跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/10 15:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:賴麗筠
研究生(外文):Li-Yun Lai
論文名稱:噪音環境下自然元素之視聽覺感官體驗對寧靜感與生心理狀態之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Natural Elements on Visual and Auditory Experiences of Tranquility and Psychophysiological States under Noisy Environments
指導教授:李美芬李美芬引用關係
指導教授(外文):Mei-Fen Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立勤益科技大學
系所名稱:景觀設計系
學門:建築及都市規劃學門
學類:景觀設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:249
中文關鍵詞:交通噪音自然元素視覺刺激聽覺刺激寧靜感生心理效益
外文關鍵詞:Traffic noiseNatural elementVisual stimulationAuditory stimulationTranquilityPsychological benefit
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:670
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:38
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
交通噪音是都市環境噪音最主要的來源,都市噪音所引起的生理及心理障害已成為備受關注的議題;故減少道路交通噪音污染是為改善都市環境品質的課題。有鑒於此,本研究乃針對在都市交通噪音環境下導入自然元素的感官體驗對空間使用者之寧靜感及情緒狀態之影響情形進行探討。研究透過量化與質化之研究取向,藉由心理量表與生理回饋儀器收取個體生、心理反應的數據,分別從視覺刺激、聽覺刺激及視聽覺雙重刺激三個層面探討人在都市噪音環境下,體驗自然景觀(視覺刺激)、自然音景(聽覺刺激)或自然元素之視聽雙重刺激體驗時對其寧靜感受與生心理狀態之影響,並利用訪談探索個體體驗時的情緒反應歷程。研究發現,都市噪音環境下,無論加入視覺、聽覺及視聽覺體驗自然元素(綠元素、水元素),皆能顯著提升人的寧靜感受。以感官刺激體驗來看,於視覺及視聽覺體驗中,觀看綠元素比水元素更能提升人的寧靜感受,減緩狀態焦慮感受;情緒方面亦是以視覺及視聽覺感官體驗綠元素比水元素有更好之效益;生理方面,以聽覺及視聽覺感官體驗自然元素,LF%皆顯著提升、HF%顯著下降,代表於環境中加入自然聲能使人呈現亢奮、喚起之感受。而以不同感官體驗綠元素時,採視聽覺感官體驗時能有最多的正向效應,且能顯著減緩人的焦慮感受。三類感官體驗模式皆能顯著提升個體的正向情緒,並減少負向情緒;在生理反應部分,以聽覺及視聽覺感官體驗綠元素時,HRV(自律神經整體活性)達顯著上升,顯示於都市噪音環境下加入鳥聲會使受測者呈現情緒舒緩之狀態。在質性回饋資料中亦發現類似之趨勢。從質性分析中發現多數受訪者提出聆聽鳥聲會產生愉悅感受;以不同感官體驗水元素時,三類型感官體驗皆能顯著提升個體的寧靜感受,降低負向情緒,亦皆能有效減緩個體的收縮壓及舒張壓;質性訪談中亦顯示,個體於加入水元素刺激後有更多平靜的感受,而於進行水元素之聽覺及視聽覺體驗時LF%顯著提升、HF%顯著下降,呈現生理亢奮之狀態。在體驗歷程的探索中發現,進行視覺感官體驗時,個體會因為受到綠景或水景阻擋噪音源之故,將注意力轉移至自然元素而忽略噪音的影響;進行聽覺感官體驗時,個體感覺自然音能夠蓋過噪音達到減噪之效果,並且專注於聆聽自然音。多數人覺得鳥叫聲較有生命力,進而產生愉悅感;聆聽水聲能令人感覺環境中的微氣候改變,讓人有清涼感;進行視聽覺感官體驗時,在加入綠景鳥聲及水景水聲後皆能感覺達到阻隔噪音之效果;在雙重感官體驗時能產生更多寧靜感,其中於加入「綠景鳥聲」元素時,受訪者陳述最多的愉悅情緒感受,於加入「水景水聲」元素時,受訪者則以平靜情緒的陳述居多,其中,「水景水聲」能比「綠景鳥聲」有誘發更豐富之情緒反應(如:好奇、有趣等),但亦有負向情緒的回饋。本研究結果可提供都市環境規劃者於改善都市噪音環境、提升環境品質時之設計操作參考。
Nowadays, traffic noise has become one of the major noise sources in the urban environment which can cause some physical and psychological problems and concerns. In order to improve the quality of the urban environment, this study aims to explore the influence of intervening sensory experience of different natural elements in urban traffic noise environment on space users' tranquility and emotional state. The research is mixing quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative data were collected through questionnaires