跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.99) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/11/04 20:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林季燕
研究生(外文):Chi-Yen Lin
論文名稱:知覺教師自主支持與自主支持學習氣氛對大學生體育課學習動機的脈絡影響
論文名稱(外文):Contextual Effects of Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and Autonomy Support Learning Climate on University Students' Learning Motivation in Physical Education
指導教授:卓俊伶卓俊伶引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hank Jwo
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立體育大學
系所名稱:教練研究所
學門:民生學門
學類:競技運動學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:196
中文關鍵詞:自我決定理論、自主支持、學習動機、滿意度、多層次分析
外文關鍵詞:Self-determination Theory、autonomy support、learning motivation、satisfaction、multilevel analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:1627
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:409
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究以自我決定理論為架構,旨在探討大學生知覺教師自主支持,透過心理變項對動機及後續行為的影響,並且應用多層次分析,驗證自我決定理論中環境因素對體育課學習動機的脈絡效果。研究對象為1544位大學生(男660位,女884位),平均年齡為20.3歲(SD=2.0歲)。知覺自主支持量表、自主性量表、勝任感量表、關係感量表及體育課學習動機量表為第一個時間點(期中)施測時所使用的測量工具,滿意度及未來修課意圖量表則為第二個時間點(期末)施測時所使用的測量工具。結果發現:(一)支持自我決定理論的論點,說明此動機因果模式在台灣大學生體育課情境下所蒐集的資料適配情形良好;(二)在體育課情境中,當各班學生所知覺的教師自主支持具有一定程度的共識時,會形成一種自主支持學習氣氛;(三)自主支持學習氣氛對自主性、勝任感、體育課學習動機、滿意度及未來修課意圖具有脈絡效果,而對關係感則無脈絡效果;(四)自主支持學習氣氛會強化個體層次學生知覺教師自主支持與自主性、勝任感的關係,對個體層次學生知覺教師自主支持與關係感則無強化作用。
This study, based on Self-determination Theory, was designed to investigate university students’ perceived teacher autonomy support through examining the influence of psychological variables on motivation and behaviors. By using multilevel analysis, the impact of contextual effects of environmental factor in Self-determination Theory on motivation in physical education classes was also examined. Sample were 1544 university students (male 660, Female 884) with an average age of 20.3 years (SD= 2.0 years). Perceived autonomy support, perceived autonomy, competence, relatedness, and learning motivation for physical education classes were used for time one (mid-term). Satisfaction and Intention for future course selection was used for time 2 (end of semester). The findings were: (1) Self-determination Theory suggesting the causal model motivation had good fit index for Taiwanese university students’ physical education class. (2) In physical education context, autonomy support learning
iii
climate is formed when students in each class perceive similar level of autonomy from their teachers. (3) Autonomy support learning climate has contextual effects on autonomy, competence, motivation for physical education class, satisfaction, and future intention for course selection, but not on relatedness. (4) Autonomy support learning climate strengthens students’ perception toward teacher’ autonomy in the individual level and the relationship between autonomy and competence, but not the students’ perception toward teachers’ autonomy and relatedness in the individual level.
目 錄
第壹章 緒論----------------------------------------------
1
第一節 問題背景----------------------------------------------
1
第二節 研究目的----------------------------------------------
8
第三節 研究問題----------------------------------------------
9
第四節 名詞解釋----------------------------------------------
9
第五節 研究重要性------------------------------------------
12
第貳章 文獻探討----------------------------------------------
13
第一節 大學體育課相關研究 ------------------------------
13
第二節 自我決定理論----------------------------------------
15
第三節 應用自我決定理論在體育課之研究---------------
26
第四節 階層線性模式----------------------------------------
32
第五節 研究的假說------------------------------------------
35
第参章 研究方法------------------------------------------
37
第一節 研究架構---------------------------------------------
37
第二節 研究範圍與對象-------------------------------------
39
第三節 研究工具---------------------------------------------
43
第四節 研究步驟---------------------------------------------
73
第五節 資料處理---------------------------------------------
75
viii
第肆章 研究結果------------------------------------------
81
第一節 各變項之基本描述統計及簡單相關分析----------
81
第二節 體育課學習動機之因果模式-----------------------
84
第三節 自主學習氣氛的脈絡效果--------------------------
105
第伍章 討論------------------------------------------
161
第一節 體育課學習動機之因果模式-----------------------
161
第二節 自主支持學習氣氛的脈絡效果---------------------
165
第陸章 結論與建議------------------------------------------
168
第一節 結論--------------------------------------------------
168
