臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　本研究主要探討生醫類開放近用期刊中高產量學者的學術著作分布，本研究收集該領域30位高產量學者的論文進行計量分析，共自WOS所收錄的期刊中蒐集了2,927篇論文。主要研究問題包含開放近用期刊中的高產量學者發表論文於開放近用期刊中的比率及分布情形，其在開放近用期刊中的論文與非開放近用期刊中的論文被引用的情形，以及這些高產量學者的學術表現等，以做為未來向學者推廣開放近用期刊之參考。
　　研究結果顯示，30位高產量學者發表論文之期刊種數與論文篇數分布呈現冪次分布，2,927篇論文中開放近用期刊論文篇數比例為36%，並有逐年增加的趨勢；而30位學者發表論文的期刊IF值與論文篇數之相關性為低度的正向關係；在論文被引用次數方面，其論文被引用的次數與期刊平均IF值有高度的正向關係；值得注意的是，本研究針對這群高產量學者所做的調查發現，開放近用期刊對其而言並不具有引用優勢，此點與前人研究結論不同；在學者的學術表現方面，本研究定義之學術貢獻度分布範圍為4.42至20.41，高低主要與發表論文時之作者排名呈現中度相關，而h-index之範圍則是5至82，高低主要與學者發表論文之篇數多寡相關。
　　綜合以上的研究結果，在學者對開放近用期刊的發表情形上，本研究立意取樣開放近用期刊的高產量學者，較過去廣泛對學者進行抽樣調查更能夠客觀的比較開放近用期刊與非開放近用期刊的投稿選擇以及對學者學術成就的影響。而採用資訊計量方法所產生的客觀數據來進行比較，亦更能夠作為推廣開放近用期刊的依據。

　The study investigated publishing behaviors of high productivity authors who have ever published papers in biomedical open access journals (OAJ). In this study, 2,927 academic papers published by 30 high productivity authors were collected from Web of Science (WOS) database.
　The ratio and distribution of the papers in OAJ from the 30 high productivity authors were calculated. The citations of papers published in OAJ are compared with papers published in non-OAJ as well. Finally, the academic performance of these high productivity authors was studied for speculating the reasons why the percentage of the articles they published in OAJ is almost 36 %.
　The results of this study showed that: 1) the categories of the academic journals and in which the number of the 30 productivity authors’ papers are displaying power law distribution;2) the percentage of the 2,927 papers in OAJ is 36% and is increasing year by year;3) the correlation between journal impact factor and the number of the papers is modestly positive correlated; 4) with regard to the number of paper citation, the correlation between the mean journal impact factor and the citation of the papers is highly positive correlated; it’s notable that, in this study, to be compared with non-OAJ, OAJ has no citation advantage to these high productivity authors, and this result differs from the predecessors’ researches; 5) the academic contribution defined in this study, ranges between4.42 and 20.41, which is mainly influenced by the authorship order in academic articles; and 6) the range of h-index is between 5 and 82, which is influenced by the numbers of the author’s published papers.
　Based on the above findings, to make a comparison of the publishing behaviors of the high productivity authors between the selection of submitting papers in OAJ and non-OAJ, and study the impact on the academic performance, it’s more objective to use purposive sampling of high productivity authors in this study than using conventional extensive sampling. Moreover, to make such comparison by adopting the objective data, which are collected by infometrics method, is more able to be as a basis to promote OAJ as well.

目次
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 6
第三節 名詞解釋 8
第四節 研究限制 10
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 開放近用期刊的發展背景 11
第二節 開放近用期刊的起源與發展 13
第三節 作者對開放近用期刊的態度及看法 19
第四節 開放近用期刊的引用優勢 27
第三章 研究設計與實施 30
第一節 研究對象與資料來源 30
第二節 資料蒐集與處理 32
第三節 資料分析方法 37
第四節 研究架構 46
第四章 研究結果與分析 47
第一節 學者發表論文之期刊分布情形 47
第二節 期刊影響係數與論文篇數之分析 53
第三節 學者發表論文的生產力及特性 57
第四節 開放近用期刊與非開放近用期刊論文被引用次數 66
第五節 高產量學者學術表現之分析 76
第五章 結論 81
第一節 結果與討論 81
第二節 研究貢獻 86
第三節 未來研究建議 88
參考文獻 89
附錄 95