and physiological feedback, while the qualitative data of the emotional reaction process of individual experience were recorded via interviews. Participants were randomly assigned to the green-plant group and the waterscape group. Each participant experienced three sensory stimulations (one for each week), including visual stimulus(green plant/falling water scene), auditory stimulus (bird/water sound), and audio-visual stimulus (green plant and bird sound/falling water and water sound).The results show that experiencing natural elements (green elements and water elements) through three sensory stimulations in the noise environment can not only improve user's tranquility and positive emotions, but also reduce negative emotions significantly. On visual and audio-visual sensory stimulations, compared to water elements, experiencing green elements can enhance user's tranquility, positive emotions, and reduce anxiety. In the physiological benefits, experiencing the natural element through auditory and audio-visual sensory can increase LF% and decrease HF%, which means that intervening natural sounds to the environment can make people feel excited and arousal. Experiencing the green elements through auditory and audio-visual sensory can improve HRV indicating that adding the bird sounds to the noise environment, user would feel emotionally relieved. Overall, experiencing the green elements through audio-visual sensory is able to promote most positive effects. Experiencing the water element through three types of stimulations, users can all significantly improve tranquility, reduce negative emotions, and decrease blood pressure. In addition, experiencing the water element through auditory and audio-visual sensory, users can increase LF% and decrease HF%. The similar trend is found in the qualitative analysis. Most participants state that listening to the bird sounds would have a pleasant feeling, and adding water elements can make them calmer. The results of the emotional reaction process show that participants turn their attention to green plants or waterscape and ignore the effect of noise when they experience visual sensory stimulation. Under auditory sensory stimulation, participants pay attention to listening to the natural sound and feel it can overwhelm the noise to achieve noise reduction. Participants believe that the audio-visual sensory experience of natural elements can achieve the effect of blocking noise and make people more tranquility. Furthermore, when the "green plant and bird sound" element is added to the noise environment, participants can have more pleasant emotions. When the "Waterscape and water sound" element is added to the noise environment, most participants express their calm emotions. Among them, water sound can make participants feel the microclimate change of environment, which makes them feel refreshed. "Waterscape and water sound" can induce richer emotional responses (such as curious, interesting) than "green plant and bird sound". The results can provide the design reference to improve urban noise environment and increase environmental quality.
摘要 I
ABSTRACT III
誌 謝 V
表目錄 IX
圖目錄 XV
一、緒論 1
1-1研究動機 1
1-2研究目的 2
1-3研究限制 3
1-3-1測試地點非現地景觀體驗 3
1-3-2研究對象以學生代替一般人 3
1-4研究之重要性 3
1-5研究流程 3
二、文獻回顧 5
2-1噪音的影響 5
2-1-1噪音對生理的影響 6
2-1-2噪音對心理的影響 6
2-2感官體驗減噪 7
2-2-1自然元素「視覺」體驗減噪與效益 7
2-2-2自然元素「聽覺」體驗減噪與效益 8
2-2-3自然元素「視聽覺」體驗減噪與效益 10
2-3寧靜感概念與測量 12
2-4情緒及情緒度量 14
2-4-1心理層面評估 15
2-4-2生理層面評估 16
2-5個人背景屬性 20
三、研究方法 22
3-1研究設計 22
3-1-1 研究架構 22
3-1-2 研究假設 23
3-1-2實驗參與者 64
3-1-3研究地點及時間 65
3-1-4實驗控制事項 65
3-1-5刺激物選取 65
3-2研究工具 68
3-2-1量化資料蒐集工具 69
3-2-2質性資料蒐集工具(訪談) 72
3-3實驗操作 73
3-4資料蒐集與分析方法 75
3-4-1量化資料蒐集與分析 75
3-4-2質性資料處理與分析 75
四、結果與討論 76
4-1受測者基本資料分析 76
4-2都市噪音環境下以不同感官體驗自然元素之效益分析 77
4-2-1都市噪音環境下加入「視覺」自然元素之效益分析 77
4-2-2噪音環境下以「聽覺」感官體驗自然元素之效益分析 79
4-2-3都市噪音環境下加入「視聽覺」自然元素之效益分析 81
4-2-4比較都市噪音環境下加入不同感官體驗自然元素對生心理影響之差異 83
4-3都市噪音環境下加入「綠」自然元素之效益分析 85
4-3-1都市噪音環境下加入綠景視覺元素對生心理效益的影響 85
4-3-2都市噪音環境下加入鳥聲聽覺元素對生心理效益的影響 87
4-3-3都市噪音環境下加入綠景鳥聲視聽覺元素對生心理效益的影響 90
4-3-4比較都市噪音環境下加入不同感官體驗綠元素對生心理影響之差異 93
4-4都市噪音環境下加入「水」自然元素之效益分析 96
4-4-1都市噪音環境下加入水景視覺元素對生心理效益的影響 96
4-4-2噪音環境下以水聲聽覺感官體驗對生心理效益的影響 98
4-4-3都市噪音環境下加入水景水聲視聽覺元素對生心理效益的影響 101
4-4-4比較都市噪音環境下加入不同感官體驗水元素對生心理影響之差異 103
4-5都市噪音環境下加入不同自然元素在不同感官體驗生心理效益之差異 106
4-5-1比較都市噪音環境下加入綠景及水景視覺感官體驗生心理差異 106
4-5-2都市噪音環境下加入鳥聲及水聲聽覺感官體驗生心理差異 107
4-5-3都市噪音環境下加入綠景鳥聲及水景水聲視聽覺感官體驗生心理差異 108
4-6不同個人屬性個體體驗不同自然元素刺激之生心理效應的差異 110
4-6-1不同性別個體體驗自然元素之生心理效應的差異 110
4-6-2不同居住地個體體驗自然元素之生心理效應的差異 116
4-6-3不同幼年期成長地個體體驗自然元素之生心理效應的差異 121
4-7都市噪音環境下加入自然元素(綠元素、水元素)之知覺反應歷程質性分析 127
4-7-1都市噪音環境下知覺反應共通歷程 127
4-7-2都市噪音環境下加入綠元素之知覺反應共通歷程 129
4-7-3都市噪音環境下加入水元素之知覺反應共通歷程 166
4-8噪音環境下以不同感官體驗不同自然元素之知覺反應歷程比較 203
4-8-1噪音環境下不同感官體驗「綠」自然元素之知覺反應歷程比較 203
4-8-2噪音環境下不同感官體驗「水」自然元素之知覺反應歷程比較 205
4-8-3在都噪音環境下體驗不同自然元素(綠元素、水元素)之知覺反應歷程比較 207
五、結論與建議 209
5-1結論結果討論 209
5-1-1在都市噪音環境下以不同感官體驗自然元素對於生心理效益之影響 209
5-1-2比較不同感官體驗「綠元素」與「水元素」對於生心理效益之差異 210
5-1-3個人屬性與不同自然元素刺激對個體生心理反應之影響 213
5-2-1都市噪音環境下加入不同自然元素之生心理效應 214
5-2-2都市噪音環境下加入不同感官之綠元素體驗的生心理效應 214
5-2-3都市噪音環境下加入不同感官之水元素體驗的生心理效應 214