第二節 建議--------------------------------------------------
169
參考文獻------------------------------------------------------
173
參考文獻
一、中文部分
王妙雯(2001)。開放教育與內在學習動機、創造力及自尊之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
行政院體育委員會(2002)。運動人口倍增計畫書。台北市:行政院體育委員會。
李文田(1997)。大學生修習體育課意願影響因素之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。
李志峰、楊慶南(2003)。大葉大學大四學生選修體育課程考量因素與教學滿意度之研究。大葉學報,12,19-28。
李清茵(2003)。家庭互動行為、心理需求滿足、關係滿意度與幸福感之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
朱錦水(2005)。大專院校學生網球選修課程學習滿意度之調查研究-以中國文化大學為例。未出版碩士論文,台北巿立體育學院運動科學研究所,台北市。
呂碧琴、陳美莉(1999)。台灣大學進修學士班學生修習體育課之意向初探。台大體育,35,9-18。
卓俊伶、簡曜輝、張智惠、楊梓楣與黃鱗棋(1998)。身體活動心理學與動作行為的發展狀況與規劃。台灣師大體育研究,5,117-128。
林季燕(2003)。以自我決定理論預測籃球選手滿足感和退出意圖之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。
林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表之編制-信度與效度分析。台灣運動心理學報,2,15-32。
邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式:LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北市:雙葉。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
邱皓政(譯)(2006)。多層次模型分析導論。台北市:五南 (Kreft, L., & Leeuw, J. D., 1998)。
邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析:以學校組織創新氣氣與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究,30,1-35。
周宏室、劉照金(2005)。影響台灣地區學生體育態度之關鍵因素研究。大專體育學刊,6,1-15。
洪大程、周靈山(2003)。實踐大學學生修習體育課因素之研究。2003台灣體育運動與健康休閒發展趨勢研討會專刊,450-456。
施淑慎(2008)。學業情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究,31 , l -26。
陳美華(2001)。彰化師大大四選修體育課考量因素之探討。彰化師大學報,2,79-104。
陳智仁(2004),體育課學習滿意度之研究-以高雄市高中職學生為例。未出版碩士論文,台北市立體育學院運動科學研究所,台北市。
陳鎰明、何金樑(2005)。體育學門人力資源評估與規劃之研究。2005年國際運動教育學術研討會大會手冊,71-84。
陳冠錦、徐煋煇(2006)。從「方法學」觀點分析大學生選修體育課程考量因素調查之問卷研究。大專體育雙月刊,87,121-126。
許崇憲(2003)。家庭與學校變項對學生學業成就動機的影響—一個後設分析。未出版博士論文,國立政治大學,台北市。
高新建(1997)。階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用:以數學學習機會為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,7,597-611。
黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式整體適配度評鑑議題之探究。2004 統計方法學論壇:結構方程模式方法學的開展研討會。台北市:台灣統計方法學會。
彭台光、林鉦棽(2006)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23,649-675。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華。
張耀騰(1996)。大專學生對體育課滿意度偏低原因之探討。大專體育雙月刊,27,126-132。
湯秀枝(1996)。中台醫事專校體育課實施興趣選項分組學生學習態度之調查研究。中台醫專學報,9,187-222。
楊建隆(1998)。台灣地區大四學生選修體育課考量因素之研究。大專體育雙月刊,35,81-89。
溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用。台北市:雙葉。
廖佩如(2002)。逢甲大學學生體育課認知、滿意度及選修意願調查。逢甲人文社會學報,5,147-164。
鄭嘉勝(2004)。教練領導風格與運動員參與動機之關係研究:自主性、關係感及勝任感之中介效果。未出版碩士論文,國立台北教育大學,台北市。
蔡銘仁(2007)。國中生體育課參與動機及其身體活動的探討-應用自我決定理論。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。

二、外文部分
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Benter, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS: Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
Black. A. F., & Dcci. F. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’
autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
Biddle, S. (2001). Enhancing motivation in physical education. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 101-127). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Brickman, S. J., & Miller, R. B. (2001). The impact of sociocultural context on future goal and self regulation. In D. M. Mclnerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on socioculrural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 119-138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coakley, J., & White, A. (1992). Making decisions: Gender and sport participation among British adolescents. Sociology of Sport Journal, 9, 20-35.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In L H. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 378-396). New York: Guilford.
deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). The general causality orientation scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991a). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991b). Intrinsic and extrinsic direction: Classic definitions and new direction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ―what‖ and ‖why‖ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Duda, J.L. (2001). Achievement goal research in sport: Pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.). Advances in motivation in sport and exercise pp. 129-182). Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
Edmunds, J. E., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2006). A test of self-determination in the exercise domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2240-2265.