參考文獻
毛慶禎（2007）。開放近用運動的真諦。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，3（2），1-14。
吳紹群、陳雪華（2008）。學術出版價值鏈變遷之圖書館角色之概念性初探。國家圖書館館刊，92（2），23-59。
林巧敏、范蔚敏（2010）。臺灣地區檔案學文獻計量分析。圖書與資訊學刊，2（1），16-38。
邱炯友、蔣欣樺（2005）。學術出版傳播之Opean Access模式。中華民國圖書館學會會報，74，165-183。
徐華玉、林奇秀（2011）。生物醫學領域研究人員投稿開放近用期刊經驗之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，49（2），241-264。
國家圖書館輔導組（2006）。中華民國九十七年圖書館年鑑。臺北市：圖家圖書館。
國家圖書館輔導組（2011）。中華民國一百年圖書館年鑑。臺北市：圖家圖書館。
黃明居、黃瑞娟、賴姿伶（2012）。大學圖書館期刊館藏之開放性資源比例與引用優勢之研究。大學圖書館，16（1），36-52。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。
蔡明月、陳憶玲（2006）。生醫科學期刊引用數據之分析比較研究。國家圖書館館刊，95（1），1-33。
劉聰德、張朝欽、梁晋嘉、謝青宏、任孝祥、林聖勇、林康藝、蔡艾玲（2012）。開放近用的機會與展望。臺北市：國研院科技政策中心。
Association of Research Libraries. (2004). Framing the issue: open access. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/framing_issue_may04.pdf
Berlin Declaration. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Retrieved from http://oa.mpg.de/files/2010/04/berlin_declaration.pdf
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.(2003, June 20). Definition of open access publication. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Bhat, M. H. (2009). Open access repositories in computer science and information technology: an Ｅvaluation. IFLA Journal, 35(3), 243-2457.
BioMed Central. (2012). Do BioMed Central journals have impact factors and are they citation tracked? Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/faq/impactfactor
Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., &; Guðnason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. Plos One, 5(6), e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Bosch, S., Henderson, K., &;Klusendorf, H. (2011). Under pressure, times are changing: Periodicals price survey 2011. Library Journal, 136(8), 30.
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2009). Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm
Davis, P. M. (2008). Author-Choice Open-Access Publishing in the Biological and Medical Literature: A Citation Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3-8. doi: 10.1002/asi.20965
Directory Open Access Directory. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.doaj.org/
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. Plos Biology, 4(5), 692-698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157
Fortney, L. M. (2009). Price history for core clinical journals in medicine and nursing 2005-2009. Retrieved from http://www2.ebsco.com/en-us/Documents/prodServices/Biomedical_Price_History_Report_2005-2009.pdf
Frandsen, T. F. (2009). The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields. Information Processing &; Management, 45(1), 131-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.001
Goodman, D. (2004). The criteria for open access. Serials Review, 30, 258-270.
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. and Gingras, Y. (2005) Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Kyrillidou, M., &; Young, M. (2008). ARL statistics 2005-2006. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstats06.pdf
Laakso, M., &; Björk, B.-C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323-1329. doi: 10.1002/asi.22856
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., &; Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. Plos One, 6(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
McVeigh, M. (2004). Open access journals: in the ISI citation databases: Analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. Retrieved from http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf
National Institutes of Health. (2008). NIH Public Access Policy Details. Retrieved from http://publicaccess.nih.gov/policy.htm
Nariani, R., &; Fernandez, L. (2012). Open access publishing: What authors want. College &; Research Libraries, 73(2), 182-195.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., &; Rowlands, I. (2004). Open access journal publishing: The views of some of the world’s senior authors. Journal of Documentation, 61(4), 497-519.
Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., &; Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963-1972. doi: 10.1002/asi.20898
Open Access Directory. (2012). Retrieved from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Research_questions
Panitch, J. &; Michalak, S. (2005). The serials crisis. Retrived from http://www.unc.edu/scholcomdig/whitepapers/panitch-michalak.html
Park, J.-H. &; Qin, J. (2007). Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Scholarly Publising , 38(2), 55-84.
Park, T.K. (1999). The maze of electronic journals in digital libraries. In Chen, C.C. (Ed.), IT and global digital library development (pp.313-322). West Newton: Micro use Information.
PLOS. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.plos.org
Poynder, R. (2009). Open access in 2009: the good, The bad and the ugly. Retrieved from http://poynder.blogspot.tw/2009/12/open-access-in-2009-good-bad-and-ugly.html
Schroter, S., Tite, L., &; Smith, R. (2005). Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. BMJ, 330(756). doi: 10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82
Schroter, S., &; Tite, L. (2006). Open access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 141-148.
Suber, P. (2004). SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 77. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-04.htm
Swan, A. &; Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17, 219-224.
Testa, J. (2012). Journal selection process. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/pdf/ssr/journal_selection_essay-english.pdf
Warlick, S. E., &; Vaughan, K. T. (2007). Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 4, 1-12. doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-4-1