5-2-4受測者個人屬性與噪音環境下體驗自然元素之交互影響情形 215
5-2-5 都市噪音環境下加入不同感官體驗之自然元素的知覺反應歷程 215
5-2-6量化分析結果與質性體驗歷程的比較 216
5-2研究檢討與後續建議 216
5-2-1研究檢討與建議 216
5-2-2都市景觀設計建議 217
參考文獻 219
附錄一 附錄-1
附錄二 附錄-2
中文部分
1.王文奇,2007,類神經網路在鄰近機場噪音預測之研究,立德管理學院,碩士論文。
2.王俊秀,1999,“音景的都市表情:雙城記的環境社會學想像”,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,10期,頁89-98。
3.王俊秀,2003,“聲音也風景:新竹市的音景初探”,造園季刊,46,頁11-20。
4.光復書局編輯部編,1985,大英科技百科全書,光復書局,台北。
5.行政院勞委會勞工安全衛生研究所,1999,勞工聽力危害預防手冊,新北。
6.行政院環境保護署,2011,100 年環保施政意向調查第1次調查結果統計分析,統計室報告。
7.李明璁,2009,聯合文學六月號,聽∕不見的城市──重繪台北聲音地景,聯合文學,台北。
8.李美芬,1996,植栽空間序列對情緒體驗及偏好影響之研究,國立中興大學,碩士論文。
9.李素卿 譯,2002,感性與理性:了解我們的情緒,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
10.李鈞傑、莊博硯、周澄興、潘志豪,2010,情緒感測指標量測,元培科技大學,碩士班專題。
11.李麗雪,1998,台灣傳統庭園的情緒體驗及景觀偏好之研究-以板橋林家花園為例,國立臺灣大學中國文學系,博士論文。
12.邱慧珊,2013,基於生理訊號變化即時偵測音樂誘發情緒研究,國立交通大學,碩士論文。
13.施鴻志,1982,都市噪音測定及分析方法之研究-台南市噪音測定及分析實例,行政院國家科學委員會。
14.施鴻志、黃乾全、黃榮村、郭宏亮、吳聰能、徐淵靜,1991,交通噪音預測方法與曝露推估模式建立之研究,國家環境保護計畫第三版,行政院環境保護署委託專題研究報告。
15.洪樣,2013,視覺聽覺雙重刺激下感知自然度對寧靜感之影響,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文。
16.孫德銓、郭益源、梁楊鴻、湯勝輝、林裕峰、張永賢、林昭庚,2006,“新型腕式生理監視器-心律大師之簡介及其中西醫學應用”,工程科技與中西醫學應用研討會大會論文集,頁33-38。
17.翁根本、何慈育、歐善福、林竹川、謝凱生,2009,“心律變動性分析”,台灣醫界,56卷,6期,頁290-293。
18.高血壓聯盟,2010,中國高血壓防治指南,衛生部疾病控制局,第三版,中國。
19.高慧娟,1992,噪音組成成分對工作表現與心臟血管功能之影響,中國醫藥學院,碩士論文。
20.屠荊清,2017,音景對都市公園環境感知影響之研究,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文。
21.張春興,1995,現代心理學,東華書局,台北。
22.許天治,1987,藝術感通之研究,台灣省立博物館,台北。
23.郭明堂、陳淨修,2006, 噪音對注意力及認知之影響研究,嘉南藥理科技大學專題研究計畫成果報告。
24.陳永儀,2007,壓力-是敵人還是朋友?,時報文化出版企業股份有限公司,台北。
25.陳宏洋,2006,應用音樂的共感覺概念於景觀路徑設計之研究,國立中興大學,碩士論文。
26.陳佩君、歐聖榮、呂文博,2011,原風景與景觀知覺關係之研究,造園景觀學報,18卷,1期,頁39-57。
27.陳怡婷,2007,音景對民眾環境偏好及情緒體驗之影響,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文。
28.陳怡婷、林晏州,2008,“聲音對民眾環境偏好之影響”,造園景觀學報,14卷,2期,頁73-97。
29.陳悅,2010,正常台灣族群心率變異性之性別與姿勢差異,國立交通大學,碩士論文。
30.陳高揚、郭正典、駱惠銘,2000,“心率變異度:原理與應用”,中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌,11卷,2期,頁47-58。
31.陳婉真,2009,“考試焦慮與考試成績表現失常之關係-從考試歷程分析”,教育心理學報,40卷,4期,頁597-618。
32.陳雷、張麗微,2012,“綠化降噪研究綜述及存在問題探析”,安徽農業學報,40卷,4期,頁2233-2235。
33.游菀瑋、林晏州、張育森,2014,“影響都市植栽減輕焦慮情緒效果之研究”,台灣園藝學報,46卷,3期,頁305-312。
34.黃士賓,2004,“台南古蹟音環境之民眾反應”,中華民國音響學會第 17 屆學術研討會論文集,頁131-140,高雄。
35.黃孝璋,2007,景觀偏好、注意力恢復力及心理生理反應之相關性研究,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文。
36.黃乾全、葉國樑、陳秋蓉,1985,國人對噪音厭煩程度之調查研究報告,行政院衛生署環境保護局。
37.黃勝宏、林榮輝、黃崇儒、洪聰敏,2008,“心率變異度與焦慮之關係”,中華體育季刊,22卷,1期,頁72-79。
38.楊仕銘,2008,探討運動前後對人體神經系統反應行為之研究,大華技術學院,碩士論文。
39.葉婉柔、歐聖榮,2013,“探討水體不同類型尺度對受測者心理感受之影響”,造園景觀學報,19卷,3期,頁15-34。
40.董貞吟、王懋雯、戴若蕾、丁淑萍,2005,“國小校園綠色音環境營造之個案研究”,中華民國音響學刊,11期,頁73-82。