Ferrer-Caja, E., & Weiss, M.R. (2000). Predictors of intrinsic motivation among adolescent students in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 267-279.
Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257-274.
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223.
Goudas, M., Biddle, S. J. H., & Fox, K. R. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 453-463.
Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Social context, student’s motivation, and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 35-38.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Barkoukis, V., Wang, C. K. J., & Baranowski, J. (2005). Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 287-301.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time: A trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784-795.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Harris, J. (2006). From psychological need satisfaction to intentional behavior: Testing a motivational sequence in two behavioral contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 131-138.
Harter, S. (1978). Effective motivation reconsidered. Human Development, 21, 34-64.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kasser, V., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 935-954.
Koestner, R., Bernieri, F., & Zuckerman, M. (1992). Self-determination and consistency between attitudes, traits, and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 52-59.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Li, F. (1999). The exercise motivation scale: Its multifaceted structure and construct validity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 97-115.
Markus. H. R., & Kitayama, S. K. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action, In V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 49, cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 1-57). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48–58.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225-242.
Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444-453.
Ommundsen, Y., & Kvalø, S. E. (2007). Autonomy-mastery, supporitive or performance focused? Different teacher behaviors and pupils’ outcomes in physical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 385-413.
Papaioannou, A., Marsh, H.W., & Theodorakis, Y. (2004). A multilevel approach to motivational climate in physical education and sport settings: An individual or a group level
construct? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 90-118.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In S. Van Etten, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students engagement by increasing teachers autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169.
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In R. Dientsbier (Ed.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1-56). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). The integration of behavioral regulation within life domains. Journal of Personality, 63, 397-429.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, L. E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, L. E. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, L. E. (2007). Active human nature: Self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 1-19). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325-339.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97-110.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). Students’ motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: A self-determination theory approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 100-110.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2005). The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and co-operative structures on the Psychological well-being of individuals engaged in a co-orientation task. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 41-68.
Standage, M., & Gillison, F. (2005). Examining the relationship between exercise motivation and habitual ―out of school physical activity: The role of school physical education. Proceedings of the British Psychology Society, 13, S97.
Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to understanding the antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 75-94.
Theodosiou, A., & Papaioannou, A. (2006). Motivational
climate, achievement goals and metacognitive activity in physical education and exercise involvement in out-of-
school settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 361-379.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: Author.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advance in experimental social psychology (pp. 271-360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senècal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the academic motivation scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 159-172.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.
Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 297-333.
Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro-accidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587-596.


連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 李志峰、楊慶南(2003)。大葉大學大四學生選修體育課程考量因素與教學滿意度之研究。大葉學報,12,19-28。
2. 林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表之編制-信度與效度分析。台灣運動心理學報,2,15-32。
3. 邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析:以學校組織創新氣氣與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究,30,1-35。
4. 周宏室、劉照金(2005)。影響台灣地區學生體育態度之關鍵因素研究。大專體育學刊,6,1-15。
5. 施淑慎(2008)。學業情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究,31 , l -26。
6. 陳美華(2001)。彰化師大大四選修體育課考量因素之探討。彰化師大學報,2,79-104。
7. 陳冠錦、徐煋煇(2006)。從「方法學」觀點分析大學生選修體育課程考量因素調查之問卷研究。大專體育雙月刊,87,121-126。
8. 高新建(1997)。階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用:以數學學習機會為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,7,597-611。
9. 彭台光、林鉦棽(2006)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23,649-675。
10. 張耀騰(1996)。大專學生對體育課滿意度偏低原因之探討。大專體育雙月刊,27,126-132。
11. 湯秀枝(1996)。中台醫事專校體育課實施興趣選項分組學生學習態度之調查研究。中台醫專學報,9,187-222。
12. 楊建隆(1998)。台灣地區大四學生選修體育課考量因素之研究。大專體育雙月刊,35,81-89。
13. 鄭嘉勝(2004)。教練領導風格與運動員參與動機之關係研究:自主性、關係感及勝任感之中介效果。未出版碩士論文,國立台北教育大學,台北市。