土地金融季刊,33(1):75-89。
8. 李建興(1995),「學校應成為社區文化堡壘」,學校社區化。中華民國社區教育學會主編,台北:師大學苑。
9. 余安邦、林民程等(2002),社區有教室—學校課程與社區總體營造的遭逢與對話。台北:遠流出版公司。
10. 林吉郎(民96),邁向永續社區發展的地方治理模式以竹山鎮大安社區為例,研習論壇月刊,第七十四期,32-44。
11. 林瑞欽(1994),社區意識的概念-測量與提振策略,社區發展研究學刊,31 期,1-21。
12. 林瑞欽(1995),「社區意識」凝聚之道,社會福利,118 期,8-17。
13. 林振春(1994),如何凝聚社區意識,整建社區社會,理論與政策,69 期,117-129。
14. 林振春(1997),學校社區化,國民教育,37 卷6 期,7-15。
15. 林振春(1999),從社區與學校互動談如何落實學校社區化,中等教育,50 卷6 期,7-12。