41.廖健富,2014,都市聲環境中不同音量自然聲對人體生心理反應之影響,國立臺灣大學,碩士論文。
42.劉小如、丁宗蘇、方偉宏、林文宏、蔡牧起、顏重威,2010,台灣鳥類誌(下),行政院農業委員會林務局。
43.劉豐國,2010,以腦波評估噪音對人的反應之影響,嘉南藥理科技大學,碩士論文。
44.歐聖榮、柯嘉鈞、許哲瑜,2012,“景觀設計中眺望藏匿理論模式之應用”,建築學報,80期,頁111-129。
45.蔡宛穎,2011,聆聽的真實與想像:高雄市愛河之城市音景意象初探,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文。
46.蔡岡廷 張俊彥 陳育德,2004,“叁山國家風景區-獅頭山風景區農村音景之評價”,中華民國音響學會第 17 屆學術研討會論文集,頁163-170,高雄。
47.蔡岡廷,1998,都市住宅區音景構成元素之初探—以台南地區為例,國立成功大學,碩士論文。
48.噪音管制紀實,2012,行政院環境保護署,台北。
49.盧博堅、劉嘉俊,2011,噪音控制與防制 ,滄海書局,台北。
50.蕭任峰,2014,都市中自然音景與交通噪音對焦慮情緒之影響,國立勤益科技大學,碩士論文。
51.蕭碗馨,2014,即時辨識情緒及平衡自律神經之環境調控嵌入式系統,國立臺北科技大學,碩士論文。
52.賴明嘉、林晏州,1995,“水景形態及聲音對情緒體驗之影響”,造園學報,2卷,1期,頁1-17。
53.謝明燁,1999,視覺對環境音感知之心理影響研究,國立成功大學,碩士論文。
54.謝燕芬,2009,都市中聽覺與視覺對景觀偏好與情緒體驗之影響,逢甲大學景觀與遊憩研究所,碩士論文。
英文部分
1.Alvarsson, J.J., Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M.E.,2010, “ Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise ˮ, Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 7(3), pp.1036-1046.
2.Andreassi, J.L. ,1995, “Psychophysiology:Human Behavior and Physiological Response,Hillssale” ,New Jersey.
3.Babisch, W., Beule, B., Schust, M., Kersten, N., & Ising, H., 2005, , “ Traffic Noise and Risk of Myocardial Infarction ˮ, Epidemiology , vol. 16(1), pp.33-40.
4.Beckett, K. P., Smith, P. H., & Taylor, G., 1998, “Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 99(3), pp.347-360.
5.Benfield, J. A., Bell, P. A ., Troup, L. J. , & Soderstrom, N.C., 2010,“Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment“ Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.30(1), pp.103-111.
6.Bjork, E.A.,1986, “Laboratory annoyance and skin conductance responses to some natural sounds ˮ, J. Sound Vibration, vol.109(2), pp.339-345.
7.Bjork, E.A.,1995, “Psychophysiological responses to some natural sounds ˮ, Acta Acustica, vol.3, pp.83-88.
8.Björk, J., Albin, M., Grahn, P., Jacobsson, H., Ardö, J., Wadbro, J., Östergren, P., & Skärbäck, E., 2008 , “Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing ˮ, J Epidemiol Community Health, vol.62(4), pp. e2.
9.Calvert,G.A., Bullmore,E.T. , Brammer,M.J., Campbell,R. ,Williams,S.C., & McGuire, P.K.,1997, “ Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading ˮ, Science, vol.27, pp.593-596.
10.Carles, J. L., Bernaldez, F. G., & De Lucio, J. V. , 1992 , “Audio-visual interactions and soundscape preference ˮ, Landscape Research, vol.17(2), pp.52-56.
11.Carter, N. L. , 1996 ,“Transportation Noise, Sleep, and Possible After-Effects” ,Environment International , vol. 22(1), pp. 105-116.
