臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

長久以來，犯罪題材的盛行歷久不衰，人們為什麼會喜歡看充滿犯罪事件的犯罪劇？一直是娛樂媒介研究中未釐清的問題。過去雖然有許多犯罪劇研究，卻大多研究其效果，少數研究試圖解開犯罪劇享樂感謎題，以暴力、正義伸張、情感傾向和道德判斷來解釋，卻都未能引發後續研究探討，使犯罪劇享樂感背後機制依然眾說紛紜。
本研究將犯罪劇定義為包含受害者、犯罪者與調查者的核心角色、故事發展與正義伸張三個要素組成，將過去被視為不同分類的推理、偵探劇等類別，重新納入犯罪劇的架構之下，並操控核心角色中的受害者與犯罪者角色特質，以及正義伸張，檢視它們對犯罪劇享樂感的影響。
實驗為組內2（受害者好／壞）X 2（犯罪者好／壞）X 組間2（懲罰有／無）的混合設計，來測量參與者的情感傾向、混合情緒與道德判斷，是否會導致觀看後的享樂感與欣賞感產生，並以同理心作為共變項。在實驗測量上，不只使用單題享樂感題目，還加入情感與認知兩種維度的享樂感題組，進一步檢視犯罪劇享樂感在情感和認知上是否有差異。另外，除了自我報告問卷，也加入生理測量儀器來記錄皮膚電導反應以及臉部肌電的活動，檢視參與者實驗過程中直接的喚起與正負面情緒的變化。
研究結果發現，受害者好壞Ｘ犯罪者好壞Ｘ有無懲罰只對情感享樂感有顯著效果。無論有無懲罰，好犯罪者的情感享樂感都較高，部分符合混合情緒假設，越是道德模糊的狀況會引起更多的混合情緒，進而導致更多的享樂感。

Why do people like crime drama? It’s still an unexplained question in media entertainment research. Although there were many studies of crime drama in the past, most of them studied its effects. A few studies tried to solve the mystery of the enjoyment of crime drama, explaining it by violence, justice, affective disposition and moral judgment, but none of them led to further studies. There are still different opinions on the mechanism behind the sense of enjoyment in the crime drama.
In this study, we define the crime drama constructed by three elements: 1) central roles， which include the victim, the offender, and the investigator；2) the development of the story；and 3) the justice. By manipulating the victim's and offender's characteristics and justice We examined their impact on the enjoyment of crime drama.
The experiment employed a 2 (Victim Good / Bad) X 2 (Offender Good / Bad) X 2 (punishment / no punishment) mixed factorial design, measure the participants' affective disposition, mixed emotions, and moral judgments, and whether it led to enjoyment and appreciation after viewing. And take the empathy as the covariant. In the experimental measurement, we use two groups of enjoyment questions to measure participants’ affective and cognitive enjoyment. Also, we use physiological measurement instruments were added to record the skin conductance and facial electromyography, and to examine the direct arousal and changes in positive and negative emotions during the experiment.
The results show that only affective enjoyment has a significant effect. Whether there is punishment or not, the affective enjoyment of good offenders is higher, partly in accordance with the assumption of mixed emotions, the more ambiguous the moral situation will lead to more mixed emotions and then lead to more enjoyment.

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與目的 1
第二節 研究重要性 2
第三節 研究架構 3
第貳章 文獻探討 4
第一節 何謂犯罪劇 4
第二節 犯罪劇的享樂感 8
第三節 現有的研究困境 13
第四節 混合情緒或情感傾向 15
第參章 研究方法 18
第一節 實驗設計 18
第二節 實驗參與者 18
第三節 實驗素材 18
第四節 生理儀器設備 23
第五節 中介變項 27
第六節 依變項 28
第七節 共變項 28
第八節 實驗程序 28
第肆章 研究結果 30
第一節 敘述統計 30
第二節 操作檢定 30
第三節 假設檢驗 35
第四節 受害者好壞、犯罪者好壞與有無懲罰的道德判斷有何不同？ 46
第伍章 討論與建議 49
第一節 研究發現與討論 49
第二節 研究限制與建議 53
參考文獻 55
附錄一 量表前測 61
附錄二 Acqknowledge 4.4分析手冊 75
附錄三 中西名詞翻譯對照表 87