12.Cerwéna, G., Kreutzfeldt, J., Wingren, C., 2017, “Soundscape actions: A tool for noise treatment based on three workshops in landscape architecture ˮ, Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 6(4), pp.504-518(質性)
13.Coss, R. G. ,1990, Picture perception and patient stress: A study of anxiety reduction and postoperative stability,Unpublished paper, Department of Psychology,University of California, Davis.
14.de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J.,2000, “The perception of emotions by ear and by eye ˮ, Cognition and Emotion , vol. 14(3) , pp.289-311.
15.den Boer, L.C., & Schroten, A. , 2007, “Traffic Noise Reduction in Europe. ”, Report. CE Delft.
16.Echevarria Sanchez, G.M., Van Renterghem, T., Sun, K., De Coensel, B. , Botteldooren, D., 2017, “ Using Virtual Reality for assessing the role of noise in the audio-visual design of an urban public space”, Landscape and Urban Planning , vol.167, pp.98-107.
17.Eriksson, C., Nilsson, ME., Willers, SM., Gidhagen, L., Bellander, T., & Pershagen, G., 2012 , “ Traffic noise and cardiovascular health in Sweden: the roadside study ˮ, Noise Health, vol.14(59), pp.140-147.
18.Evensen, K.H., Raanaas, R.K., &Fyhri, A.,2016, “ Soundscape and perceived suitability for recreation in an urban designated quiet zone ”,Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 20, pp.243-248.
19.Fang, C.F., & Ling,D.L., 2003,“Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts ˮ , Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.63(4), pp.187-195.
20.Gidlof-Gunnarsson, A. & Ohrstrom, E.,2007, “Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas”,Landscape and Urban Planning , vol. 83, pp.115-126.
21.Grahn, P. , &Stigsdotter, U.K.,2010, “ The relation between perceived sensory dimensions or urban green space and stress restoration ˮ,Landscape and Urban Planning , vol.94(3-4), pp.264-275.
22.Grinde, B. , &Patil, G.G.,2009, “Biophilia: Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being? ˮ, Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol.6(9) , pp.2332-2343.
23.Hartig,T.A., Böök, A., Garvill, J., Olsson, T., & Gärling, T., 1996 ,“ Environmental influences on psychological restoration ˮ , Scand. J. Psychol, vol.37, pp.378-393.
24.Hating, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W., 1991, “Restorative effects of natural environment experiences.” Environment and Behavior, vol.23(1), pp.003-026.
25.Herzog, T. R., & Bosley, P. J.,1992, “Tranquility and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. ” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.12(2), pp.115-127.
26.Herzog, T. R., & Barnes, G. J.,1999 ,“Tranquility and preference revisited ˮ , Journal of environmental psychology, vol.19(2), pp.171-181.
27.Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K., 2000 ,“Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings ˮ , Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.20(1), pp. 29-39.
28.Hong, J. Y. & Jeon, J. Y.,2014, “The effects of audio–visual factors on perceptions of environmental noise barrier performance”,Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.125,pp.28-37.
29.Jennings, P., & Cain, R., 2013 , “A framework for improving urban soundscapes ˮ, Applied Acoustics , vol.74(2), pp.293-299.
30.Kang, J., & Zhang, M., 2010 , “ Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces ˮ, Building and Enviroment, vol.45(1), pp.150-157.
31.Kang, J., Aletta, F., Gjestland, T. T., Brown, L.A., Botteldooren, D., Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Lercher , P., van Kamp, I., Genuit, K., Fiebig, A., Bento Coelho, J. L., Maffei, L., & Lavia, L.,2016, “Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment ˮ,Building and Environment , vol.108(1) , pp.284-294.
32.Kastka, J., Noack, R.,1987, “On the interaction of sensory experience, causal attributive cognitions and visual context parameters in noise annoyance”,Dev Toxicol Environ Sci, vol. 15, pp.345-362.
33.Kragh, J., 1981 , “Road traffic noise attenuation by belts of trees ˮ , J Sound Vib , vol.74, pp.235-241.
34.Kreibig, S. D., 2010, “Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review”, Biological Psychology, vol.84, pp.394-421.
35.Landry, C.,2006, The Art of City-Making , Routledge ,London.
36.Lee, G. S., Chen, M. L., & Wang, G. Y. ,2010, “Evoked response of heart rate variability using short-duration white noise” ,Auton Neurosci. , vol.155 (1-2), pp.94-97.
37.Lercher, P., Brink, M., Rudisser, J., Van Renterghem T., Botteldooren, D., Baulac, M., & Defrance, J. ,2010,“The effects of railway noise on sleep medication intake: results from the ALPNAP-study”, Noise Health.vol.12(47) , pp.110-119.
38.Li, H.N., Chau, C.K., & Tang, S.K.,2010, “Can surrounding greenery reduce noise annoyance at home? ”, Science of The Total Environment. vol.408(20), pp.4376-4384.
39.Liu, J., Kang, J., Holger, B. & Luo, T.,2014, “ Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Sound walks in city parks ”,Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.123, pp.30-40.
40.Mace, B.L., Bell, P.A., & Loomis, R.J. ,1999, “Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects of noise on natural landscape assessment ˮ , Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, vol.12(3) , pp.225-242.
41.Mace, B.L., Bell, P.A., Loomis, R.J., & Haas, G.E., 2003, “Source Attribution of Helicopter Noise in Pristine National Park Landscapes ˮ , Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, vol.21(3), pp.97-119.
42.Martens, M.J.M. , 1981, “Noise abatement in plant monocultures and plant communities ˮ , Applied Acoustics, vol.14(3) , pp.167-189.
43.Miller, A.C., Hickman, L.C. & Lemasters, G.K.,1992 , “A distraction technique for control of burn pain ˮ , Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation , vol.13, pp.155-157.
44.Ndrepepa, A., &Twardella, D.,2011, “ Relationship between noise annoyance from road traffic noise and cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis ˮ, Noise Health, vol. 13(52) , pp.251-259.
45.Nilsson,M.E.,Jeon, J.Y., Rådsten-Ekman, M., Axelsson, Ö., Hong, J.Y., & Jang, H.S., 2012 ,“A soundwalk study on the relationship between soundscape and overall quality of urban outdoor places”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.131, pp. 3474.
46.Ode, Å., Tveit, M. S., Fry, G., 2010 , “Advantages of using different data sources in assessment of landscape change and its effect on visual scale ˮ , Ecological Indicators, vol.10(1), pp.24-31.
47.Ow, L F., & Ghosh, S., 2017, “Urban cities and road traffic noise: Reduction through vegetation ˮ Applied Acoustics , vol.120, pp.15-20.
48.Park, S. H., & Mattson, R. , 2008 , “Effects of flowering and foliage plants in hospital rooms on patients recovering from abdominal surgery ˮ, HortTechnology, vol. 18(4), pp.563 -568.
49.Pathak,V., Tripathi, B., & Mishra V., 2008 , “ Dynamics of traffic noise in a tropical city Varanasi and its abatement through vegetation ˮ , Environ Monit Assess, vol.146(1-3), pp.67-75.
50.Persson, R., Björk, J., Ardö, J., Albin, M., &Jakobsson, K.,2007, “Trait anxiety and modeled exposure as determinants of self-reported annoyance to sound, air pollution and other environmental factors in the home ˮ, Int Arch Occup Environ Health vol. 81(2) , pp.179-191.
51.Pheasant, R. J., Fisher, M. N., Watts, G. R., Whitaker, D. J., & Horoshenkov, K. V. , 2010.“The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of tranquil space”, Journal of environmental psychology, vol.30(4), pp.501-509.
52.Pheasant, R. J., Fisher, M. N., Watts, G. R., Whitaker, D. J., & Horoshenkov, K. V.,2010, “The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of tranquil spaceˮ, Journal of environmental psychology, vol. 30(4), pp.501-509.
53.Pheasant, R. J., Watts, G. R., & Horoshenkov, K. V., 2009 , “Validation of a tranquillity rating prediction toolˮ , Acta Acustica united with Acustica , vol. 95(6), pp. 1024-1031.
54.Pheasant, R., Horoshenkov, K., Watts, G., & Barrett, B. ,2008, “The acoustic and visual factors in fluencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environ-ments tranquil spaces-quiet places”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.123(3), pp.1446–1457.
55.Pheasant, R., Horoshenkov, K., Watts, G., & Barrett, B. ,2008, “The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places? ˮ, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 123, pp. 1446-1457.
56.Raimbault, M., & Dubois, D.,2005, “Urban soundscapes: Experiences and knowledge”,Cities, vol. 22(5), pp. 339-350.