談談中國古代的“偵探”？（民104年3月）。百度知道日報。民107年10月15日，取自https://zhidao.baidu.com/daily/view?id=3971
Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). On the Consumption of Negative Feelings. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 283-300. doi:10.1086/519498
Atkin, C., Greenberg, B., Korzenny, F., & McDermott, S. (1979). Selective exposure to televised violence. Journal of Broadcasting, 23(1), 5-13. doi:10.1080/08838157909363912
Bandes, S. A. (2011). And all the pieces matter: thoughts on The Wire and the criminal justice system. OhiO St. J. Crim. L., 8, 435.
Britto, S., Hughes, T., Saltzman, K., & Stroh, C. (2007). Does “Special” mean young, white and female? Deconstructing the meaning of “Special” in Law & Order: Special victims unit. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 14(1), 39-57.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Attitudes and cognitive response: An electrophysiological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2181-2199. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2181
Cawelti, J. G. (1976). Adventure, mystery, and romance: Formula stories as art and popular culture.: University of Chicago Press.
Chaffee, S. H., & McLeod, J. M. (1972). Adolescent television use in the family context. Television and Social Behavior, 3, 149-172.
Dietz, J., & Kleinlogel, E. P. (2014). Wage cuts and managers’ empathy: How a positive emotion can contribute to positive organizational ethics in difficult times. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 461-472. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1836-6
Dimberg, U. L. F., & Petterson, M. (2000). Facial reactions to happy and angry facial expressions: Evidence for right hemisphere dominance. Psychophysiology, 37(5), 693-696.
Doob, A. N., & Macdonald, G. E. (1979). Television viewing and fear of victimization: Is the relationship causal? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 170-179. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.170
Friedman, L. M., & Rosen-Zvi, I. (2001). Illegal fictions: Mystery novels and the popular image of crime. UCLA Law Review., 48, 1411-1430.
Harriss, C. (2008). Policing propp: Toward a textualist definition of the procedural drama. Journal of Film and Video, 60(1), 43-59.
Hess, U. (2009). Facial EMG. In Methods in social neuroscience. (pp. 70-91). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (1994). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. Reaching out: Caring, altruism, and prosocial behavior, 7, 161-194.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C. (2006). Mystery appeal: effects of uncertainty and resolution on the enjoyment of mystery. Media Psychology, 8(3), 193-212. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_1
Krakowiak, K. M., & Oliver, M. B. (2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117-135. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x
Krcmar, M., & Renfro, S. (2005). Developing a scale to assess media enjoyment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York.
Lang, P. J. (1979). A bio-Informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology, 16(6), 495-512. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x
Nabi, R. L., & Krcmar, M. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory, 14(4), 288-310. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00316.x
Oliver, M. B. (1994). Portrayals of crime, race, and aggression in “reality‐based” police shows: A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(2), 179-192. doi:10.1080/08838159409364255
Oliver, M. B. (1996). Influences of authoritarianism and portrayals of race on Caucasian viewers’ responses to reality‐based crime dramas. Communication Reports, 9(2), 141-150. doi:10.1080/08934219609367646
Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53-81. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
Pfau, M., Mullen, L. J., & Garrow, K. (1995). The influence of television viewing on public perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(4), 441-458. doi:10.1080/08838159509364318
Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media: Routledge.
Raney, A. A. (2002). Moral judgment as a predictor of enjoyment of crime drama. Media Psychology, 4(4), 305-322. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0404_01
Raney, A. A. (2005). Punishing media criminals and moral judgment: The impact on enjoyment. Media Psychology, 7(2), 145-163. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0702_2
Raney, A. A., & Bryant, J. (2002). Moral judgment and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 402-415. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02552.x
Raney, A. A., Schmid, H., Niemann, J., & Ellensohn, M. (2009). Testing affective disposition theory: A comparison of the enjoyment of hero and antihero narratives. Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott, Chicago. http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p300171_index.html
Reith, M. (1999). Viewing of crime drama and authoritarian aggression: An investigation of the relationship between crime viewing, fear, and aggression. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(2), 211-221. doi:10.1080/08838159909364485
Robinson, M. J., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2017). Bedtime stories that work: The effect of protagonist liking on narrative persuasion. Health Communication, 32(3), 339-346. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1138381
Scharrer, E. (2001). Tough guys: The portrayal of hypermasculinity and aggression in televised police dramas. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4), 615-634. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4504_5
Schimmack, U. (2001). Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive? Cognition and Emotion, 15(1), 81-97. doi:10.1080/02699930126097
Schwartz, G. E., Brown, S.-L., & Ahern, G. L. (1980). Facial muscle patterning and subjective experience during affective imagery: Sex differences. Psychophysiology, 17(1), 75-82. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb02463.x
Schwartz, G. E., Fair, P. L., Salt, P., Mandel, M. R., & Klerman, G. L. (1976). Facial muscle patterning to affective imagery in depressed and nondepressed subjects. Science, 192(4238), 489-491.
Shafer, D. M., & Raney, A. A. (2012). Exploring how we enjoy antihero narratives. Journal of Communication, 62(6), 1028-1046. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01682.x
Surette, R. (1998). Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Images and Realities. New York: Wadsworth Pub.
Wakshlag, J., Vial, V., & Tamborini, R. (1983). Selecting crime drama and apprehension about crime. Human Communication Research, 10(2), 227-242. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00012.x
Zillmann, D. (1980). Anatomy of suspense. In P. H. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The Entertainment Functions of Television (pp. 133-163). Hillsdale, NJ.
Zillmann, D. (1985). Fear of victimization and the appeal of crime drama. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Selective exposure to sommunication (pp. 141-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D. (1991a). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. (pp. 135-167). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Zillmann, D. (1991b). The logic of suspense and mystery. In Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. (pp. 281-303). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53-63). Luton: University of Luton Press.
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1975). Viewer's moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(6), 572-582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90008-6
Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1972). Directionality of transitory dominance as a communication variable affecting humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(2), 191-198. doi:10.1037/h0033384
Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humour and mirth. In Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and Applications. (pp. 93-115). Piscataway, NJ, US: Transaction Publishers.