57.Ratcliffe, E., Gatersleben, B. & Sowden, P.T., 2013, “Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery”,Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.36, pp.221-228.
58.Ratcliffe, E., Gatersleben, B. & Sowden, PT.,2016,. “Associations with bird sounds: How do they relate to perceived restorative potential? ” ,Journal of Environmental Psychology , vol.47,pp.136-144.
59.Russell, J.A. ,1980, “A circumplex model of affect ˮ , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.39(6) , pp.1161-1178.
60.Selander, J., Nilsson, M.E., Bluhm, G., Rosenlund, M., Lindqvist, M., & Nise, G. , 2009, “ Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and myocardial infarction ˮ, Epidemiology , vol. 20(2) , pp.272-279.
61.Shams, L., Kanutani, S., & Shimojo, S. ,2002, “Visual illusion induced by sound ˮ, Journal of Cognitive Brain Research, vol.14 , pp.147-152.
62.Shibata, S. & Suzuki, N., 2002, “Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.22, pp.265-272.
63.Shibata, S., & Suzauki, N.,2002, “Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood ˮ , Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.22, pp.265-272.
64.Spence, C., & Driver, J. ,2004, Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention , Oxford University Press.
65.Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A.,1983, Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
66.Szeremeta, B., Henrique, P., & Zannin, T. ,2009, “ Analysis and evaluation of soundscapes in public parks through interviews and measurement of noise ˮ, Science of the Total Environment, vol.407(24), pp.6143-6149.
67.Tennessen, C.M., & Cimprich, B., 1995 , “Views to nature: Effects on attention ˮ , Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol.15(1) , pp.77-75.
68.Ulrich, R.S.,1981,“Natural versus urban Scenes:Some psychophysiological effects ˮ, Environment and Behavior, vol.13(5), pp. 523-556.
69.van Kempen E., Devilee J. , Swart W., & van Kamp I., 2014, “Characterizing urban areas with good sound quality: development of a research protocol” , Noise Health, vol. 16(73), pp.380-387.
70.Van Renterghem, T., & Botteldooren, D. ,2016, “View on outdoor vegetation reduces noise annoyance for dwellers near busy roadsˮ, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.148,203-215.
71.Viollona, S., Lavandiera, C., & Drakeb, C.,2002,“Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment”, Applied Acoustics, vol.63(5), pp.493-511.
72.Vogiatzis, K., & Remy, N.,2014, “From environmental noise abatement to soundscape creation through strategic noise mapping in medium urban agglomerations in South Europe”, Science of the Total Environment , vol.482-483, pp.420-431.
73.Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. ,1994, The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form , Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences Publications.
74.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A., 1988, “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scalesˮ, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp.1063-1070.
75.Watts, G. R., & Pheasant, R. J., 2015 , “Tranquillity in the Scottish Highlands and Dartmoor National Park: The importance of soundscapes and emotional factors ˮ,Applied Acoustics, 89, 297-305.
76.Watts, G. R., Pheasant, R. J., & Horoshenkov, K. V.,2011, “Predicting perceived tranquillity in urban parks and open spaces ˮ , Environment and Planning-Part B, vol. 38(4), pp.585-594.
77.Watts, G., 2017, “The effects of “greening” urban areas on the perceptions of tranquillity” ,Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , vol.26, pp.11-17.
78.Watts, G.R., Pheasant, R.J., Horoshenkov, K.V., Ragonesi, L.,2009, “Measurement and Subjective Assessment of Water Generated Sounds”, Acta Acustica,
79.Wells, N. M. , & Gary W. E., 2003, “Nearby nature – a buffer of life stress among rural children ˮ, Environ. Behavior, vol. 35(3), pp.311–330.
80.Yang, W. & Kang, J. ,2007, “Soundscape and Sound Preferences in Urban Squares: A Case Study in Sheffield ˮ, Journal of Urban Design, vol.10(1), pp.61-80.
網站
1.蘇賢錫,噪音公害。取自:
http://www.hkjh.kh.edu.tw/environment/air11.htm
2.台灣科學地,2004,ANS使用手冊。
取自:http://www.taiwanscientific.com.tw/answatch.html
3.健康景觀研究室,取自:
http://cychang.hort.ntu.edu.tw/page.aspx?pid=157&lang=cht
4.自由時報,取自:
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/1357549
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